Archive for July, 2005


New Section: Mys Podcast.
In a continuing series of short, but relevant podcasts, I’ll discuss today’s news and what people are talking about from a spiritual perspective.
Subscribe Today!


The Kids and Me

Published on July 29, 2005


EBG excerpt…Inspiration/Suffering

Published on July 26, 2005

Inspiration overcomes suffering.


Keywords: ,

Words

Published on July 25, 2005

Many books have been written about words. The kind of books I’m speaking of aren’t the kind that teach you how to speak proper English or how to write or have a better vocabulary. The types of words I mean are the kind that can change lives for better or worse. I’m speaking of hurtful words vs. kind/loving words.

Most people have no idea how powerful words are. They are one of the very few ways we have, as humans, to communicate. The sound of our voice, the inflections in our tone, the body language we use as we speak, are all an important clue as to how we feel about someone or something. The things we say to one another can be so powerful as to completely alter the course of a person’s life forever.

Words can influence, hurt, heal, love, shame, or inspire. An unthoughtful word can crush a person’s spirit. A hurtful argument can stay in our memories for the rest of our lives. Verbal abuse heaped on the young can prevent that child from ever achieving their best. Mean or angry words toward another can change the course of a relationship. Lying words hurt not only the recipient of the lies, but the liars themselves. Even words from strangers can influence how we feel about ourselves, if our psyche isn’t strong enough.

Words of love, truth, confidence, inspiration, and healing allow us to reach heights in our lives we’ve only dreamt of. Loving, meaningful words can brighten our day, week or life. Even the tone in our voices brings either soothing to those listening to us or an irritating shrill. Just a smile accompanied by kind words can make one’s day.

A very important thing to know about words is they are things. They are tangible in their perceptibility.. Although we cannot “see” or “touch” words, we can see the affect of words. In this way there are very real. On a spiritual level they exist forever in time. The Akashic Records* are the spiritual records of words and events kept for all time. Wouldn’t you be very careful of your speech if you knew everything said was being recorded somewhere in the universe?

On a human level, however, we must be extremely cautious with our words. Lest we do irreparable damage to another through our thoughtlessness, it is always better to keep our unkind words to ourselves. It is the old saying at its best. If you don’t have something good to say, don’t speak at all. Silence can be very golden when it leaves an unkind word unspoken.

*See article under Mystical and Mysterious

©Myswizard all rights reserved ‘05


Keywords: , , , , , ,

Karma and Reincarnation

Published on

[Excerpt from VEDA - Bhaktivedanta Book Trust, authors and Jan Mares]

In recent years we see a great spread of terms “reincarnation” and “karma” in public awareness. It is largely due to media which present reports, documents, movies, books a other products with this topic. If we set aside an analysis of this state we can briefly say that it shows a dissatisfaction with answers to existential questions given by modern science and various Western philosophies and religions.

Indeed, these sources cannot answer satisfactorily many of questions made by people nowadays. This creates a space for other philosophical sources and traditions to fill this vacuum. Most often they are various branches of so-called natural religions or various traditions of Eastern philosophies. Among other things they have in common these terms although their explanations differ in details. Their common denominator however is a cyclic perception of time (creation of the world happens repeatedly) whereas contemporary Western science adopted from Judeo-Christian tradition the linear perception of time (creation of the world is only a one-shot event).

Exceptional position among them belongs to Vedic tradition (sometimes incorrectly called hinduism) thanks to its ancient origin and authority based on the oldest texts in the world - Vedic scriptures. Because they are at the same time the widest and most detailed information source about these and many other topics, they definitely deserve attention.

Primary goal of Hare Krishna Movement is to inform the general public with knowledge contained in these books and bring into practice alternative lifestyle and culture based on them.

2. Attitude of Western science to reincarnation

Modern Western science from its beginnings considered the concept of reincarnation to be a mere religious belief or superstition and refused to explore its theses and effects.

Main problem is that science was not and still is not able to explain the life phenomenon. Even though there were attempts to explain the basis and origin of life as a biochemical combination of matter, these theories cannot satisfactorily answer many questions like e.g. origin of unlimited species of life, inherent abilities or experiences of people who went through a clinical death.

In 1966 British molecular biologist and Nobel Prize laureate Francis Crick (* 1916) published that is is possible to scientifically prove, that life is nothing more than complex chemical reaction. He also predicted that in near future science will succeed to synthetically create artificial organisms. But until now there was no success in this field even though highly advanced technologies and billion dollar expenses were used. Many scientists are thus forced to admit that bold claims of Crick and others are just empty promises. Hungarian-american biochemist and Nobel Prize laureate Albert Szent-Gyorgyi (1893-1986) wrote about it:

“While searching for the secret of life I ended up by atoms and electrons which do not show any signs of life. Somewhere on the way the life had to slip through my fingers. Now in my old age I have to backtrack.” (Biology Today, Del Mar, California, 1972)

Life as Vedic science explains is nothing physical or chemical and therefore it is subjected to laws of another nature than those guiding the movements of anorganic matter. Bhagavad-gita, a crucial work of Vedic philosophy, describes these laws as higher, subtle natural laws. Common scientific methods and devices cannot ascertain these higher laws, what to speak of helping to explain them.

3. Eight elements and two bodies

Bhagavad-gita (7.4) describes that the whole material world is composed of eight basic elements - five gross material and three subtle material.

Gross material elements are: earth, water, fire, air and ether. In modern terminology: solid substances, liquids, radiating energy, gasses and all-pervading space. Existence of ether is on the verge of modern science’s abilities to explore it and therefore it is doubted. But it is ether which enables wireless electromagnetic data transmission through space, without which modern communication systems could not function. Its existence was confirmed by Michelson-Gale experiment. (Physicist A. A. Michelson was not satisfied after previous, better known Michelson-Morley experiment and continued to explore the ether. His work culminated in Michelson-Gale experiment which was later independently verified by Georges M.M. Sagnac - www.orgonelab.org/miller.htm)

Scientific proof

All phenomena in this world perceivable by our senses are a combination of these five basic elements.

Above these five gross are three subtle material elements: mind, intelligence and false ego. Although we cannot perceive them due to their higher nature they are still material. Together they constitute so-called subtle material body (in Sanskrit linga-sarira, desire body, also called astral body) in which our thinking, feeling and willing is manifested. This means that our thoughts, feelings and desires correspond to our mind (manas) and intelligence (buddhi). Ahankara creates our false identification with our body (therefore “false ego”).

That which we usually consider a body is therefore composed of two various bodies - gross material a subtle material body. This can be understood with the example of a dream. During a dream our consciousness leaves our gross material daily body, identifies with subtle material dream body and after awakening again identifies with the gross material visible body. In both cases the consciousness, proper self (jiva) remains separated from both bodies. This is obvious from the fact that it observes them - it is a witness (saksi) of their activity - and identifies with them.

4. Soul (jiva) - source of consciousness

Sanskrit terms jiva or atma, sometimes connected into one - jivatma, are for the lack of suitable term in other languages denoted as soul.

Bhagavad-gita (7.5) describes that above these eight material elements is soul which is superior to them:

“Besides these [eight], O mighty-armed Arjuna, there is another, superior energy of Mine, which comprises the living entities who are exploiting the resources of this material, inferior nature.”

Well-known psychoanalyst C.G. Jung describes the soul as “greatest of cosmic miracles”, which is able within the frame of natural laws to manipulate material energy according to its desire and thus use it for its own benefit.

Interactions of embodied soul with its gross- and subtle material body create a web of unlimited complex reactions which cannot be described by simple laws of modern physics, chemistry or molecular biology. Therefore these natural sciences are unable to define precise difference between living and dead body.

If we would say that life is nothing more than a combination of material molecules then it should be possible bring dead body back to life by mere adding of chemicals whose lack caused death. It should be also possible to create an artificial life in a lab. However, these numerous attempts were unsuccessful and scientists’ interest switched to cloning. The reason is that life comes always and only from life and never from dead matter. Bhagavad-gita (2.17-18) explains that the difference between living and dead body is the presence of the soul. As soon as the soul leaves the body we consider it dead.

Second chapter of Bhagavad-gita (2.20-25) describes characteristics of the soul:

“For the soul there is neither birth nor death. It has not come into being, does not come into being, and will not come into being. It is unborn, eternal, ever-existing and primeval. It is not slain when the body is slain. As a person puts on new garments, giving up old ones, the soul similarly accepts new material bodies, giving up the old and useless ones. The soul can never be cut to pieces by any weapon, nor burned by fire, nor moistened by water, nor withered by the wind. This individual soul is unbreakable and insoluble, and can be neither burned nor dried. He is everlasting, present everywhere, unchangeable, immovable and eternally the same. It is said that the soul is invisible, inconceivable and immutable. Knowing this, you should not grieve for the body.”

