Entries Tagged with "Truth"


God Power and Truth…The way to ascension through God’s answers and messages

Published on Thursday, October 1st, 2009

Today, more than ever, we need something that offers hope, peace, and a general feeling of well-being. We live in a world gone mad with relativistic ideologies, or personal confusion and a general unrest. But don’t despair. There is a power greater than all the secrets, codes, ancient books, and mysteries you are searching for. It is The Power of Divinity-The Power of God. Unlike other spiritual guides that rely on biblical passages to illuminate and inspire, God Power and Truth offers straightforward and honest answers to difficult questions:

-What is God, and how do I picture Him?
-How do I learn how to tap into The Power of God?
-How do we know when God speaks to us?
-How do I keep up my spiritual journey through my own doubt and the disbelief of others?
-What is the most expedient way to enlightenment, and what can I do now to begin to reach that state?
-Do angels exist?
-How do we incorporate the path to God within a harsh, unforgiving, self-serving world?
-Why do “bad” things happen to apparently “good” people?

When this journey to test for Truth began, the scores of questions that came up were frequently personal, periodically asked by others, and regularly emerged spontaneously. They were and are extremely significant. Realizing how essential these answers are, a gift was received from The Field. It came in the form of persistence to ask that which is relevant to the present spiritual world. In a flash, permission to write this book and God’s answers had been established. The answers are received diametrically from God via the Field of
Intelligence, which holds God’s infinite knowledge. The actual answers may be short, but they are complete and need no further elaboration. This is how I received them. So if you are seeking flowery admonitions or mystical metaphors from God, you may be disappointed. As a result of presenting these questions and answers to the world, they are written in The Akashic Records of Divinity for eternity. It is more important to have these questions asked and answered whether or not they will be read presently or later on. Here is the beginning…


God Power and Truth from Amazon

Advanced Intermediate/Advanced


Tags:

Can all worldly problems be fixed using spiritual principles?

Published on Sunday, July 19th, 2009

Worldly issues are linear or measurable, whereas the spiritual realm is eternal and not measurable by any regular standards. However, spiritual principles or laws are infinitely powerful, thereby making them infallible. All linear issues respond to spiritual “fixes” when all involved parties are willing to access their powers. In this earthly realm though, the odds of having all the principle players involved willing to use “otherworldly” ways of solving problems is rare. It all depends on the context of the matter.*

What a single individual can do is pray. Proper prayer is a popular way of treating the linear with a non-linear method. One can surrender an issue to God and pray for the highest good. That is the straightest way to use the power of God. Another is trust—absolute radical trust that whatever is happening is what is required, karmically. Last but not least, you can ask for Divine guidance or an answer to a problem or question. You must be fully prepared for whatever comes your way. God doesn’t work on an agenda, but what is best for you. What you think you need is not always what is in your highest good. In other words, winning the lottery is not always in your highest good, even if you can use the money. You may have to actually do the hard work to get the result you desire. All of the aforementioned can be applied to a group if all participants are willing.

*God has given the world the gift of Divine Protoplasmic Analysis to sort through what is Absolute from what is falsehood. This one thing has the capacity to resolve or answer an otherwise difficult situation, while positioning for a win-win result.


Tags:

Conundrums About Law

Published on Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

If you break a man-made law that isn’t right, have you created negative karma? Conversely if you do something which is within the law can it still be wrong?

Throughout history, laws authorized by the prevailing governing body have been in place. The answers to the questions depend on the calibratory level of the particular law. Examples of unjust laws are slavery and justified killings or debasement for ideological reasons. Modern laws covering controversial subjects such as abortion are another illustration. Governing bodies have the right to put certain laws in place, but they have no idea how those laws calibrate. For example, all laws regarding abortion (with the exception of health related issues), calibrate beneath Truth because it is the deliberate termination of human life for expediency. Choices are an integral part of the decision making process, but God cannot be eliminated from any decision whether or not you believe it to be true. Ignorance of Divine Law is always forgiven if sincere, however.
Responsibility and Culpability


Tags: ,

The Simple Truth

Published on Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009

The above title may be construed as an oxymoron. I also entertained the title, The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. In either case, is the truth simple?

Yes, in a linear way—but no in a sacred way. The Truth has levels above the basic level of 200. That is the level on The Map at which an entity, statement, situation, context, or thing, becomes a Reality (Godly). But what is reality, you say? I see reality all around me! Well, Reality is what actually exists truth.jpgin God’s world. Everything else (although not an illusion to us) does not reflect Truth such as—evil, hopelessness, blame, guilt, shame, vindictiveness, indifference, hate, aggressiveness, despondence, and tragedy—to name a few. When testing, these qualities test below 200 because protoplasm does not recognize their reality.

So you see the Truth is well…The Truth (that which is real). But there are nuances. For example, I may be a generally honest person and calibrate at 200, but not yet at an unconditional level of love… type of honesty, which calibrates at 500.

Truth, although understandably intrinsic to God of course, is not that simple to us as humans. We have levels—depths that have certain calibrations, but are not necessarily essential to calibrate. How easy would life be if we calibrated every single motion in our lives before we acted? We’d never get anything done. So what do we on the path do?

Well first you trust and surrender everything to God. Stop seeking mystical and mysterious methods of figuring life out. Do some consciousness exercises to get you through your issues and crises, keep yourself as healthy as you have control over—notice the word ‘you’ and ‘control.’ Only God and karma govern the rest. Finally, use your inner wisdom when you can’t test and let the rest go.

I like to keep it simple—so I developed the DPA (Divine Protoplasmic Analysis) self test method of testing for Truth. It’s a handy method given to us by Divinity, to discover that which perplexes us. There Are No Secrets: The Highest Journey

Although I’ve written why we can’t figure out what is True ourselves I’ll review why.

1—You arrived as a baby with a calibrateable level of consciousness.
2—That level does not change very much in a lifetime unless you have a serendipitous leap or fall.
3—You absorb everything you see and hear like a sponge and continue on this way your entire life.
4—Everything you absorb attaches to your ego’s awareness through your brain as a viewpoint, idea, belief, doctrine, consensus, propaganda, brainwashing, etc.
5—The (narcissistic core of your) ego owns them, values them, and protects them as if it is the author.
6—You are generally stuck with them for life, and the majority (if not all) are not True. They are relative projections of what your mind’s delusions manufacture.

So back to surrendering and testing. This is what you need to do if this work is at all important to you. Since you are reading this, and I’m assuming you were not coerced, you have a yearning to have a glimpse of Truth. Go strait ahead with courage because traveling this road will make the yellow brick one, obsolete. Gloria in Excelsia Dio!


Tags: , , , ,

Do the majority of people want a human savior?

Published on Tuesday, October 28th, 2008

The answer to this question is yes. In a world that feels as though God has forsaken them, (especially in a “godless” world) people are yearning more and more for some one to save them from harm—all forms of harm. The conundrum is when you give your sense of inner power to another you are actually weakening the essence of who and what you are. A wise adage might sound like this…Never have more faith in another, than you do in Divinity. Just because you cannot physically see God, does not mean He is not present. That which is unseen comprises more of what is, than that which can be seen. angels-9-small.jpg

So what happens when you give your complete faith and trust over to some one else? It usually ends with being disappointed. After all, “someone else” is human too, with foibles, beliefs, and agendas, most of which have nothing whatsoever to do with you. You are integrating your own sense of self amidst someone else’s sense of self. How can you sort out what is true from hype, subtle indoctrination, projected glamorization and falsehood in that drama?

Today we have the key to unlocking The Truth. Divine Protoplasmic Analysis can sort out in seconds what has formerly taken lifetimes to know. Why obsess on that which you are confused about when you can know The Truth instantly? It’s a simple process which leads you out of the darkness of uncertainty to the light of knowing. Until you learn how to evaluate and discern, take nothing “for granted.”


Tags: , ,

Enlightenment and Politics

Published on Friday, October 10th, 2008

Does politics have anything to do with the path to enlightenment and God? Surprisingly the answer is yes. The path to God is inclusive of everything in life. What I find interesting is “ethics” are extremely low on the list of what people find important in this election. Although politics as an entity does not calibrate high due to the many nuances of its inherent nature, your choices, decisions and above all intentions are essential on the path to God. Since this is the direct path to God, Divine Protoplasmic Analysis is essential to eliminate what is Truth from what is falsehood (unless you have reached a level of 600 and beyond).

Testing whether the individual is above level 200 is primary. Next, test for certain intrinsic positions which may calibrate below 200. In order to make a balanced decision, you have to educate yourself via all means available. If there are similarities in the level of consciousness of individuals, then basic positions will weed out what is higher from lower. Now you’re on your way.

It’s quite easy to find out if there are secrets being held, hidden agendas or other factors. The process is complex, however. The longer the course, the bigger the game of politics and politicizing gets. The very act of “izing” anything takes it below 200. Confusion, malaise, and anger occur the more the process is drawn out. Eventually the entire creation calibrates way below the level of integrity. What is left when politics becomes war and the entire process seems exasperating?

This is not as difficult as you may think. Getting back to the basics is a higher way of seeing everything. The basics are the inherent qualities of a view. Politicians are not on the path to enlightenment, but they can be on the side of what is sacred. This is the quintessential center of the universe and God. Godless may just be a word, but it has a meaning. Godlessness removes the sacred, the spirit, and the soul from the linear or material world. Everything is mental, spiritual, and physical. You cannot extract one from the other even in a political world. The world and everything in it belongs to God, however. All life, and all non-life is an intrinsic part of the whole of God. What would God say, if He spoke to you right now? I believe it would be to take everything into consideration because karma is involved. What you do, your intentions and decisions reflect what you are. Put all of this together and you have more of your continuing karmic legacy.


Tags: , , , ,

DR. DAVID R. HAWKINS

Published on Friday, May 9th, 2008

Biography Summary

Sir David R. Hawkins, M.D., Ph.D. is a nationally renowned psychiatrist, physician, researcher, and lecturer. He co-authored Orthomolecular Psychiatry with Nobel Laureate Linus Pauling that helped revolutionize psychiatry. His national television appearances include The MacNeil/Lehrer News Hour, The Barbara Walters Show, and The Today Show. Winner of the Huxley Award, knighted by the Sovereign Order of the Hospitaliers of St. John of Jerusalem, nominated for the Templeton Prize and honored in the East with the title “Tae Ryoung Sun Kak Tosa” (Foremost Teacher of the Way to Enlightenment), Dr. Hawkins’ honors are vast. His background is detailed in Who’s Who in America and Who’s Who in the World, and his work has been acclaimed by many world leaders and Nobelists, including Mother Teresa.

Dr. Hawkins has lectured at the University of Argentina; Notre Dame, Stanford, and Harvard Universities; Westminster Abbey; and the Oxford Forum. In addition, he has been an advisor to Catholic, Protestant, and Buddhist monasteries. He has conferred with foreign governments on international diplomacy and has been instrumental in resolving long-standing conflicts that were major threats to world peace. He is the author of the best-selling trilogy, Power vs. Force (published in 17 languages), The Eye of the I, and I: Reality and Subjectivity, and three additional books, including Truth vs. Falsehood, Transcending the Levels of Consciousness, and Discovery of the Presence of God.

SPIRITUAL BIOGRAPHY

Dr. Hawkins is an internationally known spiritual teacher, author, and speaker on the subject of advanced spiritual states, consciousness research, and the Realization of the Presence of God as Self.

His published works, as well as recorded lectures, have been widely recognized as unique in that a very advanced state of spiritual awareness occurred in an individual with a scientific and clinical background who was later able to verbalize and explain the unusual phenomenon in a manner that is clear and comprehensible.

The transition from the normal ego state of mind to its elimination by the Presence is described in the trilogy Power versus Force (1995), which won praise even from Mother Theresa; The Eye of the I (2001); and I: Reality and Subjectivity (2003), which have been translated and are available worldwide in foreign editions. Reviews (such as those on the Internet at amazon.com) have awarded the works with five stars.

The trilogy was preceded by research on the Nature of Consciousness and published as the doctoral dissertation, Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis and Calibration of the Levels of Consciousness (1995), which correlated the seemingly disparate domains of science and spirituality. This was accomplished by the major discovery of a technique that, for the first time in human history, demonstrated a means to discern truth from falsehood.

The importance of the initial work was given recognition by its very favorable and extensive review in Brain/Mind Bulletin and at later presentations such as the International Conference on Science and Consciousness. Many presentations were given to a variety of organizations, spiritual conferences, church groups, nuns, and monks, both nationally and in foreign countries, including the Oxford Forum. In the Far East, Dr. Hawkins is a recognized “Teacher of the Way to Enlightenment.” (Tae Ryoung Sun Kak Dosa”)

In response to his observation that much spiritual truth has been misunderstood over the ages due to lack of explanation, Dr. Hawkins presented monthly seminars and provided detailed explanations that are too lengthy to describe in book format. Recordings are available, along with questions and answers that provide additional clarification.

The overall design of this lifetime work is to recontextualize the human experience in terms of the evolution of consciousness and to integrate a comprehension of both mind and spirit as expressions of the innate Divinity that is the substrate and ongoing source of life and Existence. This dedication is signified by the statement “Gloria in Excelsis Deo!” with which his published works begin and end.

LIFE EVENTS OF INTEREST

Awards and Recognition
• Inducted into the 2006 American Psychiatric Association 50-year Distinguished Life Fellows honor
• Inducted into the 2006 Orthomolecular Medicine Hall of Fame
• Established Devotional Nonduality as a major spiritual pathway and the Science of Consciousness Research
• Published numerous articles in spiritual periodicals, 1990 - current
• As appeared on The Today Show, Science, Barbara Walters, the McNeil-Leher News Hour and talk radio shows worldwide
• Presents lectures and workshops throughout the U.S., along with monthly full-day seminars, 2002 - current
• Gave annual Landsberg Lecture at the University of California Medical School at San Francisco
• Listed in Who’s Who in America and Who’s Who in the World
• Appointed consultant to the Unity School of Religious Studies and post-graduate curriculum, including establishment of the Unity School of Consciousness Studies, 2003
• Published research on Science of Consciousness in series of books in 14 languages
• Establishment of worldwide independent study groups
• Nobelists and world leaders accorded recognition in support of world value of research and writings: Dr. Linus Pauling; Mother Theresa; Lee Iacocca; Sam Walton; Bill W. (founder of Alcoholics Anonymous); numerous clergy and businessmen (spirit in business).
• Consultant to government leaders, South Korea, 2000
• Received title “Tae Ryoung Sun Kak Dosa” (Teacher of Enlightenment), Seoul, Korea, 2000
• Knighted by the Sovereign Order of the Hospitaliers of St. John of Jerusalem by authority of the Priory of King Waldemar the Great. The Order was established in 1070 and arrived in Denmark around 1164. The ceremony was conducted by H. H. Prince Waldemar of Schaumburg-Lippe on October 7, 2000. He was elected to the Order in October 1996 and was sponsored by Fernando Flores, then an ambassador to the United Nations. The Danish Order then established a branch in the Americas, which supports humanitarian projects in third-world countries.
• Physicians Recognition Award, American Medical Association, 1992
• Elected to Sovereign Order of St. John of Jerusalem (Founded 1077), 1989
• Invited to become Commissioner of Mental Health, State of New York, February, 1983
• Citation from Medical College of Wisconsin for “Contribution to Medicine”
• Taught classes on Advaita
• Published articles with Bill W., cofounder of Alcoholics Anonymous
• Taught classes based on A Course in Miracles
• Consultant to clergy, cloistered nuns, Episcopal and Catholic dioceses, the Zen Monastery (NYC), and spiritual groups
• North Nassau Mental Health Center Award for “Dedication to the Alleviation of Human Suffering,” 1978
• Huxley Award for “Inestimable Contribution to the Alleviation of Human Suffering,” 1979
• Published Orthomolecular Psychiatry with Nobelist Linus Pauling, 1973
• Published numerous scientific papers in the American Journal of Psychiatry amongst other fine publications, 1953 - current
• Founder and Director, The Mental Health Center (largest practice in New York City), 1958 - 1980
• Training Psychoanalysis by Prof. Lionel Oversey, M.D., at Columbia University Psychoanalytic Institute
• Supervising Psychiatrist, New York State Department of Mental Hygiene, 1957
• Awarded Fellowship in Psychiatry, Mt. Sinai Hospital, New York, 1956
• Intern, Columbia Hospital, New York School of Psychiatry, 1954
• Mosby Book Award for Scholastic Excellence, 1953
• Alpha Omega Alpha – National Medical Scholastic Honor Society, 1952
Founded
• North Nassau Mental Health Center, Inc., 1958
• Federation of Mental Health Centers, 1963
• North Nassau Clinical Laboratories, 1970
• North Nassau Research Division and Laboratories, 1971
• An Integrated System for the Care of Schizophrenics, 1971
• Academy of Orthomolecular Psychiatry, 1971
• Institute for Applied Spiritual Studies, 1980
Co-Founded
• Schizophrenics Anonymous (Board of Directors; Medical Advisor)
• Schizophrenia Foundation of New York State (Incorporator; Director)
• Schizophrenia Foundation of Long Island (Board of Directors; Medical Advisor)
• Institute for Scientific Communications (Incorporator; Board of Directors)
• Journal of Orthomolecular Psychiatry (Editorial Board)
• Journal of Schizophrenia (Editorial Board)
• St. George’s Day Activities Center (Medical Advisor)
• The Attitudinal Healing Center of Long Island (Board of Directors; Medical Advisor)
• Christ Church Day Activities Center (Medical Advisor)
• The Masters Gallery of Fine Arts (Co-Director)
• Mental Health Fairs
• The Gateposts Halfway House (Medical Advisor)
• Garfield House (Halfway House)
• Day Activities Center of Port Washington (Medical Advisor)
• Brunswick House (Alcoholism; Psychiatric Consultant)
• New York Association of Holistic Health Centers
• Life Support Systems (Board of Directors)
• Space Form (Ecologic Communities and Low-Energy Housing)
• Became Director Emeritus of the North Nassau Mental Health Center in 1980 and gave up psychiatric practice to spend full time on spiritual research.

Membership

• American Medical Association (Life Member)
• American Psychiatric Association (Life Member)
• New York State Medical Society
• Nassau County Medical Society
• Nassau Physicians Guild
• Nassau Academy of Medicine
• New York Academy of Science
• The American Association for the Advancement of Science
• New York State Psychiatric Association
• Qualified Psychiatrist, New York State Department of Mental Health
• Nassau Psychiatric Society
• New York State Clinical Directors Association
• American Association of Psychiatric Administrators
• Academy of Orthomolecular Psychiatry (Founding President; Chairman of the Board)
• International Academy of Preventive Medicine
• American Holistic Health Association
• The Huxley Institute for Biosocial Research (Board of Directors)
• Academy of Religion and Mental Health
• New York State Association of the Professions
• The Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine
• Schizophrenia Foundation of New York State (Board of Directors; Medical Advisor)
• The Attitudinal Healing Center of Long Island (Board of Directors; Medical Advisor)
• North Nassau Mental Health Center (Director Emeritus)
• Medical Society of the Brunswick Hospital (Director of Psychiatric Research)
• Attending Staff, Gracie Square Hospital
• Youth Consultation Services, Episcopal Dioceses, Long Island (Psychiatric Consultant)
• Editorial Board, Journal of Orthomolecular Psychiatry
• Editorial Board, Journal of Schizophrenia
• Editorial Board, (Alcoholism), Journal of Psychotherapy
• American Schizophrenia Association (Scientific Advisory Board)
• National Society for Autistic Children (Professional Advisory Board)
• Long Island Council on Alcoholism
• The Federation of Mental Health Centers (Co-founder)
• American Medical Society on Alcoholism
• Arizona Medical Society
• Arizona Psychiatric Society
• Brunswick House (Director of Research, Alcoholism)
• The National Acupuncture Research Society
• American Geriatric Society
• International Council on Applied Nutrition
• The Academy of Preventive Medicine
• Canadian Psychiatric Association (Associate Member)
• American Society for Psychological Research
• Monroe Institute for Applied Science
• International Kirlian Research Association
• National Council on Alcoholism
• The Association for the Advancement of Psychotherapy
• The Society for the Study of Addictions
• American Institute for Scientific Communications (Co-founder)
• International Society for General Semantics
• Consultant on Alcoholism, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
• American Ontoanalytic Association
• Consultant, New York Foundling Hospital
• New York Paleontological Society
• Consultant, Operation Hotline
Non-Medical Memberships
• The First Zen Institute of America, 1960
• The Institute for Applied Spiritual Studies (Founder, Chairman), 1983
• Institute for Advanced Spiritual Research, Inc. [501© (3) Public Charity], 1983
• Sovereign Order, St John of Jerusalem, 1995
• Devotional Nonduality Community (Founder, 2003)


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Calibration question (Dr. Hawkins)

Published on Monday, February 4th, 2008

Question:

My calibrations aren’t the same as Dr. Hawkins on the same things. Does this mean his calibrations are incorrect or are mine?

Comment:

Commitment to Consciousness Research entails quite a bit of pre-existing conditions, such as following guidelines and practicing, in order to receive accurate answers. Even then, conditions, proclivities, timing, how you hold the subject in mind, and many other circumstances have the ability to change outcomes. Testing is not an exact physical science, as we understand the corporeal sciences. Trust is an issue when considering Dr. Hawkins calibrations, since the doctor is presently the highest calibrating teacher of enlightenment on the planet. Dr. Hawkins has often iterated the former issues may indeed change calibrations. The actual precise number however, is not as essential as whether or not something calibrates as (Absolute)Truth or not Truth. It may be wiser to practice receiving generalized calibrations, such as whether something is over or between certain levels, instead of trying to confirm an exact number. It is for the highest good to keep in mind this is the path to God and enlightenment and not just a numbers game.


Tags: , ,

The Simple Things

Published on Saturday, February 2nd, 2008

The simplest things in life are often the most powerful. The golden rule may be the one single moral and ethical way of seeing and treating others. You violate the rule by not treating others the way you would expect to be treated in the exact situation. You must give kindness to receive kindness, for example and practice consistency in your actions.

What mother, grandmother, or a teacher taught you has merit also. – Wear a hat and button up your neck when it’s cold outside. Be polite to elders as well as your peers. Clean up after yourself. Slow down or you may hurt yourself! Don’t take anything which isn’t yours. Allow others to go first. Wash your hands. Say please and thank you. Be respectful at all times. Be happy for others good fortune. Try again. Be faithful to your ideals. Be fair. Tell the truth. Don’t be gullible; not everyone has your best interests at heart. Don’t make fun of others because that could be you. Have faith in God.

These simple things are often deemed old fashioned or are absent in this world today. That may just explain everything.


Tags: ,

The Dream of Hope

Published on Thursday, January 10th, 2008

The word “hope” is brandished about unequivocally everywhere you turn lately. Hope brings emotional swells of dreams not yet fulfilled. Along with the word “hope,” come feelings of inspiration and encouragement. Hope feels supportive. It is identified with prayer, religion, and a feeling of spirituality. candle-flame-2-ajhd.jpgWhat is hope?

There are many definitions of the word “hope.” The dilemma lies in the Truth that hope is merely a word with a human definition, non-existent in Reality. Hope may appear as a feeling that what is wanted will happen, or a desire accompanied by expectation. It might emerge as something sought after, anticipated or trusted and relied upon. To be hopeful is expecting to get what you want. Alternatively, you may yearn for a person, event, or something to succeed. Hope is, according to Merriam Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary, to cherish a desire with expectation, to place confidence or trust in a thing with an expectation or belief in the possibility of acquiring something. Hope is defined as aspiration, faith, conviction, belief, yearning, craving, and wanting. What happens however, when human beings’ hopes are shattered? Are we to keep hoping for the same desired results, or do we shift our hopes and desires to something else?

In Buddhism, it is said that the act of craving or desiring brings suffering. The more you want or desire, the more desire controls you. Even your faith and beliefs can fail, falter, or be crushed. Therefore, you could say that hope brings suffering. The mere act of desiring something immediately brings the fear of not getting the desired outcome. Fear causes grief, stress, confusion, and anger. The cycle of hoping for outcomes seldom or never achieved brings endless anguish. Consequently, is hope in reality hopeless? The mere mention of the word hopelessness conjures up failure and distress. How do we stop hoping?

On the spiritual path to enlightenment, it is preferable to have no expectations and witness everything as it is. By living fully present and neutrally aware, you are living consciously, in harmony and concordance. Divinity is with you, as you exist as a prayer and live in gratitude for your present life. Then, whatever life has to offer, your consciousness reflects willingness, intention, acceptance, fearlessness, and love. The word “hope” evaporates into a knowing that God is the only sacred trust, which is essential.


Tags: , , ,

Quotes on God

Published on Wednesday, November 28th, 2007

I am as sure as I live that nothing is so near to me as God. God is nearer to me than I am to myself; my existence depends on the nearness and the presence of God.
… Meister Eckhart

We tend to use prayer as a last resort, but God wants it to be our first line of defense. We pray when there’s nothing else we can do, but God wants us to pray before we do anything at all.
Most of us would prefer, however, to spend our time doing something that will get immediate results. We don’t want to wait for God to resolve matters in His good time because His idea of “good time” is seldom in sync with ours.
… Oswald Chambers

Those who give themselves to prayer should concentrate solely on the conformity of their wills with the divine will. The more fully they practice this, the greater the gifts they will receive from God and the greater their progress in the interior life.
… Teresa of Avila

Prayer is so simple. It is like quietly opening a door and slipping into the very presence of God. There, in the stillness, to listen to His voice, perhaps in petition or only to listen. It matters not. Just to be there in His presence is prayer.
… author unknown

The condition of God’s blessing is absolute surrender of all into His hands. If our hearts are willing for that, there is no end to what God will do for us and no end to the blessings He will bestow. God does not ask you to give the perfect surrender in your own strength or by the power of your will. God is willing to work it in you and for you. The Everlasting God Himself will come in and turn out what is wrong, conquer what is evil, and work what is well pleasing in His blessed sight. God Himself will work it in you.
… Andrew Murray

When one reaches a point where he seeks no solace from any creature, then he begins to relish God perfectly. Then also he will be content no matter what may happen. He will neither rejoice over great things nor grieve over small ones, but will place himself entirely and confidently in the hands of God, Who is All in All.
… Thomas a Kempis

If we are to live unto God at any time or in any place, we are to live unto Him at all times and in all places. If we are to use anything as the gift of God, we are to use everything as His gift.
… William Law

Do not allow yourself to become preoccupied with the purity of your own heart. Instead, turn your gaze toward God. Marvel over God. Rejoice that He is the All Holy One. When you are thus focused on God, do not glance back at yourself. Do not ask yourself where you stand with God. Instead, lift your gaze higher.
Purity of heart is not developing oneself to the utmost, nor is it an achievement of one’s own doing. It is at first a void which one discovers and accepts in oneself. Only then does God come to fill the void according to how much one makes oneself receptive to God’s bounty.
… Francis of Assisi

In the secret of God’s tabernacle no enemy can find us, and no troubles can reach us. The pride of man and the strife of tongues find no entrance into the pavilion of God. The secret of His presence is a more secure refuge than a thousand Gibraltars.
I do not mean that no trials come. They may come in abundance, but they cannot penetrate into the sanctuary of the soul, and we may dwell in perfect peace even in the midst of life’s fiercest storms.
… Hannah Whitall Smith

Prayer of Francis of Assisi

Lord, make me an instrument of Thy peace.
Where there is hatred, let me sow love.
Where there is injury, pardon.
Where there is doubt, faith.
Where there is despair, hope.
Where there is darkness, light,
and where there is sadness, joy.

O Divine Master, grant that I may not so much
seek to be consoled as to console;
to be understood as to understand;
to be loved as to love;
for it is in giving that we receive;
It is in pardoning that we are pardoned.
And it is in dying that we are born to eternal life.

The Practice of the Presence of God is a way of life where we engage in continual conversation with God; walk with Him in love, humility, simplicity, and faith; and think, say, and do nothing that may displease Him; because this is God’s will for us.


Tags: , ,

Introduction

Published on Friday, June 1st, 2007

The traditional “believer” or the spiritually apprehensive are cautioned that the material presented herein may be disquieting and therefore better circumvented. The teachings are presented for the seriously committed spiritual student who is seeking God as Enlightenment. The pathway to Enlightenment via Radical Truth is demanding and requires the surrendering of all belief systems. Only then does the Ultimate Reality reveal itself as the sought-after ‘I’ of Divinity. This message is paraphrased from the caveat of Dr. David R. Hawkins’ books.

Are there things you want to know, but have to trust unreliable sources? Do you want to know what is True from what is false? Do everyday decisions confuse you? Do you seek Divine Absolute Truth? There is a way to receive Truth as it comes from God. My latest book, “God Power and Truth, The Way to Ascension Through God’s Answers and Messages” explains completely how to test for Truth yourself with astounding results! See article on this page for what testing for truth can do!

There are no secrets to finding Truth. God is All loving, All forgiving, unconditional and immanent. Here is the way to God’s gift of Absolute Truth! book-2-smaller.jpg

Synchronicity led you here since there are no accidents. There is only the universe unfolding miraculously. You may stay a few seconds or minutes, or you may find being here has the capacity to change what you are and what you know, forever. The answers to many of the questions you have about God and enlightenment are here. There Are No Secrets that we cannot unlock when we honor The Power of God and Truth. Lots of money doesn’t have to be spent on books, courses, classes, retreats, and false teachers. I offer this path and the teachings to you.

This is the inner path to enlightenment. When you begin on this path, there is seldom turning back. This may lead to a lack of direction and confusion because of all the spiritual information available in the world today. The “path” doesn’t have to be agonizing or tedious. The greater part of my site is dedicated to the teachings of Dr. David R. Hawkins, Devotional Nonduality, and the journey toward enlightenment. I think of my site as a straight line, no nonsense approach to that state. To paraphrase Dr. David R. Hawkins, “One can be changed just through exposure to the teachings.” At this time Dr. Hawkins is the highest calibrating (see MAP of Consciousness) teacher of enlightenment on the planet.

The front page articles on my site are the most relevant, timely, or the latest writing. I keep an updated cache of informative articles of interest from religion to science, as well as consciousness exercises and those looking for help or to help others. Although I have some information on the metaphysical, I do not advise becoming enamored of these subjects because of their inherent falsehoods. Discernment is necessary for knowledge of what is Truth, from that which is false. 90% of what is on the Internet is not Truth, as paraphrased by Dr. Hawkins.

I periodically expand on previously written articles because of new knowledge or information…or take an older article from the archives and put it up front. There may be as many as 10 or more articles up front, or only one. (See monthly archives for latest articles) There is usually an intro to the various topics with all the articles beneath, alphabetized and by most recent publication date. Outside information is researched from quality source references.

All personal writing under the topics, Everyday Book of the Grail, Food For Thought, Thought For Today, Aphorisms For the Soul, Absolute Truth, and Devotional Nonduality comes from “The Infinite Field” or “Higher Consciousness” and recontextualizations of books, ideas, and teachings related to enlightenment. These topics explain both the content and context of this site. I only publish articles or writings that calibrate (Absolute Truth intro) with Truth and Integrity (See my Mission Statement). I do not “channel” otherworldly entities. A very important part of my journey is to bring this information to my readers in as timely a manner as possible, as it is revealed.

Myswizard’s Journey of the Spirit is expanding everyday thanks to all of you. In 4 years on the web there are over 75,000 repeat visitors.

Journey of the Spirit with Aphorisms for the Soul and The Everyday Book of the Grail, is my first collection of Truths and God’s wisdom. It contains Food For Thought, Everyday Book of The Grail, and more in one collection.

There Are No Secrets The Highest Journey has revelatory new self testing techniques and testing parameters (Divine Protoplasmic Analysis) as well as tested Truths, which have the ability to change what you know forever! As in “Journey of the Spirit,” it has hundreds of inspirational and enlightening Everyday Book of the Grail, Food For Thought, Aphorisms, and Q & A.

Wisdom on the Path to God is the 3rd book of The Enlightenment Series with over 500 Truisms and Food For Thought in one book! God Power and Truth explains how to ascend using the power of Divinity and God’s answers to the questions the spiritual world needs now. The last book of the Enlightenment Series will be a new course in enlightenment and miracles for today’s modern world. All 5 books will put the power of Divinity in your hands!!

All stores are for your potential enjoyment, since they are not an effort for personal profit. Have fun browsing my site and e mail me with questions you may have. Thanks for visiting and making this journey with me.
Blessings,
Myswizard

The readiness to initiate the journey cannot be forced nor can people be faulted if it has not occurred in them as yet. The level of consciousness has to have advanced to the stage where such an intention would be meaningful and attractive.
The Eye of The I…David R. Hawkins, M.D., PhD

The Straight Path to God
In order to get on the straight path to God, you must by-pass the inexplicable such as psychics and the mysterious. Those things reveal themselves when conditions are appropriate.___Mys

You cannot change others. If you don’t stop trying to have others be the way you desire them to be, you will always be dissatisfied. You can only work on your own essential Self.___Myswizard

“True teachers are few and pretenders abound. If the masses were headed in the right direction, sainthood and enlightenment would be common. They are not.”
- Dr. Hawkins

“Straight and narrow is the path…Waste no time! Gloria in Excelsis Deo!”
- Dr. David R. Hawkins, M.D., PhD.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

There Are No Secrets

Published on Tuesday, May 1st, 2007

Learn how to test for Truth!!

Imagine being able to know for certain if someone is telling the truth or not without a lie detector. How would you like to have the answers to everything, both past and present available to you at a moments notice? “There Are No Secrets__The Highest Journey,” reveals how to attain knowledge never before available to the spiritual seeker!

It has all of the most up-to-date* testing technique information, a revelatory, accurate, and easy way to self-test as well as the latest Food For Thought (most of which is not on site) and Everyday Grail. “There Are No Secrets” is the guide to having the answers to everything you’ve wanted to know at your fingertips! Finding truth in this way is perhaps the most important discovery in the spiritual world!
*Keep an up to date copy of “Testing Parameters” by going to Testing Parameters for Self-Testing under “Absolute Truth” on this website). Print a copy to keep in your book.

“There Are No Secrets,” by Myswizard (Nancy Brown) is available in e book, Amazon, and Barnes and Noble. com.(CLICK SIDEBAR or LINK BELOW).

Blessings,
Mys

There Are No Secrets Book
There Are No Secrets
Paperback from Amazon

Intermediate reading-Intermediate to Advanced Spiritual


Tags: , , , , , ,

Enlightenment and the Decline of the Level of Consciousness of Western Civilization

Published on Tuesday, April 17th, 2007

This article in response to Dr. Hawkins lecture regarding spirituality and issues of our modern civilization, is getting my front page attention again due to current world events.

The errors of modern society have made the spiritual path more difficult. What we’re witnessing today is perception becoming everyday truth as opposed to Absolute Truth (The Truth of Divinity). This is the Truth of Divinity via the Infinite Field of Consciousness (God) through the use of higher levels of consciousness and Kinesiology. This has led to Western civilization’s level of consciousness falling to non-integrity. This was tested on stage by Dr Hawkins.

What is happening?
Due to present events this has become a significant issue. We are at a critical point because what is being witnessed through the media, politics, business, and education is relativism in its most radical form. It is the collapse of society through the repetition of false-speak as well as errors in thought and action due to lower levels of consciousness often in the form of evil run amok. Relativism is the truth according to the individual. This would imply that there are as many truths as there are people and beliefs.

There is only one Truth about anything. You either have Truth or non-truth. The Truth itself has its levels of essence according to the realm of its existence, nevertheless Truth is still Truth. The light is either on (regardless of its luminescence) or it’s not.

Since we are already witnessing world relativism what we’re left with is the truth according to personal beliefs run rampant. Cynics and skeptics abound, creating more of the same. Cynicism and skepticism both calibrate beneath the level of integrity (200) Power versus Force, Dr. David R. Hawkins, M.D., Ph.D.)