All these qualities of of the soul are outside the field of perceivable molecular reactions. Niels Bohr (1885-1962), Danish nuclear physicist and Nobel Prize laureate, noted:

“In physics and chemistry we cannot find anything at least marginally proving the existence of consciousness. And still we all know that there is something like consciousness, simply because we have it ourselves. Consciousness therefore must be a part of nature, or expressed more commonly, a part of reality. This means that aside of physical and chemical laws described quantum theory there are laws with completely different nature.”

5. Three modes (gunas)

According to Vedic scriptures all variety of species of life is created by a combination of three basic modes of material energy, in Sanskrit called gunas. Here is again seen a limitation of other languages because they lack suitable synonym. Closest is probably the Latin word modus. Guna is therefore a kind of modus operandi (means of functioning) of material energy. They are called:

- sattva-guna (harmony, goodness)
- rajo-guna (activity, passion)
- tamo-guna (inertia, ignorance)

Bodies of individual species can be compared to various apartments or houses of different sizes, shapes and colors temporarily inhabited by embodied soul. Bodily forms limit (under the control of three modes) its freedom of movement and activities as well as possibilities of individual enjoyment. Influence of modes on people describes Bhagavad-gita (18.26-28):

“One who performs his duty without association with the modes of material nature, without false ego, with great determination and enthusiasm, and without wavering in success or failure is said to be a worker in the modes of goodness. The worker who is attached to work and the fruits of work, desiring to enjoy those fruits, and who is greedy, always envious, impure, and moved by joy and sorrow, is said to be in the mode of passion. The worker who is always engaged in work against the injunctions of the scripture, who is materialistic, obstinate, cheating and expert in insulting others, and who is lazy, always morose and procrastinating is said to be a worker in the mode of ignorance.”

6. Internal reincarnation - change of bodies in present life

Consciousness and physical form are directly related. Body and consciousness of little baby necessarily differs from body and consciousness of a young or old person. It can be said that soul travels during the development of the body from birth to death through different bodies with different consciousness. We may not be aware how we are constantly changing bodies in this life because this change is very subtle, gradual and hard to perceive. Did we notice as children how our body grows? We did notice it only when we were reminded of it by someone who saw us after a longer period of time.

This fact is confirmed also by biologists. American anthropologist John. E. Pfeiffer (* 1914) writes his book Human Brain (1955): “Our body today does not contain even one molecule from seven years ago.”

Despite this constant change of bodies we, souls, remain still the same unchanged persons.

Let us say that we are today thirty years old but we are still the same person who was five or twenty years old. We are just in a different gross body. Our current body during the time somehow changed, e.g. we gained more abilities, strength and knowledge, but we are the same persons, we have not become anyone else. Characteristics, abilities, knowledge and perceptions - all this we own but despite all external changes our identity does not change.

This transmigration of soul through many bodies during one life we can call gradual or internal reincarnation.

7. External reincarnation - change of body at the time of death

What will happen with the soul at the time of death of present physical body? In other words: Where are we going when we die? Do we have an influence over our next situation? Can we choose our future life?

In Bhagavad-gita (2.13) we will find answers:

“As the embodied soul continuously passes, in this body, from boyhood to youth to old age, the soul similarly passes into another body at death. A sober person is not bewildered by such a change.quot;

Bhagavad-gita further explains that state of consciousness in critical moment of death is crucial for the choice of new body:

“Whatever state of being one remembers when he quits his present body, in his next life he will attain to that state without fail.quot;

At the moment of death the soul together subtle body leaves the gross, physical body. It is the subtle body and our desires and thoughts recorded therein and recalled by us at this moment which are decisive as to the destination of our next body. This transmigration of soul from one body to another is called external reincarnation (samsara or samsriti in Sanskrit).

Srimad Bhagavatam (Bhagavata Purana) 5.11.5-7 mentions that mind is attracted by sense enjoyment, pious or impious. Thus it is subject to three modes of material nature and causes corresponding births in various types of bodies, higher or lower. Therefore the soul suffers material unhappiness or enjoys material material happiness because of the mind. Thus mind under the influence of illusion creates further pious and impious activities and their karma and the soul becomes conditioned by them. Sages say that the mind is the cause of bodily features bondage and liberation.

Here is refuted one widely spread idea that the soul cannot fall from the human body anymore, i.e. achieve animal or another lower body. Human form differs from lower forms in such a way that the soul in it has a free will and thus also a responsibility for its actions (karma).

The fact that the soul reincarnates together with subtle body is confirmed also by parapsychological research. With the help of various methods many people could recall from their subconsciousness memories of previous lives. This would not be be possible if the carrier of these memories would not incarnate together with the soul. According to the Vedic scriptures the memory is the function of intelligence, a part of subtle body. Although at the time of birth we forget our previous life, it is possible by certain means to restore active memories of our previous incarnations. These means however are not always cent percent reliable. In certain exceptional cases, especially in children, is proved a spontaneous ability of recall without external influence of medium or therapist.

8. Definition of term “reincarnation”

Reincarnation (from Latin “re”, again + “incarnare”, make flesh) is a continuous transmigration of the soul together with its subtle material body from one gross material body to another according to its individual karma.

Reincarnation is therefore a process and law of karma is directing it. Examples of various kinds of karma and their effects you will find at Samsara

B. Karma - The Law Behind Reincarnation
1. Law of action and reaction
2. Free will and fate
3. Karma from the action point of view
4. Karma from the reaction point of view
5. Four phases of karma
6. Three kinds of karma

1. Law of action and reaction

Term “karma” is inseparably connected with reincarnation. While trying to understand the reincarnation process one cannot avoid this term.

Sanskrit word “karma” literally means “action, activity, work”, and because other languages again lack any synonym exactly explaining its meaning, it is not recommended to translate it.

In West this term was first used by Russian theosophist Helena P. Blavatsky (1831-1891). Her definition:

“Karma is the basic cosmic law, …which in physical, mental and soul world connects cause with its effect. Because any cause, be it the greatest like the movement of cosmos, or the smallest like the movement of hand, necessarily has a corresponding effect, and because the same acts in a same way, karma is invisible and unknown law which wisely, righteously and and providentially connects every effects with corresponding cause and its originator.”

In his work “Manifestations of Karma” (1910) anthroposofist Rudolf Steiner defines karma in this way:

“…without limiting free will of man, the law of karma acts back on an entity, from which the cause came, like the law of action and reaction.”

These definitions intelligibly explain the core of Vedic term karma. Steiner’s comparing law of karma to the physical law of action and reaction (actio = reactio, third Newton’s law of classical mechanics, 1687) is very pertinent although this law represents only a little aspect of much higher and subtler law of karma. Pertinent is also the maxim that karmic law of cause and effect acts especially on an individual level and leaves a space for the free will of a doer. This is what usually forget different critics of Eastern philosophies who understand karma as a mechanical predestination forcing a man to passively await what the future will bring (nihilism).

Already before Steiner and Newton’s discovery people knew sayings showing a certain understanding of regularity of action and reaction. Also a biblical quote “A man reaps what he sows” (Galatským 6:7) became a folk saying.

2. Free will and fate

According to Vedic philosophy every living being transmigrating in material world from one body to another, is given a free will to act according to its desires, ideas and thoughts.

When Shri Krishna narrated Bhagavad-gita to Arjuna, in one of the last verses (18.63) He said:

“Thus I have explained to you knowledge still more confidential. Deliberate on this fully, and then do what you wish to do.”

Vedic scriptures say that desire is a father of thought and thought is a father of action. Desire originally comes from the soul, thought from the mind (subtle body) and actions from working sense organs of gross body.

Living being has due to free will a certain, although limited field of activity. Vedic philosophy teaches that free will and predestination or fate are parallel to each other. By our present actions, performed out of our free will, we create our future karmic reactions. At the same time we reap reaction of our previous actions. Fate is not, therefore, any punishment from above striking on innocent ones (and which God does not want to or cannot stop).