What is there to do? (Articles…What’s Going on With the World?, Forgive Them For They Know Not What They Do).
In the real-world perhaps a march or a protest would be involved, but the path to enlightenment precludes force and activism. Only the Power of Divinity stands as a certainty to those who choose to embrace the path to God through Truth.

Although following Divinity through religion or religious doctrine may find you kinder and forgiving, the path to God through Truth leads to enlightenment. What needs to be known is why this is happening, and the why is the current level of world consciousness. Nearly 85% of the world calibrates below integrity. That would certainly prohibit forcing change upon all of the worlds’ societies. By raising yourself up, you help to raise up the world. This is teaching by example. The power of the levels of love and kindness, is stronger exponentially than all the lower levels combined.

Where are we going?
The where does not matter to most of the world because of the above evident reasons, but the implications of what we do here are karmic and can be lasting nevertheless.

The short time we spend in our earthly life, has led many to wonder where we spend eternity. Although this question may not become relevant until we’ve reached a certain level of consciousness, the Truth of eternity is we reside where we have become as a result of what we are. This is a personal choice — a choice our essence makes as an eternal being.

Why is this important to know?
What we create on earth is a part of our eternal journey and the mere tip of the iceberg of what we can aspire to be when the realization of Divinity is within us. It all depends on whether or not the journey to be with or be like God, is essential to you as an infinite spirit. Only the fear of the loss of the ego self prevents us from being our Highest Self. Relativity/perception becomes Essence when we are aware of the presence of God. Until then, what we have is what we are witnessing. To paraphrase Dr. Hawkins, There is no opposition to upholding your own Highest potential. To perfect the potentiality of that which you are, is revering God in the Highest, and is your greatest gift to the world.


Tags: , , , , , , , ,

A Revelation in New Self-Testing Techniques

Published on Monday, April 9th, 2007

Because we cannot always eliminate our hidden agendas, due to the tenacity of the hold our ego has on our psyche, the necessity of a self-testing technique which thoroughly eliminates any false results is mandatory. Even at higher levels of consciousness there can be blocks to a neutral answer (especially when done with another individual due to the addition of thoughts, feelings, desires, state of health and transferred energies being present.) This possibility exists whether the other testing partner knows the question or not. It also exists whether the partner is familiar with the tester (especially when there are shared desires or self-interests.)

This research in self-testing techniques eliminates the element of self-interest and non-neutrality, as well as “false guruism,” testing for profit, bogus claims of consciousness raising, and self-doubt when testing. It is based entirely on the fact that Divinity (The Infinite Field) witnesses everything at the level of Absolute Truth, and nothing in existence can be hidden from God. It is simple, portable, and readily available. When used correctly it is 100% effective, and effectively puts The Truth at your fingertips. The (ongoing) research is complete, comprehensively explained in my book, “There Are No Secrets.” Further information regarding testing procedures will be available on site under, Testing Parameters for Self-testing. See Benefits of Reading Power vs. Force for what testing for Truth can do.

Blessings, Myswizard


Tags: , , , , ,

Manifestation, Meaning and Money

Published on Wednesday, March 14th, 2007

While it’s perfectly clear that if you walk into the spiritual section of any bookstore you are bound to see hundreds of books about manifesting abundance. The word abundance is synonymous with wealth, however it also means “great quantities of.” What is it that we need great quantities of other than money? Of course the abundance that is spoken of, is usually about money, due to the fact that the majority of the people on the planet (especially in modern societies), never think they have enough. The fastest way to sell a book, if you are out there promoting it, would be to make it about getting more, having more, and how to manifest more.– The more being wealth, which it is assumed no one has enough of.

To presume that you don’t have enough of something is putting yourself in the position of believing that you know what is best for you. This is presumptuous considering the majority of the population of the world cannot discern Truth from falsehood on their own. How can we as humans know what is best for us when we don’t even know as a majority what the Truth is about anything (even though we think we do)?

There is no secret to getting or having money. You can work hard for it, go to school to earn a degree in a particular field, purchase something that luckily appreciates in value, or inherit it. You may also be clever enough to discover something the world needs that it didn’t have before. So you see there are no secrets here, other than potentiating the conditions under which you will create what you need.

Furthermore, there are no secret rituals of manifestation which will provide you with what you need to survive. Being given the gift of physical life precludes all other egoic wishes. We are here to endure and learn until we are relieved of the physical, and return to our essential state. The one thing which must be known at your core level, is that everyone is worthy of creating. This is about the “what” of the creation and not the how. Once inspired (motivated), the how becomes clear.

This journey is to enlightenment and there are no secrets to manifesting enlightenment.– Just transcending the obstacles to that state. That is why we are here and you are here reading this. There is nothing more important than the realization of God and our transcendence of the obstacles.

The beauty of all this is that we have eternity to get all this under our spiritual belt. When a certain state is reached, the realization that we are complete and perfect at all times becomes perfectly clear. Money at that point becomes more than a means to an imaginary end, but something that we must as stewards, take responsibility for. The glamorization of society shows that an overabundance of money in the hands of people who are not ready for the responsibility, tends to be used frivolously.

If we want to place a higher meaning on wealth and/or abundance on our journey to enlightenment, higher manifestation is a necessity. This would take the form of lovingness, generosity, wisdom, discernment, patience, willingness, orderliness, fairness, peacefulness, intelligence, and kindness. When manifestation such as this is actualized, you have cracked the highest secret code—being like your Creator.


Tags: , , , ,

I see miracles

Published on Friday, January 26th, 2007

Some of the most unobtrusive things that happen in our lives are unrealized miracles. We often call them coincidences, but a ‘coincidence’ is in truth, a notable occurrence, and not a mere fluke. While witnessing these fortuitous events in my own life for decades, it seems as I get older, their occurrences are accelerating. Perhaps, I said to myself, it’s because my journey has been progressing. Maybe I’m just noticing them more because my life is focused on God and the journey to enlightenment. Sometimes I even jokingly ask God if He’s recognizing that I’m getting closer. In my heart however, I know that Gods knows. Being psychic or intuitive, I never asked these questions of myself before, having taken them for granted while being grateful for the gifts.

With 6 1/2 billion people on the planet, many people are experiencing the exact same thing, but are expressing it in their own personal ways. It’s on the Internet every day, in the bookstores, in the new publications arriving daily, and through the media. Many of these people know these experiences are what we call miracles or divine providence, and most have no recognition of it whatsoever. In fact, miracles are occurring continually to everyone, but below LOC 200 (Map of Consciousness) the mind blocks the recognition of them. In Middle Eastern religions, some of these subjective experiences are referred to as Moksha and Siddhis. In any case, there are a thousand names for the same thing. Calling them miracles, is putting a simple identification onto that which is anything but simple. My own grammatical limitations compel the use of the word ‘miracles’, however.

What are these everyday miracles? We can’t expect to see the red sea parting, or the lightning finger of God engraving the 10 Commandments into stone, but what we can do is recognize what they are and what they look like. All of these events are personal occurrences, but are certainly not unique or exclusive.

• Necessary messages that are delivered to someone by someone else at a point in their life when they needed to hear it, are miracles.
• Necessary messages that are delivered to you through other people, various media, so-called coincidental meetings, and any other form of communication that lights up like a light bulb in your life.
• Sudden but not serious, illnesses, which force you to slow down to rest, think, or meditate.
• Help arriving at opportune moments when you need it the most.
• Simple things like parking spaces becoming available to you when you need them.
• Turning on the radio and hearing a favorite song from a deceased loved one, or a message in the words of a song, in response to a communication with the other side.
• After surrendering a situation and putting it in God’s hands, resolution occurs.
• You call someone unwittingly when they need you, or they mysteriously call you when you need them.
• Answers to questions reveal themselves in a timely manner. (Without testing using Divine Proplasmic Analysis)
• Things that you need, or things that you are looking for, seem to find you.
• The perfect response to a question or scenario comes forth of its own.
• Regular visitations or communication from the nonphysical realm occurs in various forms.
• What appears to be miraculous healings. (There are many books on the subjects of miraculous healings and miraculous healers. However due to karma and karmic inheritance, healings may occur on their own or not depending on the individual karma involved. Therefore, although I have put this under the miraculous, karma plays an important role in the events regarding our health.)
• Occurrences related to ‘chance’ sightings such as: awakening to instantly witness a shooting star after dreaming of a recently deceased loved one, clouds parting and the sun shining through just as you were wishing for it to happen, or looking up to witness a magnificent sunrise, sunset, or unusually colorful sky when you were thinking of God or a loved one who has passed.
• The radiance of a beam of sunlight appearing through your window shining directly on your face when you were thinking of, discussing, or speaking of God.
• People coming to your aid, apparently from nowhere, when you are in distress.
• Strange occurrences such as being alone, suddenly tripping and falling, yet being caught and placed upright by something unseen, averting potentially harmful injuries, in a moment when time seemed to stand still.
• Signs of warnings to avert dangerous situations. i.e. Something put in front of you to slow you down, or a sighting of something to warn you of impending danger.
• Signals to alert you to witness something. i.e. Sudden awakenings in order to see an event, knowing that an important phone call was imminent, a forced detour which ‘shows’ you something or prevents another event from happening. (This is often karma in action)
• Asking for a miracle and receiving it.
• Having a feeling of being surrounded by tremendous love and an invisible presence which fills you with extreme Kundalini energy. This often occurs regularly.


Tags: , , , , ,

What do I look for in a spiritual teacher?

Published on Tuesday, January 23rd, 2007

Although this question may seem difficult, what is more important about a spiritual teacher is oftentimes what he or she is not, rather than what he or she is. On page 179, Devotional Nonduality, Dr. Hawkins comprehensively explains the traits of a true spiritual teacher.

One noticeable red light to send you in a different direction would be over glamorization, and over pricing of lectures, classes, and retreats. Other distractions are messages coming from outside sources other than The Field, coercion, exclusivity, specialness, and weird or strange practices. Over intellectualization of spirituality has further confused the spiritual initiate as well as the spiritually seasoned. If you get to the end of a book chapter or lecture and have no idea what that person was trying to say, it’s best to move in a different direction (the material may also be too advanced for your personal level of readiness). Often the most brilliant speakers and authors have nothing of Truth to offer. The fact that they may have a huge following has nothing at all to do with Truth. The masses have been following false words for millennia. (1)

The first thing one must do is to calibrate (using Divine Protoplasmic Analysis), whether or not the teacher is integrous. If this is not possible for various reasons (2) the next best thing would be to seek a spiritual teacher, who has been calibrated i.e. “Truth versus Falsehood, (Dr. David Hawkins, Veritas publishing.) The words of past teachers are just as powerful today as they were when they in the past. Exercise caution when following modern day spiritual teachers, due to the fall of many who succumbed to glamorization and personal ego.

The beginning of this journey is fraught with many side roads. The advent of modern society has made this journey easier in some ways and more difficult in others. Everyone is fully capable of walking into the spiritual section of any bookstore and finding thousands of books on the shelves. Computers have exponentially more than quadrupled the amount of information in the form of web sites and books. One could virtually stand in a book section for months or spend thousands of dollars, digesting false information.

On the other side of the coin, there are some enlightened people in the planet, who have the ability to explain comprehensively the spiritual journey in a straightforward no nonsense method. Long after they are physically gone from the planet, their words will stand for “the way” in a manner yet unrealized, and their work will continue to illuminate for generations.

The phrase “when the student is ready, the teacher appears” and vice versa is often appropriate. Although it may take decades to find Truth, when it appears it shines forth with Divinity’s brilliance.

(1) When asked to read or listen to the works of many high profile speakers and writers on the spiritual circuit, I always calibrate the writings. More often than not, they do not calibrate with Truth (over 200) and are not worth giving time to.
(2) There may be people who you trust that can calibrate for you, if you have no interest in Kinesiology.


Tags: , , , , , ,

Testing Parameters for Self-testing (Divine Protoplasmic Analysis)

Published on Wednesday, January 3rd, 2007

Due to ongoing Divine Protoplasmic Analysis, discovery of new information in reference to self-testing techniques is continually manifesting itself. This is a list of notable parameters to hold in mind when performing self-testing. Although I have information on testing with partners both on site and in my books, I have concluded (after thousands of test results) that the newest way of self-testing (There Are No Secrets and God Power and Truth) is the surest way to receive accurate numbers or results, due to an overabundance of conflicting physical energies (with partner testing) and self-interest (personal stake in the answer or ego conflict) using other testing methods. #31 is notable in that the new method of self-testing has confirmed that all testing has potential flaws except for the newest self-testing techniques, unless the tester’s (and the the tester’s partner if not self-testing) overall levels of consciousness calibrate over 900.

1. Do not test in front of or near mirrors. For unknown reasons mirrors have a tendency to change the balance of physical energy, causing false answers.

2. Holding things in mind may create vagaries due to the mind wandering. Statements are clearer, when spoken aloud. When testing alone, holding things in mind is not necessary.

3. Statements, intentions, content, and context, must be very clear. Short, concise statements work best. If there is more than one question related to a subject, test each question separately. Do not compile one on top of another in a single statement. Test within the True time frame. A question such as, “This ______ was true,” is different from “This ______is true.” The word “was” suggests a past time frame, whereas “is” means now. You can incorporate both by saying, “This______was and is true,” but you may get a negative answer, meaning one of the time frames may not be True. The Field is like an infinitely intelligent computer. It only registers precisely what is received. Being vague will not produce a precise answer. Clarity in__Clarity out.

4. Testing is not possible for reasons that calibrate below 200.

5. Individuals who calibrate below 200 cannot do testing.

6. Testing must be used in conjunction with Thymic clearing, or a like method of clearing the body’s energy meridians, because it is the body (material world), that is being used to test The Field (non-material world). Both realms must be in alignment.

7. Do not wear head coverings or test next to electrical appliances. These may cause false answers due to imbalances in the body (which we are using to test with.)

8. Testing should not be attempted after a recent emotional upset. It is wise to wait a few minutes or even hours for the energy meridians to normalize. Use the Thymic thump or other familiar methods often to clear the energy body.

9. Physical illness has the propensity to upset the delicate balance of the energy channels of the body. Defer testing when ill.

10. Take time to rest when doing extensive testing. Fatigue and/or frustration occur when testing for prolonged periods of time, and can upset the results.

11. Continual retesting for confirmation may result in negative responses. This is due to skepticism. If you desire reconfirmation, ask permission to reconfirm. (You are asking an Omniscient Field with Absolute awareness of your methods and motives.)

12. If a question returns a negative answer, restate the question appropriately for what is True (This is another way of confirmation).

13. Be specific! Paradoxical responses are often received when either the content or the context of the statement is unclear. Testing becomes an art when used within the proper parameters. For example:
“Mary passed the bar exam” may have to be rephrased as, “According to the present parameters of the exam Mary has taken, she has passed the bar exam.”___Or “It is now possible to find out whether Mary has passed the bar exam she took on ___. Or “There is something wrong with___” may be changed to… “There is an issue (illness, problem) regarding ___.” Then you can investigate what the issue is.

14. Keep in mind when testing for others (friends, relatives, colleagues): 1.) Use the phrase, “I have permission to test for the Highest Good” of _________ preceding all testing. 2.) It may not be in your Highest Good to test for others decisions, which always relate to their personal karma. 3.) It is never necessary to test for specific levels of consciousness for others. Whether the individual is over 200 is the most pertinent question. It gives others an opportunity to learn to test for themselves and to be less focused on a number.

15. Testing is an art that you can become very proficient at. It also comes with a great deal of responsibility due to the nature of what it is. Be aware of what, why, and for whom you are testing.

16. When testing, investigative procedures may have to be broken down into particularities in order to receive the end answer. This is due to life’s complexities, issues of a complex nature and karmic influences.

17. When testing individuals—say “Overall (or “Taking all facets of____ into consideration), ______ calibrates at ______.”

18. Taking my overall life situation into consideration, ______is for my highest good.– OR– ______is entirely a personal decision.

19. The overall content of ______calibrates at ______. OR ______s overall LOC calibrates at ______, instead of ______calibrates at ______.

20. There are always karmic influences at work in everyone’s life. It’s a good idea when testing to keep this in mind. We often want to test whether or not something is for our Highest Good, when everything that happens is for the Highest Good or it would not have occurred. (We can however, test for whether something is more favorable towards The Highest Good.)

21. It has been my latest observation that retesting is not necessary the more proficient you get at self-testing (using the new technique). It’s important that you have a pen and paper handy to write down the exact question to eliminate doubt about the exact wording.

22. All questions have the capacity to be answered as long as you (and the question) calibrate over 200.

23. If you are getting continual negative responses to a statement, it may be time to ask if this statement is either essential or needs to be eliminated and redressed.

24. The context surrounding your question is just as important as the question itself. Context can mean the background, perspective, circumstance, realm or environment in which you are testing. So for example if you are asking if someone is trustworthy, then the paradigm in which you are asking is imperative. “This person is trustworthy now,” is different than “This person was trustworthy 3 months ago.” OR “This person is lying now,” is different than “This person lied to me 5 weeks ago.”

25. The newest form of self-testing (There Are No Secrets) is so reliable that re-testing for confirmation will bring false answers due to the interference of distrust and skepticism. In other words, The Infinite Field of Intelligence (God) must be trusted absolutely (and this is one way of doing that). The Field is aware of everything; therefore one’s intentions regarding testing are noted. If retesting is mandatory due to forgetfulness, etc., you may ask again, noting your intentions. Questions, if stated properly need only to be answered once, because the answer doesn’t change unless the context changes. So what you can do is change the context in which you are stating the question. As long as your consciousness calibrates over 200, there is nothing (other than lack of trust) that will interfere with this form of testing.

26. You may have permission to ask any question, but you do not have permission to receive an answer to any question. A better question would be to ask if you have permission to receive an answer to a particular question. Often the answer is “no” due to the question not having a calibration over 200. What you may consider to be important or informative is irrelevant to Divinity.

27. If you are getting continual negatives for a particular question, remember to rephrase it. Asking God if this or that is of importance for instance, will bring negative answers since the word “important” is a human label and does not have meaning to Divinity. A good phrase to preface testing is, “Taking everything into consideration,”……………………this “person” or that “thing” calibrates as true or calibrates at—.

28. There are an infinite amount of nuances which may affect the answer to a question. If you leave one thing out, the answer may change. The Field is like an infinite live computer. Be as specific as possible when asking a question, both verbally or by holding it in mind. As you become more proficient, how to ask and rephrasing will become second nature and testing will proceed quickly.

29. Be aware that you have the ability to know certain things, especially in the present. This often comes with great responsibility and discernment is necessary when sharing certain information.

30. When testing for an answer to something for which you already have a knowing, use the phrase, “This is for confirmation, only.” The Field knows that you already know the answer, and as you ascend the levels of consciousness you are obliged to trust your own knowledge.

31. The new method of self-testing has confirmed that all testing has potential flaws except for the newest self-testing techniques, unless the tester’s (and the tester’s partner if not self-testing) overall levels of consciousness calibrate over 900.

32. A further explanation for why testing for Truth in this manner works is because God is The Source of Everything…Omniscient, Omnipresent, All Knowing and All Truth. Only that which is Divine Truth exists as Reality. Everything other than Divine Truth is an illusion. What is being tested is protoplasm (life). Life only reacts positively to what is Truth (Divinity). Therefore, what does not exist as a Reality will produce a negative response.

33. If you continually get a negative response to a question (posed in the form of a statement), here is a question you may ask…”I have to trust that I inherently know the answer and only need confirmation.” The incredible thing about testing is that you are actually having a conversation with God. God understands when you have the capacity to “know” the answers. After speaking this, you may now ask as a confirmation only.

34. Another amazing thing you can do with testing is when you are writing or information seeking (on the computer). You only need to highlight a passage from your own or others writings, and ask if what you have highlighted is True. If you get a negative, you can go sentence by sentence changing the wording or just one word, until it tests True. It may sound tedious, but it only takes one erroneous word to change what is Truth to what is not Truth. After a while what is True comes to you effortlessly.

35. Testing using the preface, In the name of God, In the name of the Highest Good, or In the name of the Highest Truth is another way you can begin your statement before testing.

36. Testing an answer’s opposite will get you a negative response. This is due to the “God trust effect.” (see # 25.) You are testing “The Field” but you cannot distrust God. That will get you a negative response since distrust (calibration level -200) does not exist in Reality.

.


Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Buddha

Published on Wednesday, November 22nd, 2006

Profound truth, so difficult to perceive, difficult to understand, tranquilizing and sublime, is not to be gained by mere reasoning and is perceived only by the wise. -Buddha


Tags: ,

Free Speech

Published on Tuesday, October 10th, 2006

Our society prides itself on its freedoms, one of the most important being the freedom of speech. It is true that the freedom to speak our minds has been an important part of humankind’s progress within civilized countries. Through the laws of our constitution (which calibrates in the 700s), this nation has become one of the freest countries in the world.

This freedom however, when used to coerce, inflame, and further personal agendas, has not proven itself as the highest way of change throughout history. Usually those speaking Truth were killed for uttering it. The freedom to convey all manner of falsehoods has not added positively to the collective consciousness of the planet. This is one of the reasons for our slow move upward in consciousness, in this tough Karmic school.

Truth throughout time was and still is practiced in the form of relativity. This is truth according to the one who is speaking. Thankfully, the lower levels of consciousness are not as powerful as the higher levels, or the fallout from “free speech” would have eradicated this planet eons ago.

World wars, memes, and messianic dictatorships, through others freedom to speak (and act), has made planetary spiritual progress slow in earthly terms. Physical time is in actuality, witnessing evolution within a limited unit of measurement. In Truth, there is an infinite amount of time to create or discrete Karma using all manner of speech.

The freedom to speak whatever it is we wish to convey, has evolved however, into the freedom to act out in public using the constitution as a defense for bad (lower conscious) behavior. The phrase “Actions speak louder than words,” translates into “Actions are unspoken words.” This is witnessed whether the choice is present to see or not to see. Society presents with force, what Divine Power would otherwise negate. In order to stay in Higher Consciousness, the neutral Self witnesses without opinion. Being unopinionated is practicing non-attachment (a Buddhic state). Otherwise, we are merely chained horses pulling in opposite directions.

All words and actions have a calibrateable level of consciousness. Since our society is only 49/51 percent integrous to non-integrous, and more than 50 percent of what we believe as truth is fallacious, the odds are we are seeing or hearing non-truth and negativity daily. Those who wish not to hear or see most of what society has to say or do, are bombarded everyday regardless, through all forms of the media.

In order to practice avoidance of the negative, one would need shielding from the covers of the magazines at the checkout lines, the news and talk shows any time of day, billboards, or simply being out in public. This is a highly unlikely scenario, since money is being made through the sensationalism and victimization game.

Dr. David R. Hawkins uses a way of resetting one’s thymus, which is “blown out” continually by world negativity, which invades our “field.” The Thymic Thump* developed by Dr. John Diamond (Your Body Doesn’t Lie), does a complete job of aligning our subtle bodies.

In the meantime, we could use a little freedom from speech, as Dr. Hawkins often says.

One of the lessons of history is that Nothing is often a good thing to do and always a clever thing to say.
Will Durant

*See_ Applied Kinesiology__Testing For Truth


Tags: , , , , ,

Mind Fields

Published on Thursday, September 28th, 2006

Mind Field: A complex of coexistent forces (as biological, psychological, and social or interpersonal) which serve as causative agents or as a frame of reference in human experience and behavior, within which one thinks, reasons, collaborates, opinionates, intellectualizes, pontificates, retains hidden agendas, inclines toward, perceives, recalls, holds beliefs and indoctrinations within, objectifies, evaluates, considers, concludes, comprehends, focuses attention on, and analyzes, regarding something.

The inherent risks of playing within mind fields (ours and others) is witnessed in the world as war, religious intolerance, criminality, lies, anger, hatred, egocentricities, and all forms of debasing and defiling behavior.

What is noteworthy is all of the workings of the mind have nothing at all to do with Truth. What the mind conjures up, is a result of what the ego has objectified for it. Depending on LOCs,* the triggers actualize impending eruptions lying beneath the layers of the mind field. The mind field goes where the body takes it, so it is ever-present. Where it may “blow us up” so to speak is at the core level of our consciousness within a fraction of an instant. Due to the nature of the lower levels of consciousness this comes about with no apparent warning because all glaring signals have been hidden within the framework of the ego. (See Uncovering Mind Fields in Consciousness Exercises)

LOCs remain constant until they are transcended by eliminating blocks. As the ego is tamed, it remains with us, but as a more docile version of our animal-self. The mind field at this point has been rendered harmless and one is free to roam at higher LOCs unimpeded by the dangers of mind fields.
*Levels of Consciousness
Map of Consciousness (Power vs. Force), Dr. David R. Hawkins


Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Meditations on First Philosophy

Published on Tuesday, September 26th, 2006

Meditations on First Philosophy (subtitled In which the existence of God and the real distinction of mind and body, are demonstrated) is a philosophical treatise written by René Descartes first published in Latin in 1641. The French translation was made by the Duke of Luynes with the supervision of Descartes and was published in 1647 with the title Méditations Metaphysiques. The original Latin title is Meditationes de prima philosophia, in qua Dei existentia et animae immortalitas demonstratur. The book is made up of six meditations, in which Descartes first discards all belief in things which are not absolutely certain, and then tries to establish what can be known for sure.

The Meditations consist of the presentation of Descartes’ metaphysical system in its most detailed level and in the expanding of Descartes’ philosophical system, which he first introduced in the fourth part of his Discourse on Method (1637). Descartes’ metaphysical thought is also found in the Principles of Philosophy (1644), which the author intended to be a philosophy guidebook.

Meditations

Meditation I

Descartes begins the first meditation by noting the large number of false beliefs which he had adopted in his childhood. It is necessary to start over entirely, he realizes, if he wants to establish anything in the sciences which is firm and likely to last. In order to do this, he will suspend judgment about any of his beliefs which are in any way uncertain. To inspect each belief separately would take too long; he must find some way to undermine all of his beliefs at once.

The first way that Descartes tries to undermine his beliefs is by considering the fact that he remembers that his senses have deceived him before. If he has been misled by sensory information in the past (e.g. he judged that the stick in the water was straight, when in fact it was bent), then he may be deceived now, “and it is prudent never to trust completely those who have deceived us even once.”

Descartes acknowledges, however, that this consideration doesn’t undermine his beliefs very effectively, since it really seems as if he is sitting in his dressing gown by the fire, holding this piece of paper in his hands, and so on. How could his senses be misleading him about these things?

He goes on to suggest more powerful reasons to doubt that his beliefs are true. In general, his method is that of forming skeptical hypotheses. In the first meditation, he considers whether he is mad, dreaming, or deceived by an evil demon. If any of these scenarios were the case, many of his beliefs would be false. For instance, if he were mad, he might believe completely ridiculous things e.g. that his head is a pumpkin (he only considers the possibility that he is mad briefly and then seems to dismiss it). If he were dreaming, it would be false that he is sitting by the fire. He would only be imagining this were true, when in fact he’s lying in bed asleep. Likewise, if there were a powerful being deceiving him, he would believe that there is a sky and an earth and so on, since the demon would make it appear to him as if this is the case, when in fact none of these things exist.

The general form of these arguments is:

If I am dreaming/deceived, then my beliefs are not true.
I don’t know whether I am dreaming/deceived.
So, I don’t know whether my beliefs are true.
Descartes’ goal — as stated at the beginning of the meditation — is to suspend judgment about any of his beliefs which are even slightly doubtful. The skeptical scenarios show that all of the beliefs which he considers in the first meditation, including at the very least all of his beliefs about the physical world, are doubtful. So he decides to suspend judgment. He will henceforth give up all of his beliefs about the physical world. This is very difficult (as anyone who tries it can attest). At the end of the first meditation Descartes compares himself to a prisoner who enjoys an imaginary freedom while asleep, and dreads waking. In the same way Descartes slips back into his old beliefs, and dreads waking to toil “amid the inextricable darkness of the problems [he] has now raised.”

It is important to keep in mind when reading the Meditations that Descartes intends to lead the reader along with him gradually. He begins with skepticism and attempts to offer a solution. Thus, he should not be uncharitably read as contradicting himself when, for instance, he thinks something is doubtful in the first meditation and as certain in the last. Several of his objectors fail to read the meditations as a guide, in which the order of the arguments is important, and so make this mistake.

Meditation II

In Meditation II: On the Nature of the Human Mind, Which Is Better Known Than the Body, Descartes lays out a pattern of thought, sometimes called representationalism, in response to the doubts forwarded in Meditation I. He identifies five steps in this theory:

We only have access to the world of our ideas; things in the world are only accessed indirectly.
These ideas are understood to include all of the contents of the mind, including perceptions, images, memories, concepts, beliefs, intentions, decisions, etc.
The ideas represent things that are separate from themselves.
These represented things are many times “external” to the mind.
It is possible for these ideas to constitute either accurate or false representations.
Descartes argues that this representational theory disconnects the world from the mind, leading to the need for some sort of bridge to span the separation and provide good reasons to believe that the ideas accurately represent the outside world. The first plank he uses in constructing this bridge can be found in the following excerpt:

I have convinced myself that there is nothing in the world - no sky, no earth, no minds, no bodies. Doesn’t it follow that I don’t exist? No, surely I must exist if it’s me who is convinced of something. But there is a deceiver, supremely powerful and cunning whose aim is to see that I am always deceived. But surely I exist, if I am deceived. Let him deceive me all he can, he will never make it the case that I am nothing while I think that I am something. Thus having fully weighed every consideration, I must finally conclude that the statement “I am, I exist” must be true whenever I state it or mentally consider it. (Descartes, Meditation II: On the Nature of the Human Mind, Which Is Better Known Than the Body).

In other words, one’s consciousness implies one’s existence. In one of Descartes’ replies to objections to the book, he summed this up in the phrase, I am, I exist, which is often confused with the famous quote, I think, therefore I am.

Once he has secured his existence, however, Descartes seeks to find out what “I” is. He rejects the typical method which looks for a definition, e.g. Rational Animal, because the words used in the definition would then need to be defined. He seeks simple terms that do not need to be defined in this way, but whose meaning can just be “seen.” From these self-evident truths, complex terms can be built up.

The first of these self-evident truths is Descartes’ proof of existence turned on its head:

But what then am I? A thinking thing. And what is that? Something that doubts, understands, affirms, denies, wills, refuses, and also sense and has mental images. (Descartes, Meditation II: On the Nature of the Human Mind, Which Is Better Known Than the Body).

To define himself further, Descartes turns to the example of wax. He determines that wax isn’t wax because of its color, texture or shape, as all of these things can change and the substance still be wax. Therefore, he distinguishes between ordinary perception and judgment. The reality of the wax is “grasped, not by the senses or the power of having mental images, but by the understanding alone.” When one understands the mathematical principles of the substance, such as its expansion under heat, figure and motion, the knowledge of the wax can be clear and distinct.

If a substance such as wax can be known in this fashion, then the same must be of ourselves. The self, then, is not determined by what we sense of ourselves - these hands, this head, these eyes - but by simply the things one thinks. Thus, one “can’t grasp anything more easily or plainly than [their] mind.”

Meditation III

Building upon the foundation that “I exist,” Descartes seeks to prove that “I am not alone” in Meditation III: On God’s Existence. Along the way, he solves the skeptical problem of the criterion with an argument as follows:

I exist as a thinking thing.
How can I be certain?
Using the “clarity and distinctness” criterion, Descartes then seeks to prove he is not alone by proving that God exists. He chooses this method because without a knowledge of whether God exists or if he is a deceiver, there is no way to discuss the all-powerful deceiver challenge of reality. In order to do this, he first establishes a causal principle: There must be at least as much reality in the cause as there is in the effect. For example, if a thought of an elephant is caused by a picture of an elephant, the picture must have as much reality as the thought. If it were not so, it could not have produced it.

Using this causal principle, Descartes lays out two ontological arguments in Meditation III for the existence of God. The first begins with the fact that each of us has an idea of God and the second begins with the fact that it is true that the self exists.

Argument 1

I have an idea of God (an infinitely perfect substance).
That idea must have a cause.
Nothing comes from nothing.
The cause must have at least as much formal reality as the idea.
I am not infinitely perfect.
I could not be the cause of the idea.
There must be a cause that is infinitely perfect.
God exists.

Argument 2

I exist.
My existence must have a cause.
The cause must be either:
a) myself
b) my always having existed
c) my parents
d) something less perfect than God
e) God
Not a. If I had created myself, I would have made myself perfect.
Not b. Continued existence does not follow from present existence.
Not c. This leads to an infinite regress.
Not d. This idea cannot account for the fact that the idea is of something supreme.
e. God exists.
From these arguments, Descartes feels he has proved he is not alone in the universe as an infinitely intelligent and powerful and perfect substance exists, also. Not only that, but that this God cannot be a deceiver:

The whole argument comes down to this: I know that I could not exist with my present nature - that is, I could not exist with the idea of God in me - unless there were really a God. This must be the very God whose idea is in me, the thing having all of the perfections that I can’t fully comprehend but can somehow reach with thought, who clearly cannot have any defects. From this it’s obvious He can’t deceive - for, as the natural light reveals, fraud and deception arise from defect. (Descartes, Meditation III: On God’s Existence).


Meditation IV

The conclusions of the previous Meditations that “I” and “God” both exist lead to another problem: If God is perfectly good and the source of all that is, how is there room for error or falsehood? Descartes attempts to answer this question in Meditation IV: On Truth and Falsity.

If I’ve gotten everything in me from God and He hasn’t given me the ability to err, it doesn’t seem possible for me ever to err. (Descartes, Meditation IV: On Truth and Falsity).

The framework of his arguments center on the Great Chain of Being, in which God’s perfect goodness is relative to His perfect being. On the extreme opposite end of the scale is complete nothingness, which is also the extremity of evil. Thus, humans are an intermediary between these two extremes, being less “real” or “good” than God, but more “real” and “good” than nothingness. Thus, error (as a part of evil) is not a positive reality, it is only the absence of what is correct. In this way, its existence is allowed within the context of a perfectly inerrant God.

I find that I am “intermediate” between God and nothingness, between the supreme entity and nonentity. Insofar as I am the creation of the supreme entity, there’s nothing in me to account for my being deceived or led into error, but, insofar as I somehow participate in nothing or nonentity - that is, insofar as I am distinct from the supreme entity itself and lack many things - it’s not surprising that I go wrong. I thus understand that, in itself, error is a lack, rather than a real thing dependent on God. Hence, I understand that I can err without God’s having given me a special ability to do so. Rather, I fall into error because my God-given ability to judge the truth is not infinite. (Descartes, Meditation IV: On Truth and Falsity).

Descartes also concedes two points that might allow for the possibility of his ability to err. First, he notes that it is very possible that his limited knowledge prevents him from understanding why God chose to create him so he could make mistakes. If he could see the things that God could see, with a complete and infinite scope, perhaps he would judge his ability to err as the best option. He uses this point to attack the Aristotelian structure of causes. The final cause described by Aristotle are the “what for” of an object, but Descartes claims that because he is unable to completely comprehend the mind of God, it is impossible to completely understand the “why” through science - only the “how.”

I realize that I shouldn’t be surprised at God’s doing things that I can’t explain. I shouldn’t doubt His existence just because I find that I sometimes can’t understand why or how He has made something. I know that my nature is weak and limited and that God’s is limitless, incomprehensible, and infinite, and, from this, I can infer that He can do innumerable things whose reasons are unknown to me. On this ground alone, I regard the common practice of explaining things in terms of their purposes to be useless in physics: it would be foolhardy of me to think that I can discover God’s purposes. (Descartes, Meditation IV: On Truth and Falsity).

Second, he realized that God has the ability to create a large number of things of which he would just be a part. Perhaps the error is only apparent when looking at the individual and is reconciled when looking at the whole.