Law of karma is very strict because it must assure fulfillment of desires of all living beings in the whole material world in such a way that they do not contradict but complement themselves and that even one injustice does not go unpunished. American Transcendentalist Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803-1882) describes it in this way (Lectures and Biographical Sketches, 1868):

“If you love people and serve them, you will be rewarded. Hidden rewards continue to reinstate balance of divine justice. This law cannot be changed. All tyrants, owners and monopolists of this world try in vain to disrupt this balance. Equator still keeps its place and people as well as insects, sun and planets must obey it or be destroyed by backlash reaction.”

Universe is ruled by strict and generally operative laws - like rules of a great game of life - which coordinate desires and mutual relationships among individual living beings. Thus each of them gets exactly as much as it deserves - neither more, nor less.

According to Bhagavad-gita (2.70) the continuous stream of desires coming from the mind of each living being is like innumerable rivers which all enter one vast ocean. In this way originates endlessly complex, multidimensional web of actions and reaction which a man cannot understand. Here is apparent the influence of invisible hand of God who in His aspect of omnipresent Supersoul (paramatma) is accompanying all individual soul during their transmigration through various bodily forms. Bhagavad-gita (13.23) describes this aspect of God:

“Yet in this body there is another, a transcendental enjoyer, who is the Lord, the supreme proprietor, who exists as the overseer and permitter, and who is known as the Supersoul.”

Function of Supersoul is therefore to record innumerable desires of each living being and arrange for their fulfillment as well as observe activities of living beings and grant them corresponding reactions. This directing hand of God is called a law of karma.

3. Karma from the action point of view

Vedic scriptures contain exact information which actions we have to perform if we wish to achieve certain results (reactions). For example it is said: if you want to be rich, you have to act in this way, if you want to be famous, do this, if you want to live a satisfactory family life, do that etc.

If someone is in this life very successful, wealthy, educated, influential or beautiful, we can conclude from it that he must have been in his previous life magnanimous, diligent, and pious and now only reaps results of his previous deeds.

But what he will do with these assets in present life is another question - it depends on his free will. Therefore we see that not every wealthy and powerful person behaves properly.

Same principle is valid for unwanted things. Vedic scriptures can advise us: if you do not want to be sick or bankrupt, you must not do this or that. If we act according to these instructions, we will surely reach desired result in this or some of our future lives. Miscellaneous reactions may come either sooner or later - some immediately and others only after several lives.

4. Karma from the reaction point of view

While looking from the other side we have to admit that whatever happens to us in this life is nothing else than reaction to to our activity in this or some of previous lives. It is not therefore, a matter of blind chance but only a result of our deeds we decided to perform out of our free will.

Therefore it sometimes happens that people who live very pious and proper life are still exposed to all kinds of sufferings. From this one can conclude that in past they had to act improperly. Usually they learn from this and decide to live properly in their present life. Also one whose life is full of success reaps the fruit of his deeds.

Materialistic life and a chain of actions and reactions are inseparable. It is like a long movie of actions and reactions and the length of one life is like its several fields. When a child is born, his present body can be understood as a beginning of another series of actions and the death of an old man as its end. From this it is clear why someone, due to different reactions, is born in rich family and someone else in poor family although they were born at the same time in the same place and under same circumstances. Who carries along with him pious reactions (good karma) will get a chance to be born in rich or pious family and who is burdened by impious reactions (bad karma) will be born in low class and poor family.

5. Four phases of karma

“Plant a thought and you will reap a deed, plant a deed and you will reap a habit, plant a habit and you will reap a character, plant a character and you will reap a fate.” (Indian proverb)

Vedic philosophy (Padma Purana) explains that karmic reaction are manifested in four different phases compared to the phases of a plants’ growth:

1. bija (seed) Our wishes and intentions already exist in subtle form and only later they will manifest in activities. Thus to avoid unpleasant karmic reactions (suffering) we must pay attention to our unspoken material desires before the seeds of actions did not begin to sprout.

2. kuta-stha (sprouting) Reactions manifesting after a decision to perform a deed. They are material desires which already began to sprout.

3. phalonmukha (fructifying) Reactions already bearing fruits (phala). As soon as we perform a material actions - good or bad - it is only a question of time before they manifest reactions (fruit) in the form of happiness or distress.

4. prarabdha (harvest) Reactions already fulfilled at our birth: family (defining our socio-economic situation, nationality, race), physical and psychic dispositions etc.

Previous three phases are also in Sanskrit given a summary term aprarabdha or reactions not yet fully manifested, potential happiness and suffering. Fourth phase, prarabdha-karma, is what is generally called “karma”.

Upanisads describe these categories of karma:

1. sancita (stored)
1.1. anarabdha (not yet manifested) = aprarabdha
1.2. prarabdha (already manifested)
2. kriyamana (newly created)

6. Three kinds of karma

Bhagavad-gita (4.17-18) says: “The intricacies of action are very hard to understand. Therefore one should know properly what action is, what forbidden action is, and what inaction is. One who sees inaction in action, and action in inaction, is intelligent among men, and he is in the transcendental position, although engaged in all sorts of activities.”

These verses describe three kinds of karma. Here ‘karma’ does not denote reaction but action, activity.

1. karma Activities in harmony with higher laws of nature (dharma), which are also described in Vedic scriptures. This positive action brings positive reactions in the form of happiness and enjoyment.

2. vikarma Activities forbidden by scriptures písma because they are in conflict with dharma. These negative actions bring corresponding reactions - distress and suffering.

Bad karma - a short movie from film.bullguard.com

3. akarma Activities of higher nature which are not subjected to material laws of nature and therefore are called “inactions”. They do not bring any reactions, neither positive nor negative, and thus they bring reincarnation to an end. This end will occur when our “karmic account” at the end of life is zero. This cannot be achieved, however, by parallel performing of karma and vikarma, as someone may think, because they are counted independently of each other.

The cause of problems is vikarma which is at present performed by huge number of people all over the world in great amounts, and which is a threat for the whole humankind because it affects it in the form of collective karma (summary of individual karmas). This is manifested as wars, epidemics, natural disasters etc.

Reality proves that we are missing knowledge of law of karma because despite all our good intentions and efforts to alleviate suffering there is more and more unhappiness, individual and collective, in this world. This knowledge is ultimately the only solution of current problems. One who realizes this will understand that the change must start with himself.

C. Dharma - cosmic ethics
So how do we know what is “proper” and what is “improper”? This knowledge is crucial for our free decision-making. If there is a law there must be available its written form so everyone can get acquainted with it. After all, it is said that ignorance of law is no excuse.

These rules are listed in scriptures, especially in so-called dharma-sastras (scriptures describing dharma). They are law-books precisely defining how every human being should act according to one’s social and spiritual position. Most famous among them is Manu-smriti or Manu’s Law-book. Passages on dharma are also contained in Mahabharata (and its most important part, the Bhagavad-gita), Ramayana, Bhagavata and other Puranas, Bible, Qur’an etc.

Term “dharma” comes from Sanskrit root “dhri” (maintain, sustain, preserve in work). Usually it is translated as ethical, moral and religious principles which, however, does not fully represent its meaning. Dharma is a law or order of the material world (that which maintains its harmonic function), virtue or righteous conduct. Still deeper explanation says that dharma is an inherent or inseparable quality or nature. There is an example of salt whose inseparable quality (dharma) is salty taste. The word dharma would be therefore possible to translate as “ultimate cause”. This term from Western philosophy expresses the reason for existence of an object. Ultimate cause - dharma - of a house is to provide shelter to people. Uninhabitable house represents adharma (opposite of dharma). Dharma defines the function of the law of karma and itself is established by God. As “pillars of dharma” are called four qualities described in Bhagavata Purana (1.17.24):

- mercy (refusal of violence, meat-eating etc.)
- renunciation/sense control (refusal of intoxicants)
- truthfulness (refusal of gambling and speculations)
- purity (refusal of sex forbidden in scriptures)

It is therefore already established which human activities are good and bring positive reactions and which are bad and bring negative reactions in the form of suffering. This value system is universally valid and does not depend on opinions of individual living beings. I may think that what I do is good and also be able to justify it intellectually and thus impress others. If, however, my activity is not in accordance with universal definition of goodness, I will still reap a negative reaction.

Freedom of thinking and acting so propagated nowadays is sometimes misunderstood as a chance to do whatever we like. Yes, we have a free will, but at the same time we are responsible for our activity. Nothing can be further from reality that an idea that violation of dharma is unpunished. Contemporary state of the world should warn us not to put an economic benefit (artha) before dharma. It is this desire for sense enjoyment (symbolized by money) which is the most frequent cause of dharma violation.