When asking whether God’s works are perfect, I ought to look at all of them together, not at one isolation. For something that seems imperfect when viewed alone might seem completely perfect when regarded as having a place in the world. Of course, since calling everything into doubt, I haven’t established that anything exists besides me and God. But, when I consider God’s immense power, I can’t deny that He has made - or, in any case, that He could have made - many other things, and I must therefore view myself as having a place in a universe. (Descartes, Meditation IV: On Truth and Falsity).

Lastly, Meditation IV attributes the source of error to a discrepancy between two divine gifts: understanding and will. Understanding is given in an incomplete form, while will (by nature) can only be either completely given or not given at all. When he is presented with a certain amount of understanding and then chooses to act outside of that, he is in error. Thus, the gifts of God (understanding and will) both remain good and only the incorrect usage by him remains as error.

If I suspend judgement when I don’t clearly and distinctly grasp what is true, I obviously do right and am not deceived. But, if I either affirm or deny in a case of this sort, I misuse my freedom of choice. If I affirm what is false, I clearly err, and, if I stumble onto the truth, I’m still blameworthy since the light of nature reveals that a perception of the understanding should always precede a decision of the will. In these misuses of freedom of choice lies the deprivation that accounts for error. And this deprivation, I maintain, lies in the working of the will insofar as it comes from me - not in my God-given ability to will, or even in the will’s operation insofar as it derives from Him. (Descartes, Meditation IV: On Truth and Falsity).

Meditation V

Meditation V: On the Essence of Material Objects and More on God’s Existence begins with the stated purpose of expanding the “known items” of God and self to include outside material objects, Descartes saves that for Meditation VI in lieu of something he deems more fundamental but in the same direction: a discussion concerning the ideas of those external items. Along the way, he stumbles upon another claimed logical proof of God’s existence.

Before asking whether any such objects exist outside me, I ought to consider the ideas of these objects as they exist in my thoughts and see which are clear and which confused. (Descartes, Meditation V: On the Essence of Material Objects and More on God’s Existence).

In pondering these ideas of external objects, Descartes realizes they can be separated into those that are clear and distinct and those that are confused and obscure. The former group consists of the ideas of extension, duration and movement. These geometrical ideas cannot be misconstrued or combined in a way that makes them false. For example, if the idea of a creature with the head of a giraffe, the body of a lion and tail of a beaver was constructed and the question asked if the creature had a large intestine, the answer would have to be invented. But, no matter how you combine or rearrange mathematical properties, the three angles of a triangle will still add up to 180 degrees and the largest side will always be opposite the largest angle. Thus, Descartes discovers that these truths have a nature or essence of themselves, completely independent of one’s thoughts or opinions.

I find in myself innumerable ideas of things which, though they may not exist outside me, can’t be said to be nothing. While I have some control over my thoughts of these things, I do not make the things up: they have their own real and immutable natures. Suppose, for example, that I have a mental image of a triangle. While it may be that no figure of this sort does exist or ever has existed outside my thought, the figure has a fixed nature (essence or form), immutable and eternal, which hasn’t been produced by me and isn’t dependent of my mind. (Descartes, Meditation V: On the Essence of Material Objects and More on God’s Existence).

While thinking about the independence of these ideas of external objects, Descartes realizes that he is just as certain about God as he is about these mathematical ideas. He asserts that this is natural as the ideas of God are the only ideas that imply God’s existence. He uses the example of a mountain and a valley. While one cannot picture a mountain without a valley, it’s possible that these do not exist. However, the fact that one cannot conceive of God without existence inherently rules out the possibility of God’s non-existence. Simply put, the argument is framed as follows:

God is defined as an infinitely perfect being.
Perfection includes existence.
So God exists.
While Descartes had already claimed to have confirmed God’s existence through previous arguments, this one allows him to put to rest any discontent he might have had with his “distinct and clear” criteria for truth. With a confirmed existence of God, all doubt that what one previously thought was real and not a dream can be removed. Having made this realization, Descartes asserts that without this sure knowledge in the existence of a supreme and perfect being, assurance of any truth is impossible.

Thus I plainly see that the certainty and truth of all my knowledge derives from one thing: my thought of the true God. Before I knew Him, I couldn’t know anything else perfectly. But now I can plainly and certainly know innumerable things, not only about God and other mental beings, but also about the nature of physical objects, insofar as it is the subject-matter of pure mathematics. (Descartes, Meditation V: On the Essence of Material Objects and More on God’s Existence).


Meditation VI

In Meditation VI: On the Existence of Material Objects and the Real Distinction of Mind from Body, Descartes addresses the potential existence of material outside of the self and God. First, he asserts that such objects can exist simply because God is able to make them.

Insofar as they are the subject of pure mathematics, I now know at least that they can exist, because I grasp them clearly and distinctly. For God can undoubtedly make whatever I can grasp in this way, and I never judge that something is impossible for Him to make unless there would be a contradiction in my grasping the thing distinctly. (Descartes, Meditation VI: On the Existence of Material Objects and the Real Distinction of Mind from Body).

Knowing that the existence of such objects is possible, Descartes then turns to the prevalence of mental images as proof. To do this, he draws a distinction between mental images and understanding, the former being something that is seen like a mental photograph and the latter being something that is understood but not pictured. He uses an example of this to clarify:

When I have a mental image of a triangle, for example, I don’t just understand that it is a figure bounded by three lines; I also “look at” the lines as though they were present to my mind’s eye. And this is what I call having a mental image. When I want to think of a chiliagon, I understand that it is a figure with a thousand sides as well as I understand that a triangle is a figure with three, but I can’t imagine its sides or “look” at them as though they were present. (Descartes, Meditation VI: On the Existence of Material Objects and the Real Distinction of Mind from Body).

Descartes has still not given proof that such external objects exist, however, only shown that their existence could conveniently explain this mental process. To obtain this proof, he first reviews his premises for the Meditations - that the senses cannot be trusted and what he is taught “by nature” does not have much credence. However, he views these arguments within a new context; after writing Meditation I, he has proved the existence of himself and of a perfect God. Thus, Descartes jumps quickly to proofs of the division between the body and soul and that material things exist:

Proof for the body being distinct from the soul

It is possible for God to create anything I can clearly and distinctly perceive.
If God creates something to be independent of another, they are distinct from each other.
I clearly and distinctly understand my existence as a thinking thing (which does not require the existence of a body).
So God can create a thinking thing independently of a body.
I clearly and distinctly understand my body as an extended thing (which does not require a soul).
So God can create a body independently of a soul.
So my soul is a reality distinct from my body.
So I (a thinking thing) can exist without a body.
Proof of the reality of external material things

I have a “strong inclination” to believe in the reality of external material things due to my senses.
God must have created me with this nature.
If independent material things do not exist, God is a deceiver.
But God is not a deceiver.
So material things exist and contain the properties essential to them.
After using these two arguments to dispel solipsism and skepticism, Descartes seems to have succeeded in defining reality as being in three parts: God (infinite), souls, and material things (both finite). He closes by addressing other details about reality that some could see as inconsistencies, such as senses in amputated limbs, dropsy and dreams.

Objections and replies

Descartes submitted his manuscript to several philosophers, theologians and a logician before publishing the Meditations. Their objections and his replies (many of which are quite extensive) were included along the first publication of the Meditations. In the Preface to the Meditations, Descartes writes: “I…ask my readers not to pass judgment on the Meditations until they have been kind enough to read through all these objections and my replies to them.” Thus, this dialogue could be seen as an integral part of Descartes’ views expressed in the Meditations.

The seven objectors were, in order (of the sets as they were published): The Dutch theologian Johannes Caterus (Johan de Kater); various “theologians and philosophers” gathered by Descartes’ friend and principal correspondent, Friar Marin Mersenne; the English philosopher Thomas Hobbes; the theologian and logician Antoine Arnauld; the philosopher Pierre Gassendi; another miscellany gathered by Mersenne; and the Jesuit Pierre Bourdin.

They make many objections to Descartes’ arguments and method. Some of the objections show that the objector has misunderstood the text. Descartes’ response to these is often dismissive and curt (e.g., in response to Hobbes, “I cannot possibly satisfy those who prefer to attribute a different sense to my words than the one I intended”). Other objections are more powerful, and in some cases it is controversial whether Descartes responds to them successfully.

Some of the most powerful objections include the following:

Objections to proof(s) of God’s existence:

A. We have no (clear ) idea of an infinite Being (1st, 2nd, and 5th objections).

B. From the fact that I can think of perfect being, it doesn’t follow that the perfect being exists (1st, 2nd, and 5th).

C. We could get the idea of God without God’s causing the idea (2nd, 3rd).

D. Nothing can cause itself to exist (4th), so God can’t cause himself to exist.

Objections to the epistemology:

A. How can we be sure that what we think is a clear and distinct perception really is clear and distinct (3rd, 5th)?

B. Circle objection 1: if we aren’t certain that judgments based on clear and distinct ideas are true before we prove God’s existence, then we can’t be certain that we are a thinking thing (2nd). Circle objection 2: if we aren’t certain that clear and distinct ideas are true before we prove God’s existence, then we can’t be certain that God exists, since we use clear and distinct ideas to prove God’s existence (4th).

C. Contrary to what Descartes argues, we are certain that bodies exist/that perception is veridical (5th, 6th).

Objections to philosophy of mind:

A. Ideas are always imagistic (3rd), so we have no idea of thinking substance (non-image idea).

B. We can’t conclude that the mind (thinking thing) is not also a corporeal thing, unless we know that we know everything about the mind. But we don’t know that we know everything about the mind. So we don’t know that the mind isn’t corporeal. (4th, 5th, 7th).

See also
17th-century philosophy

Notes and references

Collected works in French and Latin

Oeuvres De Descartes, 11 vols., edited by Charles Adam and Paul Tannery (Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1983).

English translations

The Philosophical Writings Of Descartes, 3 vols., translated by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).
The Philosophical Works of Descartes, 2 vols, translated by Elizabeth S. Haldane, and G.R.T. Ross (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978).

Single works

Meditations on First Philosophy, translated by John Cottingham (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
Méditations Métaphysiques, translated by Michelle Beyssade (Paris: GF, 1993).


Further reading

Alquié, Ferdinand. La découverte métaphysique de l’homme chez Descartes (Paris: PUF, 2000).
Beyssade, Jean-Marie. La Philosophie première de Descartes (Paris: Flammarion, 1979).
Cottingham, John. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Descartes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).
Dicker, Georges. Descartes: An Analytical and Historical Introduction (New York: OUP, 1993)
Frankfurt, Harry. Demons, Dreamers and Madmen (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1970).
Gilson, Étienne. Etudes sur le rôle de la pensée médiévale dans la formation du système cartésien (Paris: Vrin, 1930).
Gueroult, Martial. Descartes selon L’Ordre des Raisons (Paris: Aubier, 1968). Translated by Roger Ariew as Descartes’ Philosophy Interpreted According to the Order of Reasons (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984).
Hatfield, Gary. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Descartes and the Meditations (London: Routledge, 2003).
Kenny, Anthony. Descartes: A Study of His Philosophy (Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1968).
Rorty, Amelie. (ed.) Essays on Descartes’ Meditations (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986).
Williams, Bernard. Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry (London: Penguin Books, 1978).
Wilson, Margaret. Descartes (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978).

External links

Descartes’ Life and Works at the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Descartes’ Modal Metaphysics at the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Online text of the Meditations translated by John Veitch
SparkNotes: Meditations on First Philosophy
Summary of the Meditations in 6,488 words
Undergraduate essays on the Meditations
“Philosophy of Psychology and Mind: Descartes and Ryle”
Retrieved from “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meditations_on_First_Philosophy”
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article “Meditations on First Philosophy”.


Tags: , , , ,

Why aren’t our prayers always answered?

Published on Monday, September 11th, 2006

When we pray, the majority of the time it is our ego which is doing the praying. The ways in which humans word their prayers is an example of this. When we ask for something for ourselves or others, we are imagining that we know what is best, and that God does not. Advice is being given to God all the time. We even act out in God’s name, inferring that our personal selves have the market on what God’s wishes are. We impose partialities, positions, preferences, and profiling onto God. In essence, we have created God in our image. The Infinite Field of Existence (God) hears everything, as all is recorded for eternity. Nothing gets lost in eternal existence. Since God is not a material being in the way human beings assign that image to Him, it is not remotely possible that a determination can be made as to what The Infinite Field wants. Creation/evolution is what God has manifested. If The Field had wishes, It would produce them. Our ego manifests what we believe God desires. This is one of the greatest fallacies of all human existence. Since God must look as we do, then ego believes we must be God also. We would never admit to it, but it is always an underlying presence in our hidden reservoir of beliefs.

So, when we pray and ask for something, there must be pure and unequivocal discernment that we are praying from the Higher Self. At that point, what the Higher Self is implementing is an intention within The Field. God (The Field) works on an infinitely higher plane, from a point of existence far removed from our comprehension. What happens is closely related to quantum physics and the Heisenberg Principle. Our intention by power of the will, collapses the wave function. All of this happens within the framework of the Highest good which encompasses our own (or others’) Karmic inheritance. Although we can physically affect or delay others (or our own Karmic destiny), we cannot pray to alter that which is in the Highest good. You can see why trying to alter The Field with our will for anything but the Highest good, won’t affect a change.

God (see The Nature of God) is Omniscient, Omnipresent, Omnipotent, and Infinite Love. Imposing human, linear will on a power such as this, is a lesson in futility. Because God Consciousness is infinitely high, asking for that which is not born of love will not produce anything but frustration for the one who prays. Our highest intention must always be in alignment with God. Note that Highest means Absolute Truth and not our ego’s wishes. When Higher Intention meets Higher Power and Higher Will, the result is always the Highest Good (from God). What we can do it is pray for the Highest Good (see Prayers) and then allow God’s will in God’s time to be. What we want is not as infinitely important as what God’s will and intention is.

What might have to happen is for a series of unfortunate events to transpire. What also may happen are miraculous healings, good luck, and good fortune. Since we are not privy to what future creation nor present evolution will bring, all that occurs is God’s Will. With all this in mind, we can surrender and free ourselves from outcomes, while transmitting our positive charge out into the universe, trusting that all is perfect all of the time.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Life’s Great Illusions and Myths

Published on Thursday, August 3rd, 2006

Most, if not all of our lives are lived within the content of our beliefs, indoctrinations, positionalities, and opinions. This puts up an invisible veil between the Truth and falsehood (our illusions.) Of course the greater majority of the world has no idea that the beliefs they are holding have nothing to do with Absolute Truth. We are not protected from the ego’s illusions, so ultimately most of humanity lives life behind the illusory field of the ego.

Skepticism, cynicism, and complete disbelief does not preclude the existence of Truth according to God. What we hear from those around us who we have come to respect as our teachers, is simply handed down doctrine, beliefs, opinions, and positions. There is a way to Truth, but it is not within the content of our material world. The line of the non-linear realm of spirit must be crossed in order to get to where Absolute Truth resides.

It is for this reason that I have included the topic of the Absolute Truth into my web site. Using Consciousness Research, Applied Kinesiology, and the knowledge which comes from the Infinite Field, I will be listing some common illusions and explanations as they unfold.

1.) There is no such thing as karma.
Karma is a fact. It is Divine action/reaction. It exists whether one believes in it or not. See articles on Karma.

2.) The dead are missing something because of their death, died too young, suffered too much, were cheated out of living longer, or did not finish what they set out to do.
We are born with the nonlinear time of our death set. We do not have knowledge of what other’s Karma was or what the soul was learning here. Human feelings about suffering or being cheated are merely projections of the ego. We are either eliminating negative Karma or creating new Karma, then we go back to the non-linear realm of eternal existence.

3.) We are only remembered because of something we did, something we had, our offspring, or a legacy.
God, as well as all souls, remember everything. The Infinite Field of Existence records everything infinitely. Nothing is ever forgotten.

4.) God wants something and punishes us.
An Infinite Being of Infinite Love and Power needs nothing. Only human beings project neediness and human attributes onto God.

5.) There is only heaven and hell, and we are judged by God.
There are an infinite number of realms, dimensions, heavens, and hells. Where our spirit goes is by hierarchy, levels of consciousness (from the linear to the non-linear), and certain non-material choices we make. There is no judgement. There is only the witnessing of the Self unfolding. Karmic propensities and inheritance bring forth actualizations to achieve balance.

6.) That which is popular, must be correct or true.
Popularity is a symptom of the glamorization of society and the world. We project what we see as truth onto the over-glamorized.

7.) Intelligence is a sign of wisdom.
Intelligence is the knowledge of stored data. Wisdom comes from The Higher Self.

8.) Wealth will make you happier.
The wealthy have been taking their own lives for millennia. This alone proves wealth does not bring peace of mind. Happiness is a by-product of higher levels of consciousness.

9.) A little white lie won’t hurt anyone.
A non-truth is a non-truth no matter how small an importance is placed on it. All non-truth brings with it Karmic consequences. Nothing in The Field is overlooked.

10.) One person cannot change something or anything.
Everything is a potentiality within creation/evolution, which has the propensity to become an actuality. That is why the future cannot be foretold. There are infinite amounts of potentialities within creation, which have the possibility of changing outcomes.

11.) The media and those in power are imparting the Truth.
History has spoken in that regard. There is no one more confused or ignorant of the Truth than those who have been glamorized by society. They are merely people with a higher profile.

12.) There is no way to tell Truth from falsehood.
Today we have the enlightened knowledge and the science to know Truth. This site is dedicated to Absolute Truth.

13.) What we think is our truth, represents Truth.
To paraphrase Socrates…”Man chooses only what he perceives to be the good.” We are born inherently ignorant of Truth, however. Others truths have been instilled in us through teachings which are not always Truth. The capacity to know Truth has come to us in the form of the highest sages of the past and present. The means to tell the difference between Truth and falsehood now exists, thanks to Dr. David R. Hawkins and Consciousness Research.

14.) Whatever we do not see or believe, must not exist.
The linear world is just a tiny part of existence. In actuality, the majority of the totality of all that exists, cannot be seen from the physical realm.

15.) We have to have an opinion or take a stand or a side for or against everything.
That’s just the ego having to be right, or needing to have feelings about everything. When opinions, beliefs and positionalities are put aside, what remains is just what is, without commentary. Everything then becomes the context of all that you see and cannot see, instead of the content, which is within your personal locality (mind). Ego believes it must fix everything or comment about it.

16.) If a person has credentials and appears to be intelligent, they must be telling the Truth.
Credentials do tend to give credibility to people. This is often a show of intelligence and intellectualism. Intellectualizing however, is not Truth, but borders the next level of consciousness which enters the realm of the non-linear. The non-linear is wholly subjective and cannot be proved, so debating facts brings no definitive answer using intelligence alone.

17.) People in high positions or those who have wealth, have more importance by an unspoken hierarchy.
Only in the minds of those who believe that. We are all equally important by virtue of our birth from Divinity. Even the word important is a projection on something. We all just are. The rest is all about the ego.

18.) Animals are dumb.
Anyone who has ever owned an animal knows that is not true. Animals have an innate instinct which allows their survival. They may not have the brain capacity of humans, but an animal lover will always be able to tell you, at higher levels of animal consciousness, they can show and feel love. Animals are a part of nature and as so, a Divine creation. Projecting dumbness on anything is the ego taking a positionality to make itself feel greater.

19.) We are all born innocent.
In a human sense it appears so, but spiritually we come with Karmic inheritance. We do arrive with amnesia, so you could say we are ignorant (or innocent) of that fact and more. We are a clear slate in the material sense, until the programming of our hard drive (ego/mind) occurs. Babies all appear to be innocent, but certain factors will show that from no apparent cause, children will soon show personalities ranging from the highest to the lowest consciousness. This is due to our having a particular level of consciousness at birth.

20.) Once we are dead, that is it.
This may seem silly to some, but there are those who believe dead is dead. All I can say is there is a different side to life and this isn’t all there is. (See my article on Life After Death.)

21.) We look like God.
That’s the ego projecting again. Our ego believes we are the center of the universe, so to speak, so naturally the belief is we look like our creator. I would suppose then, God would be a superman of sorts. God is An Infinitely Powerful Field of Knowledge and Love. (See my articles on God.)

22.) There is something we have to do or remember while we’re here.
I have written about this also. We have free will to do or be anything. It may be scary to some, but that scenario plays itself out on the evening news everyday. Due to human ignorance and ego, most of the world has no fear about not being good__only about not being right. Our levels of consciousness set our personal priorities about how we live out this life. What we witness is the fact that the majority of the world consciousness doesn’t even think about that.

23.) The Truth will reveal itself if you just sit quietly or meditate.
Being quiet and/or meditating is certainly a good thing to do for spirit, but it has little bearing on changing our positions on things unless we are following an enlightened teaching. Consciousness levels have the most influence on the Self realization of Truth.

24.) “To thine own self be true.”
This is true in a common sense. In a grander sense it is completely false. We are true to our selves every day. The small self, that is. In that way we keep making the same efforts with the same results, as the same situations arise continually. Lifetime after lifetime we return to eliminate negative Karma, as we incur more. When we realize the big Self through the path to enlightenment, we cannot be anything but True.

25.) Disease, famine, and other natural disasters are God’s way of eliminating evil or are tragic.
Any position or opinion we place on an event is merely a viewpoint. Evil is merely a word placed on something which doesn’t fit our personal profile of rightness. Human beings want and need to have a reason behind everything which occurs. The fact that everything is happening of its’ own would not be a reasonable answer to most people, but this is Truth. Creation/evolution* create conditions continually out of the infinite propensities which exist infinitely. Nature just is. Events just are. Enlightenment reveals the unfoldment of everything (without exception) perfectly within Divinity. A natural event (or even a man-made event) is not a disaster until we place that positionality on it. A disease is a natural occurrence of nature, as is the propensity to find a cure. Famine and drought are the natural consequences of locality and conditions. Man-made events are a result of certain levels of consciousness. There are also Karmic considerations which are choices and innate Karmic events (group Karma) occurring over which we have no control.

26.) We control our own destiny.
Destiny/fate does not exist in a linear way, therefore we cannot control it. That would be assuming there is a predetermined course of events, which is under our personal power to regulate. If something were predetermined, we would be powerless to change it anyway. If life were predetermined, free will would be non-existent, and we would be actors in a script written for us. Therefore, foretelling future events is not possible. The potential for future events is infinite due to the infinite number of possibilities, each with an infinite number of potentials to change everything infinitely. In other words, a simple sneeze could change the outcome of something else, etc., ad infinitum. Therefore the future is an unknown. What exists are the conditions under which we set up potentialities and possibilities within our proximate field (the totality of our existence which has manifested within this materiality), reaching out infinitely to The Infinite Field.** Actualizations will then occur on their own, spontaneously. All of this is occurring within our own Karmic “destiny” which is the irresistible, non-linear totality of all that we are from the beginning of time. So, we have is free will within The Field of our infinite Karmic potentialities.

27.) Eliminating evildoers will change/fix everything.
This is more like wishful thinking, rather than a higher way of being. Eliminating that which we don’t like or is harmful, is a tall order since most of the world consciousness calibrates below 200 (courage and the level of integrity). Since the material world is where we get to eliminate negative Karma, being even more rapacious would be adding fuel to the fire, not to mention going a few thousand years backward in karma and evolutionary history. Humans suffer from impatience due to the intrinsic ignorance about existence. When the content of the story becomes more important than the context, the larger view of humanity and consciousness escapes the majority. Our universe is roughly 13 billion years old and is expanding at the speed of light. Humans came in just about a millisecond ago relative to the rest of creation. The ego appeared with the advent of sentience and we witness what has occurred. Karma will be created and undone eternally until consciousness has risen to the point where all is revealed and enlightenment is commonplace. If one wants to save the world, begin within one’s own Self. Until then, we can learn from the words of Ramana Maharshi, “There is no sense in trying to save the world, because the world you see doesn’t even exist.”

28.) To be a higher spiritual being we must do something about injustice and help those less fortunate.
One’s level of consciousness will dictate where they are in regard to being of service. On one level, helpfulness is being of service in the medical field, teaching, science, or industry. On another level there is nothing to do at all, because what is witnessed is everyone’s Karma unfolding, and interference may be furthering Karmic consequences. It is all quite personal to the individual, but it is certainly a good thing to keep one’s own level of consciousness high for the collective. On any level however, there must be discernment regarding how far to take any form of action.

29.) We were created in God’s image.
God (who has many names), is not a human being in the way we prescribe humanness onto Him. Although God is also referred to by gender (i.e. Him), God is genderless. God is an Infinitely Powerful Field of Intelligence and Love with unearthly attributes far beyond our comprehension. Humans love to see God as we see ourselves, but that is merely the ego projecting.

* I merge creation and evolution because they are not separate entities. As Dr. Hawkins says, “Creation and evolution are one and the same.” To separate the two for the purposes of debate is another continuing illusion of the ego. Creation is infinitely occurring, as is evolution (and at the speed of light). Instilled doctrine will keep the argument going indefinitely, however.
**The Fields we exist within are determined by levels of consciousness. Higher states of consciousness are inclusive of higher probabilities of what we call the miraculous, or Divine intervention. Therefore, what appear to be opportunities miraculously presenting themselves are a result of what we are, or are Karmically related.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Terminology

Published on Wednesday, July 5th, 2006

I tend to use terms that are sometimes familiar to the spiritual aspirant and sometimes not. There are words I use which I have become familiar with because of my teacher, Dr. David Hawkins, MD, PhD. Some of the words are in caps because of their reference to God, and some words are used within the practice of Devotional Nonduality and Dr. Hawkins’ teachings. I hope to make all of my readers familiar with these words, so I will list as many of them here as I can to familiarize you with them. There are words here that should be in the dictionary and others that will become recognizable as time and society move forward. Although I did not make this clear in my first book, “Journey of the Spirit,” I hope to make up for this error to my readers here.

Names of God
There are more names for God than perhaps any other thing in existence. I have my own terms, but any word that is in caps, and is not a proper noun, generally refers to God. These are some:
The Field, The Infinite Field, The Infinite Field of Intelligence, Divine Intelligence, Divinity, Divine Knowledge, The Akashic Records, The Divine Field of Intelligence, The Mind of God, Truth, Absolute Truth, Divine Truth, The All, The Light, Source, Divine Source, Absolute Source, The All That Ever Was or Will Be, The Infinite, The Everlasting, Universal Intelligence, Allness, Beingness, The Presence, The Presence of Divinity, Eternal Source, Electromagnetic Field, Divine
Creator, Source, Totality, Beingness.

LOC (Level of Consciousness)
I use the term, “level of consciousness” often and may from time to time abbreviate it with LOC. It refers to levels on the MAP (Map of Consciousness, Dr. David R. Hawkins, Power vs. Force)

MAP (Map of Consciousness)
One of the most important discoveries of the spiritual world. A Map of where everything is, at the level of consciousness. Complete studies are available within all of Dr. David R. Hawkins works. (See bibliography, Myswizard.com for a referential version, or Veritaspub.com)

Calibrations or Calibrate
This is in reference to the levels of human consciousness, on the MAP of Consciousness. It also refers to what level something calibrates at within its’ own frequency, such as an inanimate object, which in and of itself may not have “life” but may send off a vibratory quality which may be calibrated, such as a place, ideology or book.

Integrous
This word is used by Dr. Hawkins and I love it. It’s not in the dictionary, but should be. It simply means that which is ‘of” integrity. “ous” is an adjective suffix which means, possessing the qualities of. There may be other words from time to time that don’t have a corresponding adjective which “ous” may be added onto.

‘ness’
The state : condition : quality : degree. This may also be added to the end of words to describe that which otherwise is indescribable, such as “Beingness, Allness, and Knowingness. These words may have a direct connection to a description for God.

Consciousness
Consciousness is the Invisible, Infinite Energy Field of All That Exists.* It is omnipresent, omniscient, all encompassing, infinitely powerful, all-inclusive, limitless, and formless. It records all that has ever existed throughout time in both the material and the non-material realms of existence, with complete and Absolute potentiality. Because of the qualities of consciousness, it is capable of having calibratory levels of frequency or vibration. (See page 14 of Dr. Hawkins book, Truth vs. Falsehood for a ‘Summary of the Essential Principles of the Science of Consciousness.’)

Consciousness within the material world evolves as matter evolves. Within higher levels of sentience come forth the abilities to raise ones intrinsic level of consciousness. At the present time 1000 (Map of Consciousness, Consciousness Research) is the highest logarithmic level one can attain within a physicality. Divinity’s’ level of consciousness is Infinite, therefore, raising of ones level of consciousness higher than 1000, becomes possible within the non-physical realm.
*Caps are used to denote Divinity, which is The Source of consciousness


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Looking in the Wrong Direction

Published on Tuesday, July 4th, 2006

As many of my readers know, I use everyday life to find the subtleties and the obvious for signals. Human actions are the thermometer as to how our spiritual temperature is doing. It doesn’t take long to instantly see human nature in action and relate it to our journey.

Over the July 4th holiday I had the opportunity to witness one of these scenarios. A group of people had come together to take a ride on a rather large boat to see fireworks. The fireworks were being shot off in a large area over the lake and people had gathered on the dock by the thousands in anticipation. Unbeknownst to about a hundred or so people who had gathered in a particular spot on the dock, a space had been reserved and paid for by the boat’s owner to tie up for the show.

When the boat docked, much to the dismay of the people on the dock, words began to fly and shouts from the crowd. Needless to say these words were not for the ears of the small children on the boat (a scene which was noticed by a woman in the crowd who began to tell them they should be ashamed of their behavior.)

Angry words continued to be shouted, until the coast guard settled it by telling the people to settle down. One could feel the crowds hostility, but the owner of the boat played soothing music for everyone to hear which was a simulcast for the show.

As the fireworks began I saw the irony in the evenings events. The fireworks were not positioned in the direction the people had expected. All the people on the dock had to move and turn in another direction, only to be blocked by a single large tree which had been planted there perhaps 25 years earlier. The hundred or so people had been facing in the wrong direction, (along with 500 more on the dock) with expectations of seeing the show clearly. The boat had not been blocking them at all. Not only had they been wrong in their decision about where to place themselves for the evening, but their anger and righteous indignation were improperly placed also.

I thought of how we handle ourselves in public as well as private, and how our ego makes us the winner or the loser in the daily battles of our lives. Had the angry crowd been accepting of how events were and not resisting them, they might have seen in the end, that anger and resentment were for naught. That’s not how human nature at lower levels of consciousness work, however. A hundred people had become instant victims and the boat’s owner was the victimizer.

How often throughout time, have human beings looked in the wrong direction for direction. It is easy to see how people cannot tell right from wrong, or Truth from falsehood, whether solo or in large groups. The path to God is not through angry words, hurt egos, and indignation, but through kindness and acceptance.

When our consciousness is raised to the point where we see that things are not always as they seem, we may just take a hint from that lone woman in the crowd, to be kind and hush up around impressionable ears.


Tags: ,

Radical Truth and Spirituality

Published on Tuesday, June 27th, 2006

It occurred to me while I was in the midst of having a conversation with an old friend, how we often think of ourselves as spiritual beings, but neglect to think of ourselves as honest human beings. There are many of us on the planet who are on the spiritual path. This might have occurred as an epiphany, an idea, or just something that we had to do because it was within us. How little thought we gave to truth and honesty as we journeyed on this path with many highways.

There were many times on my own journey that I questioned my personal truth and honesty as it related to my spirituality, which was and still is of the highest importance to me. My practices, classes, readings, and personal endeavors never brought me to the place where I would question truth and integrity, until the last decade of my life. Even then, while questioning Truth was I willing to practice it fully? The answer was no.

So what of our spiritual journey and Radical Truth? Can we be spiritual and still be dishonest? Can we be kind, have integrous intentions, do our daily practices, but be selectively truthful and honest toward ourselves and others?

When we get together in groups, workshops, and other spiritual endeavors, we are and do think of ourselves as spiritual beings. Being spiritual however, is just a label. It’s the label we love to have fun with when being with other spiritual and like-minded people. We could also label ourselves nice and still be not so nice sometimes. If we were doctors we would still be doctors even if we were doing something else, wouldn’t we?

As humans we’re doing and being different things all the time. We label ourselves with our thoughts, religious beliefs, professions, duties, and our spiritual beliefs. The dichotomy lies within the content of our definition of spirituality, and the context of our lives. The spiritual tag we place on ourselves is arbitrary. Our spirituality becomes relative to where we place it within our lives and ourselves.

There is no half way between truth and non-truth. If I was being a good person and my intentions were of the highest, I fooled myself into believing that I was on the straight and narrow path to God. My epiphany was the realization that you can’t have it both ways. There is no such thing as having good intentions, but being selectively honest with yourself and others. There is only Truth or not truth. Selective truth is arbitrary and relative.

Relativism is never Truth. This is the one truth no one likes to hear. It is truth according to us, and as human beings we have no way of knowing Absolute Truth without help from Divinity. We need not practice kinesiology on ourselves to see how truthful we’re being. We absolutely know when we are not being honest. Humans have a tendency to go into denial over this, but those on the spiritual path cannot sweep this under the rug without the consequential karmic dust cloud which hovers over us.

Absolute Radical Truth is just that. It is Truth at all times to oneself and others. We need not worry about being honest to God, because we never fool God. The Universal Field of Intelligence which we call God, stores everything for all time and with an all-knowing of all that exists. So if we ever think that there is no one looking over our shoulder, we are just kidding ourselves.

Radical Truth and honesty have to be in place within ourselves if we are on the path to enlightenment. There is no one to fool, there is no past to hide, we have atoned, we have forgiven ourselves, and we continue on with Truth and honesty in our lives on our devotional path to God. It is not a better path, but just a different path. It is the rare high road we take with humility, integrity, willingness, intention, devotion, and love for all of humanity and God. ©Myswizard all rights reserved ‘05-’06


Tags: , ,

Don’t Get Sidetracked

Published on Friday, June 16th, 2006

Once the spiritual Journey has begun, there are an infinite number of roads to follow. Each road has side roads and each sideroad gets smaller and smaller, until you’ve become lost and cannot figure out your way back home.

This is how life is. When simplicity becomes elusive, and life along with your spiritual journey become more and more complex, home seems further and further away.

I’ll use an experience to give you an example. Where I live in the countryside, there are many twisty backroads. To get to these backroads you need to take a major highway. From the major highway, you turn onto a county road which has a letter or two as it’s name. Now you can get on to smaller gravel roads with a name which usually denotes who lives on it or a name someone gave it a while back. These roads, although beautiful, are smaller and sometimes deadend.

I do a lot of research in the world of spirit and science as they relate to each other. Since I’m only interested in Truth, most of my research doesn’t follow deadends because I test first using Consciousness Research. This effectively eliminates the false. Every now and then, just for fun, I’ve allowed the journey to lead me somewhere to see where it ends up.

Sometimes I come to a term that’s new or unusual and I delve further. From this term, I find many more terms that usually denote a doctrine or concept that has been intellectualized or simply adopted as true. I often find myself after an hour or so, chasing something which leads nowhere. One idea leads into another and so on, infinitely with no definitive conclusion.

This is very common to the spiritual initiate as well as all people. They spend lots of time and money following something which leads them to a dead end. What I’ve found is, simplicity, (no matter how large the creation gets), will lead you where you want to go faster than a long, complex effort. One can fill their lives with minutia, but life will always find it’s own evolution, no matter what you throw into the mix. It is Infinite Divinity creating.

One’s intention is the most important factor. If we keep our intention focused we really never get too lost. Our intention is our compass and consciousness is our map. We may take a side road for the scenery but the destination always remains clear. So too, the journey to Divinity.

You can investigate, navigate, and journey downstream, but when you feel lost on your journey, always remember God is on highground.


Tags: , , ,

Alice Bailey

Published on Tuesday, May 23rd, 2006

This is a brief biography of Alice Bailey, who had a genuine influence on western spiritualism through “Theosophy.” Although I have read many of Alice Baileys’ works, due to the fact that most of her works were supposedly channeled (cal. under 200) through ‘The Tibetan,’ an astral being, I cannot give any recommendations. They are however, fairly fascinating, although complex reading. Theosopy’s basic ideology does calibrate with Truth. ___Myswizard

A prolific writer on mysticism and the founder of an international esoteric movement, Alice Bailey was born on 16th June 1880, in Manchester, the daughter of an engineer. After a cloistered upbringing she entered on a period of evangelical work with the British army, which took her to India. In 1907 she married Walter Evans, whom she had met while he was serving in the army in India, and they emigrated to America, where he became an Episcopalian minister. The marriage was not a success, and after the birth of three daughters she obtained a separation and later a divorce.

In America she discovered the works of Madame Blavatsky and became active in the Theosophical Society. The narrow, dogmatic Christianity which she had previously followed gave way to wider spiritual horizons, though the figure of Christ remained central to her beliefs. She later grew disillusioned with the petty intrigues of the Theosophical Society and ceased to play an active part in it, but she always recognized the valuable part that Theosophy had played in her life.

Blavatsky’s doctrine of occult Masters led her to identity a spirit that, she said, had guided her from the age of fifteen, with the Theosophical Kut Humi. In 1919 she said she was contacted by the spirit of another individual whom she called ‘the Tibetan’ and identified with the occult adept Djual Khool mentioned by Blavatsky. After some initial reluctance she agreed to be his amanuensis. The result was a series of books which she claims the Tibetan (whose name she spelt “Djwhal Khul”) dictated through an inner voice, and which she wrote down word for word. The most popular, also the most unreadable, is the weighty Treatise on Cosmic Fire, which is even more difficult to read than Madame Blavatsky’s Secret Doctrine, but does contain some interesting cosmic diagrams. Some of these diagrams had originally appeared in earlier Theosophical literature, while others were original.

None of this voluminous material, incidentally, has anything to do with authentic Tibetan Buddhism, although there was quite a bit of Theosophy and folksy Christianity in it. Clearly we have here an example of a channelled communication, incorporating elements from the medium’s subconscious; but also, as in the case of Jane Robert’s “Seth”, one cannot discount the possibility of psychic symbiosis with an elevated entity expressing itself through her subconscious.

In 1920 Alice married another Theosophist, Foster Bailey, and in 1923 they started The Arcane School to teach disciples how to further the Great Universal Plan under the guidance of the inner hierarchy of spiritual masters led by Christ. After her death in 1949 the school was carried on by her husband. It still flourishes as a large international organization, and an organisation, the Lucis Trust, was formed to overlook the legal aspects of the School and the published books. The influence of Ms Bailey’s difficult writings has been, if anything, even greater than that of Blavatsky in the New Age movement.

And while the Alice Bailey stream has inspired many, it has not gone the way of lesser theosophic and new age teachings like Summit Lighthouse (which also with a series of masters, rays, and so on, derivative of AAB, via the “I AM” movement). One might argue that because of this it belongs to the class of “genuine” channelled communications.


Tags: , ,

Names of God

Published on Wednesday, May 3rd, 2006

The Field, The Infinite Field, The Infinite Field of Intelligence, Divine Intelligence, Divinity, Divine Knowledge, The Akashic Records, The Divine Field of Intelligence, The Mind of God, Truth, Absolute Truth, Divine Truth, The All, The Light, Source, Divine Source, Absolute Source, The All That Ever Was or Will Be, The Infinite, The Everlasting, Universal Intelligence, Allness, Beingness,The Presence, The Presence of Divinity, Eternal Source, Electromagnetic Field, Divine Creator, Source


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Enlightenment and Mystery Schools

Published on Thursday, April 27th, 2006

Let me preface this article with the statement, “There is no such thing as a mystery school.” The simple reasoning is there are no real mysteries. I realize I have the topic Mystical and Mysterious on this site. That is because there are things which seem mysterious to us. They are however, not a true mystery in the way we view mysteries. Mysteries are that which we feel we have to solve. They are stories or occurrences which have a who, what or why as a question to which there is sometimes no definitive answer.

There is only Truth (Absolute Truth). This isn’t a mystery. There are many sites which have all sorts of information which have nothing to do with Truth. They intellectualize and philosophize endlessly, but they still aren’t Truth. There is only one Truth to anything which takes the mystery out of everything.

We however, love to mystify everything. We love asking the about the meaning of life endlessly. Isn’t that the bottom line of all questions? Is this a mystery? Maybe in the earthly sense of how we try to rationalize everything. We cannot understand nor can we endlessly figure out why we are here in a linear sense. In the non-linear world of the spirit, there is no need to ask why. Everything just is. When the state of enlightenment occurs, the soul has an understanding beyond the linear and physical. At that point however, the enlightened also have no need to explain it.


Tags: , , ,

Sin, Guilt and Right vs.Wrong

Published on Thursday, April 27th, 2006

All of the above words are descriptions of judgmentalisms. As long as humans have been on the planet, there have been actions that created consequences which were summarily criticized and judged. With the advent of religion, religious doctrine and belief systems, one learned how to feel bad accordingly and repent, atone or be judged not only by peers, but by God himself.

Now one was open for all sorts of societal discrimination, guilt, vilification and punishment. If the action was considered to be wrong or horrible enough, it could mean a lifetime of self flagellation, incarceration, or death. Things haven’t changed very much. This all goes on today, except there’s better therapy.

When looking at guilt, sin, right and wrong through the portal of content, there would be a natural assumption to initiate argumentation based on viewpoints, beliefs, indoctrinations, societal norms, philosophizing and intellectualizations. Taken further and drawing back to witness context instead of content, all judgment becomes self-judgment. With enlightenment comes the Inner Knowledge (which comes from the ultimate realization of Universal Truth) that guilt, sin, right and wrong simply do not exist.

All mentalizations which are spawned by the ego are not the Self. The words humans use to attach a meaning to everything do not do Truth, justice (in a manner of speaking). Karmic consequences will always equalize behavior and consciousness levels will gauge where we are in our state of “being.”

Living within the material world of course, means being subject to the rules and laws of where you are. So if stealing a loaf of bread within ones’ society means losing a hand, there’s karma and a lot more going on. The loss of the hand would perhaps keep ones motives in line, and maybe not. It’s relative entirely to a higher law, Universal Law. This law is not questionable, but Absolute.

The context of the entire issue would be how we are being within ones own society and Self. A broader way of looking at this is “You are what you’ve been and what you’ve become, now and forever.” If thought is given to this for even an instant it will not be fear (of guilt, sin, right and wrong) which drives the self, but the intention and willingness to be that which needn’t ever feel anything but unconditional love, no matter what comes to into play.


Tags: , , , , , , ,

Devotional Nonduality as an Everyday Practice

Published on Tuesday, April 18th, 2006

Devotional Nonduality is a direct way to enlightenment. It uses the power of the heart and not spiritual ambition. Followers of Devotional Nonduality seek the “core” of spirituality for its own sake, knowing that the source of our own existence is within. It is the devotion to the essence of Truth itself. It’s founder and my teacher, Dr. David Hawkins, M.D., PhD. has comprehensively explained this state within all his teachings and writings, and in his book, “Devotional Nonduality”.

Students of Devotional Nonduality have meaningful practices that work for them, so I thought it would be a good idea to explain how it works in my life, as well as personal definitions and descriptions as paraphrased from Dr. Hawkins.

Devotional Nonduality is a new “sounding” paradigm of being in the world, but not a new way of being. Its relatives are Advaita and some forms of Buddhism, without the strict practice of meditation and the “void” being the ultimate reality. It’s a way to enlightenment through devotion to The Ultimate Reality of our existence, by means of the pathways of higher levels of consciousness. One doesn’t need to do fancy rituals or give up their life or life savings to it. It’s a relatively simple practice with huge implications.

Devotional Nonduality is a commitment to raising ones’ own level of consciousness through being “that” which you have the intention to become. It is devotion to God in the highest, through living life as a prayer. All positionalities, belief systems, ideologies, and conceptualizations must be surrendered. This is a major commitment necessary to becoming enlightened and cannot be taken frivolously. Therefore it is rare to be on the path to enlightenment.

The beingness to which I refer can be as simple as practicing kindness to a fault everyday and without exception. If I find myself not being as kind as my practice has maintained, I stop and witness what my ego is being (by being more contemplative). Due to the fact, we still have to live in the world, as long as we are willing to witness the ego and surrender it, our intrinsic level of consciousness doesn’t vary.

Contemplation (recommended by Dr. Hawkins), is a way of being in the world. In order to practice contemplation, one needs to witness the world in a wider mode of context vs. content, and not get “caught up in the drama” of the momentary stories of ones’ life. Through living within a state of contemplation, non-attachment can be maintained while still enjoying the fruits and pleasures of material existence. The neediness of lesser egoic states tends to disappear. Dr. Hawkins often reminds his students that it’s not the ego itself that is the problem, but the juice, power or excitement we get out of its’ “pitfalls.” He also advises to avoid negativity rather than opposing it. Precious time is wasted resisting that which doesn’t calibrate above the level of integrity. These are the levels such as anger, apathy, desire, grief and all the negative aspects of lower consciousness discussed in Dr. Hawkins books and lectures. One cannot change that which isn’t ready, so avoid “the lower realms” and remain in the light.*

Practicing Truth (Absolute Truth) through devotion to Divinity is the highest commitment of Devotional Nonduality. Within my own daily practice, I like to call this Radical Truth. This is living truth everyday without exception. It does not mean to be radically opinionated. Truth overcomes opinions as one climbs the scale of consciousness. Radical Truth is also radical honesty. When I am confused I state my confusion. If uncertain, I abdicate until I am. Radical truth is being truthful (with kindness) to everyone at all times and under all conditions. Telling lies on any level is not an exception.

By being the qualities of higher levels one naturally becomes kind toward all life. Compassion, joy, sincerity, unconditional love, willingness, neutrality and more is what is necessary to transcend the levels of consciousness. Awareness of the pitfalls of the ego and the ways in which we can fall back is a priority. Surrendering that which you have no control over to Divinity is the path. Through the vigilant practice of being that which you wish to become, you become it. Force is not the way, but the power of Divinity. The intention alone to be more of what you wish to be will make it happen.

If the aforementioned way of being seems difficult, then you are not yet ready to commit to this and that is perfectly alright. The practice of Devotional Nonduality will be around for a very long time and Divinity has an infinite amount of patience. When you are ready to walk the path, there will be many to help guide you along the way.

*This could lead to life changing scenarios, such as divorce, changing social groups/friends, employment or avoidance of certain family members.


Tags: , , , , , , , ,

The Names of God

Published on Sunday, April 9th, 2006

There are an infinite amount of names for God. Many are right here on this site*, and more can be found in religious books and doctrine. The strange thing about a name is it’s only a label. It’s a local identification. It has no meaning other than the one “we” give it. We can, for instance call a table a chair and it doesn’t change the “nature” of what it is. If I called you a name other than the one you were given, it wouldn’t change what you are. God as a name for Divinity actually is bothersome to some, although I haven’t a clue as to why.

The problem with giving God a name is God isn’t a locality. God is non linear. How does one give a name to the Un-nameable? In Judaism, for example, there are words for God that cannot even be written, because of the sacredness of the word. However you put it to paper it’s still naming that which cannot be named. We have to call things by a name for identification purposes, so we persist. By not taking names with a seriousness that only we can place on it, we are able to dispense with having to put a meaning on everything. As we witness it, we realize it just is. It’s an advanced concept, but you are on the path to enlightenment, or you wouldn’t be here right now reading this. “Everything is it’s own meaning,” as Dr. David Hawkins says.

We can’t help wanting to put a meaning to everything that we see, feel and hear, but it is what it is. That’s all. Releasing the “need” to name everything may also bring on the state that you aren’t who and what you “think” you are, also. Try going a day without a name for yourself. It may be scary, but when you’re ready it’s freeing. I happen to love the name my parents gave me, but I’m not attached to it. It’s meaning is twofold…From the Hebrew name Channah which meant “favour” or “grace”. Hannah was the mother of Samuel the prophet in the Old Testament. The Latin version of this name is Anna…and this is the name traditionally assigned to the mother of the Virgin Mary, though she is not mentioned in the Bible. None of these is my actual name however, which is a diminutive of Hannah and Anne…Nancy.

See how confusing this all gets? Imagine for a moment all the names of everything on the planet and beyond and all the various meanings for all the names. It’s mind boggling! Now close your eyes and imagine something before you, say for instance an ice cream cone. One wouldn’t need to name it to know this is something I like. It is what it is.

So instead of finding “the” name for God, (which is the simplest one I can think of,) try imagining God as Infinite Love. It’s a good start.

* For references purposes here are some__The Field, The Infinite Field, The Infinite Field of Intelligence, Divine Intelligence, Divinity, Divine Knowledge, The Akashic Records, The Divine Field of Intelligence, The Mind of God, Truth, Absolute Truth, Divine Truth, The All, The Light, Source, Divine Source, Absolute Source, The All That Ever Was or Will Be, The Infinite, The Everlasting, Universal Intelligence, Allness, Beingness,The Presence, The Presence of Divinity, Eternal Source, Electromagnetic Field, Divine Creator, Source ©Myswizard all rights reserved ‘05 -’06

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Happiness

Published on Sunday, April 9th, 2006

1 archaic : good fortune : good luck : Prosperity 2 a (1) : a state of well-being characterized by relative permanence, by dominantly agreeable emotion ranging in value from mere contentment to deep and intense joy in living, and by a natural desire for its continuation (2) : a pleasurable or enjoyable experience i had the happiness of seeing you — W.S.Gilbert> b Aristotelianism : a life of activity governed by reason 3 : Aptness, Felicity -his examples lack happiness _a striking happiness of expression__ synonyms Felicity, Beatitude, Blessedness, Bliss: happiness is the general term denoting enjoyment of or pleasurable satisfaction in well-being, security, or fulfillment of wishes

There are as many states of happiness as there are people. There are also as many definitions as well. To some happiness is a quiet moment with a loved one. To others happiness is climbing Mt. Everest. The truth is most people seldom feel happiness regularly. People aren’t monitoring whether they are “happy” or not. They are treading water within their existence, but not swimming with expertise. The majority of the world’s population level of happiness is less than fifty per cent. (over 50% of the world is happy less than 50% of the time)

Happiness is elusive for many reasons. State of mind has much to do with happiness and most peoples’ state of mind is running in circles. The mind seldom shuts off, therefore it cannot maintain a state of happiness for long. In his books, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi(”Flow”) shows how (being in the moment) creates the state known as happiness or even bliss. Being in love may also mimic this state of bliss. Our work and love can be two very important things to achieve happiness.

We are not always “in love” however and our work is sometimes less than gratifying. How then does one achieve a state of permanent happiness? The ego creates scenarios on a continual basis for us to feel miserable about. Events are increasingly thrown our way which we can’t avoid or handle fast enough. The planet as well as our lives can feel like bouncing between heaven and hell.

If we can appreciate that this is the best place for eliminating karma we have a head start on the journey to higher consciousness and complete happiness. In order to reach happiness on a more permanent level, the level of ones’ consciousness has to be that which attracts that state. This isn’t difficult once you create the intention to do so. The intention will start events happening in one’s life faster than anything I can presently think of. Intention collapses the wave function and creates change.

The ways in which our consciousness is raised is through the simple things. There aren’t any secrets to living this life happier. Until this becomes common knowledge, unhappiness, despair, and victimhood will run rampant. Here are just a few of the things that will change lives.

Be kind to all living things including oneself. Be aware of living in the present moment at all times. Devote yourself to being loving and not having to be in love. Devote yourself to service to others. Devote yourself to Divinity. This can all be done within the context of ones’ life. Even a token of your kindness is enough to sustain others, when practiced continually.

Unless your life has a Higher purpose than “you,” you will not experience total happiness. This is Truth on the highest level. When you create a life not built around the small self you will realize the complete happiness of the grander Self.


Tags: , , , , ,

Life After Death

Published on Friday, March 31st, 2006

I’m posting an ongoing article on life after death, simply because this is a high profile topic. The answer is yes, there is life after death, or as I call it…Our true home, when we aren’t experiencing here. There are many variations of what it’s like, how to get there, and where it is… and you can find them all on the internet, Amazon.com or Barnes and Nobel. There are as many “experts” on The Afterlife as there are books written on the subject. Most of them are not true, but fantasized.

I have not channeled these answers, nor has any entity revealed knowledge to me, and God has not come to me personally in any form. I have asked for permission to receive this knowledge from The Infinite Field of Consciousness (which holds all knowledge of Absolute truth) for The Highest Good of all of us, and confirmed with Consciousness Science.* I have also rephrased a few of Dr. Hawkins teachings. These Truths are explained (to the best of the capabilities) within the written word:

1. Our time of death is set at birth. This isn’t a physical time as we know it, but a time relative to the realm of the non-physical. Another way of explaining it is when the parameters of our life have been lived, we give up the body. (It also explains why some people go quickly and some stay on even when all odds are against them. What sometimes seems accidental is not. In human form, we don’t have the capacity to understand how this works, because everything is actualizing its potential within another realm.)

2. The way in which we die is not set and is subject to the potentialities of what happens in our life.

3. We do not die when it is not time and there is no such thing as died too young or went before our time. (In NDAs** one’s spirit enters the astral realm and returns as a consequence of it not being “time” to leave.)

4. There are many realms. There is no one heaven or hell, but an infinite number of realms we can go to depending on the potentialities of our existence.

There are infinite realms, which are interdimensional, also. In The Field of Existence there are places which are incomprehensible to the human mind. Since Omnipotence created Existence, you might say for simplicity’s sake that there are existential domains, which are by hierarchy related to levels of consciousness or ascension, overseen by Intelligence. If I were to go further, it may just take the surprise out of where you’re going when you leave this place. Besides, all you really have to know is God is at the highest, not lowest levels of consciousness.

5. We gravitate to the level of consciousness that we are. If we live in a type of hell of our own making here, that’s what we can choose to experience on the other side. It is all relative to what our soul’s consciousness has become or has the intention of becoming. Nothing is set in stone so to speak, and the spirit has free will to ascend.

6. There is Karma. This is a non-material, Divine action/reaction. See my article on the Four Phases of Karma.

7. We do have a body (energy) in the non-physical realms. As ones’ spirit progresses, the necessity for any sort of body decreases.

8. Suicide is not a “sin” and we do not have to return immediately to human form (as some high profile psychics have said). Suicide, like every action in ones life has a karmic consequence. We are not privy to know what that is.

9. Death and life are the same. There is no such thing as losing someone. It is only a matter of physical time before you may reunite with them. Spirit and consciousness are eternal. We are all a part of existence and are subject to Divine Law.

10. Existence in a non-physical body is nothing like that of material existence. We vibrate with a different intensity and consciousness calibrates at differing levels within the paradigm of the realm you are in. Movement occurs with the speed of thought. There is no physical pain since there is no physical body. Our mind/consciousness/spirit are one. The spirit retains a non-linear type of personality and we are capable of retaining negative as well as positive aspects of our totality. In this respect like tends to gravitate to like. Spirit however, may have an intrinsically higher level of consciousness in the non-material realm than the material realm, due to “spiritual amnesia,” an effect of physical rebirth. As a physical being, the potentialities of our lives effect our consciousness levels. Consciousness has the capability to ascend in the non-physical, but death alone is not a catalyst.***

11. Consciousness has free will within the physical and the non-physical realms. (Because the will is only as powerful as ones level of consciousness, this would define the parameters of the spirit’s capabilities.)

12. The angelic realm is by hierarchy only (angels and archangels have the capacity to move between realms). Spirit does not get to choose to become an “angel or archangel.” That would be akin to appointing an infant to be the Pope or the CEO of a company. (see #11)

13. All realms, (physical, celestial, astral, angelic and beyond) are entirely within the body of The Infinite Presence. In other words, you are a living presence within the Entirety of God. This eliminates any ideas of duality. We are one within The Body (Field) of Divinity (God).

14. The non-physical world has the power to affect the physical world by permission based on a hierarchy. This would be on a “need to” basis depending on karmic consequences and other factors. The higher levels of non-physical consciousness have higher powers. An example of this would be “help, signs, or otherworldly experiences” of no apparently source other than what we would call the “miraculous.” Lower consciousness (non-physical) does not have the capacity for the miraculous, but can influence (be attracted to) the physical based on human levels of lower consciousness. Be cautious of “what you are or are becoming” would be in order, lest you attract the lower entities and their negative influences. (The lower consciousness of the non-physical can heighten or strengthen the negative aspects of a physical being due to lower consciousness’s vulnerabilities.)

15. The soul (spirit body) has free will to choose its’ own ‘realm of existence’ within its’ consciousness level, in the non-physical realm.

16. There is no need for us to “know” what the other side is like, because it is different for every individual soul. Spirit has the capacity for actualizing anything within the potential of its’ particular level.

* Map of Consciousness, Transcending the
Levels of Consciousness, Dr. David Hawkins
** Near death experience
***(Consciousness within the material world evolves as matter evolves. Within higher levels of intelligence come forth the abilities to raise ones intrinsic level of consciousness. At the present time 1000 (Map of Consciousness, Consciousness Science) is the highest logarithmic level one can attain within physicality. Divinity’s’ level of consciousness is infinite and so the raising of ones level of consciousness higher 1000, becomes possible within the non-physical realm.)

©Myswizard all rights reserved ‘05-’06


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Higher States of Consciousness

Published on Wednesday, March 22nd, 2006

Masters of enlightenment throughout written history described enlightenment in their terminology of the time and their level of linguistic expertise. Within the modern world it is imperative for those on the path to enlightenment to understand many of the experiential changes which can happen within the higher states.

Dr. Hawkins describes these states within his books and lectures quite succinctly for his students, and I thank him from the bottom of my heart for his wisdom. Dr. Hawkins has imparted knowledge to his students about the ability of consciousness to jump as a result of ones: intentions, reading or seeing the materials, being in the presence of the teacher, or transcending obstacles on the path. Any or all of these can cause sudden awareness of changes.

Masters of enlightenment throughout written history described enlightenment in their terminology of the time and their level of linguistic expertise. Within the modern world, it is imperative for those on the path to enlightenment to understand many of the experiential changes that can happen within the higher states.

Dr. Hawkins describes these states within his books and lectures quite succinctly for his students, and I thank him sincerely for his wisdom. Dr. Hawkins has imparted knowledge to his students about the ability of consciousness to jump as a result of one’s intentions, reading or seeing the materials, being in the presence of the teacher, or transcending obstacles on the path. Any or all of these can cause sudden awareness of changes.

I thought it necessary to describe what consciousness feels like from an experiential view on the path to enlightenment. They are in no particular order, but each has an impact on how you experience the world of form. Although it may sound humorous, these feelings have nothing whatsoever to do with alcohol, mind-altering drugs, or dementia, although they may be mistaken by the outside world for the cause of these symptoms if friends and family aren’t forewarned of your intentions.

1. Time distortion: The effect of this would be hours seeming like seconds, or time standing still. Time itself would seemingly dissolve and become either relative or irrelevant.

2. Multidimensionalizing: The ability to see or view all sides of the material or immaterial. Ideas, problems, issues, physical objects take on an other dimensional feel or presence.

3. Expansion of consciousness outside of the body. Although it is not a permanent state, it can happen spontaneously.

4. Kundalini energy. A feeling of energy shooting up the back and into the crown of the head, causing a rush or state of “being high” feeling. This also can happen spontaneously.

5. Sight and sound clarity beyond the normal. Colors may seem brighter, visuals become clearer, and sometimes unpleasant or destructive sounds are unbearable.

6. The feeling of a presence without actually seeing anything. A comforting, warm, and surrounding feeling of love.

7. A feeling of being fuzzy as if clarity of thought is not necessary. This also can happen spontaneously.

8. Sudden feelings of sleepiness.

9. Seeing everything within the view of context, rather than content. It feels as if you are part of the totality of everything. This is a state that can remain with you a great deal of the time. It may manifest as seeming to be uncaring (neutral) or as shrugging off what used to seem important. Compassion is necessary here, especially when amongst those who still take all of life’s issues with a fervent seriousness.

10. Psychic openings. This can manifest as knowing the phone will ring or who it’s from. Feelings that occur that warn or “tell” you something. Visitations from other realms or ”the deceased.” Knowings about events or the Truth about things. (These can happen spontaneously or stay with you your entire life.) If they occur without having happened before, it may be representative of a jump in the level of one’s consciousness. In the case of knowings, there is discernment. Many times people who hear things are channeling “others” or getting information from the astral planes. This is a dangerous practice. It is knowing the difference between false information and that of The Field. I use AK when in any doubt.

11. Manifestations occurring. Things becoming available to you as you need them: i.e. information, convenient parking spaces, money, helping hands, willingness of others. The kindness of others is the rule (rather than the exception). The ability to let go of so-called important things. Other’s anger no longer has any effect on you. Life tends to flow, rather than be filled with obstacles. Startle reflex lessens or leaves completely.

12. Sudden understanding and realizations. There seems to be no further confusion about anything. Answers to questions manifest. Language and writing come forth with necessary eloquence, though it sometimes feels as if it’s coming from outside the self. It feels as though there is no need for clarification regarding other’s intentions or agendas. Truth reveals itself fully when needed.

13. Fear, anger, blame, and most of the ego’s characteristics and temptations are no longer issues. They may be experienced from time to time as the witness. Positionalities may come up but are also viewed from the state of observer and not taken seriously. Humor is seen in most things, and seriousness about this reality is abated.

14. There is no longer an urgency to do anything. If something thing occurs, it’s okay, and if not, that’s fine, also.

15. There is a tendency to avoid places or people who are not congruent.

16. Neediness toward anything lessens. If you go somewhere, do or have something, that’s okay, and if you don’t, that’s okay, also.


Tags: , , , ,

Bodhi

Published on Wednesday, March 22nd, 2006

Bodhi (Pāli and Sanskrit. Lit. awakening) is a title given in Buddhism to the specific awakening experience attained by the Indian spiritual teacher Gautama Buddha and his disciples. It is sometimes described as complete and perfect sanity, or awareness of the true nature of the universe. After attainment, it is believed one is freed from the cycle of Samsāra: birth, suffering, death and rebirth. Bodhi is most commonly translated into English as enlightenment, though this translation is problematic, since enlightenment (the soul being “lit” by a higher power) is originally a concept from Christian mysticism or conversely evokes notions of the 18th century European Age of Enlightenment that are not identical with the Buddhist concept of Bodhi. There is no image of “light” contained in the term, “Bodhi” - rather, it expresses the notion of awakening from a dream and of being aware and Knowing (Reality). It is thus preferable to think of Bodhi as spiritual “Awake-ness” or “Awakening”, rather than “enlightenment” (although it is true that imagery of light is extraordinarily prevalent in many of the Buddhist scriptures).

Bodhi is attained only by the accomplishment of the Paramitas (perfections), when the Four Noble Truths are fully grasped, and when all karma has reached cessation. At this moment, all greed (lobha), aversion (dosa), delusion (moha), ignorance (avijjā), craving (tanha) and ego-centered consciousness (attā) are extinguished. Bodhi thus includes anattā, the absence of ego-centeredness.

Certain Mahayana Buddhist sutras stress that Bodhi is always present and perfect, and simply needs to be “uncovered” or disclosed to purified vision. Thus the “Sutra of Perfect Awakening” has the Buddha teach that, like gold within its ore, Bodhi is always there within the being’s mind but requires the obscuring mundane ore (the surrounding defilements of samsara and of impaired, unawakened perception) to be removed. The Buddha declares:

“Good sons, it is like smelting gold ore. The gold does not come into being because of smelting … Even though it passes through endless time, the nature of the gold is never corrupted. It is wrong to say that it is not originally perfect. The Perfect Enlightenment of the Tathagata [Buddha] is also like this.”

Similar doctrines are encountered in the Tathagatagarbha sutras, which tell of the immanent presence of the Buddha Principle (Buddha-dhatu/ Buddha-nature) within all beings. Here, the Tathagatagarbha (Buddha-Matrix) is tantamount to the indwelling transformative and liberational power of Bodhi, which bestows an infinitude of unifying vision. The Buddha of the Shurangama Sutra states:

“My uncreated and unending profound Enlightenment accords with the Tathagatagarbha, which is absolute Bodhi, and ensures my perfect insight into the Dharma realm [realm of Ultimate Truth], where the one is infinite and the infinite is one.”

Queen Maya holding the branch of a Bodhi tree, during the birth of Siddhartha Gautama, Gandhara, 2-3rd century CE.

The Bodhi tree is a specimen of the Sacred Fig (Ficus religiosa) in what is now the town of Bodhgaya. It was while sitting in meditation under this tree that Siddhartha Gautama became enlightened. In the legends of Mahayana Buddhism, it was said that Queen Maya held a branch of one of these trees while resting in Lumbini Garden and her son, Siddhartha, was born.

Modes of Enlightenment

Sāvaka-Bodhi (Arhat)
Those who study the teaching of a samma-sambuddha and then attain enlightenment in this world are known as Arhats. Such beings are skilled at helping others to reach enlightenment as they may draw on personal experience.

Pacceka-Bodhi (Pratyeka)
Those who obtain enlightenment through self-realisation, without the aid of spiritual guides and teachers, are known as pratyekabuddhas. According to the Tripitaka, such beings only arise in ages where the dharma has been lost. Their skill in helping others to obtain enlightenment is inferior to that of the arhats, but one need to accumulate paramis in a much long time to become a pratyekabuddha than an Arhat. Many pratyekas may arise at a single time.

Sammā-Sambodhi (supreme Buddha)
These are perfect, most developed, most compassionate, most loving, all knowing beings who fully comprehend the dhamma by their own efforts and wisdom and teach it skillfully to others, freeing them from Samsāra. One that develops Sammā-Sambodhi is known as samma-sambuddha, and it is needed much more time of parami accumulation here than to become a pratyekabuddha

Quotes
When you get to this, then thoughts become still without being stilled, calmness and insight arise without being produced, the mind of the buddhas appears without being revealed. To try to liken it to the body of cosmic space or the light of a thousand suns would be to be further away than the sky is from the earth.
— Wei-tse
To be a living being is not the ultimate state; there is something beyond, much more wonderful, which is neither being nor non-being, neither living nor not-living. It is a state of pure awareness, beyond the limitations of space and time. Once the illusion that the body-mind is oneself is abandoned, death loses its terror, it becomes a part of living.
— Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj


Tags: , , , , , ,

The Expanding Knowledge of Spirituality

Published on Monday, March 20th, 2006

The knowledge regarding the path to enlightenment is expanding exponentially. Even as I write these words they become obsolete in their own way, as the ability to access the Infinite Field of Knowledge becomes increasingly available. This is one of the capabilities of a proactive website, which is my intention.

While browsing through my own library, flipping through past chapters in the vast amount of spiritual books I’ve read, I realized how many authors have had their own personal journeys. Books from twenty years ago almost pale against the writings in present books of Truth and integrity.

As humans evolve so does the knowledge of the experiential. More humans are becoming enlightened (albeit at a very minuscule percentage of the total population throughout time). Even those who have not yet reached enlightenment, but the levels just preceding it, have the capacity to eloquently explain the higher levels of spirituality in their own terminology.

As I’ve said in previous articles, there is no new spiritual knowledge but only new abilities to relate this knowledge based on present levels of intellectual capacity. I wonder however, how high our intellectual abilities for explanations and our capacity for understanding have to become, before we cease to write or speak at all. At that point I imagine, just the Knowing will be all there is. ©Myswizard all rights reserved ‘05-’06


Tags: , , , ,

Activism and Spirituality

Published on Sunday, March 12th, 2006

Activism is intentional action to bring about social or political change. This action is in support of, or opposition to, one side of a controversial argument. We all know those who gather in groups to create a spiritual change on the planet, help the poor, feed the hungry, keep the ozone layer from disappearing, etc, etc. There are many good people doing great works. There is a difference however, between service to others and fighting for a cause.

There are probably more activist groups fighting for change on the planet than anyone could ever conceive of. The intentions behind their actions are of the highest, but there are qualities about activism I’ve always questioned.* Does it work and is it fruitful? Does it matter in the long or short term? Would the planet have had the potential for change regardless of how hard anyone was forcing (yang), or should it change in its’ own time (yin)?

“Are we supposed to interfere?” Karma, being the great equalizer doesn’t ask us to get involved. Does God want us to “do something (or anything at all for that matter)?” The last and biggest question of all is, “Are we heaping more karma on ourselves or others? If we pick someone up who’s down and he or she keeps falling, are we preventing them from hitting bottom? We would certainly be extending their own journey and creating lengthier karmic consequences for them, as well as ourselves. This would apply to everything we interfere with.

How are we to know what’s the highest good for another? Perhaps their karmic highest good is exactly what is happening to them. Is there something, which we need to do? By keeping ones’ own consciousness level high, planetary consciousness is lifted, collectively. What we do is within the context of what we are, consciously. If our level of consciousness is above 500 and the level of love, or even higher (joy), then we would probably seek to alleviate suffering. At even higher levels, nothing needs doing. “The spiritual ego wants to save the world. What are you going to save it from? If you want to do something for the world, teach people to overcome ignorance.”__Dr. David Hawkins

Teaching is one of the highest forms of service. There are people all over the planet bringing wisdom to the world in the form of willingness to see education flourish. Seeing educational opportunities given to all is a very high calling. It is not necessarily the path to “enlightenment”, but it is a form of “right livelihood.” Teaching the path to enlightenment however, is the path to God. Enlightened education when incorporated into mainstream education has the ability to create an enlightened planet. Education alone, without higher consciousness doesn’t have the power to end wars, poverty, and unhappiness. What it could be creating are highly educated criminals, if spirit isn’t taken into consideration. There cannot be education without educating the totality of the Self.

A quality of activism is righteousness for others good. The injection of pride into this adds yet another layer of ego to unravel. Even with good intentions, this can be dangerous. Socrates said, “Man chooses only what he believes to be the good.” Man however, doesn’t have the capacity to know what’s good for himself let alone another’s Truth.** That’s a fact throughout history. Human beings have been warring more than they have ever been at peace. Warmongers will always want war, and those who have to defend themselves do so out of the necessity to serve. Minds cannot be changed through activism and force, so do we pluck the narcissistic megalomaniacs out of leadership at the start? Does policing the world have any positive effects? There is no proof it has worked in a permanent way, as evil continues to spawn as time goes on.

Superman of the 1950’s fought for truth, justice and the American way. That however was American truth, American justice and the American way wasn’t the way of the rest of the world. Fighting in any respect is force, not power, therefore pushing ones will where it was not asked for is a dangerous game. In a fight there is always a winner and a loser and the loser gets beat up. Win-lose is not a positive outcome. Choosing what we think is right for another is a dangerous, egoistic practice. That is true, historically. (Read about the history of the world wars to see what relativism has created.)

Is our activism as altruistic as we think? The enlightened master Ramana Maharshi said, “There’s no use in trying to save the world, for the world you see doesn’t even exist.” This is enlightened wisdom. What then are we supposed to do when called upon? Be kind to others? Yes. Hurt no living thing? Yes. Give a helping hand? Yes, but only for the highest good with compassion, but not endless enabling. Be charitable? Of course. Avoiding negativity and lower levels of consciousness is wise. In their own ways Jesus, Krishna and all enlightened masters have said this.

Practice loving kindness, while being non-interfering. Be that which is inspiring, not for a cause and effect, but because that is what you are. If one is inspired to do something, then the inspiration to give a part of yourself becomes its’ own highest meaning. Love produces a field which will lift others. Praying to God for guidance and the highest good for all is wiser than forcing that which will take its’ own course in Gods’ Infinite Time.

In order to reach the goal of enlightenment, all opinions, beliefs, and positionalities must be surrendered. Allow the Infinite Field of Consciousness to give you answers. Revere all of life for the miracle it is. As my teacher, Dr. Hawkins says, “Live life as a prayer.” ©Myswizard all rights reserved ‘05-’09

*Although I offer these questions within a linear, Newtonian paradigm, activism itself has no substance within the levels above 500 (calibration levels of The Map of Consciousness), which operates out of love and service. The answers to the questions are already known in the Infinite Field. Activism is a result of egoistic ideologies and righteousness. In actuality activism produces frustration, argumentation, conflict and questionable results.
**Truth as Divinity which is Absolute Truth.