D. Sanatana-dharma: the higher aspect of dharma
Dharma defines the way of life to suffer the least in this world. But the four basic kinds of suffering - birth, disease, old age and death - we cannot avoid here because they are present in the whole material world. It can be seen as a penitentiary institution with various corrective groups with better or worse standard of life. To get from the third group into the first can be considered as a certain advancement but we are still imprisoned. Although there is a small group of prisoners who like to stay in jail, vast majority of people desires freedom. Those who wish to be completely free from all suffering are informed by Vedic scriptures about even higher level called para-dharma (superior dharma) or sanatana-dharma (eternal dharma). Activity on this level is akarma, or free from any reactions. It is bhakti, devotional service to the Supreme Lord which is described in detail in Bhagavad-gita, Bhagavata Purana (Srimad Bhagavatam) and other confidential scriptures. Pleasant study!

“Man should serve to Lord Krishna with devotion without any desire for material benefit in this or next life. This will bring him liberation from the shackles of karma.” (Gopala-tapani Upanisad 1.14)
The Afterlife Experiments : Breakthrough Scientific Evidence of Life After Death


Keywords: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Ignorance vs. Knowing

Published on July 21, 2005

Main Entry: ig·no·rant
Pronunciation: ‘ig-n(&-)r&nt
Function: adjective
1 a : destitute of knowledge or education <an ignorant society>; also : lacking knowledge or comprehension of the thing specified <parents ignorant of modern mathematics> b : resulting from or showing lack of knowledge or intelligence <ignorant errors>
2 : UNAWARE, UNINFORMED
Main Entry: 1know
Pronunciation: ‘nO
Function: verb
Inflected Form(s): knew
/’nü also ‘nyü/; known /’nOn/; know·ing
Etymology: Middle English, from Old English cnAwan; akin to Old High German bichnAan to recognize, Latin gnoscere, noscere to come to know, Greek gignOskein
transitive senses
1 a (1) : to perceive directly : have direct cognition of (2) : to have understanding of <importance of knowing oneself> (3) : to recognize the nature of : DISCERN b (1) : to recognize as being the same as something previously known (2) : to be acquainted or familiar with (3) : to have experience of
2 a : to be aware of the truth or factuality of : be convinced or certain of b : to have a practical understanding of <knows

 

It may be said, a wise person is one who knows that they don’t know. It is not important to know everything about something or something about everything. Having “knowings” is the highest form of wisdom. The Self knows everything  that is ..It just hasn’t awakened yet.  That Self is a part of God. God would not keep God in the dark. One must be still of mind to hear and see anything worth knowing.

 

Those who are knowing, know they know and those who are ignorant don’t know yet, but sometimes think they do.  Is ignorance bliss when you know you don’t know, and don’t care? If one knows they know, then they also know that they do not know all there is to know. These individuals often are accused of being egoists or overconfident. Is overconfidence a negative trait? It is to those who have little confidence or none at all. It may be these very same people who ridicule confidence. Ridicule is fear; fear of those who have recognition of truth. Truth, however, can be a scary thing for others. David Hawkins says in one of his lectures, “There’s a famous poet who said, After you tell the truth, leave town.” Most people do not want to hear the truth. It’s so much more comfortable living in familiar taught doctrine or formed opinions. It’s scary to leave one’s “comfort” zone…So much easier, in fact, then never questioning the context of one’s life.

 

When the questions arise that one has no answers for, then the journey on the path has begun. There is no turning back. You know you are a part of the Divine, and your entire life becomes the journey to merge who you truly are with God. How can anyone who is not unknowing of the path, ridicule the search for the Divine? To walk this path of mysticism and spirit in truth and knowing isn’t to be questioned. The way is absolute.

 

©Myswizard all rights reserved ‘05


Keywords: , , , , , , ,

Dr. Avul Pakir Jainulabdeen Abdul Kalam

Published on July 20, 2005

Dr. Avul Pakir Jainulabdeen Abdul Kalam (born October 15, 1931) Indian scientist and engineer; 11th President of India; generally referred to as Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam.

Attributed
All God’s creatures are His family; and he is the most beloved of God who tries to do most good to God’s creatures.

God has not promised Skies always blue, Flower-strewn pathways All our life through; God has not promised Sun without rain, Joy without sorrow, Peace without pain.

I will not be presumptuous enough to say that my life can be a role model for anybody; but some poor child living in an obscure place in an underprivileged social setting may find a little solace in the way my destiny has been shaped. It could perhaps help such children liberate themselves from the bondage of their illusory backwardness and hopelessness?

Thinking is progress. Non-thinking is stagnation of the individual, organisation and the country. Thinking leads to action. Knowledge without action is useless and irrelevant. Knowledge with action, converts adversity into prosperity.
Thinking should become your capital asset, no matter whatever ups and downs you come across in your life.

What actions are most excellent? To gladden the heart of a human being, to feed the hungry, to help the afflicted to lighten the sorrow of the sorrowful and to remove the wrongs of injured.

When you speak, speak the truth; perform when you promise; discharge your trust?. Withhold your hands from striking, and from taking that which is unlawful and bad?

Whenever you face problems or are in the middle of them just think— What has happened, has happened for the good. What is happening is happening for the good. And what will happen will also happen for the good…

We have built the Agni to deliver all forms of warheads, including Flowers : {In the context of his role in building India’s premier Missile, The Agni}


Keywords: , , , , ,

The Akashic Records

Published on July 18, 2005

The Akashic Records have also been called Divine Intelligence, Infinite Field of Knowledge, All Knowing, The Presence, The Field, Higher Consciousness and The Mind of God. Although I have the wiki article which is written by authors with opinions, The Akashic Records have been calibrated to be Truth. The history is quite interesting as well as other references to it under my Topics… Religions and Great Books and Writings in Library… Myswizard

The Akashic Records (Akasha is a Sanskrit word meaning “sky”, “space” or “aether”) are said to be a collection of mystical knowledge that is stored in the aether; i.e. on a non-physical plane of existence. The concept is common in some New Age religious groups. The Akashic Records are said to have existed since the beginning of the planet. Just as we have various specialty libraries (e.g., medical, law), there are said to exist various Akashic Records (e.g., human, animal, plant, mineral, etc). Most writings refer to the Akashic Records in the area of human experience.

History of Akashic Records
Some who believe in the Records claim that they were used by ancient peoples around the world, including the Tibetans, Egyptians, Persians, Chaldeans, Greeks, Chinese, Hebrews, Christians, Druids, and Mayans. The belief is that the pre-Buddhist priests of the Himalayas knew that each soul recorded every moment of its existence in a “book”, and that if one attuned oneself properly then one could read or view that book. In Egypt, it is said, those who could read the Akasha were held in high standing and were often found advising Pharaohs on daily activities and dream interpretation. A Chinese gentleman named Sujujin was reported to need only the first name of anyone to access the Akasha and describe their life history; another Chinese seer, named Tajao, explored a variety of topics in the Records which span over two thousand years.

Believers claim that the Druid cultures of England and Wales (400–900) demonstrated the ability to access the Akasha. To gain access to the Akasha, the famous fortune teller Nostradamus claimed to have used methods derived from the Greek oracles, Christian and Sufi mysticism, and the Kabbalah. Individuals who claim to have consciously used the Akashic Records include : Charles Webster Leadbeater, Annie Besant, Alice Bailey, William Lilly, Manly P. Hall, Lilian Treemont, Dion Fortune, George Hunt Williamson, Rudolf Steiner, Max Heindel and Edgar Cayce.

Despite claims that the Akashic Records have been used by mystics throughout history, the term itself, along with the concept of an aetheric library, originated with the 19th century movement of Theosophy. Skeptics suggest that the concept of Akashic Records has been attributed indiscriminately and inappropriately to a wide range of historical religious figures and movements.

The theory has also been rejected by the scientific community, due to a lack of any independently verifiable evidence.

Description and explanation of the Akashic Records
The Akasha is said to be the library of all events and responses concerning Human Consciousness in all realities. Every human therefore supposedly contributes and has access to the Akashic Records. It is claimed that to gain access into the Akashic Records, every individual human can become the physical medium, and various techniques (e.g., yogic breathing, visualizations) can be employed to quiet the mind, become a “witness”, and achieve the focused, preconscious state necessary to access the Records. While in the Akashic Records and viewing the past, both the events and responses are said to be visible. This can be compared to seeing a full color movie with a plot and characters. When viewing the future, the events are known, but the responses are only probable. Based on an individual’s responses in the past, the Akashic seer/reader can investigate probable future responses and give the highest future probability. A simple illustration of this might be witnessing several alternate endings to the main characters in a movie (e.g., Run, Lola, Run). However, at some point in the evolution of the Akashic reader, a state of unification and awareness can be achieved whereby even the future responses are known with absolute clarity instead of only as a probability.