Tags: , , , , , ,

Karmic Justice

Published on Tuesday, March 7th, 2006

The idea of karma hasn’t caught up with the west as a concept. It is accepted as Truth in the east because of Buddhism and other religions that see it as the non linear form of equalization that it is. In western societies an eye for an eye is considered justice. You do something to me; I do it back to you. This kind of justice however, continues to create more karma. It’s circuitous therefore never-ending. This may be the explanation for the slow rise within the levels of human consciousness throughout time. Karma is not a concept easily grasped by the majority. It is the reason our planet will stay at present levels or perhaps even slip backwards. In order to comprehend karma it’s necessary to understand the workings of it. (more details on the site)

Because of our linearity, we want immediate justice. Criminals cannot be allowed to walk the streets without being found guilty of their crimes and incarcerated. It is necessary however, for the safety of society to have those who have committed crimes to be taken away to be “punished.” The problem with our form of justice is criminals will commit crimes again. The recidivism rate for most criminals is very high. How can they grasp a concept such as live and let live or that stealing, raping or worse isn’t the way to live? It’s quite out of their realm of existence. Therefore they will continue to commit crimes, unless there is an intervention, Divine or otherwise which changes their positionality on life. True karma does not work in the ways we wish for it to. It comes from Divinity and we aren’t masters in that realm. Our capability lies within our intentions.

Modern society is quite wrapped up in the concerns of everyday life and so it should be. We have a lot to do while here. There’s an infinite amount of learning and experiencing to do. This is quite a place for that! We can suffer endlessly if we wish, get blown up, commit crimes of astounding proportions or seek enlightenment. The Truth is, it’s still a world where karma ranks high in importance within the upper levels of consciousness due to the fact we are experiencing it continually.

Karmic Justice is Absolute. It is justice by Divinity. It doesn’t work within the constructs of our material world or time frames. It is not God being the punisher, but a way in which our souls can experience what it is we are (were) being when we are (were) being “that”. It doesn’t necessarily happen within the lifetime some would like for others to see it in. Because of this we are always feeling the “bad guys” didn’t get their “just due”. Karma is not a concept one can be convinced of. It is a realization of the higher consciousness levels. It’s a contextual concept as opposed to one that’s concerned with present content. It takes justice to a much higher level within the world of the spirit.

The higher the scale of consciousness, the more one is able to discreate karma without creating anything new. Kindness, honesty and non interference become an integral part of life. A knowing occurs that any action or thought will create new karma. It is seen for the perfection of “justice” which it is…Myswizard
©Myswizard all rights reserved ‘05-’06


Tags: , ,

The Theory of Everything

Published on Monday, March 6th, 2006

It was a bit difficult knowing where to put this on my site. After all, it’s The Theory of Everything, by Myswizard. Whew! As a prelude to writing my own Theory of Everything, I did put information on the scientific Theories of Everything or Unified Theory or Unified Field Theory under “Science”. I like the name Unified Field Theory. It’s such a spiritual sounding title. Unified in the Webster’s New World Dictionary means “to combine into one; become or make united; consolidate. So that was easy. It’s the One Theory. “The One and Only Theory of Everything That Exists and The Reasons Behind It All Theory.”

Scientists like to figure everything out. I wasn’t a great math student, but I did fine in science. The scientific knowledge out there, boggles my mind. I’ve read a lot of scientific theories since college and I’ve taken an interest in Quantum Physics because it comes closet to the world I’m familiar with… the Spiritual Domain. A Unified Theory of Everything sounds as great as the New Unified Theory of Creation going on out there. There’s only one problem with both theories or stories. The scientific theory has scientific facts and the religious version has some spiritual Truths, but neither one is the “Unified Theory of Truth”. The One and Only Unified Truth, not theory. Theories are speculative, conjecture, and at best a good guess.

If I told you now I guess I risk having nothing more to say. It will all be over. The reason behind everything, the how and the why. It’s a short book. Just a few sentences and it’s over. I’m not worried, however, because there’s an infinite amount of intelligent people out there who would argue, debate, disbelieve, be skeptical, cynical and maybe even chuckle. Most of them won’t even be visiting this site, so I need not worry.

I’ve often discussed my KISS method to spirituality. Keep it simple, sweetheart. If you thought you were going to read something else, you’re on the wrong site. I like to keep things simple. Maybe it comes from having to read so many manuals and business related materials over the years. Perhaps it’s because I’ve reached pre-senior age. Mostly it’s because humans don’t really want complications. They want to understand easily. In as few words as possible, not a PhD. dissertation. I love to intellectualize, but that’s just for fun. In reality I want brief, but meaningful explanations.

These are the things I cannot give you.
1. The explanations for why in scientific terms.
2. The explanations for how in scientific terms.
3. Any scientific or linear world explanations.

Here it is…(to be expanded upon as more information becomes available)
Everything is happening of its’ own. All things in the universe have been manifested by Divine Intelligence. The Universal Field of Potentiality is creating infinitely. Out of The Divine Potential comes forth all that exists. Its’ a self fulfilling Potentiality creating the actual (the physical and non physical manifestation) of our world, infinite worlds, universes, and infinite planes of existence. This Potentiality is of Infinite Power. The kind of Power that has no apparent source other than the Source of Divinity. This kind of power is inconceivable in the material domain. It is Self generating, Self propagating, Self actualizing, Infinite, Eternal, Infinitely Powerful and Pure Potentiality. It is Omniscient, Omnipresent, and Omnipotent. It is All that ever was, and All that ever will be. It is Absolute. Out of Divinity came forth the Divine Potentiality, which spawned Divine Actuality, in order to “experience” the Beingness of That Actuality.

(Consciousness within the material world evolves as matter evolves. Within higher levels of intelligence come forth the abilities to raise ones intrinsic level of consciousness. At the present time 1000 (Map of Consciousness, Consciousness Science) is the highest logrithmic level one can attain within a physicality. Divinitys’ level of consciousness is infinite and so the raising of ones level of consciousness higher than 1000, becomes possible within the non-physical realm.)

Now you can add in the scientific, geologic, anthropological and anthropomorphic explanations, and here we are! Divinity was a priori to everything that came after. It’s still creating and evolving eternally. Creation and evolution are the same. They are inseparable. So any theories that favor one over the other are False. You cannot have a divisive evolution. It is creation and that is God. (What’s in a name? that which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet.)…Shakespeare

Ref. (All works of Dr. David Hawkins… from 1995-2006)
(Other masters on this site)
(Divine Guidance)


Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Experiential Divinity vs Common Reality

Published on Saturday, March 4th, 2006

There is a theory that empiricism is a more practical way of seeing or experiencing truth. Since empiricism means to search for knowledge through experimentation, experience and observation, the way to Truth* through this method is a possibility, unless one’s methods do not distort the Truth. Since our minds cannot discern the difference between truth and falsehood, it becomes circuitous due to the fact that mentalization is not a way of finding Truth. It is experiential only in that it hypothesizes what it “thinks” is the correct answer. This is in actuality, seeing what you believe. Unfortunately for believers, a belief in something does not make it true. Our eyes and our minds deceive us with regularity. The dictum, “I’ll believe it when I see it” is having truth be “the way in which we view something.” Beliefs are still not Truth, but merely a viewpoint. Relativism is a way saying, “What is true for ourselves is our truth,” but in actuality should state, “What we think is our truth is just another self deception.”

Our mind therefore, is not the way to Truth anymore than our common beliefs are. The only way to Truth is through Divinity which is entirely experiential and related to the higher levels of consciousness. As one climbs the ladder, the urge to share this knowledge becomes lessened by the experience itself. What we see in the world of academia is a sharing of ideas and belief systems based on intellectualism and philosophy. The great “realized” masters of the past and present are very rare, but the intellectualization of the spiritual world is widespread. In this we see spiritual ideas that are infused with academic beliefs.

What we as spiritual devotees look within ourselves for, is the subjectively experiential basis for Truth borrowed from The Divine Field of Intelligence, confirming (if you wish) with Consciousness Science. This ability is created as a consequence of ones’ level of consciousness.

The reality is, what the majority of the worlds’ population experiences is common reality. It’s experienced as content rather than context, and ones everyday life is realized as their own melodrama. When the situations within ones’ life are taken as absolute reality, this is the common experience of reality. Most people are in the world and not of the world. Because of the current level of consciousness within the world today, reality is seen from a linear point of view. Whatever people experience on a basic level is what life appears to be. The idea of the exploration of ones’ spiritual nature hasn’t reached them yet and common reality is their only world.

Within the gates of Experiential Divinity is the willingness to seek enlightenment for its’ own sake. But what if all you want to do is better yourself as a human and a spiritual being? You desire Truth, but cannot get there. You aren’t seeking enlightenment, but you are seeking answers, knowledge, and a closeness to your Source. The answers to Truth aren’t out there. The answers one is seeking is within ones’ own connection with Divinity, and this connection cannot be made until certain barriers fall. The path is rife with these obstacles. Don’t allow this to dissuade you, because to be on the path at all, is rare. Truth will wait until you find it. Until then, practice kindness, willingness, and compassion, at all times. Within these three simple things one can find Divinity. You will not have to wonder if it has, happened__you will know.
*Absolute Truth


Tags: , , , , , , ,

Human Relationships and Levels of Consciousness

Published on Thursday, February 9th, 2006

Relationships are the most difficult, but effective way to “know” ourselves. As a societal entity, relationships are propitious for many other reasons. Basic biological impulses bring people together to propagate, and although a modern phenomena, “romantic” love continues to connect people, even if one cannot make sense of it.

Our human nature and egos have been a driving force to be together with others for pleasure, companionship, and sex throughout time. Mirroring each other (seeing ourselves in another) is another of the urgencies that drive us to be together (subsisting perhaps from our animal nature.) Within the levels of lower consciousness, individual neediness prevails and all of the baser instincts that accompany it. In all cases, humans will strive to “be” together, even if at war with each other.

The “health” of a relationship is direct correlation to the level of consciousness of the participants in that relationship. The probability of gross differences within mature relationships is minimal, however with an inequality of consciousness levels several things are apt to occur. Since there is more power within the higher levels of consciousness, the bouyancy of the higher level will “lift all ships.” Unless the ego becomes involved, the probability of falling back to a lower level, lessens. The higher the mutual level of consciousness, the higher the likelihood of a continued successful relationship.

The optimal relationship would be one in which both people calibrate* within a close range, or one calibrates high enough as to balance any negativity from lower levels. If the relationship is of the highest importance to both, then a commitment must be made to raise up the level of consciousness within and all that it entails.(i.e. therapy, counseling, cleric intervention) When only one has made a commitment, it’s only through the shear strength of the love in the relationship that it continues.

Another quality of an optimal relationship would be radical honesty. Radical honesty is living in Truth. This is Truth with the context of Divinity or The Infinite Field of Consciousness. Honesty wouldn’t be a concept with fear of reprisal, but practiced as a result of what you’ve become, or through having the intention to live Truth within the levels of Higher Consciousness. It is a way of a life which is lived completely in recognition of each others’ spirit. If the willingness to practice radical honesty is lacking, the relationship will remain within the confines of mediocrity.

Within the higher levels of consciousness, relationships stand a better chance of successful long term survival. By practicing courage, willingness and reason, relationships take on a different meaning. There is solidarity, alignment, common ground, desire for the good of the “other” and a healthy love for one another. As the levels of consciousness between couples rises, so does their goal for the common good of all. Divinity becomes a part of everyday life and the highest good for the relationship is realized. Egos have no place in the interaction within the relationship. Love is unconditional and joy abounds.

At the lower levels where ego reigns, relationships are at best strained, and at worst destructive. This is where shame, grief, fear, anger and pride reside. Relationships such as these may continue for a lifetime with no resolution to the upside or end in heartbreak, anger, and confusion.

If it seems as if relationships are a near impossibility to be successful, it is because of the present truth of that statement. The present consciousness levels of humankind (presently at 78% below that of integrity) will keep most relationships at their present levels. The success rate of all relationships can be gauged with accuracy within the levels of human consciousness at the time. The future of relationships is hopeful however, with the knowledge that the consciousness level of humankind is rising, even if at an infinitely slow rate. The willingness and the intention to be that which will sustain a healthy and higher relationship with another, will be the only way in which present and future generations will subsequently realize enlightened relationships…©Myswizard all rights reserved ‘05-’06

*See Dr. David Hawkins, Map of the Scale of Consciousness, “Transcending the Levels of Consciousness, the Stairway to Enlightenment”

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Nondualism

Published on Wednesday, February 1st, 2006

Nondualism is the belief that dualism or dichotomy are illusory phenomena. Examples of dualisms include self/other, mind/body, male/female, good/evil, active/passive, and many others. A nondual philosophical or religious perspective or theory maintains that there is no fundamental distinction between mind and matter, or that the entire phenomenological world is an illusion (with the reality being described variously as the Void, the Is, Emptiness, or the Nondualism).

Many traditions (generally originating in Asia) state that the true nature of reality is non-dualistic, and that these dichotomies are either unreal or (at best) inaccurate conveniences. While attitudes towards the experience of duality and self may vary, nondual traditions converge on the view that experience does not imply an “I”.

In Western philosophy, nondual views are often called monism. Many postmodern theories also assume that the dichotomies traditionally used are invalid or inaccurate. For example, one typical form of deconstruction is the critique of binary oppositions within a text while problematization questions the context or situation in which common myths such as dualisms occur. Nondualistic beliefs also include monism and pluralism.

Terminology
The term “nondual” is a literal translation of the Sanskrit term advaita.

In the context of postmodern feminism and Tibetan Buddhism, Anne Carolyn Klein (1995, p.151), defines “dualism” as “an opposition that presumes a differance or tension that goes beyond taking account of qualities unique to logically related categories, for example, subject and object, sacred and profane, or enlightened or unenlightened.” She defines cognitive, ontological, and evolutionary nondualism. Simultaneous perception of self and other or joining of subject and object, simultaneous perception of one’s conditioned and unconditioned aspects, and one’s potential or inherent enlightenment, respectively.

Nondual realization
To the Nondualist, reality is ultimately neither physical nor mental. Instead, it is an ineffable state or realization. This ultimate thing can be called “Spirit” (Aurobindo), “Brahman” (Shankara), “God”, “The One”, “The All” (Plotinus), “The Self” (Ramana Maharshi), “The Absolute” (Schelling) or simply “The Nondual” (Bradley). Ram Dass calls it the “third plane”—any phrase will be insufficient, he maintains, so any phrase will do.

It should be pointed out that, technically, there can be no such thing as a nondual perspective or theory or experience, only a realization of Oneness or nonduality. One cannot accurately claim to experience nonduality, because the concept of experience depends on the subject-object distinction, which is a duality. The subject experiences an object, which is something separate from the subject. This is incompatible with a truly nondual realization. Thus, technically, there cannot truly be an accurate verbal account of this union, only words that insufficiently point to the realization.

Nondual religious and spiritual traditions

Zen
Zen, either in isolation or as a spiritual belief (Zen Buddhism), is a tradition or philosophy which is non-dual. It can be considered a religion, a philosophy, or simply a practice depending on one’s perspective. It has also been described as a way of life, work, and an art form.

Buddhism
In the Buddhist canon, the Diamond Sutra presents an accessible nondual view of “self” and “beings”, while the Heart Sutra asserts shunyata — the “emptiness” of all “things”. The fullest philosophical exposition is the Madhyamaka; by contrast many laconic pronouncements are delivered as koans. Advanced views and practices are found in the Mahamudra and Maha Ati, which emphasize the vividness and spaciousness of nondual awareness.

Not Two, Not One
Mahayana Buddhism, in particular, tempers the view of nonduality (wisdom) with respect for the experience of duality (compassion) — ordinary dualistic experience, populated with selves and others (sentient beings), is tended with care, always “now”. This approach is itself regarded as a means to disperse the confusions of duality (i.e. as a path). In Theravada, that respect is expressed cautiously as non-harming, while in the Vajrayana, it is expressed boldly as enjoyment (especially in tantra).

Dzogchen
Dzogchen is a relatively esoteric (to date) tradition concerned with the “natural state”, and emphasizing direct experience. This tradition is found in the Nyingma tradition of Tibetan Buddhism, where it is classified as the highest of this lineage’s nine yanas, or vehicles of practice. Similar teachings are also found in the non-Buddhist Bön tradition. In Dzogchen, the primordial state, the state of nondual awareness, is called rigpa.

Advaita
Advaita (Sanskrit a, not; dvaita, dual) is a nondual tradition from India, with Advaita Vedanta as its philosophical arm. The theory was first consolidated by Sri Adi Shankaracharya in the 8th century AD. Adherents to this theory of the nature of the soul (Brahman) are known as Smarthas.

According to Ramana Maharshi, the jnani (one who has realised the Self) sees no individual ego, and does not regard himself (or anyone else) as a “doer” of actions. The state of recognition is called jnana which means “knowledge” or “wisdom” referring to the idea that in this state of being, one is constantly aware of the Self. Bob Adamson (Melbourne, Australia), once a student of Nisargadatta Maharaj, who belonged to the Navanath Sampradaya lineage, says that a ‘Jnani’ is the ‘knowing presence’ which abides with all (of us) yet this knowing is seemingly covered over by identification with the ‘minds content’. However, teachers like Adamson point to the fact that the content of the mind is known, recognized by a prescence or awareness that is independent of the mind’s content. Adamson teaches that we form an identity based on the content of the mind (feelings, sensations, hopes, dreams, thoughts), however our true identity or nature is that which observes all of these things - the seer, the witness or the Self.

Taoism
Taoism’s wu wei (Chinese wu, not; wei, doing) is a term with various translations (e.g. inaction, non-action, nothing doing, without ado) and interpretations designed to distinguish it from passivity. From a nondual perspective, it refers to activity that does not imply an “I”.

Sufism
Sufism (Arabic تصوف taṣawwuf) is a mystic tradition of Islam based on the pursuit of spiritual truth as it is gradually revealed to the heart and mind of the Sufi (one who practices Sufism).

The central doctrine of Sufism, sometimes called Wahdat al-Wujud or Unity of Being, is the Sufi understanding of Tawhid. Put very simply, Tawhid states that all phenomena are manifestations of a single reality, or Wujud (being), which is indeed al-Haq (Truth, God). The essence of being/Truth/God is devoid of every form and quality, and hence unmanifest, yet it is inseparable from every form and phenomenon either material or spiritual. It is often understood to imply that every phenomenon is an aspect of Truth and at the same time attribution of existence to it is false. The chief aim of all Sufis then is to let go of all notions of duality (and therefore of the individual self also), and realize the divine unity which is considered to be the truth.

Individuals subscribing to a non-dual view of reality

Ancient Western philosophers
Plotinus

Medieval Western philosphers
Hildegard of Bingen
Mechteld of Magdeburg
Meister Eckhart
John of the Cross
Teresa of Avila

Modern Western philosophers
Baruch Spinoza
F. H. Bradley
Ken Wilber
David R Hawkins

Asian philosophers and spiritual leaders
Nagarjuna
Shankaracharya
Aurobindo
Ramana Maharshi
Nisargadatta Maharaj
Ramesh Balsekar
Mahatma Gandhi
Lao Tzu
Gaudapada
Uddalaka Aruni
Yajnavalkya
Bhartrhari

Authors
Richard Bach
Kahlil Gibran

Musicians
Stuart Davis

See also
Advaita
shunyata
Diamond Sutra
Heart Sutra
Hinayana
A Course in Miracles
Enlightenment
Taoism
Eckhart Tolle
Nirvikalpa

External links
Dzogchen Practice in Everyday Life by HH Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche
Rigpa, Non-dual Awareness
Sentient.org
Ramesh Baleskar’s website
Dhamma and Non-duality by Bhikkhu Bodhi
Western approachs to nonduality:

A Course in Consciousness
Tony Parsons - Welcome to The Open Secret
Nathan Gill
Sailor Bob Adamson
The Atma Institute, CA
greaterreality.com (contains a mixture of nondual, science and new age)

Source
Klein, Anne Carolyn (1995). Meeting the Great Bliss Queen: Buddhists, Feminists, and the Art of the Self. Boston, Beacon Press. ISBN 0807073067.

References
Baleskar, Ramesh (1999). Who cares?
Castaneda, Carlos (1987). The Power of Silence. New York: Simon and Schuster. ISBN 0-671-50067-8.
Godman, David (Ed.) (1985). Be As You Are: The Teachings of Sri Ramana Maharshi. London: Arkana. ISBN 0-14-019062-7.
HH The Dalai Lama (2000). Dzogchen: The Heart Essence of the Great Perfection. Ithaca: Snow Lion Publications. ISBN 1-55939-157-X.
Kongtrül, Jamgön (1992). Cloudless Sky: The Mahamudra Path of The Tibetan Buddhist Kagyü School. Boston: Shambhala Publications. ISBN 0-87773-694-4.
Norbu, Namkhai (1993). The Crystal and the Way of Light: Sutra, Tantra and Dzogchen. London: Arkana. ISBN 0-14-019314-6.
Trungpa, Chögyam (1987). Cutting Through Spiritual Materialism. Boston: Shambhala Publications. ISBN 0-87773-050-4.
Watson, Burton (Trans.) (1968). The Complete Works of Chuang Tzu. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-03147-5.

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article “Nondualism”.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Bhagavan Sri Ramana Maharshi

Published on Tuesday, January 31st, 2006

Bhagavan Sri Ramana Maharshi

The Sage of Arunachala

30th Dec. 1879 to 14th April 1950

Throughout the history of mankind spiritual giants have appeared on very rare ocassions to exemplify the Highest Truth, guiding followers by their conduct in every moment of their lives; Sri Ramana Maharshi was such a giant. Unique in our time, He perfectly embodied the ultimate truth of Self-realisation, or complete immersion in God.

Known as the Sage of Arunachala, He spoke and wrote very little. He preferred to communicate through the power of overwhelming Silence, a silence so deep and powerful that it stilled the minds of ardent seekers who were attracted to Him from all over the world.

His highest teaching of ‘Self-enquiry’ was understood in the infinite silence of his presence. Through this silence, countless numbers of devotees and visitors experienced the pure bliss of True Being. That same experience of perfect peace is still available to sincere souls who turn to him and practice his teachings with devotion.

This act of perfect grace can be experienced anywhere, but it is especially palpable at the foot of the holy Arunachala Hill, a hill that has attracted saints and sages for thousands of years. The Maharshi’s teaching of ‘Self-enquiry’ (Pure Advaita,) is simplicity itself, requiring no outward formalities, no outer change of life, only a simple change in ‘point of view’ and a sustained effort on the part of the seeker. The goal is no heaven after death or a faraway ideal, but rather the removal of the ignorance that prevents us from knowing that we are eternally One with our Source, the Supreme Self, or God. It is an experience than can be had NOW! All that is required is a sincere effort, which earns us the necessary grace.

On his deathbed the Maharshi told his grieving devotees, “You say I am going away, but where can I go? I am always here. You give too much importance to the body.” His promise of a ‘continued presence’ is daily being experienced by numerous devotees from around the world, and it is that experience of ‘continued presence’ that has inspired many to devote themselves to the path of peace and love.

Devotees are not required to give up their current faith in God (however perceived) and practices of devotion or worship, in fact they are encouraged to continue in them as long as benefit is perceived. Self-enquiry does not require the seeker to leave home, job, family or anything else. Progress depends only upon effort and nothing else and help in Sadhana (Spiritual effort) is always available.

Truth is Freedom.

Ramana-Maharshi


Tags: , , , , , , ,

Keep it Simple

Published on Friday, January 27th, 2006

I’m continually getting e mails to check out various websites, efforts, and spiritual endeavors. There’s an immense amount of great spirits out there doing great things for humanity. The subject is creation and evolution and it’s a highly charged one. People will debate it forever. This is only a commentary, but it’s relevant to our world as it is today.

A great group of folks have gotten together to form a site and a project devoted to a “new” way of presenting creation. It blends the scientific with the spiritual and it’s a valiant effort. I wonder, however, how much of a difference most of it makes toward an enlightened planet. It’s not a simple effort. It starts from scientific beginnings and then writers will be adding to the story with spiritual ideas. We are back to theories and specualtion mixed with scientific data. Still not Absolute Truth, but truth. It satisfies the intellect. It’s above the level of truth, but only to satisfy the linear realm.

Humans are obsessed with finding complex explanations for everything, but we are not capable of finding Truth on our own without Divine guidance. I just read an article that 22% of Britons are still convinced of the creation theory. If they’re representative of just a part of the world, imagine what the rest thinks. So many opinions and religious doctrine abound. But there is still only one Truth. Only one… not millions of versions. But humans have a desperate need to figure everything out…and so the search for “why” and “how” will continue.

All that has ever been said in Truth is already available to us.(see Spiritual Masters) When the student is ready… perhaps the teacher with Truth will appear. If organization is necessary, then let’s keep it simple. If explanations have to be recontextualized, make them short. Remember Occams Razor. The best way is the simplest. Let’s not confuse the spiritual initiates any further. The fastest way to becoming enlightened (which will give you the answer) is to keep transcending. This alone raises mass consciousness. If people are destined to be enlightened they will be. The creation of our universe and the infinite amount of universes out there is not explicable in human terms. Billions of words are not going to come up with a definitive explanation for the humanly unexplainable. Until the masses have become enlightened, why not practice honesty, kindness and cooperation? The complexity of our world lends itself to revisiting the simple, and the simple Truth is…well let’s keep that for a future article.


Tags: , , , ,

Advaita Vedanta

Published on Wednesday, January 25th, 2006

Advaita Vedanta

Hinduism

History · Deities
Denominations · Mythology
Beliefs & practices
Reincarnation · Moksha
Karma · Puja · Maya
Nirvana · Dharma
Yoga · Ayurveda
Yuga · Vegetarianism
Bhakti · Artha
Scriptures
Upanishads · Vedas
Brahmana · Bhagavad Gita
Ramayana · Mahabharata
Purana · Aranyaka
Related topics
Hinduism by country
Leaders · Mandir ·
Caste system · Mantra
Glossary · Hindu festivals
Murti
Advaita Vedanta (IAST advaita vedānta; Devanagari अद्वैत वेदान्त; IPA [ədvaitə vé:dα:ntə]) is probably the best known of all Vedanta schools of philosophy of Hinduism, the others being Dvaita and Vishishtadvaita (total six). “Advaita” literally means “not two”, and is often called a monistic or non-dualistic system which essentially refers to the indivisibility of the Self (Atman) from the Whole (Brahman). The key texts from which all Vedanta (lit., end or the goal of the Vedas) texts draw are the Upanishads (twelve or thirteen in particular), which are usually at the end of the Vedas, and the Brahma Sutras (also known as Vedanta Sutras), which in turn discuss the essence of the Upanishads.

Adi Sankara: The Pillar of Advaita

The first person to consolidate the principles of Advaita was Adi Sankara (आदि शंकर, pronounced as /α:di shənkərə, 788-820 CE, i.e., 788-820 AD). He is also known as Śankarāchārya (शंकराचार्य, pronounced as /shənkərα:chα:ryə/). Continuing the line of thought of some of the Upanishadic teachers, and also that of his own teacher’s teacher Gaudapada, (Ajativada). Sankara expounded the doctrine of Advaita — a nondualistic reality. According to Advaitins (followers of Advaita), Sankara exposed the relative nature of the world and established the supreme truth of the Advaita by analysing the three states of experience — being awake (vaishvanara), dreaming (swapna), and being in deep sleep (sushupti). The supreme truth of the Advaita is said to be the non-dual reality of Brahman, in which atman (the individual soul) and Brahman (the Supreme Consciousness) are identified absolutely. (Brahman is not to be confused with Brahma, the Creator and one-third of the Trimurti along with Shiva, the Destroyer and Vishnu, the Preserver.)

Adi Shankara, with his disciples. [1]Psychologically, Advaita is a state in which the subject and object lose their independent identities — in which one can no longer differentiate on the basis of any material characteristics. The three states mentioned earlier are said to be mere transformations of this (fourth) state of experience of non-duality turiya.

This idea of a fourth state of consciousness is borrowed from the Taittariya Upanishad, dating back to about 1000 BCE. It may be noted that another school of non-dual (but agnostic) thought, Buddhism, also talks of such a similar transcendental state (as vinnanam anidassanam, in the Brahmanimantanika Sutta (Majjhima-Nikaya)). The idea of such a state of enlightenment has been a favorite with ancient Indian philosophers, and still continues to be.

Sankara’s contributions to Advaita are crucial. His main works are the commentaries on the Prasthanatrayi and the Gaudapadiya karikas. Another treatise on Advaita, popularly attributed to him by the more enthusiastic followers of the system, is the Viveka Chudamani. Note that many other followers believe that this is not the work of Sankara, citing several differences in style and ideas. Many philosophers after Sankara have criticized him of being hypocritical or pracchanabauddha (Buddhist in disguise), mainly due to this work. This is because the Buddhist positions which Sankara refutes in the Brahma Sutra Bhashyas seem to be wholly advocated in the Viveka Chudamani.

Sankara is also well known for propounding a system of bhakti (selfless devotion) and composing several bhajans (devotional songs), which he believed brought one closer to God. Some of his well-known bhajans are Bhaja Govindam, Saundaryalahari and Śivānandalahari.

Salient Features of Advaitism

Indian philosophy
Hindu philosophy
Samkhya
Nyaya
Vaisheshika
Yoga
Purva Mimamsa
Uttara Mimamsa
Advaita Vedanta
Vishishtadvaita
Dvaita
Carvaka philosophy
Jain philosophy
Buddhist philosophy
Logic

Three levels of Truth

The transcendental or the Pāramārthika level in which Brahman is the only reality and nothing else;
The pragmatic or the Vyāvahārika level in which both Jiva (living creatures or individual souls) and Ishvara are true; here, the material world is completely true, and,
The apparent or the Prātibhāsika level in which even material world reality is actually false, like illusion of a snake over a rope or a dream.

Brahman

According to Sankara, God, the the Supreme Cosmic Spirit or Brahman (pronounced as /brəh mən/; nominative singular Brahma, pronounced as /brəh mə/) is the One, the whole and the only reality. Other than Brahman, everything else, including, universe, material objects and individuals are not true. Brahman is (at best) described as that infinite, omnipresent, omnipotent, incorporeal, impersonal, transcendent reality that is the divine ground of all Being. It (gramatically neutral, but exceptionally treated as masculine), though not a substance, is the basis of the material world, which in turn is its illusionary transformation. Brahman is not the effect of the world. Brahman is said to be the purest knowledge itself, and is illuminant like a source of infinite light.

Due to ignorance (avidyā), the Brahman is visible as the material world and its objects. The actual Brahman is attributeless and formless (see Nirguna Brahman). It is the Self-existent, the Absolute and the Imperishable (not generally the object of worship but rather of meditation). Brahman is actually indescribable. But Sankara says that Brahman cannot be identified with Shunya or zeroness of Buddhism. It is at best, “Sat” + “Chit” + “Ananda”, ie, Infinite Truth, Infinite Consciousness and Infinite Bliss. Also, Brahman is free from any kind of differences. It does not have any sajātīya (homogeneous) differences because there is no second Brahman. It does not have any vijātīya (heterogeneous) differences because there is nobody in reality existing other than Brahman. It has neither svagata (internal) differences, because Brahman is itself homogenous.

Though Brahman is self-proven, some logical proofs have also been proposed by Shankara:

Shruti—the Upanishads, the Bhagavad Gita and the Brahma Sutras describe Brahman in almost exact manner as Shankara. This is the testimonial proof of Brahman.
Psychological—every person experiences his soul, or atman. According to Shankara, atman = Brahman. This argument also proves Brahman.
Teliological—the world appears very well ordered; the reason for this cannot be an unconscious principle. The reason must be Brahman.
Essential—Brahman is the basis of this created world.
Perceptible Feeling—Many people, when they achieve the turīya state, claim that their soul has become one with eveything else. The feeling of this transcedental perception is regarded as the best proof for Brahman.

Māyā

Māyā (/mα: yα:/) is the most important contribution of Sankara. Māyā is that complex illusionary power of Brahman which causes the Brahman to be seen as the distinct material world. It has two main functions — one is to “cover up” Brahman from the human minds, and the other is to present the material world in its stead. Māyā is also indescribable. It is neither completely real nor completely unreal—hence indescribable. Its shelter is Brahman, but Brahman itself is untouched by the profanity of Māyā, just like a magician is not tricked by his own magic. Māyā is temporary and is destroyed with “true knowledge”. This Māyāvāda of Sankara was highly criticized and misunderstood. Bhaskaracharya, a Hindu mathematician, described Shankara to be indebted to the Buddhists for his concept of Māyā. But Guff, Cowell and other writers claim to find the concept of Māyā in a germinating form in the Vedas and the Upanishads. Shankara had used the terms Māyā and avidya (ignorance) in the same sense, but the later Advaitins called Māyā as the positive force of God and avidyā as a negetive knowledge.

The concept of Māyā seems to be a hypothesis. Since according to the Upanishads only Brahman is real, but we see the material world to be real, Shankara explained the anomaly by the concept of this illusionary power Māyā.

Ishvara

Ishvara (pronounced as /ī:sh vərə/, lit., the Supreme Lord) — when man tries to know the attributeless Brahman with his mind, under the influence of Maya, Brahman becomes the Lord. Ishvara is Brahman with Maya — the manifested form of Brahman. Shankara uses a metaphor that when the “reflection” of the Cosmic Spirit falls upon the mirror of Maya, it appears as the Supreme Lord. The Supreme Lord is true only in the pragmatic level — his actual form in the transcendental level is the Cosmic Spirit.

Ishvara is Saguna Brahman or Brahman with innumerable auspicious qualities. He is all-perfect, omniscient, omnipresent, incorporeal, independent, Creator of the world, its ruler and also destroyer. He is causeless, eternal and unchangeable — and is yet the material and the efficient cause of the world. He is both immanent (like whiteness in milk) and transcendent (like a watch-maker independent of a watch). He may be even regarded to have a personality. He is the subject of worship. He is the basis of morality and giver of the fruits of one’s Karma. However, he himself is beyond sin and merit. He rules the world with his Maya — his divine power. This association with a “false” knowledge does not affect the perfection of Ishvara, in the same way as a magician is himself not tricked by his magic. However, while Isvara is the Lord of Maya and she (ie, Maya) is always under his control, the living beings (jīva, in the sense of humans) are the servants of Maya (in the form of ignorance). This ignorance is the cause of the unhappiness and sin in the mortal world. While Ishvara is Infinite Bliss, humans are miserable. Ishvara always knows the unity of the Brahman substance, and the Mayic nature of the world. There is no place of a Satan or devil in Hinduism, unlike Abrahamic religions. Advaitins explain the misery because of ignorance. Ishvara can also be visualized and worshipped in anthropomorphic form like Vishnu, Krishna or Shiva.

Now the question arises that why the Supreme Lord created the world. If one assumes that Ishvara creates the world for any incentive, this slanders the wholeness and perfection of Ishvara. For example, if one assumes that Ishvara creates the world for gaining something, it would be against his perfection. If we assume that He creates for compassion, it would be illogical, because the emotion of compassion cannot arise in a blank and void world in the beginning (when only Ishvara existed). So Shankara assumes that Creation is a sport of Ishvara. It is His nature, just as it is man’s nature to breathe.

The sole proof for Ishvara that Sankara gives is Shruti’s mentions about Ishvara, as Ishvara is beyond logic and thinking. This is similar to Kant ’s philosophy about Ishvara in which he says that “faith” is the basis of theism. However, Shankara has also given few other logical proofs for Ishvara, but warning us not to completely rely on them:

The world is a work, an effect, and so must have real cause. This cause must be Ishvara.
The world has a wonderful unity, coordination and order, so its creator must have been an intelligent being.
People do good and sinful work and get its fruits, either in this life or after. People themselves cannot be the giver of their fruits, as no one would give himself the fruit of his sin. Also, this giver cannot be an unconscious object. So the giver of the fruits of Karma is Ishvara.

Atman

The swan is an important motif in Advaitism. It symbolizes two things — firstly, the swan is called hamsah in Sanskrit (which becomes hamso if the first letter in the next word is /h/). Upon repeating this hamso indefinitely, it becomes so-aham, meaning, “I am That”. Secondly, just like a swan lives in water but its feathers are not soiled by water, similarly a liberated Advaitin lives in this world full of Maya but is untouched by its illusion.The soul or the self (Atman) is exactly equal to Brahman. It is not a part of Brahman that ultimately dissolves into Brahman, but the whole Brahman itself. Now the arguers ask that how can the individual soul, which is limited and one in each body, be the same as Brahman? Shankara explains that the soul is not an individual concept. Atman is only one and unique. It is a false concept that there are several Atmans. Shankara says that just as the same moon appears as several moons on its reflections on the surface of water covered with bubbles, the one Atman appears as multiple atmans in our bodies because of Maya. Atman it self-proven, however, some proofs are discussed—eg., a person says “I am blind”, “I am happy”, “I am fat” etc. So what is this ego here? Only that thing is the ego which is there in all the states of that person — this proves the existence of Atman, and that consciousness is its characteristic. Reality and Bliss are also its characteristics. By nature, Atman is free and beyond sin and merit. It does not experience happiness or pain. It does not do any Karma. It is incorporeal.

When the reflection of atman falls on Avidya (ignorance), atman becomes jīva — a living being with a body and senses. Each jiva feels as if he has his own, unique and distinct Atman, called jivatman. The concept of jiva is true only in the pragmatic level. In the transcendental level, only the one Atman, equal to Brahman, is true.

Salvation

Liberation or Moksha (akin to Nirvana of the Buddhists) — Advaitins also believe in the theory of reincarnation of souls (Atman) into plants, animals and humans according to their karma. They believe that suffering is due to Maya, and only true knowledge of the Brahman can destroy Maya. When Maya is removed, there exists ultimately no difference between the Jiva-Atman and the Brahman. Such a state of bliss called Moksha can even be achieved while living (jivana mukti). While one is in the pragmatic level, one can (and MUST) worship God in any way and in any form, like Krishna as he wishes. Sankara himself was a proponent of devotional worship or Bhakti. But Sankara believes that Vedic sacrifices, puja and devotional worship can lead man to true knowledge, however, they cannot lead him directly to Moksha. Moksha is the outcome solely of true knowledge.

Other points

The famous mantra of Shankara was “Brahma Satyam Jagat Mithyā, jīvo Brahmaiva nāparah”, ie, Brahman is the only truth, the world is unreal, and there is ultimately no difference between Brahman and individual self.
Shankara also explicitly condemned the caste or varna system of the Hindu society, calling it utterly foolish. This is in contrast to other schools like Vishishtadvata, Dvaita and Mimamsa who believe that since caste is based upon one’s karmas in previous life, it should be unscrupulously followed. Sankara also condemned many other superstitions.
Shankara established four monastries (mathas) in the four corners of Hinduism to guide the Hindu religion in the future. Each matha was assigned one Veda. The mathas are Jyothir Math at Badrinath in northern India with Atharva Veda; Sharada Math at Shringeri in southern India with Yajur Veda; Govardhan Math at Jagannath Puri in eastern India with Rig Veda and Kalikā Math at Dwarka in western India with Sama Veda. Each of the abbots of these four mathas also have the title of Jagadguru Shankaracharya — and are regarded as Patriarchs of Hinduism by many Hindus. Sometimes, the title of Shankaracharya is also applied to the abbot of the Kamakoti Math at Kanchi, the place where Adi Shankara reportedly passed away.

Are the world and God wholly false?
Status of the world

People often get confused by Advaita teachings that the universe is false. Shankara says that the world is not true, it is an illusion, but this is because of some logical reasons. Let us first analyse Shankara’s definition of Truth, and hence why the world is not considered true.

Shankara says that whatever thing remains eternal is true, and whatever is non-eternal is untrue. Since the world is created and destroyed, it is not true.
Truth is the thing which is unchanging. Since the world is changing, it is not true.
Whatever is independent of space and time is true, and whatever has space and time in itself is untrue.
Just as one sees dreams in sleep, he sees a kind of super-dream when he is waking.The world is compared to this conscious dream.
The world is believed to be a superimposition of the Brahman. Superimposition cannot be true.
On the other hand, Shankara claims that the world is not absolutely false. It appears false only when compared to Brahman. In the pragmatic state, the world is completely true—which occurs as long as we are under the influence of Maya. The world cannot be both true and false at the same time; hence Shankara has classified the world as indescribable. The following points suggest that according to Shankara, the world is not false (Shankara himself gave most of the arguments):

If the world were false, then with the liberation of the first human being, the world would have been annihilated. However, the world continues to exist even if a human attains liberation.
Shankara believes in Karma, or good actions. This is a feature of this world. So the world cannot be false.
The Supreme Reality Brahman is the basis of this world. The world is like its reflection. Hence the world cannot be totally false.
False is something which is ascribed to inexistent things, like Sky-lotus. The world is a logical thing which is perceived by our senses.
Consider a scientific logic. A pen is placed in front of a mirror. One can see its reflection. To our eyes, the image of the pen is perceived. Now, what should the image be called? It cannot be true, because it is an image. The truth is the pen. It cannot be false, because it is seen by our eyes.

Status of God

Some people claim that in Shankara’s philosophy, there is no place for a personal God (Ishvara), because Ishvara is also described as “false”. He appears as Ishvara because of the curtain of Maya. However, as described earlier, just as the world is true in the pragmatic level, similarly, Ishvara is also pragmatically true. Just as the world is not absolutely false, Ishvara is also not absolutely false. He is the distributor of the fruits of one’s Karma. In order to make the pragmatic life successful, it is very important to believe in God and worship him. In the pragmatic level, whenever we talk about Brahman, we are in fact talking about God. God is the highest knowledge theoretically possible in that level. Devotion (Bhakti) will cancel the effects of bad Karma and will make a person closer to the true knowledge by purifying his mind. Slowly, the difference between the worshipper and the worshipped decreases and upon true knowledge, liberation occurs.

Status of ethics

Some claim that there is no place for ethics in Advaitism, because everything is ultimately illusionary. But on analysis, ethics also has a firm place in this philosophy—the same place as the world and God. Ethics, which implies doing good Karma, indirectly helps in attaining true knowledge. The basis of merit and sin is the Shruti (the Vedas and the Upanishads). Truth, non-violence, service of others, pity, etc are Dharma, and lies, violence, cheating, selfishness, greed, etc are adharma (sin).

Shankara’s theory of creation

In the pragmatic level, Shankara believes in the Creation of the world through Satkaryavada. It is like the philosophy of Samkhya, which says that the cause is always hidden into its effect—and the effect is just a transformation of the cause. However, Samkhya believes in a sub-form of Satkaryavada called Parinamvada (evolution)—whereby the cause results in an action. Instead, Shankara believes in a sub-form called Vivartavada. According to this, the effect is merely a superimposition of its cause—like its illusion. eg., In darkness, a man often confuses a rope to be a snake. But this does not mean that the rope has actually transformed into a snake.

In the pragmatic level, the universe is believed to be the creation of the Supreme Lord Ishvara. Maya is the divine magic of Ishvara, with the help of which Ishvara creates the world. The serial of Creation is taken from the Upanishads. First of all, the five subtle elements (ether, air, fire, water and earth) are created from Ishvara. Ether is created by Maya. From ether, air is born. From air, water is born. From water, earth is born. From a proportional combination of all five subtle elements, the five gross elements are created, like the gross sky, the gross fire, etc. From these gross elements, the universe and life are created. This series is exactly the opposite during destruction.

Some people have criticized that these principles are against Satkaryavada. According to Satkaryavada, the cause is hidden inside the effect. How can Ishvara, whose form is spiritual, be the effect of this material world? Shankra says that just as from a conscious living human, inanimate objects like hair and nails are formed, similarly, the inanimate world is formed from the spiritual Ishvara.

Comparison with the Buddhist school of Shunyavada

The Buddha had not answered philosophical questions like God, the world and its creation. So the later Buddhist schools developed their own theory. The Madhyamika school of Mahayana Buddhism developed a theory, called Shunyavada, which is quite similar to Advaitism.

Similarities between the two:

The world is not believed to be eternal, nor true.
Both have defined different levels of truth. the Madhyamikas have defined two levels of truth.
The Madhyamikas believe that the eternal voidness (Shunyata) is the cause of this material world. This occurs because of illusion.
Differences between the two:

The Shunyata of the Madhyamikas is neither real nor false—it cannot be described at all. In contrast, Brahman is infinite Truth, infinite Consciousness and supreme Bliss.
The soul is believed to be false in the Madhyamika school, but true in Advaitism.
Some people interpret the Shunya to be falsehood. So the world of these Buddhist seems to evolve from a void—from a false thing. In Advaitism, the world evolves from the true Brahman. Shankara had given only one criticism against the Madhyamikas—The Shunyavada, “being contradictory to all valid means of knowledge, we have not thought worth while to refute.” [2]
In Advaitism, the personal God (Ishvara)is the manifestation of the Brahman (God). Among the Madhyamikas, there is no place for a personal God.

Adi Sankara’s thoughts in a summary

Adi Sankara’s treatises on the Upanishads, the Bhagavad Gita and the Brahma Sutras are his principal and almost undeniably his own works. Although he mostly adhered to traditional means of commenting on the Brahma Sutra, there are a number of original ideas and arguments. He taught that it was only through knowledge and wisdom of nonduality that one could be enlightened.

Sankara’s opponents accused him of teaching Buddhism in the garb of Hinduism, because his non-dualistic ideals were a bit radical to contemporary Hindu philosophy. However, it may be noted that while the Later Buddhists arrived at a changeless, deathless, absolute truth after their insightful understanding of the unreality of samsara, historically Vedantins never liked this idea. Although Advaita also proposes the theory of Maya, explaining the universe as a “trick of a magician”, Sankara and his followers see this as a consequence of their basic premise that Brahman is real. Their idea of Maya emerges from their belief in the reality of Brahman, rather than the other way around.

Sankara was a peripatetic orthodox Hindu monk who traveled the length and breadth of India. The more enthusiastic followers of the Advaita tradition claim that he was chiefly responsible for “driving the Buddhists away”. Historically the decline of Buddhism in India is known to have taken place long after Sankara or even Kumarila Bhatta (who according to a legend had “driven the Buddhists away” by defeating them in debates), sometime before the Muslim invasion into Afghanistan (earlier Gandhara).

Although today’s most enthusiastic followers of Advaita believe Sankara argued against Buddhists in person, a historical source, the Madhaviya Sankara Vijayam, indicates that Sankara sought debates with Mimamsa, Samkhya, Nyaya, Vaisheshika and Yoga scholars as keenly as with any Buddhists. In fact his arguments against the Buddhists are quite mild in the Upanishad Bhashyas, while they border on the acrimonious in the Brahma Sutra Bhashya.

The Vishistadvaita and Dvaita schools believed in an ultimately saguna Brahman. They differ passionately with Advaita, and believe that his nirguna Brahman is not different from the Buddhist Sunyata (wholeness or zeroness) — much to the dismay of the Advaita school. A careful study of the Buddhist Sunyata will show that it is in some ways metaphysically similar as Brahman. Whether Sankara agrees with the Buddhists is not very clear from his commentaries on the Upanishads. His arguments against Buddhism in the Brahma Sutra Bhashyas are more a representation of Vedantic traditional debate with Buddhists than a true representation of his own individual belief. (See link: Sankara’s arguments against Buddhism)

The Impact of Advaita

Advaita Vedanta philosophy had a tremendous impact on the Hindu system of Tantra and also served to bolster Yogic (see Yoga) ideas of the ultimate Self, Brahman/Atman, being One. Advaita rejuvenated much of Hindu thought and also spurred on debate that led to the expounding of Vishishtadvaita (qualified nondualism) and Dvaita (dualism). Advaita served to bring to the fore the Hindu/Vedic philosophy whose seed can be seen in the Rig Vedic statement “Truth is One, though the sages see it as many.” Advaitism is definitely the deepest and the most influential philosophy of India. Even today, pious Hindus regard material wealth and money as “Moha-Maya”.

Advaita and Science

According to some followers of Advaita, it may very well be a place where the scientific world intersects with the spiritual world. They point to the relationships between mass, frequency, and energy that 20th century physics has established and the Advaitic ‘Unity of the Universe’ as the common ground. They feel that these relationships, formalized as equations by Planck and Einstein, suggest that the whole mesh of the Universe blend into a One that exhibits itself as many (namely, mass, energy, wave etc), and that this follows Advaita’s view that everything is but the manifestation of an omnipresent, omniscient and omnipotent “One”. It must be remembered however, that none of these physicists have talked of an ‘omnipresent, omniscient and omnipotent “One”‘.

They also connect the De Broglie waves of modern physics to Aum in Hindu philosophy. However, scientists in India and abroad clarify that the de Broglie waves (or matter waves) are neither optical nor acoustic waves, but are “just functions of a probability distribution of finding a particle, which may be represented as a Fourier sum of constituent probability waves.”

However, notable scientists like Erwin Schrödinger and Robert Oppenheimer were also Vedantists. Fritjof Capra’s book, The Tao of Physics, is one among several that pursue this viewpoint as it investigates the relationship between modern, particularly quantum, physics and the core philosophies of various Eastern religions, including Hinduism, Buddhism and Taoism.

It must be noted that Advaita does not share the same ground on Science as other schools of philosophy do. For example, Sankara rejected the idea of momentariness of the Universe in his Brahma Sutra commentary since Brahman is immanent in the Universe, while Buddhists affirm that the universe on its own accord, due to the causality of the dharmas, is constantly changing. The dvaita-enthusiasts on the contrary, blame Sankara for inconsistency, since he adopts the view that the Universe is momentary in many of his other works like the Upanishad bhashya. Dvaita-enthusiasts see the Universe as a creation of God, while Advaitins see it as a manifestation of Brahman; Buddhists on the other hand see it as a flux of changes, originating from natural phenomena leading to its formation.

Mahavakya

Mahavakya, or “the great sentences,” state the unity of Brahman and Atman. They are 4 in number and their variations are found in other Upanishads.

Sr. No. Vakya Meaning Upanishad Veda
1 प्रज्नानम ब्रह्म prajnānam brahmā Brahman is knowledge aitareya Rig Veda
2. अहम ब्रह्मास्मि Aham brahmāsmi I am brahman brihadāranyaka Yajur Veda
3. तत्त्त्वमसि tattvamasi That thou art chhandogya Sama Veda
4. अयमात्मा ब्रह्म Ayamātmā brahmā This Atman is Brahman mandukya Atharva Veda

Founders & key texts

Sri Adi Shankaracharya - (attributed work) Viveka Chudamani, the Brahma Sutra Bhashya Bhagavad Gita Bhashya, Upanishad bhashya.
Upanishads
Vedanta Sutras
Vedas
Traditional life history of Adi Shankara - Historical record accepted by scholars worldwide. Written by Madhava Vidyaranya, English translations by Swamy Tapsyananda of Ramkrishna Ashram, Mylapore, Chennai.
mahavkyas are six in number-

1-aham brahmasmi

2-ayam atma brahma

3-tat tvam asi

4-sarvam khalvidam brahma

5-pragyanam brahma

6-soaham

Demigods, Sages, and Saints of Advaitins

Lord Shri Rama
Lord Shri Krishna
Marici
Angiras
Atri
pulaha
kratu
pulastya
Vashishta
Kashyapa
Vishwamitra
Jamadagni
Gautama
Bharadwaja
Bhrigu
Agastya
Shri Dattatreya
Shri Ashtawakra
Vyasa

Later teachers and proponents

Shri Ramakrishna (1836-1886) well-known modern proponent of Advaita; the primary source book, Gospel of Shri Ramakrishna (Shri Ramakrishna Kathamrita), was written by an eyewitness devotee ‘M’. It documents his later life and conversations with disciples/devotees and serves as the key reference for his philosophy/teachings
Sai Baba of Shirdi (c. 1838-1918), a mystic philosopher of Maharashtra, he was followed devotedly by Hindus and Muslims alike and practiced a blend of Vedantic Hinduism and Sufi Islam.
Shri Narayana Guru (1856-1928)- Vedic scholar, mystic philosopher, prolific poet and social reformer, who, after Adi Shankara, was the next greatest proponent of Advaita Vedanta from the present-day Kerala.
Swami Vivekananda (1863-1902), disciple of Shri Ramakrishna, wrote books on four Hindu Yogas: Bhakti Yoga, Jnana Yoga, Karma Yoga and Raja Yoga. The Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda contains a complete collection of transcribed lectures. Spoke at the 1893 Parliament of Religions at the Columbian Exhibition in Chicago.
Sri Aurobindo (1872–1950) Bengali philosopher-sage who synthesized Advaita thought with Western theories of evolution.
Shri Ramana Maharshi (1879–1950) the silent sage of Tamil Nadu who had a profound realization of nonduality
Shri Swami Tapovan Maharaj - A virakta mahatma
Shri Swami Sivananda (1887—1963), Divine Life Society. Bestowed samyasa initiation of Swami Chinmayananda, scholar, and author of over 300 books on Hinduism, many available on the web.
Shri Swami Chinmayananda Jnana diksha bestowed under Shri Swami Tapovan Maharaj in Uttarkashi. Disciples founded the Chinmaya Mission. ‘Chinmaya’ = “pure consciousness of bliss”.
Shri Swami Dayananda Saraswati, a contemporary Advaitin who united disparate Hindu sects under a single body known as the Arya Samaj.
Shri Nisargadatta Maharaj A twentieth-century master of Neo-Advaita
Shri Sathya Sai Baba, whose philosophy draws on Hindu philosophy while also acknowledging other major religions.
Master Nome (aka Jeffrey Smith), founder of Society of Abidance in Truth. Teaches in tradition of Ramana Maharshi. Co-translator into English of Adi Sankara’s Svatmanirupanam (The True Definition of One’s Own Self) and the Ribhu Gita. Translator of Adi Sankara’s Nirvana-satkam (Six Verses on Nirvana).

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article “Advaita Vedanta”.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

EBG Excerpt…Truth and The Masters

Published on Tuesday, January 24th, 2006

Through the masters, everything that has ever been spoken about Truth has been said. All is available. There are no secrets, only Truths one has not heard…Myswizard


Tags:

Link

Published on Tuesday, January 3rd, 2006

A very peaceful and passionate blog site for God and Truth.
Mysticsaint


Tags: ,

Parapsychology

Published on Monday, January 2nd, 2006

Parapsychology

Parapsychology brings up a great deal of controversy as a “science” and its’ actual existence. Trying to scientifically prove much of the phenomena within this category is quite difficult at best. Scientists have proven within clinical studies using mediums, the existence of an afterlife (see “The Afterlife Experiments” under my library), as well as others who have devoted their life to these explorations. Although there are Truths within this (parapsychology) topic, there are also Falsehoods. Sorting them out could take an interminable amount of time. There are many who “claim” to have “abilities” who do not. (as they make their living off the naivete’ of their followers) One Truth is, that when one’s consciousness level has been heightened, many of these “abilities” come as a consequence of what one has become. Others are born with psychic abilities greater than the norm. I don’t know the answer as to the “why”. Perhaps at some future date I will do some of my own research using the Map of Consciousness in order to bring more light on this subject. Having experienced quite a bit of this phenomena myself, it’s become an integral part of my life, so my curiosity level isn’t very high. I know it comes from our Higher Self which is part of the Field of Consciousness. Any subject which the scientific community cannot “prove” beyond a doubt, will most likely be in the spiritual domain. This level of existence is beyond linear proof. So with that in mind, here is Wiki’s definitons of the topic. (Keep in mind Wikipedia is written by people who have opinions and ideas. Most authors thereof, are quite intelligent, but not always without bias.)…Myswizard

Parapsychology is the study of the evidence of mental awareness or influence of external objects without interaction from known physical means. Most objects of study fall within the realm of “mind-to-mind” influence (such as extra-sensory perception and telepathy), “mind-to-environment” influence (such as psychokinesis) and “environment-to-mind” (such as hauntings).

The premiere professional organization, the Parapsychological Association (PA), is a member in good standing of the American Academy for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). However, the scientific validity of parapsychology research is a matter of frequent dispute and criticism.

Types of parapsychology
The phenomena in question fall into two broad groups.

Extra-sensory perception (ESP) is also known as anomalous cognition, and includes telepathy, clairvoyance, clairaudience, clairalience, clairgustance, clairsentience, precognition, postcognition, psychometry, and dream transference.

Anomalous operation includes psychokinesis (in the past referred to as telekinesis), out-of-body experiences, astral projection, near-death experiences, mediumship, and reincarnation.

The general term “psi phenomena” (or the somewhat older term, “psychic phenomena,” which was said to be the “psi factor” in an experiment) covers all of these categories.

Status of the field
The standing of the field of parapsychology has always been controversial within the scientific community.

As its name indicates, parapsychology is sometimes considered a sub-branch of psychology, and this has arisen historically since it involved the study of apparently mental faculties. In its modern form, parapsychology is an interdisciplinary field, which has attracted physicists, engineers, and biologists, as well as psychologists and those from other sciences. (For an argument that parapsychological phenomena may not in fact be psychological, see Peter J. King’s “Parapsychology without the ‘Para’ (or the ‘Psychology’)” (Think 3, 2003, pp 43 53).) Parapsychology often involves the use of new and untested technologies and methods such as; neurofeedback, NLP, and past life regression etc. As such, it may yet earn the right to be included as a modern and proper science.

Many people are not satisfied with the term, and have proposed alternatives, such as “psi research” (similar to the older term “psychical research”), but parapsychology is the term that has gained the greatest acceptance today.

How science views the field
In the scientific disciplines there is a belief that all claims should be treated with scientific skepticism. Mainstream science believes that after examining psi claims for over a century, there has been significant difficulty in merging the results of parapsychology studies with other fields of science. As a result, many in the scientific community think that parapsychology is not a real science, that psi phenomena do not exist, and that parapsychology is a pseudoscience. Many scientists and skeptical observers of the field believe that some parapsychologists knowingly commit fraud; that some are incompetent or misled by their own hopes or desires; and that some are naïve and therefore easily deceived by fraudulent participants; or perhaps some combination of the above. One of the most famous cases in psychology that illustrates being misled by one’s hopes is that of Clever Hans. Mr. Wilhelm von Osten did not mean to defraud anyone, but he fooled himself and large audiences nevertheless.

Parapsychologists disagree with this assessment. Many have been formally trained in science, and are familiar with the scientific method. Statistician Jessica Utts has shown in a number of papers that:

“Using the standards applied to any other area of science, it is concluded that psychic functioning has been well established. The statistical results of the studies examined are far beyond what is expected by chance. Arguments that these results could be due to methodological flaws in the experiments are soundly refuted.”
The precise percentage of scientists holding negative views about parapsychology is unclear, since surveys targeting this group are far less common than those targeting the general population. In his article Save Our Science: Paranormal Phenomena and Zetetics, skeptic Henri Broch complains:

“These data are based on an investigation on the belief in parasciences among Frenchmen (published in 1986). […] Contrary to what might have been thought, the level of belief in the paranormal is directly proportional to the level of education, whatever the religious persuasion may be. Those with higher scientific degrees fare slightly better, although their level of belief is superior to [greater than] the average!”
Some skeptics believe that there is a tendency for parapsychology researchers to select “good days” and discard “bad days” for the people in the test samples. But the “Theory of Runs” shows that the chance of a long run of successes (or failures) increases drastically when the periods of success or failure are selected as part of a larger sample. See: Feller, William (1968), An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, vol. I, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, p. 86. For a more recent discussion of the theory and the “arcsine law” Unfortunately, what many skeptics are not aware of, is that the criticisms raised by statisticians like Feller are out of date by many decades. That is, the prevailing experimental methodology and conventions of statistical analysis in parapsychology have not been susceptible to such critiques since the 1940s and 1950s when Feller first raised his criticisms. See the chapter called “Field Guide to Skepticism”[5]in Dean Radin’s (1997) Conscious Universe: The Scientific Truth of Psychic Phenomena” for a review of such out-to-date criticism. Radin’s book also provides a review of experimental parapsychology up to 1997 that contradicts the “party-line” that many skeptics uncritically follow without having first-hand knowledge of the research literature of the field. (See Rochus Boerner’s article “The Objectivity of Science: Seven Signs of Bogus Skepticism” for some examples of skepticism/criticisms raised without a familiarity with the research literature of a field.)

Wagner and Monnet conducted a survey of 1100 college professors in 1979 and found that 34% of psychologists, 55% of natural scientists, 66% of other social scientists, and 77% of professors in the humanities believe that ESP is either an established fact or likely possibility. (Zetetic Scholar 5, 1979) Andrew Greeley, a sociologist from the University of Arizona, studied surveys on belief in ESP from from 1978 through 1987, and studied the mental health of believers in ESP. The surveys he studied showed that from 1978 through 1987, the number of American adults who reported psychic experiences rose from 58% to 67%. He also tested the psychological well-being of people reporting mystical experiences with the “Affect Balance Scale” and found that people reporting mystical experiences received top scores. Greeley summarized his findings by writing,

People who’ve tasted the paranormal, whether they accept it intellectually or not, are anything but religious nuts or psychiatric cases. They are, for the most part, ordinary Americans, somewhat above the norm in education and intelligence and somewhat less than average in religious involvement.
The Parapsychological Association is an affiliate of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). There are chairs, centers, or research units concerned with parapsychology in whole or in part at many universities around the world, as well as independent laboratories involved in parapsychology. For example, the Koestler Parapsychology Unit in the School of Psychology, Philosophy and Linguistic Sciences at the University of Edinburgh, the Parapsychology Unit of the Psychology Department at Liverpool Hope University, the Consciousness and Transpersonal Psychology Unit at Liverpool John Moores University, the Center for the Study of Anomalous Psychological Processes at University College Northampton, the Mind-Matter Unification Project at Cambridge University , and the Institut für Grenzgebiete der Psychologie und Psychohygiene of Frieburg University, among others. Links to other research organizations, university units, periodicals is available under the “Psi Info” section of the website of the Parapsychology Foundation. Many members of these units, while not considered to be skeptics per se, investigate the phenomena of the field from the point of view of conventional hypotheses, that is, looking at psychological correlates of reports of experiences, “successful” performances in laboratory tests, as well as looking for evidentially-supported extensions to current knowledge in physics, physiology, neuropsychology and other disciplines. The bulk of the refinements to the methodological repertoire of the field of parapsychology — both in terms of experimental method and in terms of statistical and other evaluative techniques — have come from this segment of the community, that is, from the so-called “proponents”.

A few parapsychologists are skeptics, for example Chris French and his colleagues at the Anomalistic Psychology Research Unit at Goldsmiths College in London, and Richard Wiseman and his colleagues at the Perrott-Warrick Research Unit in the Psychology Department of the University of Hertfordshire, both of which units include individuals who are members of the Parapsychological Association. These researchers do not approach the field with a belief in the paranormal, but are rather interested in the purely psychological aspects of those who report paranormal experiences, along with the study of the psychology of deception, hallucination, etc. These researchers also have provided their own guidelines and input to other parapsychologists for the design of experiments and how to properly test those who claim psychic abilities. While some of these guidelines have been useful, many have suffered from a naive understanding of scientific practice in general and in parapsychology in particular, from a distorted view of the methodology actually in use in the field, and the unfortunate habit of some skeptics to make sweeping statements about the applicability of counter-hypotheses to lines of research without actually investigating the appropriateness of those counter-hypotheses to the details at hand. (See, for example a mostly-positive review of one of these guidelines written by skeptics.)

The most important point that both proponents and skeptics raise is the need to be critical of the theory, methods, and conclusions of any one who investigates or comments on parapsychology as a science, no matter what point of view they represent. In order to be an objective professional, one must have a first-hand knowledge of the vast past and present published scientific literature in the field, primary and scholarly sources of its age whenever possible, and — even more important — have first-hand experience as an experimenter or investigator and a respect for the art of conjuring and its masters. The hands-on approach is essential to scientific progress in the field, whether one approaches it from a “paranormalist” or a “conventional theorist” point of view. Selective and historically uninformed armchair cheerleading and armchair skepticism are equally useless in all fields of inquiry and science.

Interpretation of the evidence
Many scientists hold that the entire body of evidence to date is of poor quality and not properly controlled; in their view, the entire field of parapsychology has produced no results whatsoever. Frequently, however, those who hold this view have not had any contact with the published literature of the field such as that which can be found in the Journal of Parapsychology, the Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, the Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, or in the proceedings of the annual convention of the Parapsychological Association. Instead, they have relied on the analyses made by members of the skeptical community who, wrongly, assume that all parapsychological experiments suffer from flaws and therefore no parapsychological experiment may be considered evidential even in the weak sense of the term. Working psi researchers welcome criticisms that are based on knowledge of the peer-reviewed, published literature of the field. Criticism and blanket statements based on hearsay are not productive and not encouraged in any area of science.

Other scientists hold that there is a small amount of data from properly controlled experiments that can be trusted for a small number of psi phenomena. They hold that this evidence is not definitive, but suggestive enough to warrant further research.

Other scientists, who are familiar with the published literature of the field of parapsychology, believe that a great deal of evidence has been collected, which, if it addressed more conventional phenomena, would be sufficient to provide proof.

Criticisms of parapsychological research
Anecdotal evidence, characteristic of most of parapsychology, is inherently unreliable. Anecdotes may have natural, non-anomalous explanations such as random coincidence, fraud, imagination, or auto-suggestion.
If an experiment is not controlled to prevent fraud, then the results may not be trusted. This is especially so given the fact that many people who claimed to possess psi abilities were later proven to be frauds.
Parapsychology experiments are usually poorly designed. They often lack proper controls, allowing paths of intentional or unintentional information leakage through normal means, etc.
Parapsychology experiments are rarely replicated with positive results at independent laboratories.
Positive results in psi experiments are so statistically insignificant as to be negligible, i.e. indistinguishable from chance. For example, parapsychology may have a “file drawer” problem where a large percentage of negative results are never published, making positive results appear more significant than they actually are.
Currently inexplicable positive results of apparently sound experiments do not prove the existence of psi phenomena, i.e., normal explanations may yet be found. Concluding inexplicability from lack of existing explanation constitutes the well-known fallacy Argument from Ignorance.
Psi phenomena cannot be accepted as explanation of positive results until there is a widely acceptable theory of how they operate.
Parapsychologists may prefer and write selective history. The whole story may be avoided.
Parapsychology spends too much time simply trying to show that certain phenomena occur, and too little time trying to explain them — yet it is explanation that constitutes the heart of scientific enquiry, and wider, scientific acceptance of parapsychological phenomena would come only with the provision of explanation. (See King (2003) cited above.)

Responses from parapsychologists to criticisms
The hard evidence for psi phenomena today is founded on repeatable experiments and not anecdotal evidence.
Anecdotal evidence is considered valid in law and many other fields. The validity of anecdotal evidence does not depend upon the opinion of those listening to it.
There is no such thing as a completely foolproof experiment in any field of science, and it is unreasonable to hold parapsychology to a higher standard of epistemology than the other sciences. Fraud and incompetence in parapsychology is addressed in the same way it is addressed in any other field of science: repeating experiments at multiple independent laboratories; publishing methods and results in order to receive critical feedback and design better protocols, etc.
Experimental protocols have been continually improved over time, sometimes with the direct assistance of noted skeptics. Meta-analyses show that the significance of the positive results have not declined over time, but instead have remained fairly constant.
There are certain phenomena which have been replicated with odds against chance far beyond that required for acceptance in any other science. Meta-analyses show that these cannot be accounted for by any file drawer problem.
Anomalous phenomena do not disappear for lack of a theory. There have been many instances in the history of science where the observation of an anomalous phenomenon came before an explanatory theory, and some commonly accepted non-psi phenomena today still lack a perfectly satisfactory, undisputed theory. For instance, in the past, those who sighted meteors falling to the earth were dismissed as madmen or false prophets.
Theories abound in parapsychology for aspects of psi phenomena, though there is not any one that is comprehensive and widely accepted within parapsychology.
It is not necessary to be a licensed psychiatrist or acquainted with clinical psychology to test the validity of psi. The field of parapsychology overlaps many disciplines, including physics and biology, and often physicists, engineers and others trained in the hard sciences, in conjunction with stage magicians and other experts in deception, are in a better position to design experiments for certain types of phenomena than are psychiatrists or psychologists.
The opinion of parapsychologists regarding the overall evaluation of the body of evidence to date is divided. As noted above, some parapsychologists are skeptic and do not believe that there is anything observed so far which cannot ultimately be explained within the existing framework of known science. Probably a majority of parapsychologists believe in the likelihood, or at least the possibility, of actual psi phenomena, though there is a range of attitudes toward the evidence.

Regarding the evidence, the rule of the thumb of the skeptical community is that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Since skeptics may consider paranormal claims extraordinary, they may think that the evidence needs to be better than what normally would be required. However, this puts the responsibility for investigating seemingly paranormal phenomena squarely on the shoulders of proponents and “internal” skeptics. Not only is research conducted by “external” critics and skeptics useful to the field as a whole, but it also imparts a kind of craft knowledge to critics and skeptics that makes their criticism and counter-hypotheses more productive and more useful. Further many of the counter-hypotheses proposed by skeptics are so unparsimonious as to be extraordinary claims as well, and in that case, those counter-hypothesis, also require extraordinary evidence. Sadly, given the Zeitgeist in science today which treats even the study of seemingly paranormal phenomena as taboo, the extraordinary/unparsimonious claims of the skeptics are accepted uncritically, without investigation. See an article by the late sociologist and skeptic Marcello Truzzi which is relevant to this topic.

Most people use this approach to evidence in everyday life. For instance, if the news reports that the president of the USA has just arrived in South Korea for a state visit, most people will take this at face value. The news is considered a fairly reliable source of information, and the president visiting a country such as South Korea is not an extraordinary claim. However, if the same news broadcast later mentioned that a 92-year-old man has improved the world record time on the marathon by half an hour, many reasonable people would require more evidence, even despite the assumed reliability of the source, since the claim is extraordinary. This analogy might be flawed, however. In the case of the 92 year old man, we have positive evidence gained from a lifetime of experience and the reassurance of physiologists that this feat is indeed extraordinary (i.e., improbable). When it comes to parapsychology, however, some would argue we have no positive evidence that it is improbable, only our own cultural bias and a subjective sense that Psionic powers are extraordinary. Hence, some would argue, it is not the sort of extraordinary claim which necessarily needs more evidence than a mundane claim.

Some parapsychologists agree with critics that the field has not yet reached the degree of consistent repeatability of experimental results needed for general consensus. John Beloff, in his book Parapsychology: A Concise History, notes the evanescent – some have said the apparently evasive – nature of psychic phenomena over time, and that the range of phenomena observable in a given era seems to be culturally dependent.

For example, in earlier times, psychic research studied physical phenomena demonstrated by spiritualist mediums that, according to the reports passed down to us in the literature, far surpassed anything that any of today’s “psychics” can demonstrate. Skeptics consider this more evidence of the non-existence of psi phenomena. Frequently this particular claim is the result of the proponent community having cut itself off, because of political pressures of conforming to the scientific Zeitgeist, from the community of modern mediums and psychics who operate today. Whether or not the phenomena being exhibited by modern day mediums can provide proof of traditional notions of spirituality or can be attributed to the operation of mundane psychological processes is mostly an open question, due to the lack of research. So it is possible that physical phenomena is being exhibited today, but to what cause the effects may be attributed is an open question, even among parapsychologists.