Specific accounts of the Akashic Records
In Theosophy and the various New Age-related faiths, the Akashic Records are records of all knowledge, including all human experience down to the finest detail, held in the universe. The Akashic records resemble a library and are also compared to a universal computer (some would say the ‘Mind of God’).

The Akashic Records are referred to by Edgar Cayce, who stated that each person is held to account after life and ‘confronted’ with their personal Akashic record of what they have/not done in life in a karmic sense. This is not however a process evaluated by the supposed limited lowly earth plane mind—i.e. the brain—but one fathomed by the higher mind or one’s ’super-consciousness’.

Jane Roberts in the Seth books describes a different version of a similar idea when Seth asserts that the fundamental stuff of the universe is ideas and consciousness, and that an idea once conceived exists forever. Seth argued that all ideas and knowledge are in principle accessible by “direct cognition”. Direct cognition is similar to or perhaps identical to intuition and is said to allow direct knowing without time elapsing and without knowledge needing to be transferred e.g. in speech or text. This is similar to what Robert Monroe refers to as rotes in his out-of-body book trilogy.

Some writers believe that free from and independent of all religions and faiths, there exist many libraries or record repositories such as the Akashic library throughout the universe, albeit on various planes of existence.

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article “Akashic records”.


Keywords: , , , , , , , ,

Earth and the Moon

Published on July 16, 2005

EARTH and the MOON

Equatiorial Radius 6,378.140 km
Mean Density 5.515 g/cm³
Sidereal Rotation 23h56m0.41s
Sidereal Period 365.26

The third rock from the Sun. Earth is our home planet. It is the only planet in the solar system that has liquid water and the only planet (we know so far) that has intelligent(?) life.
The structure of Earth is made up of layers. The inner core is made up of iron and nickel. The very center is probably solid, but the outer part of the core is probably a dense liquid. The next layer out is called the mantle. The mantle is the largest, or thickest area of the planet. The final layer is the crust. The Earth’s atmosphere is also layered. There are 5 layers: Ionosphere (90 KM up and 350 KM thick), Mesosphere (50 KM up and 40 KM thick), Stratosphere (18 KM up and 30 KM thick), Tropopause (14 KM up and 4 KM thick), and, Troposphere (Ground level to 14 KM up).
Information regarding the Earth falls more into the category of geology so I will leave the rest of the explanations up to the geologists.

The MOON is the Earth’s satellite. It revolves around the Earth once every 27 days, 7 hours and 43 minutes. The Moon’s diameter is 3476 KM (2159 miles). The Moon is EASILY viewed, studied, drawn, and photographed. You don’t even need binoculars or a telescope to start, just your eyes! The Moon has one side that always faces the Earth. The other side, or dark side as some call it, is NOT always dark! When the Moon is between the Sun and the Earth, the back side of the Moon is facing directly towards the Sun.

For some reason, the back side of the Moon is by no means as interesting as the side that faces us. The craters on the back side are much smaller and less spectacular. Let’s break the side that faces us into 2 sections:

Part #1 - The section we see from new to full:

Mare Crisium (Sea of Crisis)
Mare Fecunditatis (Sea of Fertility)
Mare Nectaris (Sea of Nectar)
Mare Tranquillitatis (Sea of Tranquility)
Mare Serenitatis (Sea of Serenity)
Mare Vaporum (Sea of Vapours)
Mare Australe (Southern Sea)
Mare Frigoris (Sea of Cold)
Upon examining the Mare listed above, you will notice there are a lot of impact craters. These craters also have names, but there are just so many of them, that it wouldn’t make sense to list them all here. If I have enough requests, I might add a page of just the impact craters.

Part #2: The section we see from full back to new.

Mare Imbrium (Sea of Rains)
Oceanus Procellarium (Ocean of Storms)
Mare Humorum (Sea of Moisture)
Mare Nubium (Sea of Clouds)
Mare Cognitum (Known Sea)
Tycho - Large Impact Crater with huge ejector
Copernicus - Large Impact Crater highly reflective
I have mentioned two craters in this area because these are easily seen in binoculars or even with the naked eye. Many of the craters are named after famous people, not just astronomers.

Tips for Lunar Observing
When observing the Moon, it’s best to start observing when the Moon is just coming out of the “new” phase and becoming a crescent. You should try and at least catch a glimpse of the Moon every night until the Moon becomes “full” which will be about 14 days. If you are viewing the Moon with the aid of binoculars or a telescope, you can spend hours just viewing along the terminator.

The terminator is the line where the light stops and the shadows of the lunar darkness begin. Along this line is where you can see the most amount of detail in the edge of the craters, the mountains, and the rilles. Aim your scope or binoculars to the top of the Moon and work your way down the terminator. Do this each night and you will see more and more and more every night. Keep notes if you wish, about the different features you notice. You may even want to draw the features as you see them.

DON’T try and view the Moon when it is full. This is when the least number of features are clearly visible and the light from the full Moon coming through your binoculars or an unfiltered telescope can actually make you eyes ache! The Moon only reflects about 5% of the light it receives, but the light from the Moon can easily cast a shadow!

After the Moon has past the “full” phase, the light will begin to recede leaving more details to see from a different angle. This time, the light will be coming from the east side of the Moon, causing the shadows to be cast in the opposite direction than when the Moon was going from “new” to “full”. You will see the same features, just with a different perspective. This time, viewing the Moon will be a little more difficult. See, the Moon at last quarter won’t rise until midnight and the crescent Moon won’t rise until nearly 3:00am! This makes it more of a challenge (yeah right!)


Keywords: , , ,

Gossip, Gossip, Gossip

Published on July 13, 2005

I will dispel with the Middle English and Old English derivatives of God-parent and use the most common version of the definition of gossip. Gossip means to chatter. If you are a gossip you are a person who engages in idle chatter and rumors about the private affairs of others. I am not speaking of factual news related events, public or private. This is strictly about the person who engages in the embellishment of the events in others lives, sometimes even their own.

What is it that people love to listen to about the lives of others? Even biographies can often be gossip about the public and private events of famous or infamous people’s lives. We are a world of humans who love to be entertained and don’t really care much about who does the entertaining. A biographer, relative, or the friend next door, are the same when engaging those who will listen with bated breath. So what of the gossip and the listener? Certainly, we have all been one or the other at some time in our lives and perhaps relished in the listening or the telling.

Gossip is all about the ego. The definition of ego in Webster’s is the individual as self aware. My definition of ego is what we think we are as a self. Self aware ego becomes an oxymoron. If one is truly aware in the Real sense of Self, the ego tends to fall away. Gossip is no longer necessary to entertain others at the expense of delivering false information, or even to ridicule. The gossip is full of themselves. They boast of having information that is exclusive. As they dole it out to others they become “the storyteller.” The attention they receive is the fuel for their fire.

As long as we continue to listen to the gossip, the gossip will never quit. On and on the stories will unfold, never ceasing to engage listeners eager to hear slanted tales of others lives. Truth has no real place in the life of the gossip, because the telling is the means to a never-ending end. Those who will listen will always be hangers-on and those who do not wish to listen will still keep one ear open lest they be the one left out of the news.

When the listener and the teller of gossip are no different to you; When the news is neither interesting or of no interest at all to you; When you become neutral toward all of it, you are truly free of gossip. The news becomes as meaningless as the motives behind the gossip and the gossiper. Perhaps then all those involved will move on to more important involvements.