Yet many people, such as Beloff, cannot easily dismiss the entirety of all the positive accounts – so many of which came from the experts of their day (including scientists and conjurers), many of whom began as noted skeptics – and so believe that continued research in the field is justified.

Other parapsychologists, such as Dean Radin and supporters such as statistician Jessica Utts, take the stance that the existence of certain psi phenomena has been reasonably well established in recent times through repeatable experiments that have been replicated dozens to hundreds of times at labs around the world.

They refer to meta-analyses of psi experiments that conclude that the odds against chance (null hypothesis) of experimental results far exceeds that commonly required to establish results in other fields, sometimes by orders of magnitude.

Indeed, many parapsychologists have moved on from proof-oriented research, intended primarily to verify the existence of psi phenomena, to “process-oriented” research, intended to explore the parameters and characteristics of psi phenomena. Time will tell whether these results prove to be evanescent as well. Unfortunately, what complicates the “time will tell” hope that many skeptics and proponents have is the lack of funds available for research from either the conventional or the “paranormalist” perspectives, and the negative impact on career advancement that an interest in these phenomena — even from a skeptical point of view — can have.

Early Scientific American challenge
The offering of prizes for demonstrations is not new to the field. Circa 1924, Scientific American magazine offered a $5000 prize to anyone who could produce any “visible psychic manifestation.” Medium Mina Crandon, known in the literature as “Margery,” made a bid and was tested by a committee set up by the editorial staff. Her performance was such that the committee members were split, four negative to one positive in their opinions. The magazine published the mixed report in its November 1924 issue, no prize was awarded, and the competition was declared closed the following year. In the early 1900s, the then well-known stage magician Howard Thurston, who had earlier studied to be a medical missionary, was impressed by the mysterious table lifting demonstrations of medium Eusapia Palladino. He advertised in the New York Times his offer of $1000 to charity in the name of any fellow conjuror who could duplicate this feat. He had no takers. In 1910 Eusapia Palladino publicily acknowledged she used tricks to an American reporter. Today many methods of table lifting and other seance secrets are well known to master conjurors, but kept secret as demanded by their art.


Other objections to parapsychology

There are a variety of other objections to parapsychology as well.

Psi Phenomena as a Violation of the Laws of Physics or Nature
Some critics claim that the existence of psi phenomena would violate “the known laws of physics”, and some of these critics believe that this is reason enough that such phenomena should not be studied. Parapsychologists respond that “laws of nature” are simply summaries of existing scientific knowledge and do get revised from time to time during the course of scientific progress, in addition they are not so well understood that with them one could confidently predict the non existence of Psi ( Consider quantum mechanics). If the existence of psi phenomenon were ever proved, explaining how they work might require revising or extending the known laws of physics. Precognition, for example, would challenge commonly held notions about causality and the unidirectional nature of time. However, these commonly held notions are often not physical laws, and are already being challenged by modern physical theories, quite apart from psi phenomena. Skeptics and parapsychologists alike generally agree that, as per Occam’s Razor, simple explanations should be preferred for any resulting theories of psi. Some parapsychologists are critical of skeptics’ frequently-uninvestigated claims about fraud, or the application of conventional hypotheses specifically because these claims are unparsimonious. Conventional explanations, many parapsychologists believe, should also conform to Occam’s Razor. Then there are others, both skeptics and proponents, who agree that even in mainstream science nature itself is frequently unparsimonious.

Parapsychology as Taboo
Some believe that paranormal phenomena should not be studied, either because they are forbidden by their religious orientation, or because they believe that to do so opens the investigators to some sort of “spiritual attack”. Parapsychology is also seen as a taboo subject in science and the academy and individuals who show an interest in studying seemingly psychic phenomena, even from a skeptical point of view, often find themselves losing or being pushed out of employment, or denied funding. Anthropologist of science, David J. Hess, has written on this topic.

Parapsychology as a Danger to Society
Some believe that parapsychology should not be pursued because it somehow represents a danger to society. As is stated in the Y2000 NSF report Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Public Understanding: Belief in the Paranormal or Pseudoscience[19]:
“Concerns have been raised, especially in the science community, about widespread belief in paranormal phenomena. Scientists (and others) have observed that people who believe in the existence of paranormal phenomena may have trouble distinguishing fantasy from reality. Their beliefs may indicate an absence of critical thinking skills necessary not only for informed decision making in the voting booth and in other civic venues (for example, jury duty), but also for making wise choices needed for day-to-day living.”
Even “insiders” in the parapsychological community worry about the possible harm that naive belief in paranormal phenomena can have on individuals, on culture and on societies. A great deal of effort has been put into the notion of developing expertise in dealing with reported experiences both in a clinical sense, and as a topic of investigation. Unfortunately organized skepticism and the “taboo” that exists against serious research on such phenomena has impeded the ability of many researchers — both skeptics and proponents — from doing the kinds of research that would allow evidence-based therapeutic interventions.

Although under the heading ‘paranormal phenomena’ the report lists topics such as astrology, UFOs, and the Loch Ness Monster, it also lumps in belief in ESP and, by implication, most parapsychology.

Parapsychology as a Waste of Resources
Some believe that parapsychology should not be funded because it is a waste of resources that would be better spent on other activities. Some of these critics feel so strongly about this that they engage in activism to try to prevent or remove funding from psi research. Psychic detectives may waste valuable police resources. One of the negative — and probably unintended — consequences of this point of view is that while 10% of the world’s population or over 400 million individuals on the planet, may experience what they believe are psychic phenomena, and may suffer in their daily lives from psychological problems caused by their experiences, few scientists on the planet are able to find the resources to really investigate the phenomena, and therefore very little real knowledge exists that can be used to help these experiencers. While even most parapsychologists would agree there are more urgent problems to solve, having no research address these reported experiences does a grave disservice to people everywhere.

Trivia
German psychiatrist Hans Berger originally invented the electroencephalograph (EEG) in 1929 as a tool to study whether telepathy might be explained by brain waves.
The first and only Ph.D. in Parapsychology awarded by the University of California, Berkeley was to Dr Jeffrey Mishlove in 1980. Subsequently some activists unsuccessfully lobbied the Berkeley administration to revoke the degree. Reportedly, as many as 46 people in the UK have doctorates in parapsychology. However, this is a myth. In fact, with the exception of Dr. Mishlove, mentioned above, the so-called “46 people in the UK” have doctorates in other disciplines, principally in psychology, but completed doctoral thesis work which included or were devoted to research projects in parapsychology. Such individuals are also expected to be competent in the disciplines in which they received their degrees. Examples of these individuals include: Dr. Susan Blackmore, Dr. Richard Broughton, Dr. Deborah Delanoy, Dr. Serena-Roney Dougall, Dr. Chris Roe, Dr. Simon Sherwood, Dr. Christine Simmonds, Dr. Matthew Smith, Dr. Carl Williams, Dr. Richard Wiseman, among others.
Patent #5830064, “Apparatus and method for distinguishing events which collectively exceed chance expectations and thereby controlling an output,” was granted by the US Patent Office on Nov 3rd, 1998 to inventors including several researchers from the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR) center. The patent in no way relies on the existence of psi phenomena, but in the description the inventors do suggest that “One application of the present invention is the investigation of anomalous interaction between an operator and random physical systems, whether by serious scientists or curious members of the public who would like to conduct experiments on their own.”
Through out the history of the investigations of physical mediums there seems to be no record of simply applying wet paint to a medium’s hands and feet to assure control and eliminate fraud.
Joseph B. Rhine began examining psychic abilities after hearing, and being deeply impressed, by a lecture given by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, about the scientific reality of having established contact with the dead.

Famous parapsychologists
Rais Amrohvi
Khwaja Shamsuddin Azeemi
Hans Bender
Susan Blackmore
William Crookes
Max Dessoir
Gustave Geley
John Hasted - author and creator of the shyness effect, unwatched children could bend eating utensils with their minds
Charles Honorton
Robert G. Jahn
William James - founding father of American Psychology
Brian Josephson - Nobel Prize in Physics, 1973
Oliver Lodge
William McDougall
Jeffrey Mishlove
Edgar Mitchell
Gardner Murphy
Frederick W. H. Myers
Julian Ochorowicz
Harry Price
Andrija Puharich
Harold E. Puthoff
Dean Radin - Author of The Conscious Universe, which examines the scientific evidence in parapsychology.
Jim D. Ray
Carl Reichenbach
Joseph B. Rhine
Charles Robert Richet
Carl Sargent
Helmut Schmidt
Albert von Schrenck-Notzing
Gary Schwartz-Has stated he has scientific proof of established contact with the dead
Stephan Schwartz
Henry Sidgwick
Ian Stevenson
Ingo Swann
Wilhelm Heinrich Carl Tenhaeff
Mark Twain
G. N. M. Tyrrell
Alfred Russel Wallace
Doug Davis-Wrote the theory of deja-vue explanation

Other names who have contributed to this field
The following are famous primarily for fields other than parapsychology but still had important working interests in the field:

Hans Eysenck
Alister Hardy
Carl Jung
Arthur Koestler
Rupert Sheldrake

Claimed psychics
Sylvia Browne — received the Pigasus award, Category #4 for 2004 for claiming to “see” in July, 2004 that Osama Bin Laden was dead, predicting in 2003 that Saddam Hussein would be found dead by year’s end, and other triumphs. Sylvia won in category #2 in 2003.
Kuda Bux firewalker, famous for being able to see with his eyes covered by coins, tape, dough, gauze, etc.
Edgar Cayce — claimed to be a psychic healer in the first half of the 20th century and to have lived a past life in Atlantis
Miss Cleo
Mina Crandon “Margery” — last noted physical medium in the USA and widely thought to be fraudulent
Gerard Croiset
Derren_Brown
Natasha Demkina — The girl with x-ray eyes
Jeane Dixon — made wide and vague predictions, claimed she had a Divine gift.
William and Horatio Eddy — 19th Century Vermont psychics. Their spirit cabinet performances were very similar to that of the famous Davenport Brothers. This tradition is carried on by the team of Glenn Falkenstein and Frances Willard.
Tom Rannachan — Scottish “Psychic Medium” who claims to talk with the dead & receive accurate premonitions.
John Edward — Host of TV show “Crossing Over” in which he claimed to communicate with the dead.
Leslie Flint
Uri Geller — Israeli telekinetic, famous for bending handled spoons in television shows. Traveled the world with his confederates, who sometimes posed as news reporters. He was deported from Israel, his home country.
Stuart Harary probably means Keith Harary, OBEr
Daniel Dunglas Home — most famous physical medium of the 19th century (See Other Links: Crookes 1871)
Jim Jones — claimed to perform healings. He was the leader of the Peoples Temple that committed mass suicide in 1978
Joseph McMoneagle Former US Army intelligence officer, currently a corporate remote viewer
Wolf Messing
David Morehouse Government remote viewer
Dr. Mysterian
Stefan Ossowiecki (Ossovietski?) — read things in sealed envelopes
Ted Owens — claimed to have the ability in predicting and controlling weather, earthquakes, and volcanoes through psychokinesis
Eusapia Palladino— accused of using her foot to levitate table and other deceptions by conjurers in hiding who watched her methods at close hand. (Rinn, 1950)
Leonore Piper
Pat Price, government remote viewer
Sathya Sai Baba, Indian guru; materialization of small objects
JoJo Savard
S. G. Soal
Ingo Swann, involved in the formation of the remote viewing procedure.
Alex Tannous
James Van Praagh
Rev. B. Anne Gehman
Miroslaw Magola may adhere objects to his body

Critics of parapsychology
Derren_Brown (Has a detailed TV show ,debunking people’s beliefs.)
Susan Blackmore — Stopped lecturing and abandoned parapsychology altogether, because she could no longer endure the near fanatic and rude behavior of both believers and non-believers.
Milbourne Christopher — Noted Conjuring Historian and Master Conjuror, his works are frequently overlooked.
Martin Gardner-Noted rationalist, puzzlist, science writer, and Master Conjuror
Ray Hyman- Conjuror and noted research psychologist
James Randi-Master Conjuror and author
Ehrich Weiss (Harry Houdini)-Master Conjuror and author
Penn and Teller

Psychic investigations
Remote viewing (includes Stargate project)
Global Consciousness Project

References
^ Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Public Understanding: Belief in the Paranormal or Pseudoscience, National Science Foundation, 2000.
Parapsychology, by Khwaja Shamsuddin Azeemi, Al-Kitaab Publication, 1985.
The Conscious Universe, by Dean Radin, Harper Collins, 1997, ISBN 0062515020.
Parapsychology: A Concise History, by John Beloff, St. Martin’s Press, 1993, ISBN 0312096119.
Parapsychology: The Controversial Science, by Richard S. Broughton , Ballantine Books, 1991, ISBN 0345356381.
Our Sixth Sense, by Charles Richet, Rider & Co., 1937, First English Edition
ESP,Seers & Psychics : What the Occult Really Is , by Milbourne Christopher,Thomas Y. Crowell Co., 1970, ISBN 0690268157
The Elusive Quarry: A Scientific Appraisal of Psychical Research, by Ray Hyman, Prometheus Books, 1989, ISBN 0879755040.
Readings in the Philosophical Problems of Parapsychology, ed. Antony Flew, Prometheus Books, 1987, ISBN 0-87975-385-4
Sixty Years of Psychical Research : Houdini and I Among the Spirits, by Joseph Rinn, Truth Seeker, 1950
Roots of Consciousness, Jeffrey Mishlove, 2 editions

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article “Parapsychology”.


Tags: , , , , ,

Calibrations (Truth or Falsehood)

Published on Saturday, December 31st, 2005

These calibrations are based on “Calibrations of the Levels of Human Consciousness” and “Map of Consciousness”. For information regarding the scale, read any of Dr. David R. Hawkins Books (calibrations for spiritual teachers, religions and texts can be found in “Truth vs. Falsehood”) For the purposes here (see my article…Absolute Truth), I will only be using the levels above and below Truth, and calibrating spiritual practices and related subjects using Divine Protoplasmic Analysis.

Over 200

Afterlife (nonphysical) Realms
Reincarnation
Karma
Guides/Teachers in the Afterlife realm
God as Infinite Love
Angels/Archangels
Astral Realms
Freemasonry (in it’s original intention/formation)
Walking the Labryrinth (as a meditation)
Feng shui (within the context of the laws and numerical proportions of nature)
The Holy Grail (as a concept)
M Fields
Infinite Field of Consciousness (The Akashic Records/Infinite Field of Knowledge)
Higher Self (tapping into in order to gain wisdom)
Infinite realms of existence in the non physical
Levels of consciousness in the non-physical
Consciousness floats to the level it is in the non-physical
Existence of UFOs

Under 200

Binary Soul Theory
Alien Abduction (actual, physical)
Devil (actual, not conceptual)
God as punisher
Missing Link Theories
“Bad” Angels
The Occult (as a practice)
Modern Neo-Paganism
Fortune telling (as a practice)
The Holy Grail (as a reality)
Channeling entities (As a practice, there are very few who are genuine. Although those of higher consciousness levels have been known to channel, it would require testing each on an individual basis. The need to hear channelers is under 200 as all neediness regarding the spiritual circus) Therefore, I’ve put it under 200)
Physical immortality
Calibrating others’ levels for monetary gain
Guaranteed “How to” methods of raising personal LOCs to extraordinary levels
Any claims by a “teacher,” of being a certain LOC
UFOs originating from “other” planets


Tags: ,

Absolute Truth…Another Definition

Published on Saturday, December 31st, 2005

This article calibrates very high in regard to the definition of Absolute Truth. Steven Robiner is the author of the quotation, and in all likelihood, of the entire article. If he isn’t already a student of Dr. Hawkins, he echos the doctors’ teachings eloquently… Myswizard

“What is absolutely true is always correct, everywhere, all the time, under any condition. An entity’s ability to discern these things is irrelevant to that state of truth.” - Steven Robiner

Absolute truth can be interpreted in different ways based on its usage, just like truth. One of the arguments for the existence of absolute truth is that relativism is considered to be self refuting. For example, it is argued that if one asserts all truth is relative one is making an absolute truth statement. Thus, relativism is seen as self refuting. Except that a relativist could state “To a relativist, all things are relative, but to an absolutist, they may not be”.

Absolute truth is often defined in two ways: state-truth and action-verity form.

As a state (truth)
Absolutism contends that in a particular domain of thought, all statements in that domain are either absolutely true or absolutely false: none is true for some cultures or eras while false for other cultures or eras. These statements are called absolute truths. A common reaction by those who newly criticize absolutism is the absolute truth statement: Absolute truths do not exist.

The statement, ‘Absolute truths do not exist.’, reveals the characteristic of absolute truth. Absolute truth does not apply to reality, existence, belief, or to human intelligence. In the logic of dichotomy of true-not true, application is without respect to what is absolutely true. Certainly, absolute truth does not define material existence, but supports material existence, position, and state of being. Absolute truth is as applicable to ‘not true’ as it is to ‘true’. The double negative reveals this monistic status of absolute truth. The non-existence of absolute truth would, if true, be as true as the existence of absolute truth in an absolute sense. To postulate the non-existence of truth; however, is to violate the most fundamental capacity of mind. It is as though a snake could swallow itself by starting at the tail. Therein lies the value of absolute truth for thought. Violation of truth value in an absolute sense, validates the truth value of existence versus non-existence. Some say, “If I see it I believe it.” Others say, “I believe it if I know it.” If the sense of knowing is little better than the sense of sight, little can be made of the analogy. The acuity of the sense of absolute truth may not be good enough for most to clearly distinguish the difference between what is true and truth itself.

One could ask, ‘Is it true that truth exists?’ One can also ask, ‘Is it true that truth does not exist?’ The first can be affirmed by mind, while the latter cannot be affirmed without a gross distortion of sense. If truth does not exist, it would certainly be true that truth does not exist. That is the quality of absolute truth. If the negation were true, one could not ask the question and expect a true answer. Absolute truth is the essence of thought and distinguishes the capacity of the sapient being.

As an action (verity)
In action form, absolute truth most closely represents verity. This form can be likened to the action usage of metaphysical truth, but not its state usage (which represent metaphysical truths in state form). Absolute truth in action form is considered by many to be metaphysical only, and therefore the same as the action usage of metaphysical truth. Some believe the outcome of absolute truth (verity) can be metaphysical truths, physical truths or both, but by definition not any form of a lie.

Examples
A particularly confusing absolute truth in state form (but good for example) is:

Absolute truth cannot be a lie.
Some interpret this to mean:

The outcome of absolute truth cannot be a lie.
But that refers specifically to the action form of absolute truth. Others interpret it as:

Absolute truth statements cannot be lies.
But that refers specifically to the state form of absolute truth. The original statement can be interpreted as either the state or action form. In the state form the statement is not true, but in the action form it is true. Either way the statement is an absolute truth in state form.

A potential example of absolute truth in action form is:

The words you are reading exist because of absolute truths in action form supporting their ability to exist.
Attentive readers will recognize the previous statement as an absolute truth in state form describing absolute truth in action form. Whether or not the statement is true is left as an exercise for the reader.

An interesting paradox arises when someone refutes the existence of any absolute truths. Their statement might be something along the lines of:

There are no absolute truths.
If this statement were true, it would imply that it is an absolute truth itself. And if this statement is an absolute truth, it would contradict its original statement and mean that the statement is in fact false. Therefore it is impossible to prove that there are absolutely no absolute truths. However, this doesn’t necessarily imply that they exist.

A more proper way of stating it would be to say that “Relative truth is correct”. Although this seems to be an absolute statement, it is in fact not, because it does not exclude that “Absolute truth is also correct”. To a relativist, whose culture holds this as a tenet; relativism is indeed correct. But a relativist can also allow that to one raised in a culture of absolutism, it would be incorrect.

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article “Absolute Truth”.


Tags: ,

Absolute Truth

Published on Saturday, December 31st, 2005

Absolute Truth
by Myswizard

“Humanity isn’t capable of discerning truth from falsehood. It doesn’t have the capacity.”…DRH

In philosophy, The Absolute is the opposite of relative. The term has acquired numerous widely variant connotations in different philosophical systems. It means unlimited, unconditioned, or free of any relation; perfect, complete, or total; permanent, inherent, or ultimate; independent, or valid without reference to a perceiving subject. In epistemology, absolute means certain or indubitable as opposed to probable or hypothetical. As a substantive, the absolute is the ultimate basis of reality, the principle underlying the universe. Theologically, it is synonymous with, or characteristic of, God. Philosophically, it may be considered as the unknowable, the thing-in-itself; as that ultimate nonrelative that is the basis of all relation; as the ultimate, all-comprehensive principle in which all differences and distinctions are merged. The concept of the absolute was present in Greek philosophy. In modern times, both realists and idealists have used the term, but it is, perhaps, most intimately connected with the idealism of G. W. Hegel…Columbia Encyclopedia

Since reading discourses, theories, and opinions on Absolute Truth, I am absolutely amazed at how the discussions, when linked with relativity, get so very charged with emotion. This invariably leads nowhere, because of the qualities of anything Absolute. Absolutism is beyond the scope of relativism*. It cannot be discussed at all in linear (easy to comprehend, logical, not complex, with boundaries) terms. Only the non linear, references The Absolute…(God). The problem lies with the fact that man has been trying with the greatest of wisdom to translate, theorize, or pontificate on a subject for which there is no scientific answer. As DRH* says, “It’s like trying to find Ghosts with a geiger counter.” When faced with the “wall” of “The Spirit”, discussion tends to be circuitious, which comes back to, “The Unknown”. Many intellectuals and pseudo intellectuals don’t care to discuss the non-linear, because of it’s ethereal quality.

In his book, Truth vs. Falsehood, Dr. Hawkins has done thousands of calibrations, which he continues to do as he writes and lectures. The work is groundbreaking, astonishing and of course controversial. One hasn’t been lauded, who also wasn’t criticized. When you put yourself “out there”, it’s a fact that you will be stoned (so to speak, by naysayers). As the Doctor says, “Tell the Truth and then leave town quickly.” Truth, however, cannot be deconstructed through the scientific mind. All the masters that I have under the topics on my site, expounded in their time, on Truths that were not discernable through “abstract reasoning”. Only through Higher levels of consciousness does Absolute Truth rein free.

I will be calibrating (using Divine Protoplasmic Analysis and The Map of Consciousness from Advanced Consciousness Research) that which I feel is relative to the world of spirituality (and writing from Higher Consciousness.) Although I’ve always used my own psychic capacity for discerning most things, I will be confirming using DPA. The levels above 200 calibrate with Truth and levels below 200 do not. That is the only scale I’ll use here. I will not be doing any personal calibrations. (Only subject matter, past or present with integrous intention.) I have no vested interest in how anything calibrates. The only thing I’m seeking is whether or not, the particular subject matter is worth giving time or interest to.
See below (Absolute Truth..definiton)
Definitions from American Heritage Dictionary, Columbia Encyclopedia.

*Everyday truth is based on statements which are assumed to be fact only through beliefs, indoctrinations, biases, opinions, prejudices, or scientific reasoning. These things however, are “relative” to the “believer”. Therefore, truth in the ordinary sense is relativistic (Todays’ philosophers give no credence to truth relativism.) Relativistic truth is not Truth. The quote at the beginning of this article says, “Humanity isn’t capable of discerning truth from falsehood. It doesn’t have the capacity.” That statement is Absolute Truth. What we “think” is truth is not Truth. Absolute Truth is absolute. There can be no discussion as to its’ quality. It is Truth as it comes from The Field, which is what we know as God. Science works through mathematical equations and laboratory testing. It cannot, however, prove Absolute Truth, since it falls within the unseen realm of Higher Consciousness and Divine Presence. (But they’re always trying)
©Myswizard all rights reserved ‘05

Truth
Noun:
Conformity to fact or actuality.
A statement proven to be or accepted as true.
Sincerity; integrity.
Fidelity to an original or standard.
Reality; actuality.
often Truth That which is considered to be the supreme reality and to have the ultimate meaning and value of existence.
Etymology:
Middle English trewthe, loyalty, from Old English trowth; see deru- in Indo-European roots
Synonyms:
truth , veracity , verity , verisimilitude
These nouns refer to the quality of being in accord with fact or reality. Truth is a comprehensive term that in all of its nuances implies accuracy and honesty: “We seek the truth, and will endure the consequences” (Charles Seymour). Veracity is adherence to the truth: “Veracity is the heart of morality” (Thomas H. Huxley). Verity often applies to an enduring or repeatedly demonstrated truth: “beliefs that were accepted as eternal verities” (James Harvey Robinson). Verisimilitude is the quality of having the appearance of truth or reality: “merely corroborative detail, intended to give artistic verisimilitude to an otherwise bald and unconvincing narrative” (W.S. Gilbert).
Thesaurus
Correspondence with fact or truth: accuracy, correctness, exactitude, exactness, fidelity,veraciousness,veracity, eridicality, verity. Freedom from deceit or falseness: truthfulness, veracity. The quality of being actual or factual: actuality, fact, factuality, factualness, reality.

Absolute
Noun:
Something that is absolute.
Absolute Philosophy
Something regarded as the ultimate basis of all thought and being. Used with The.
Something regarded as independent of and unrelated to anything else.
Etymology:
Middle English absolut, from Latin absoltus, unrestricted, past participle of absolvere, to absolve : ab-, away ; see ab- 1 + solvere, to loosen; see leu- in Indo-European roots
Other forms:
abso·luteness (Noun)
Usage Note:
An absolute term denotes a property that a thing either can or cannot have. Such terms include absolute itself, chief, complete, perfect, prime, unique, and mathematical terms such as equal and parallel. By strict logic, absolute terms cannot be compared, as by more and most, or used with an intensive modifier, such as very or so. Something either is complete or it isn’tit cannot be more complete than something else. Consequently, sentences such as He wanted to make his record collection more complete, and you can improve the sketch by making the lines more perpendicular, are often criticized as illogical.·Such criticism confuses pure logic or a mathematical ideal with the rough approximations that are frequently needed in ordinary language. Certainly in some contexts we should use words strictly logically; otherwise teaching mathematics would be impossible. But we often think in terms of a scale or continuum rather than in clearly marked either/or categories. Thus, we may think of a statement as either logically true or false, but we also know that there are degrees of truthfulness and falsehood. Similarly, there may be degrees of completeness to a record collection, and some lines may be more perpendicular that is, they may more nearly approximate mathematical perpendicularity than other lines. Accordingly, the objection to modification of an absolute term like parallel by degree seems absurd when it is used metaphorically, as in The difficulties faced by the Republicans are quite parallel to those that confronted the Democrats four years ago. This statement describes the structural correspondence between two distinct situations, and concerns about the possibility of intersection seem remote indeed. In this sense, parallelism is clearly a matter of degree, so one should not hesistate to modify parallel accordingly.

* DRH=Dr. David Hawkins (I often use just his initials, because of the fact he is mentioned so often on my site.)


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sri Aurobindo’s Teaching and Method of Sadhana

Published on Friday, December 30th, 2005

Sri Aurobindo’s Teaching and Method of Sadhana

The teaching of Sri Aurobindo starts from that of the ancient sages of India that behind the appearances of the universe there is the Reality of a Being and Consciousness, a Self of all things, one and eternal. All beings are united in that One Self and Spirit but divided by a certain separativity of consciousness, an ignorance of their true Self and Reality in the mind, life and body. It is possible by a certain psychological discipline to remove this veil of separative consciousness and become aware of the true Self, the Divinity within us and all.

Sri Aurobindo’s teaching states that this One Being and Consciousness is involved here in Matter. Evolution is the method by which it liberates itself; consciousness appears in what seems to be inconscient, and once having appeared is self-impelled to grow higher and higher and at the same time to enlarge and develop towards a greater and greater perfection. Life is the first step of this release of consciousness; mind is the second; but the evolution does not finish with mind, it awaits a release into something greater, a consciousness which is spiritual and supramental. The next step of the evolution must be towards the development of Supermind and Spirit as the dominant power in the conscious being. For only then will the involved Divinity in things release itself entirely and it become possible for life to manifest perfection.

But while the former steps in evolution were taken by Nature without a conscious will in the plant and animal life, in man Nature becomes able to evolve by a conscious will in the instrument. It is not, however, by the mental will in man that this can be wholly done, for the mind goes only to a certain point and after that can only move in a circle. A conversion has to be made, a turning of the consciousness by which mind has to change into the higher principle. This method is to be found through the ancient psychological discipline and practice of Yoga. In the past, it has been attempted by a drawing away from the world and a disappearance into the height of the Self or Spirit. Sri Aurobindo teaches that a descent of the higher principle is possible which will not merely release the spiritual Self out of the world, but release it in the world, replace the mind’s ignorance or its very limited knowledge by a supramental Truth-Consciousness which will be a sufficient instrument of the inner Self and make it possible for the human being to find himself dynamically as well as inwardly and grow out of his still animal humanity into a diviner race. The psychological discipline of Yoga can be used to that end by opening all the parts of the being to a conversion or transformation through the descent and working of the higher still concealed supramental principle.

This, however, cannot be done at once or in a short time or by any rapid or miraculous transformation. Many steps have to be taken by the seeker before the supramental descent is possible. Man lives mostly in his surface mind, life and body, but there is an inner being within him with greater possibilities to which he has to awake - for it is only a very restricted influence from it that he receives now and that pushes him to a constant pursuit of a greater beauty, harmony, power and knowledge. The first process of Yoga is therefore to open the ranges of this inner being and to live from there outward, governing his outward life by an inner light and force. In doing so he discovers in himself his true soul which is not this outer mixture of mental, vital and physical elements but something of the Reality behind them, a spark from the one Divine Fire. He has to learn to live in his soul and purify and orientate by its drive towards the Truth the rest of the nature. There can follow afterwards an opening upward and descent of a higher principle of the Being. But even then it is not at once the full supramental Light and Force. For there are several ranges of consciousness between the ordinary human mind and the supramental Truth-Consciousness. These intervening ranges have to be opened up and their power brought down into the mind, life and body. Only afterwards can the full power of the Truth-Consciousness work in the nature. The process of this self-discipline or Sadhana is therefore long and difficult, but even a little of it is so much gained because it makes the ultimate release and perfection more possible.

There are many things belonging to older systems that are necessary on the way - an opening of the mind to a greater wideness and to the sense of the Self and the Infinite, an emergence into what has been called the cosmic consciousness, mastery over the desires and passions; an outward asceticism is not essential, but the conquest of desire and attachment and a control over the body and its needs, greeds and instincts are indispensable. There is a combination of the principles of the old systems, the way of knowledge through the mind’s discernment between Reality and the appearance, the heart’s way of devotion, love and surrender and the way of works turning the will away from motives of self-interest to the Truth and the service of a greater Reality than the ego. For the whole being has to be trained so that it can respond and be transformed when it is possible for that greater Light and Force to work in the nature.

In this discipline, the inspiration of the Master, and in the difficult stages his control and his presence are indispensable - for it would be impossible otherwise to go through it without much stumbling and error which would prevent all chance of success. The Master is one who has risen to a higher consciousness and being and he is often regarded as its manifestation or representative. He not only helps by his teaching and still more by his influence and example but by a power to communicate his own experience to others.

This is Sri Aurobindo’s teaching and method of practice. It is not his object to develop any one religion or to amalgamate the older religions or to found any new religion - for any of these things would lead away from his central purpose. The one aim of his Yoga is an inner self-development by which each one who follows it can in time discover the One Self in all and evolve a higher consciousness than the mental, a spiritual and supramental consciousness which will transform and divinise human nature.

August, 1934

Sri Aurobindo Birth Centenary Library, Vol. 26, “Sri Aurobindo on Himself”, pp. 95-97.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
The contents of this document are copyright 1972, Sri Aurobindo Ashram Trust, Pondicherry, India. You may make a digital copy or printout of this text for your personal, non-commercial use under the condition that you copy this document without modifications and in its entirety, including this copyright notice.
This article is informational only and not intended for profit.


Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Divine Protoplasmic Analysis (formerly AK (Kinesiological Testing) and Calibrations of Human Consciousness

Published on Sunday, December 25th, 2005

Although I’ve been a student of Dr. David Hawkins and his works since Power vs. Force was first released, I had become very familiar with this form of testing previous to my discovering the Doctors’ work. Over the past 15 years I’d come to learn about this very important method of testing. Beginning with the use of Bach Flower Essences, this journey took me through the discoveries of testing for strength/weakness using essential oils, various methods of human behavior patterns, medications, and the use of supplements. I learned and practiced the closed circuit method, which is still used today by many practitioners.

Over the past year or so, because of my intense focus on Dr. Hawkins methods, I discovered something else which works for me. Because of the original work in AK requiring a partner, it was not very handy when needing to “know” something while doing self or solo research. A light bulb lit for me while I was going about my daily routine practices. I began experimenting, and saw that it worked for me. Although my own psychic abilities have grown throughout my life, this way of “seeing” is a perfect complimentary way to know Absolute Truth at all times.

I use this method for finding lost articles, health issues for myself and my family, finding integrous outside services, people to work with, people in general, choices regarding business and personal issues, whether or not news is truthful, whether someone is truthful or not, where to find what it is I’m searching for, and more (See Benefits of Reading Power vs. Force). It’s effectiveness is mind-boggling (100%) and has saved me time in making choices and decisions, because I have no time to waste.

This is not a secret, since there are no secrets within Absolute Truth. In fact, DRH has been discovering these self testing methods as a result of his work evolving. My own method is just a different way. It’s handy and can be used using various tools. Because of the nature and seriousness of this work, using it properly with integrous intention, is very important.

There have been many discussions and confusion regarding testing. It’s a fairly easy process in learning how to test. What is not easy, however, is being neutral.*(see below for new information) Neutrality is important. One must not have a vested interest in the answer and this is a lot more difficult than most realize. Becoming neutral requires practice because of the nature of the ego, and preconceived beliefs will affect the result. We all have desires and resistances to everything. Unless you’re adept at creating the state of pure awareness at will, your attention will very likely not be neutral. This is the one thing that may prevent getting a true reading using AK. The testers’ “field” has the possibility of getting in the way. Instead of wondering why readings are not inalignment with others, and becoming frustrated with the process, it is helpful to learn how to still the mind with meditation and other practices. Preface the testing with permission and for “The Highest Good.” One can also add “with complete detachment from the answer” or “with total neutrality.”

“There Are No Secrets”, my second book of the Enlightenment Series for complete details

If you are a student of Dr. Hawkins, and are completely familiar with AK…E mail me for more information. “Truth is free”

Note: I advise anyone serious about this work to read up on Dr. Diamond’s work and other books on kinesiology. It is also important to familiarize yourself with all of Dr. Hawkins work. His work cannot be taken out of context and done frivolously. Mentalizing and endless skepticism regarding applied kinesiology will render the process useless, since it can only be done by those with consciousness level 200 and above. See Applied Kinesiology__Testing For Truth

* See New Self-Testing Techniques Divine Protoplasmic Analysis ( formerly Applied Kinesiology__Testing For Truth)


Tags: , , , , , ,

Liar Liar

Published on Tuesday, December 20th, 2005

Being a Jim Carrey fan since his old days as a relatively unknown Canadian stand up comic, I can’t keep myself from watching his movies again and again. This time it was Liar Liar, a movie about an attorney who’s entire life has been built on lies. He loses his wife and continually disappoints his young son. His young son makes a wish while blowing out his birthday candles. He wishes his dad can’t tell a lie for 24 hours. The rest is Jim Carrey antics when he realizes he cannot lie and doesn’t know why. In the courtroom scene, where he’s about to lie his head off to get his wealthy client a huge divorce settlement, we witness his writhing and distorted pain of having to tell the truth. Of course he makes it funny, but in real life that would be no laughing matter.