©Myswizard all rights reserved ‘05


Keywords: , ,

Intelligence vs. The Open Mind

Published on July 9, 2005

Main Entry: in•tel•li•gent
Pronunciation: in-’te-l&-j&nt
Function: adjective
Etymology: Latin intelligent-, intelligens, present participle of intelligere, intellegere to understand, from inter- + legere to gather, select — more at LEGEND
1 a : having or indicating a high or satisfactory degree of intelligence and mental capacity b : revealing or reflecting good judgment or sound thought : SKILLFUL
2 a : possessing intelligence b : guided or directed by intellect : RATIONAL
3 a : guided or controlled by a computer; especially : using a built-in microprocessor for automatic operation, for processing of data, or for achieving greater versatility — compare DUMB 7 b : able to produce printed material from digital signals
- in•tel•li•gen•tial /-”te-l&-’jen(t)-sh&l/ adjective
- in•tel•li•gent•ly /-’te-l&-j&nt-lE/ adverb
synonyms INTELLIGENT, CLEVER, ALERT, QUICK-WITTED mean mentally keen or quick. INTELLIGENT stresses success in coping with new situations and solving problems
. CLEVER implies native ability or aptness and sometimes suggests a lack of more substantial qualities . ALERT stresses quickness in perceiving and understanding . QUICK-WITTED implies promptness in finding answers in debate or in devising expedients in moments of danger or challenge .

I wanted to get past the proper definition of intelligence, since there are varying ideas about what, exactly, constitutes intelligence. I especially like the synonyms for intelligence, like the words clever, alert, and quick witted. Does intelligence, however, suggest the presence of an open mind? Surely we all know people of vast intellectual capacity who are one-sided and completely closed minded on certain subjects and in certain areas. Having witnessed this in my own field of human observation, I’ve come to the conclusion that intelligence and an open mind do not necessarily go hand in hand. Skillful, rational, and alert people may be more capable of seeing things from different perspectives, but to truly have an open mind, means to see everything from a multidimensional point of view. Once this has been accomplished, then one is able to choose how and what to think about something. One would think, to be of greater intelligence would mean to know how to explore the variables and see all from differing points of view. This, unfortunately, does not always occur.

The intellectualization of our world has produced some of the greatest minds of our age. Still, are all these great minds as well as the average intelligent being on the planet open to all possibilities? What is it exactly, that creates the intelligent mind? Some traits of true intelligence are curiosity, expansiveness, and awareness.

Many wish they were more intelligent. They look at life and think they would be more of whatever it is they are wishing for if they were smarter. These same wishful thinkers are the very ones who can make huge differences in their lives, as well as the lives of others, by simply being curious or passionate about what it is they are doing. I’m quite certain there are multitudes of people who have been extremely successful in their work who couldn’t get past a C in school. These very people are proof that intelligence is not measured by grades, tests, or cleverness. We all know “clever” people who get into trouble all the time. So then, what is intelligence?

It is easy to use the dictionary and thesaurus to get the worldly meanings of intelligence, (and there are many), but it’s so much more. It’s the freedom to think creative thought and put it to use. It’s seeing the possibilities in every day of one’s life. Its passion and fervor. It’s the sense to be here now and always in the present. It’s to know you are spirit and your spirit is free to be and inquire. It’s to not be so serious when life is challenging, and accept the challenge. It’s to know that it’s ok to be childlike without being childish. It’s to feel the flow of life and be a part of it, instead of apart from it. True intelligence is knowing that you don’t know all there is to know, and not pretending you do, while keeping an open mind.

“We should take care not to make the intellect our God; it has of course, powerful muscles, but no personality.”___Albert Einstein

©Myswizard ‘05 all rights reserved


Keywords: , , ,

Money

Published on July 7, 2005

Everyone desires money, but desire alone doesn’t make you wealthy. As David Hawkins, the renowned Doctor, Ph.D., and author, states, “Dedication, inventiveness, creativity, hard work, and patterning ourselves after success, creates wealth.” I’ll add to that… education, focus, and willingness.

In order to have monetary wealth, you must be willing to do work to achieve this (unless you’ve inherited it, which brings it’s own karma along). Seeing what you want and being able to create it takes practice and dedication as well. Since what you hold in mind tends to manifest, how we hold what we desire is very important. Greediness, neediness and wanting to win the lotto just doesn’t work in this realm. Worlds open for you if you are willing to take the first step towards the process. There are many ways to do this and practices such as the Avatar courses, Dr. Hawkins work, and Science of Mind can help you to reach your goals.

Until you commit yourself to the re-creation of you, monetary wealth will remain the elusive dream. Keep in mind two things as you read this. 1)Everything you’ve believed about money isn’t true (i.e. It will bring happiness, It will be the answer to all my problems, It’s the root of all evil, Only money makes money, etc.) 2) Money is a source of energy. It can generate more or can be spent, but unless it’s in motion it has no purpose, other than to perpetuate the egoic illusion of safety and security.

There are as many thoughts about money as there are people on the planet. It’s always been a dream of many and a goal for much of the modern western world. There is nothing inherently bad about money and it certainly can make life much easier. One would rather be “with” money than “without” unless you are religiously or politically opposed to it. The exchange of money for goods and services is as old as man, and it will always be the the source of either not having enough of, wanting more of… no matter how much you have, or frustration about.

I cannot finish without speaking of “Right Livelihood.” Right Livelihood is the universe whispering in your ear (or shouting) to do or be whatever it is you must. It is the thing you cannot NOT do. It is the passion you arise every morning for and the doing that sets all other doings apart from. It is work glorified into love. It is the “one” thing that allows you to see the world through different eyes, and the world to see who and what you are being. Right livelihood brings something of God to your work and your work to God. It is the “right” thing to do at the level of the spirit. When you are in your “Right Livelihood,” money will flow to you, but not because it’s necessarily great amounts of money you seek, but the work itself.

©Myswizard all rights reserved ‘05-’06

Neale Donald Walsch on Abundance and Right Livelihood (Walsch, Neale Donald, Applications for Living.)


Keywords: , , , , , , , , , ,

Kabbalah and Food For Thought

Published on July 4, 2005

It came to my attention recently from some of my friends about a television program aired recently concerning Kabbalah. I have not seen the recent program due to the fact that I don’t concern myself with programs that don’t calibrate truth. My friends however, were confused by the program thinking that Kabbalah was something started by a cult group in California, and that it had something to do with water and other products of a general nature using the word Kabbalah on them. Heaven save us from the falsities of television! Please read my articles on Kabbalah and then click on my Kabbalah links to find the truth.


Highlighting David R. Hawkins, M.D. Ph.D.

Published on

Dr. David R. Hawkins is a nationally renowned psychiatrist, physician, researcher and lecturer, as his listing in Who’s Who in America amply attests. He has been a guest of MacNeil/Lehrer, Barbara Walters and The Today Show. His previous book, Orthomolecular Psychiatry, co-authored with Nobelist Linus Pauling, sold out completely. By the end of 1995, word-of mouth sales of POWER vs. FORCE were increasing by ten per cent a week.

POWER vs. FORCE is the culmination of twenty years’ research. In it, David Hawkins conclusively proves the ability of kinesiological testing to distinguish truth or falsehood in any statement—an astonishing idea in itself, with far reaching implications for every aspect of human life. He goes on to demonstrate the application of his method (explained clearly for the layman) in commerce, art, sport, etc. Then he explains its spiritual application, as a path to enlightenment

Beyond this, Dr. Hawkins demonstrates kinesiological calibration as a tool for assessing value and motive, revealing the hidden determinants of human behavior—and establishing a Map of Consciousness that illuminates the spiritual ladder we must follow as a race and as individuals.

The volume concludes with compendious notes and bibliography, and, finally, a fascinating narrative of the author’s own journey from atheism to spiritual enlightenment.

From the Author of Power vs Force:

All human endeavor has the common goal of understanding or influencing human experience. To this end, man has developed numerous descriptive and analytical disciplines: Morality, Philosophy, Psychology, and so on….Regardless what branch of inquiry one starts from - philosophy, political theory, theology-all avenues of investigation eventually converge at a common meeting point: the quest for an organized understanding of the nature of pure consciousness… To explain that which is simple can be difficult indeed. Much of this book is devoted to the process of making the simple obvious. If we can understand even one simple thing in depth, we will have greatly expanded our capacity for comprehending the nature of the universe and life itself.

David R. Hawkins, M.D. Ph.D.
Sedona, Arizona, December 2001

This is what others have had to say about “Power vs Force”

Lee lacocca
…particularly timely ….a significant contribution to understanding and dealing with the problems we face today.

Mother Teresa
[A] beautiful gift of writing… [You] spread joy, love and compassion through what you write. The fruit of these three is peace, as you know….

Sam Walton
I especially appreciate [the] research and presentation on the attractor patterns of business….

Brain/Mind Bulletin
The reader will almost certainly be impressed by Hawkins’ clear, articulate style and the philosophical strength of his insight and observations….he has indeed helped arm us for the internal struggle.

Sheldon Deal, then President, International College of Applied Kinesiology
Overwhelming! A masterpiece! A lifetime work

Intermediate/Advanced Reading-Intermediate to Advanced Spiritual

Power vs. Force: The Hidden Determinants of Human Behavior


Keywords: , , , , , , , ,

The Holy Grail

Published on July 1, 2005

In Christian mythology, the Holy Grail was the dish, plate, cup or vessel used by Jesus at the Last Supper, said to possess miraculous powers. According to legend, Joseph of Arimathea used the Grail to catch Christ’s blood while interring Him and then took the object to Britain where he founded a line of guardians to keep it safe. The quest for the Holy Grail makes up an important segment of the Arthurian cycle. The legend may be a combination of genuine Christian lore with a Celtic myth of a cauldron endowed with special powers.
The development of the Grail legend has been traced in detail by cultural historians: it is a gothic legend, which first came together in the form of written romances, deriving perhaps from some pre-Christian folkloric hints, in the later 12th and early 13th centuries. The early Grail romances centered on Percival and were woven into the more general Arthurian fabric. The Grail romances started in France and were translated into other European vernaculars; only a handful of non-French romances added any essential new elements.

Origins of the Grail

Early forms of the Grail

The origins of the Grail can be traced back to early Celtic lore involving a hero/traveller who finds himself within an “other world”, one that is on a magical plane parallel to ours. The transition from one world to another is usually described subtly, such as an unnoticeable and gradual change in the scenery. The role of the “grail” in such stories was simply as a magical platter or dish which serves to signify the mystical nature of the other world and the test the worth of the hero. Sometimes the item was said to generate a never-ending supply of food, sometimes it could raise the dead. Sometimes it would decide who the next king should be, as only the true sovereign could hold it.
On the other hand, some scholars believe the Grail began as a purely Christian symbol. For example, Joseph Goering of University of Toronto (Goering 2005) has identified sources for Grail imagery in 12th-century wall paintings from churches in the Catalan Pyrenees (now mostly removed to the Museu Nacional d’Art de Catalunya, Barcelona) that present unique iconic images of the Virgin Mary holding a bowl that radiates tongues of fire, images that predate the first literary account by Chrétien de Troyes. Goering argues that they were the original inspiration for the grail legend.
In the past, scholars were divided as to whether the Grail had its beginings in Celtic or continental Christian lore. However, as strong cases can be made for both origins, most scholars accept both had a hand in the legend’s development, though there is some debate over which was the more prevalent.

The Grail and the Fisher King

The tale of the Fisher King involves a king who is lame in one leg (a euphemism for impotency) which in turn causes the land to become barren (infertile). The hero (Gawain in the earlier tales with Percival or Galahad in the later retellings) encounters the Fisher King and is invited to a feast, as in the older other-world tales. The Grail is again presented as a platter of plenty but is also presented as part of a series of mystical relics, which also included a spear that drips blood and a broken sword. The purpose of the relics is to incite the hero to question them and thereby, through some unknown means, break the enchantment of the infirm king and the barren land, although the hero invariably fails to do so.

The Grail and Arthurian legend

The story of the Fisher King and the Grail was later incorporated into the Arthurian myths. At first presented as a retelling of the older Fisher King tale, it eventually evolved into an explicit “quest” for the Grail.
Distribution of Grail ideas
Various notions of the Holy Grail are currently very widespread in Western Society (especially British and American), popularized through numerous medieval and modern works (see below) and linked with the predominantly Anglo-French (but also with some German influence) cycle of stories about King Arthur and his knights. Because of this wide distribution most Americans and West Europeans assume that the Grail idea is universally well known.
The stories of the Grail are totally absent from Eastern Orthodox teachings and are not a part of the culture and mythos of those countries that were and are Orthodox (Orthodox Arabs, Orthodox Slavs, Orthodox Romanians, Orthodox Greeks). This is even more true of the Arthurian myths which were not well known (until the present day Hollywood retellings) east of Germany. The notions of the Grail, its importance, and prominence are, and should always be regarded as, a set of ideas that are essentially local and particular, being linked with Catholic or formerly Catholic locales, Celtic mythology, and Anglo-French medieval storytelling. The contemporary wide distribution of these ideas is due to the huge influence of the pop culture of countries where the Grail Myth was prominent in the Middle Ages.
The word graal, as it is earliest spelled, appears to be an Old French adaption of the Latin gradalis, meaning a dish brought to the table in different stages of a meal. According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, after the cycle of Grail romances was well established, late medieval writers came up with a false etymology for sangreal an alternate name for “Holy Grail”. In Old French, san grial means “Holy Grail” and sang rial means “royal blood”, later writers played on this pun. Since then, Sangreal is sometimes employed to lend a medievalizing air in referring to the Holy Grail. This connection with royal blood bore fruit in a modern best-seller linking many historical conspiracies (see below).
Some insist the Holy Grail, even if historical, should be considered separate from the Holy Chalice used by Jesus at the Last Supper. However, confusion between the two has been the historical practice.

The beginnings of the Grail in literature

Chrétien de Troyes

The Grail is first featured in Perceval, le Conte del Graal (The Story of the Grail) by Chrétien de Troyes, who claims he was working from a source book given to him by his patron, Count Philip of Flanders. In this incomplete poem, dated sometime between 1180 and 1191, the object has not yet acquired the implications of holiness it would have in later works. While dining in the magical abode of the Fisher King, Perceval witnesses a wondrous procession in which youths carry magnificent objects from one chamber to another, passing before him at each course of the meal. First comes a young man carrying a bleeding lance, then two boys carrying candelabras. Finally, a beautiful young girl emerges bearing an elaborately decorated graal, or “grail”.
Chrétien refers to his object not as “The Grail” but as un graal, showing the word was used, in its earliest literary context, as a common noun. For Chrétien the grail was a wide, somewhat deep dish or bowl, interesting because it contained not a pike, salmon or lamprey, as the audience may have expected for such a container, but a single Mass wafer which provided sustenance for the Fisher King’s crippled father.
Perceval, who had been warned against talking too much, remains silent through all of this, and wakes up the next morning alone. He later learns that if he had asked the appropriate questions about what he saw, he would have healed his maimed host, much to his honor.

Robert de Boron

Though Chrétien’s account is the earliest and most influential of all Grail texts, it was in the work of Robert de Boron that the Grail truly became the “Holy Grail” and assumed the form most familiar to modern readers. In his verse romance Joseph d’Arimathie, composed between 1191 and 1202, Robert tells the story of Joseph of Arimathea acquiring the chalice of the Last Supper to collect Christ’s blood upon His removal from the cross. Joseph is thrown in prison where Christ visits him and explains the mysteries of the blessed cup. Upon his release Joseph gathers his in-laws and other followers and travels to the west, and founds a dynasty of Grail keepers that eventually includes Perceval.
The Grail in other early literature
After this point, Grail literature divides into two classes. The first concerns King Arthur’s knights visiting the Grail castle or questing after the object; the second concerns the Grail’s history in the time of Joseph of Arimathea.
The nine most important works from the first group are:
• The Perceval of Chrétien de Troyes.
• Four continuations of Chrétien’s poem, by authors of differing vision and talent, designed to bring the story to a close.
• The German Parzival by Wolfram von Eschenbach, which adapted at least the holiness of Robert’s Grail into the framework of Chrétien’s story.
• The Didot Perceval, named after the manuscript’s former owner, and purportedly a prosification of Robert de Boron’s sequal to Joseph d’Arimathie.
• The Welsh romance Peredur (generally included in the Mabinogion), based on Chrétien’s poem but including very striking differences from it.
• Perlesvaus, called the “least canonical” Grail romance because of its very different character.
• The German Diu Crone (The Crown), in which Gawain, rather than Perceval, achieves the Grail.
• The Lancelot section of the vast Vulgate Cycle, which introduces the new Grail hero, Galahad.
• The Quest del Saint Grail, another part of the Vulgate Cycle, concerning the adventures of Galahad and his achievement of the Grail.
Of the second class there are:
• Robert de Boron’s Joseph d’Arimathie,
• The Estoire del Saint Graal, the first part of the Vulgate Cycle (but written after Lancelot and the Queste), based on Robert’s tale but expanding it greatly with many new details.
Though all these works have their roots in Chrétien, several contain pieces of tradition not found in Chrétien which are possibly derived from earlier sources.

The Grail

Fate of the Grail

A number of knights undertook the quest for the Grail, in tales annexed to Arthurian legend. Some of these tales tell of knights who succeeded, like Percival or the virginal Galahad; others tell of knights who failed to achieve the grail because of their tragic flaws, like Lancelot. In Wolfram von Eschenbach’s telling, the Grail was kept safe at the castle of Munsalvaesche (mons salvationis) or Montsalvat, entrusted to Titurel, the first Grail-King. Some, not least the monks of Montserrat, have identified the castle with the real sanctuary of Montserrat in Catalonia.
Belief in the Grail, and interest in its potential whereabouts, has never ceased. Ownership has been attributed to various groups (including the Knights Templar). There are cups claimed to be the Grail in several churches like the Valencia cathedral. The emerald chalice at Genoa, which was obtained during the crusades at Aleppo at great cost, has been less championed as the Holy Grail since an accident on the road while it was being returned from Paris after the fall of Napoleon revealed that the emerald was green glass. Other stories claim that the Grail is buried beneath Rosslyn Chapel or is to be found deep in the spring at Glastonbury Tor. Still other stories claim that a secret line of hereditary protectors keep the Grail, and local folklore in Nova Scotia and Accokeek, Maryland says that it was moved to these locations by a closeted priest aboard Captain John Smith’s ship.

Four medieval relics

During the Middle Ages, four major contenders for the position of Holy Grail stood out from the rest.
1. The earliest record of a chalice from the Last Supper is of a two-handled silver chalice which was kept in a reliquary in a chapel near Jerusalem between the basilica of Golgotha and the Martyrium. This Grail appears only in the account of Arculf, a 7th-century Anglo-Saxon pilgrim who saw it, and through an opening of the perforated lid of the reliquary where it reposed, touched it with his own hand which he had kissed. According to him, it had the measure of a Gaulish pint. All the people of the city flocked to it with great veneration. (Arculf also saw the Holy Lance in the porch of the basilica of Constantine.) This is the only mention of the chalice situated in the Holy Land.
2. There is a reference in the late thirteenth century to a copy of the Grail being at Constantinople. This occurs in the 13th century German romance, the Younger Titurel: “A second costly dish, very noble and very precious, was fashioned to duplicate this one. In holiness it has no flaw. Men of Constantinople assayed it in their land, (finding) it richer in adornment, they accounted it the true grâl.” This Grail was said to have been looted from the church of the Bucoleon during the Fourth Crusade and sent from Constantinople to Troyes by Garnier de Trainel, the then bishop of Troyes, in 1204. It was recorded there in 1610, but it disappeared at the French Revolution.
3. Of two Grail vessels that survive today, one is at Genoa, in the cathedral. The hexagonal Genoese vessel is known as the sacro catino, the holy basin. Traditionally said to be carved from emerald, it is in fact a green Egyptian glass dish, about eighteen inches (37 cm) across. It was sent to Paris after Napoleon’s conquest of Italy, and was returned broken, which identified the emerald as glass. Its origin is uncertain; according to William of Tyre, writing in about 1170, it was found in the mosque at Caesarea in 1101: “a vase of brilliant green shaped like a bowl.” The Genoese, believing that it was of emerald, accepted it in lieu of a large sum of money. An alternative story in a Spanish chronicle says that it was found when Alfonso VII of Castile captured Almeria from the Moors in 1147 with Genoese help, un uaso de piedra esmeralda que era tamanno como una escudiella, “a vase carved from emerald which was like a dish”. The Genoese said that this was the only thing they wanted from the sack of Almeria. The identification of the sacro catino with the Grail is not made until later, however, by Jacobus de Voragine in his chronicle of Genoa, written at the close of the 13th century.
4. The other surviving grail vessel is the santo cáliz, an agate cup in the cathedral of Valencia. It has been set in a medieval mounting and given a foot made of an inverted cup of chalcedony. There is an Arabic inscription. The earliest secure reference to the chalice is in 1399, when it was given by the monastery of San Juan de la Peña to king Martin I of Aragon in exchange for a gold cup. By the end of the century a provenance had been invented for the chalice at Valencia, by which St Peter had brought it to Rome.

Modern interpretations

Casual metaphor

The legend of the Holy Grail is the basis of the use of the devalued term holy grail in modern-day culture. This or that “holy grail” is seen as the distant, all-but-unobtainable ultimate goal for a person, organization, or field to achieve. For instance, cold fusion or anti-gravity devices are sometimes characterized as the “holy grail” of applied physics.

Modern retellings
Spoiler warning: Plot and/or ending details follow.

The Holy Grail, by Dante Gabriel Rossetti
The combination of hushed reverence and overheated chromatic harmonies of Richard Wagner’s late opera Parsifal fatally inflated the Holy Grail theme, while it brought the old medieval tale back into a wider public consciousness. The high seriousness of the subject was also epitomized in Dante Gabriel Rossetti’s painting (illustrated), in which William Morris’s soulful Titian-haired wife, at the time the painter’s mistress, holds the Grail like a champagne glass that she is about to make ring with a snap of her long finger. The Grail was overripe, and Monty Python and the Holy Grail (1975) deflated it and all pseudo-Arthurian posturings.
The Grail had turned up in movies before: it debuted in a silent Parsifal. In The Light of Faith (1922), Lon Chaney attempted to steal it, for the finest of reasons. The Silver Chalice, a novel about the Grail by Thomas B. Costain was made into a 1954 movie (in which Paul Newman débuted), that is considered notably bad by several critics, including Newman himself. Lancelot of the Lake (1974) is Robert Bresson’s gritty retelling. Excalibur is a more traditional sex-in-armor representation of an Arthurian tale, in which the Grail is little more than a prop. The Fisher King and Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade place the quest in modern settings, the one serious yet unavoidably faintly camp, the other robustly self-parodying. Science fiction has taken the Quest into interstellar space, figuratively in Samuel R. Delany’s 1968 novel Nova, and literally in the 1994 episode “Grail” of the television series Babylon 5.
For the authors of Holy Blood, Holy Grail, who assert that their research ultimately reveals that Jesus may not have died on the cross, but lived to marry Mary Magdalene and father children, whose Merovingian bloodline continues today, the Grail is a mere sideshow. Dan Brown’s bestselling novel The Da Vinci Code is likewise based on the idea that the real Grail is not a cup but the earthly remains of Mary Magdalene (again cast as Jesus’ wife), plus a set of ancient documents telling the “true” story of Jesus, his teachings and descendants. In Brown’s novel, it is hinted that the Grail was long buried beneath Rosslyn Chapel just like one tradition claims, but in recent decades its guardians had it relocated to a secret chamber embedded in the floor beneath the Inverted Pyramid in front of the Louvre Museum. Of course, the latter location has never been mentioned in real Grail lore. Yet such was the public interest in even a fictionalized Grail that the museum soon had to rope off the exact location mentioned by Brown, lest visitors inflict any damage in a more or less serious attempt to access the supposed hidden chamber. (See: La Pyramide Inversée.)
Related articles
Cornucopia and sampo are other mythical vessels with magical powers.
Further reading
• Roger Sherman Loomis, The Grail: From Celtic Myth to Christian Symbol ISBN 0691020752
• Joseph Goering, 2005. The Virgin and the Grail : Origins of a Legend (Yale University Press) ISBN 0300106610 [1]

The Virgin and the Grail : Origins of a Legend The Grail: From Celtic Myth to Christian Symbol


Keywords: , , , , , , , , , ,

He/She Who Hesitates

Published on

I was just having a discussion the other day with a very dear friend of mine about making decisions.  This gave me food for thought. In so many ways we are confused about the decisions we must make on a daily basis…This may be as seemingly inconsequential as deciding what we want for breakfast, to as grand as our life’s work, getting married or purchasing a new home. Every day the phrase “He who hesitates is lost” is being said somewhere by someone.

Are we really lost when we hesitate or is that a decision, also?  Not deciding for or against something IS a decision. One has merely decided NOT to decide! Of course we ruminate to and fro about deciding…”What to do..what to do.” Confusion is the biggest factor in our not making a definitive decision.

In a universal way decisions are being made for us all the time by default. If one doesn’t become proactive…events will occur regardless, and there we are, using the phrase, “It was meant to be” or “It was my karma.”  But, what if your karma was “the choice” to make a decision and you didn’t?

When you use your “inner knowing” (which we all have), all decision making becomes as easy as picking up your toothbrush in the morning. We are creators in every sense of the word, so why not use the natural powers we were given to steer the boat inside of casting her at sea with no captain at the helm?

©Myswizard all rights reserved ‘05


Keywords: , , ,