It reminded me of how impossible it is for humans to be truthful. As an entire planet we have come to rely on falsehood to get by with our relationships, business, personal life and government. Lying has become the rule, rather than the exception. “The human mind cannot distinguish between truth and falsehood without outside help. It is simply not capable on it’s own because of illusion and ego.”… Dr. David Hawkins. We tell small lies and then gradually one’s entire life is lived in non- truth. As small children we came to see lying as a way of not getting punished or seem “bad” or “wrong”. We lie to stay out of trouble, keep the status quo, have our “secrets,” cheat in relationships and business. Many people have come to want and even need falsehood in their lives because truth is too painful to hear. We, as humans, have a tendency to deny truth even when it is offered as a gift. Offering up our opinions which are based on others lies, is also a common practice, and we hold them as truth. So, even our opinions are falsehoods. Egos live in falsehood in the attempt to keep others from seeing our so called faults or weaknesses. Holding lies, secrets and hidden agendas keep our attention focused on the lie, instead of more important issues. While holding these falsehoods, we have to protect them and guard them to keep them hidden, taking up precious energy we don’t have time to waste. How freeing it is to live a life based on truth. It’s a wonder humanity has even survived it’s short life living this way.

It’s only just recently, humanity has reached the level of integrity. (David Hawkins, Power vs. Force) Throughout all of human history there has only been a few who have come to bring the word of truth (i.e. Jesus, Buddha, Krishna, etc.) Mostly those who brought Truth were killed for uttering it. Even now most do not want to hear or say what is true. For the most part this is because we don’t even know what is true. We have opinions, beliefs, preferences and indoctrinations, and we haven’t the slightest inkling of whether they are true or not. That is called blind faith and it can get you into trouble or even killed for it. Who wants to be blindly led by those who can’t see any better than you?

Unlike little Max from the movie we can’t merely wish for truth. Even if we are in touch with our inner knowing, our ego misleads us. We have the opportunity in this lifetime to be honest with our feelings and statements*, but how are we to know others truth? How do we discern what’s integrous from the non integrous? Every day we are deluged with decisions we must make based on others opinions, or lack of true knowledge. We trust in our gurus, politicians, partners, and friends to tell us the truth, while they have no more knowledge of truth then we do. How can we know which books to bother reading, what schools to send our children to, or any important decisions to make?

Little Max can now get his wish on an ongoing basis. There is only one Truth of anything, and it will always find it’s way to be revealed. Using kinesiological testing and David Hawkins (calibrations of the levels of consciousness), one can now tell Truth from falsehood. In order to do this our level of consciousness must calibrate integrous, as well as the question. Belief and/or non-belief is not an issue. There will always be those who condemn that which they don’t understand. This method cannot be used for greed/personal gain, or the future. It’s a confirmed method of knowing what is true, based on the knowledge that our bodies use the Field which is All Knowing to find Truth. It is revelatory, non secretive, and available to all who calibrate over the level of truth. This excludes 78% of the population of the world, so in that context it is limited to those already integrous. Dr. Hawkins books and dialogues can be read, seen and researched as they have been by thousands the world over. You may also e mail me for more information, or click on the DRH link on my sidebar. This is a great gift to humanity…Myswizard
*see Karma and Reincarnation under Mystical and Mysterious


Tags: , , , , , ,

Meme and Creation

Published on Saturday, December 17th, 2005

Meme n. pron.(meem)
A unit of cultural information, such as a cultural practice or idea, that is transmitted verbally or by repeated action from one mind to another.
Etymology:
Shortening (modeled on gene ), of mimeme from Greek mimma, something imitated, from mimeisthai, to imitate ; see mimesis

Being the kind of person who likes to take the difficult and make it simple (Occam’s Razor or KISS), I’m going to share explanations, about thought, attention, and intention.

Thoughts and ideas arise out of a nonlinear energy field, which is a part of the totality of “The Field” (The Electromagnetic Field of everything…Universal Intelligence or God.) Thought, once given energy (through our intention or will) moves to the linear or local (our mind.) At this point it is real (a creation within our linear reality).

This is where a meme comes into play. This creation is either based on Absolute Truth or non-truth (due to the bias of indoctrination, opinions and most cultural ideas.) If an idea or piece of information becomes our reality, we now have the beginnings of either Relativistic Epistemology,*or our own personal design for life. The ensuing consequences are astonishing, pleasing, or horrifying (depending on what is created). As consciousness is raised, creation come from The Field of Absolute Truth and our memes dissolve.

That is how and what we create, using our intentions. It is all part of the miracle of creation. This is God creating, with all of us as an extension of The creation.

*See articles on Relativism, Epistemology, and Relativistic Epistemology
Thank you to Dr. Hawkins for his class discourses on Relativistic Epistemology and Creation
©Myswizard all rights reserved ‘05


Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Myswizard on Dr. David Hawkins

Published on Friday, December 16th, 2005

When one begins to be publicly criticized this usually means they have found their place in history. Usually it’s someone with a high profile or one who has broken ground on new concepts, theories, or in Dr. Hawkins case, Truth. It’s certainly a strange way for the great masters of our time to have been lauded, but in the past they were stoned, or worse. ( If this were the time of Jesus, I shudder to think of the consequences). We’re a so-called civilized society now, but that does not preclude having detractors. It has usually taken decades or sometimes centuries, for wondrous discoveries or Spiritual Masters to be truly acknowledged.

Dr. Hawkins has one of the longest lists of accomplishments in ones lifetime that I’ve ever seen. His work is groundbreaking. **(see all articles and books) Since the non linear, cannot be proven within a linear realm, those who don’t understand will either be curious or criticize. As Dr. Hawkins says, “The mind cannot differentiate between truth and falsehood. It doesn’t know how”. Ego will always get in the way of Truth, no matter how learned one becomes. Our opinions and beliefs about everything are subjective, but not to be confused with Absolute Truth. There is a measurement for everything in the material world. Divinity has given us the awareness for the measurement of spiritual Truth through the work of Dr. Hawkins.

Dr. Hawkins detractors would like proof, so they are doing their best to discredit him. But, Cynicism,* calibrates under 200 while the desire for Truth calibrate over 200. Healthy curiosity about that which one doesn’t understand is more appropriate to intelligent behavior, than a lambasting. Having used his methods, I can attest to the fact, that the ways in which I use them in my daily life, have proven to me they work. I suppose this could leave me open to criticism, but since it always shows me The Way, I know that I know. I have to attest to having a tool in my life that is so precious, it’s beyond price. Skepticism has no place in my life. When in doubt, I use The Map of Human Consciousness and AK (Applied Kinesiology).

Everything on the planet is moving at an accelerated rate, including the path to enlightenment. Discoveries are arriving almost at the speed of light and this is due to the tapping into The Infinite Field of Knowledge. We have no time to waste, anymore. The more knowledge that is available, the more we are able to utilize it, when the time is right, and one has the will to “see” it. I am honored and priviledged to be on the planet at the same time as this man. In the decades and centuries to come, I know it will be what Dr. Hawkins has brought forth that will hasten this journey back to God, for peace and an enlightened society.

*Seventy eight percent of the population cannot do AK because of their calibrated level of consciousness. Another 10 percent(of those who calibrate over 200) cannot, for various unknown reasons. Also the calibration of the question, itself, and the intention must be integrous. This negates the cynics, who, by virtue of what they are, calibrate under 200. For further understanding see reference below and other works by DRH.
**
Truth Vs. Falsehood:  How to Tell the Difference


Tags: , , , , , , ,

Myswizard on Dr. David Hawkins

Published on Friday, December 16th, 2005

When one begins to be publicly criticized this usually means they have found their place in history. Usually it’s someone with a high profile or one who has broken ground on new concepts, theories, or in Dr. Hawkins case, Truth. It’s certainly a strange way for the great masters of our time to have been lauded, but in the past they were stoned, or worse. ( If this were the time of Jesus, I shudder to think of the consequences). We’re a so-called civilized society now, but that does not preclude having detractors. It has usually taken decades or sometimes centuries, for wondrous discoveries or Spiritual Masters to be truly acknowledged.

Dr. Hawkins has one of the longest lists of accomplishments in ones lifetime that I’ve ever seen. His work is groundbreaking. **(see all articles and books) Since the non linear, cannot be proven within a linear realm, those who don’t understand will either be curious or criticize. As Dr. Hawkins says, “The mind cannot differentiate between truth and falsehood. It doesn’t know how”. Ego will always get in the way of Truth, no matter how learned one becomes. Our opinions and beliefs about everything are subjective, but not to be confused with Absolute Truth. There is a measurement for everything in the material world. Divinity has given us the awareness for the measurement of spiritual Truth through the work of Dr. Hawkins.

Dr. Hawkins detractors would like proof, so they are doing their best to discredit him. But, Cynicism,* calibrates under 200 while the desire for Truth calibrate over 200. Healthy curiosity about that which one doesn’t understand is more appropriate to intelligent behavior, than a lambasting. Having used his methods, I can attest to the fact, that the ways in which I use them in my daily life, have proven to me they work. I suppose this could leave me open to criticism, but since it always shows me The Way, I know that I know. I have to attest to having a tool in my life that is so precious, it’s beyond price. Skepticism has no place in my life. When in doubt, I use The Map of Human Consciousness and AK (Applied Kinesiology).

Everything on the planet is moving at an accelerated rate, including the path to enlightenment. Discoveries are arriving almost at the speed of light and this is due to the tapping into The Infinite Field of Knowledge. We have no time to waste, anymore. The more knowledge that is available, the more we are able to utilize it, when the time is right, and one has the will to “see” it. I am honored and priviledged to be on the planet at the same time as this man. In the decades and centuries to come, I know it will be what Dr. Hawkins has brought forth that will hasten this journey back to God, for peace and an enlightened society.

*Seventy eight percent of the population cannot do AK because of their calibrated level of consciousness. Another 10 percent(of those who calibrate over 200) cannot, for various unknown reasons. Also the calibration of the question, itself, and the intention must be integrous. This negates the cynics, who, by virtue of what they are, calibrate under 200. For further understanding see reference below and other works by DRH.
**
Truth Vs. Falsehood:  How to Tell the Difference


Tags: , , , , , , ,

More Mystical and Mysterious

Published on Thursday, December 15th, 2005

There are many subjects related to this category, that you, my readers, will gravitate here to learn about. There is a neverending multitude of books on Life after death, if there is life after death, strange and well known alternative healing modalities, psychic abilities, telepathy, synchronicity, serendipity, and the paranormal. Speaking from my own knowings, all of the aforementioned with exceptions in the field of the paranormal and some healing, calibrate with Truth. Instead of relaying stories to you about these subjects, I’ll be sharing integrous literature with you from time to time for your curiosity. It’s been my own curiosity that’s led me here, and I would like to share the explorative journey with you.

Recently I’ve been searching the web for sites of interest. What I’ve discovered is, there are quite a few folks out there with lots of credentials, who are charging a great deal of money for their help. I can’t emphasize strongly enough…Be very discerning with whom you decide to give your money to or focus your efforts toward. When you begin the journey of self exploration, it always helps to have your antenna up for what is true and what isn’t. I will have comprehensive lists very soon of more teachers and masters. My Spiritual Masters category focuses only on very high calibrating teachers of the past and present, as well as books and/or courses I recommend. Some classes may charge fees both high and low, but you can decide for yourself what is right for you.


Tags: , , , ,

The Final Talks of Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj

Published on Wednesday, December 14th, 2005

A few Excerpts from
Consciousness and the Absolute

The Final Talks of Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj 1994

May 14, 1980

Maharaj: Doctors have diagnosed that this body has cancer. Would anyone else be as joyful as I am, with such a serious diagnosis? The world is your direct experience, your own observation. All that is happening is happening at this level, but I am not at this level. I have dissociated myself from Sattva Guna, being ness.

The Ultimate state in spirituality is that state where no needs are felt at any time, where nothing is useful for anything. That state is called Nirvana, Nirguna, that which is the Eternal and Ultimate Truth. The essence and sum total of this whole talk is called Sat-guru Parabrahman, that state in which there are no requirements.

After the dissolution of the universe, when no further vestige of creation was apparent, what remained is my perfect state. All through the creation and dissolution of the universe, I remain ever untouched. I have not expounded this part: my state never felt the creation and dissolution of the universe. I am the principle which survives all the creations, all the dissolutions. This is my state, and yours, too, but you don’t realize it because you are embracing your beingness. Realizing it is only possible when one get support from invincible faith, from that eternal Sat-guru Parabrahman. This state, this Parabrahman principle, is eternal and is also the Sat-guru. It is the eternal property of any devotee of a Guru.

July 29, 1980

Questioner: Why did this consciousness arise?

Maharaj: You are both the question and the answer. All your questions come from your identification with the body. How can any questions relating to that which was prior to the body and consciousness be answered? There are yogis who have sat in meditation for many, many years seeking answers to this question, but even they haven’t understood it. And yet you are complaining.

Q: It is a great mystery.

M: It’s a mystery only to the ignorant. To the one not identified with the body, it is no longer a mystery.

Q: Maharaj cannot convey it to us?

M: I keep telling you but you don’t listen.

Q: Does Maharaj see us as individuals?

M: There are no individuals; there are only food bodies with the knowledge “I Am”. There is no difference between an ant, a human being, and Isvara; they are of the same quality. The body of an ant is small, an elephant’s is large. The strength is different, because of size, but the life-force is the same. For knowledge the body is necessary.

Q: How did Maharaj get the name Nisargadatta?

M: At one time I was composing poems. Poems used to flow out of me and, in this flow, I just added Nisargadatta. I was reveling in composing poems until my Guru cautioned me, “You are enjoying composing these poems too much; give them up!”

What was he driving at? His objective was for my to merge in the Absolute state instead of reveling in my beingness.

This was the way I realized knowledge, not through mental manipulation. My Guru said, “This is so,” and for me, it was finished! If you continue in the realm of intellect you will become entangled and lost in more and more concepts.

Consciousness is time flowing continuously. But I, the Absolute, will not have its company eternally because consciousness is time bound. When this beingness goes, the Absolute will not know “I Am”. Appearance and disappearance, birth and death, these are the qualities of beingness; they are not you qualities. You have urinated and odor is coming from that — are you that odor?

Q: No, I am not.

M: You require no more sadhana.. For you, the words of the Guru are final.

October 5, 1980

Maharaj: I have no individuality. I have assumed no pose as a person. Whatever happens in the manifest consciousness happens.

People identify me with their concepts and they do what their concepts tell them. It is consciousness which is manifest, nothing else. Who is talking, who is walking, who is sitting? These are the expressions of that chemical “I Am”. Are you that chemical? You talk about heaven and hell, this Mahatma or that one, but how about you? Who are you?

In meditation, one sees a lot of visions. They are in the chemical, the realm of your consciousness, are they not? All these things are connected only to that birth-chemical. You are not this chemical “I Am”!

Spiritual knowledge should not be studied; it is knowledge derived from listening. When the listener hears it, and accepts it, something clicks in him.

This “I Amness” is otherness; it is an expression of duality.

November 8, 1980

Questioner: Why is it that we naturally seem to think of ourselves as separate individuals?

Maharaj: Your thoughts about individuality are really not you own thoughts; they are all collective thoughts; they are all collective thoughts. You think that you are the one who has the thoughts; in fact thoughts arise in consciousness.

As our spiritual knowledge grows, our identification with an individual body-mind diminishes, and our consciousness expands into universal consciousness. The life force continues to act, but its thought and actions are no longer limited to an individual. They become the total manifestation. It is like the action of the wind — the wind doesn’t blow for any particular individual, but for the total manifestation.

Q: As an individual can we go back to the source?

M: Not as an individual; the knowledge “I Am” must go back to its own source.

Now, consciousness has identified with a form. Later, it understands that it is not that form and goes further. In a few cases it may reach the space, and very often, there it stops. In a very few cases, it reaches its real source, beyond all conditioning.

It is difficult to give up that inclination of identifying the body as the self. I am not talking to an individual, I am talking to the consciousness. It is consciousness which must seek its source.

Out of that no-being state comes the beingness. It comes as quietly as twilight, with just a feel of “I Am” and then suddenly the space is there. In the space, movement starts with the air, the fire, the water, and the earth. All these five elements are you only. Out of your consciousness all this has happened. There is no individual. There is only you, the total functioning is you, the consciousness is you.

You are the consciousness, all the titles of the Gods are you names, but by clinging to the body you hand yourself over to time and death — you are imposing it on yourself.

I am the total universe. When I am the total universe I am in need of nothing because I am everything. But I cramped myself into a small thing, a body; I made myself a fragment and became needful. I need so many things as a body.

In the absence of a body, do you, and did you, exist? Are you, and were you, there or not? Attain that state which is and was prior to the body. Your true nature is open and free, but you cover it up, you give it various designs.

November 9, 1980

Questioner: Should the type of dispassion which Maharaj is teaching us be taught to children?

Maharaj: No. It that’s done, they’ll have no ambition to grow further; they must have certain ambitions, certain desires, for their proper growth.

The one who has fully investigated himself, the one who has come to understand, will never try to interfere in the play of consciousness. There is no creator with a vast intellect as such; all this play is going on spontaneously. There’s no intellect behind it, so don’t try to impose yours to bring about any change; leave it alone. Your intellect is a subsequent product of this process, so how can your intellect take charge of or even evaluate, the whole creation? Investigate your self; this is the purpose of your being.

Spirituality is nothing more that understanding this play of consciousness — try to find out what this fraud is by seeking its source.

November 12, 1980

Maharaj: The “I Amness”, the manifest Brahman, and the Isvara are all only one; ponder over this and realize it. This is a rare opportunity, one where all has been explained in great detail, so take full advantage of it.

You are the manifest Brahman. I have told you many times what your true state is, but, through force of habit, you again descend into body identification. A stage has now arrived at which you must give up this bodily identification. The bodily activities will continue until the body drops off, but you should not identify with them.

Questioner: How are we to do this?

Maharaj: You can watch the body, so you are not the body. You can watch the breath, so you are not the vital breath. In the same way, you are not the consciousness; but you have to become one with the consciousness. As you stabilize in the consciousness, dispassion for the body and for the expressions through the body occurs spontaneously. It is a natural renunciation, not a deliberate one.

It does not mean that you should neglect your worldly duties; carry these out with full zest.

Q: Shouldn’t we rediscover the freedom of the little baby from the body?

M: Understand the source of the child. The child is a product of the sperm of the father and the ovum of the mother. Consciousness is there in the child as it is in the parents; it is always the same consciousness whether in the child or the adult. There is only one consciousness. You must become one with and stabilize in that consciousness, then you transcend it. That consciousness is you only capital. Understand it.

To what extent do you know yourself?

Q: I have held the feet of Sat-guru, beyond that I don’t know anything.

M: You must do that, but you should understand the meaning of “feet of Sat-guru.” Understand that, as movement begins with the feet, so movement begins from no-knowingness to knowingness. When the knowingness occurs, that is Sat-guru movement. Go to the source for the movement where the “I Amness” begins. The effort of the one who has arrested that movement will not go to waste. Holding the fee of the Sat-guru is the borderline between knowingness and no-knowingness.

November 17, 1980

Questioner: Don’t we have to discard all knowledge?

Maharaj: You must have a thorough knowledge of this consciousness, and having known everything about the consciousness you come to the conclusion that it is all unreal, and then it should drop off. Having listened to these talks, sit and meditate, “That which I have heard, is it true or not?” Then you will understand that this is also to be discarded.

The principle which can pass judgment on whether the world is or is not, that principle antedates the world. That by which everything is known, whether it is or not — who knows this?

When I say Parabrahman, then you say that you understand. Names are merely an instrument for communicating. Do you understand what I am driving at?

Q: The jnani knows that this is all an illusion, that there is no path; but if, from within the illusion, one is convinced that there is a path, and there’s somewhere to go, does it make sense to use techniques to get to that further illusion?

M: Illusion - is it a word or not?

Q: It’s a word that relates to a concept.

M: That is also a name only, is it not?

Q: Yes.

M: So what illusory word do you want that will satisfy you?

November 18, 1980

Maharaj: My present outlook is without limitation, total freedom.

Ultimately one must go beyond knowledge, but the knowledge must come, and knowledge can come by constant meditation. By meditating, the knowledge “I Am” gradually settles down and merges with universal knowledge, and thereby becomes totally free, like the sky, or space.

Those who come here with the idea of getting knowledge, even spiritual knowledge, come here as individuals aspiring to get something: that is the real difficulty. The seeker must disappear.

When you know your real nature the knowledge “I Am” remains, but that knowledge is unlimited. It is not possible for you to acquire knowledge, you are knowledge. You are what you are seeking.

Your true being exists prior to the arising of any concept. Can you, as an object, understand something that existed prior to the arising of a concept? In the absence of consciousness is there any proof of the existence of the existence of anything? Consciousness itself is mind, is thought, is all phenomena, all manifestation. Apprehending this is being dead to “A am the body” while alive. This kind of knowledge comes only in a rare case, and is a very elusive kind of knowledge where no effort is necessary; in fact, effort itself is a hindrance. It is intuitive understanding.

Questioner: Then should all spiritual disciplines be dropped?

M: At the highest level this is so; at the earlier levels you have to do your homework.

Those who are able intuitively to grasp this lose their interest in worldly affairs. Having lost it, what will they get? Whatever they have lost, they will have lost as an ordinary person, but what they get in return will be fit for a King. hose who have comprehended and who have reached a certain stage will not ask for anything, but everything will come to them spontaneously. There will be no wish for it; nevertheless, it will be there. This does not happen for an individual — it happens for the universal manifestation, of for the one who has become one with his true nature. For the j񡮩, only witnessing is taking place.

November 20, 1980

Maharaj: The principle which can know itself is in the organism. In a worm crawling, it is there, because the worm knows itself instinctively.

By listening to my talks you will be transformed back to your original state, prior to you birth. Right now, in spite of you present life, it will happen. My present talk is quite different now, at a higher level; therefore I do not invite anybody to listen to my present talks. I recommend that nobody should come and listen because they will develop a dispassion for their family or daily life.

Language energy and vital breath energy should merge and stabilize. Otherwise, if you allow them to go outward, they will be dissipated.

If you want peace, stabilize at that point where you started to be, stay put there. Om is the unstruck sound, the unpronounced word.

You don’t respond to my talks, you have not been able to perceive the nature of you consciousness. Consciousness is something like the drama of a play, play-acting. You are unsupported, you have no support at all. The birth, the parents, all this is illusion. Taking the body as oneself is the accident. If you don’t cling to the body as your identity, everything will be all right.

When beingness forgets itself, that state is Parabrahman. This knowingness is not your true state, it is the outcome of the food essence body, and you, the Absolute, are not that.

November 21, 1980

Maharaj: Whatever I had thought earlier has now changed. What is happening now is that even the slightest touch of individuality has completely disappeared, and it is consciousness as such which is spontaneously experiencing. The result is total freedom. All the time there was complete conviction that it was consciousness which was experiencing; but that “I” which the consciousness was there. Now that has totally disappeared; therefore, whatever happens in the field of consciousness, I, who am there before consciousness, am not concerned in any way. The experience is of consciousness experiencing itself.

Nevertheless, understand what consciousness is, even if consciousness is not an individual. The basis and source of consciousness is in the material. What I say is still in the conceptual world, and you need not accept it as truth. Nothing in the conceptual world is true.

Once the disease was diagnosed, the very name of the disease started various thoughts and concepts. Watching those thoughts and concepts I came to the conclusion that whatever is happening is in the consciousness. I told the consciousness, “It is you who is suffering, not I.” If consciousness wants to continue to suffer, let it remain in the body. If it wants to leave the body, let it. Either way, I am not concerned.

All kinds of things were happening, thoughts and experiences, and they were credited to my account, but once I have seen what it is, all those account books have been burned and I no longer have any account.

How amusing it is to see someone who thinks of himself as an individual, who thinks of himself as a doer or achiever. Whatever is happening, and the experiencing of the happening, takes place in this consciousness when the “I Am” arises.

November 24, 1980

Questioner: If there is no difference between what is prior to birth and what is after death there is no difference, is there any reason for attempting to learn who we are now? Isn’t it all the same?

Maharaj: The light coming from the sun and the sun itself - is there any difference?

Q: The only difference is what happens in the middle?

M: Whatever happens between birth and death is also an expression of the consciousness only. Even in the realm of consciousness you pass the time entertaining various concepts; what else are you doing?

Q: Is Maharaj playing with various concepts?

M: No. It is the consciousness, it plays by itself.

Q: Does Maharaj’s consciousness play, even though he is detached from it?

M: Consciousness is not private property, it is universal.

Q: Though we understand this, sometimes it seems confined to a body.

M: You are trying to understand with the intellect; just be. When I tell you that you are that dynamic, manifest knowledge, you are everything. What else do you want?

Q: I am aware that I came here because Maharaj gives me the mirror, but this time he is showing me that I am my own mirror.

M: That is why you should not stay for long.

Q: After we leave here, what are we to do?

M: It is up to you. If you abide in consciousness everything will be happening spontaneously. If you are still at body-mind level, you will think that you are doing something. If you really abide in what I say, you become one with your Self. Then people will be serving you, they will fall at your feet. Whatever is necessary for you will happen. Activities are bound to happen. Consciousness can never remain inactive, it will always be busy - that is its nature. When you come here, you have certain expectations, certain aspirations, but after listening to my talks you lose all that.

Q: Even when I have an intuitive understanding of this, what is this reluctance to give up all that I am not?

M: You have not stabilized firmly in that understanding. Your conviction should be such that no question at all should arise in future about that. For example, a person is dead and has been cremated, it is all over, is there any question about that? Like that, it will be all over.

Q: What effort do I need to make toward that?

M: Effortlessly, just be.

When the consciousness fully understands the consciousness, will it embrace the body as itself? It is in totality; it is not going to pick our a fragment of the manifestation and say, “I am this.”

The consciousness expresses itself as does a light. This five elemental play is the manifestation of the consciousness, the effulgence of consciousness only. The play of the five elements will finally merge into the consciousness, because it is an outcome of the consciousness.

November 25, 1980

Maharaj: People come here and stay for days, weeks, even months. The first few days what they have heard takes root, and that is when they should leave, so that what has taken root will have time to grow and blossom. As soon as the seed takes root, they must go. What has taken root must bloom, must express itself within each heart.

Questioner: Maharaj has said, in this respect, that the teachings were his Gurus, but the understanding was his.

M: My Guru told me that consciousness alone is the Guru, all other developments sprouted within me. The fruit should grow on your own plant. I should not sow my understandings in you.

I have no use for traditions or traditional knowledge. If you do the slightest research on tradition you will see that it is all a concept. I am concerned with only one fact. Here I was in my wholeness, not even aware of my awareness, then suddenly this consciousness sprang up. How did it come about? That is the question which needs investigating.

One must understand how clever this fraud of Maya is; first it shows us our body and makes us believe that we are the body, but the body is nothing but a speck of fertilized sperm, and in that sperm the consciousness is latent. You see what a fraud it is?

The essence of the body is the essence of the foodstuff, and this consciousness lies dormant in it from the very beginning. In that state of consciousness is the entire universe. Having seen this, whoever has understood is bound to be quiet, knowing that this is only a transient happening. An enormous structure of concepts being taught to us as knowledge is based on the simple appearance of consciousness.

December 5, 1980

Maharaj: This sickness gave the confirmation that there is no personality, no individual. Sickness to whom? Sickness is part of the functioning of the entire manifest, dynamic Chaitanya; it is the play of consciousness. My true state is prior to this consciousness. That state does not depend on the consciousness.

There is a couplet we sing at Bhajans, to Chakrapani. Chakrapani means that “I Amness”, the life principle, the manifest principle. It is like this cigarette lighter. The gas as such has no light, but its manifestation is the flame; it is full of light, life, energy. Even in the atom and sub-atom, that energy is there.

The functioning of consciousness takes place spontaneously, and one doesn’t know what will happen. For instance, I say something and M. will translate it one way, B. will translate it another, in whichever way they have understood it. This is the way the process will go on. This Chakrapani is “like a flywheel,” Lord Krishna said, “rotating allbeings.” That energy which moves all things in the waking state is latent in deep sleep. How long is one unaware of awareness? One doesn’t know, but suddenly consciousness arises. Does anyone think along these lines? Is it not amazing that consciousness, which might remain latent for any length of time, suddenly arises spontaneously?

Questioner: Is universal cansciousness ever uware of itself as universal consciousness, or does it become aware only when there is aform.’

M: Awareness is not aware of its awareness. If you get too much involved in what I am saying you will throw away the books you are writing, everything.

Q: I will finish the books, then I amfinished.

M: [To Jean Dunn] You have promised me that you will complete the books. Universal consciousness will not write the books. How will you write the books?

Q: It will happen spontaneously.

December 8, 1980

Maharaj: I am talking about the consciousness which works through this body at the moment, but which is not visible. This consciousness is not limited to the body but is universal consciousness; I can’t speak of anything else now. A person who is already dead is not worried about anything. Whether the people like it or not doesn’t matter. Perhaps you may be getting some blessings, some benefits, from listening to my talks, I don’t know.

All my actions are the actions of universal consciousness appearing to work through this body. I do not remember something from the past and then act; it is all action in the now.

Questioner: Where does consciousness comefrom?

M: It never comes or goes, it just appears to have come.

Q: Why does Maharaj know this and we do not?

M: It is not difficult for you to know also, but with what identity are you asking?

Q: Is it karmic, can karma be changed?

M: It is all consciousness working, not this one or that one working; it is all consciousness.

Q: Can Maharaj, out of compassion, give me a push into that state of universal consciousness ?

M: Yes, of course, I can do that, but you must listen to me, you must have complete faith in whatever I tell you about yourself, and you must behave accordingly.

By nature I am non-manifest, yet I am manifested, but I am really not manifested. Can you live like that, as the non-manifest?

As long as the attribute is there, the quality of the attribute, the “I Am”, is there; therefore, I can speak like this. If it goes away, what happens? The sense of “I” has come and has gone, that is all, I am not going to die. One who has rejected this identity will understand.

Q: Maharaj said that he is not going to die ?

M: How can one who is not born, die?

When people first learned about this illness, those who have affection for me came to talk to me, or wrote to me, giving advice and medicine. Whatever is to happen will happen, I have no interest. I don’t have fear so I don’t have to do anything. It is quite in order that those who have affection for me write and come to discuss things with me; I don’t listen to them, and that is also quite in order, because I am not afraid of anything.

You are asking, “Who am I?” and you are not going to get an answer, because the one who will get the answer is false. You may have an idea, a concept, and you will think you have found yourself, but it is only a concept; you can never see your Self.

Q: What is sat-chit-ananda?

M: It is words. You can take it that sat-chit-ananda is the limit which your mind can describe of that state which cannot be described. Your true state is non-manifest; the manifestation comes and the words come. The one who experiences sat-chit-ananda is there before the experience.

December 15, 1980

Maharaj: Consider the status you have reached if you are able to understand what I say, and if you have understood, there will be no status at all. Your worth cannot be measured. You have done all your homework and now your sadhana or spiritual practice is bearing fruit; now you are here. Let it grow in you. You don’t have to go to anybody else after you leave this place; that part of the work has already been done by you. Because you are worthy of that state of realization, you are here today.

Get to know that “I Am” without words which arises in the morning. Knowing the Self, abiding in the Self- knowledge, is not a mere intellectual knowing. You must be that, and you should not move away from it. Remain firm. Do not consult others about the advice I have given to them. Abide in what I have told only you. Kill that curiosity to know what others are told; to each seeker the appropriate advice is given. Unless you abide in your own true nature you will not be able to gauge the depth of another’s nature. When you try to understand others, the Self-effulgent nature of one’s Self should open up completely. You will know yourself in the process. The knowledge being expounded here you will not find in any books. Now, having given you so much, you may see me tomorrow or you may not, that is immaterial, but don’t forget what I have told you about your Self.

December 18, 1980

Questioner: This consciousness is like a screen, and I am the screen.

Maharaj: Understand what I say without concepts; you are adding new concepts. Now go to zero concepts.There are many spiritual seekers whose aim is to acquire sufficient merit to reach a certain place, such as Heaven or Vaikuntha. I have had no aims except to find out. I was not aware of my awareness, and suddenly I became conscious that. I am. Where and how did this consciousness arise on me? That was my enquiry, going back to that state when the presence of phenomena was not there. That is, original knowledge of the original Self. So, I went back, tracing this original Self, and I reached a stage where I wanted to know what my state was before this consciousness arose. That is the destination which I have reached. Brahman, Isvara, God, all these are names given to the consciousness when it is conscious of itself. If you have properly understood this knowledge, what will be your position at the moment of so-called death? It will be watching what is happening. This consciousness gradually loses everything, and ultimately consciousness is no longer conscious of itself. That state cannot be described. It is called Parabrahman, the Supreme Absolute, but that is only a name for communication purposes.

This line of enquiry started when I noticed that from the moment one wakes up until one falls asleep, one is very busy doing something or other. What is it that compels us to do these things? Because of what does this go on? Then I came to the conclusion that it is my beingness, the fact that I am conscious of existing, which is working throughout the day. That was how my enquiry started.

In the body the indwelling principle is the consciousness. Abiding in the consciousness, it became all manifestation. Now transcendence of the consciousness has also occurred. With the appearance of consciousness, the Absolute knows it is, “I Am”. This is the experience. There are other experiences now, in this time factor, but experiences are gradually dropping off, including this primary experience “I Am”. It is only the consciousness that is going to disappear, the Absolute is always there. What a fall! The perfect state, caught up in these experiences, and trying to derive certain benefits out of the experiences.

Q: Is it spontaneous?

M: Yes. Whatever experiences were happening in this field of knowingness, the Ultimate principle got caught up in that. It accepted some experience as itself. Accepting experiences as the truth, it gets more and more involved.

December 22, 1980

Maharaj: Just now I was lying down in the waking state, but with no perceiving or receiving of any words, something like a prior-to-words state.

Now the last traces of personality or individuality have left me. Last year I used to talk to people with a certain affection, but that is not available now. My dwelling place in the grosser world is gone now; presently it is in the subtler sphere, as in space.

The effect of these talks is that you will stabilize in the very source from which the words sprout. Abiding in the dynamic, manifest consciousness is abiding in the words of the Guru. The meaning of the mantra I have given you is that you are the manifest, dynamic principle, not the body. When you abide in that, you become that.

People think that they are coming here of their own volition, but it is the consciousness which is bringing them here, because the consciousness wants this knowledge.

My talks are addressed to the consciousness, “You have identified with the body, but you are not the body.” It is knowledge which must understand its own nature, and merge with the knowledge which is its source.

People come here and ask for blessings; they don’t understand that the knowledge that one is not the body, but the consciousness within, is the blessing.

Decem ber 25, 1980

Questioner: When we are busy with our worldly jobs, what should we keep in mind?

Maharaj: Because the “I Am” principle is there, it is moving all over. To recognize it, you put on various uniforms in order to give it an identity, but that principle is already there, and because of that principle you are engaging in various activities. Unless you wear the uniform (the body) you will not be able to conduct any activities.

This knowledge is meant for the Isvara principle, which is presently caught up in the illusion that it is the body-mind. You have accepted the identity of the uniform and that identity becomes your ego.

Isvara is the manifest principle by which all activities are carried on. It has no form - the forms are given because of the five elemental play. Now, that principle gets completely lost in the uniform and is recognized by the uniform only. You have the fear of death because you fear losing your identity, the body.

Since the uniform is available to you, by all means use it, but understand that you are not the uniform.

Q: What does one do when the uniform gets troublesome?

M: Recede into your own Self, be one with your true Self.

This “I Amness” enjoys various experiences. It becomes a beggar or a King.

Is this body eternal? The body has been changing all during your life, which identity is you?

Q: I identify myself with my body, I know that.

M: Who?

Q: I do.

M: Give me a photograph of the meaning of that word “I” You can’t. That principle has no name or form or shape. My firm conclusion is that whatever is done through the uniform is perishable, it is not going to remain. Which uniform has any permanency? Once you know that you are not the form or the name of that uniform, it is all over. Suppose you have hoarded some thousand-rupee notes and suddenly the government order comes that they are all invalidated.

Once you discard this “I Amness” uniform, what remains is the Parabrahman. That which is eternally current is the Parabrahman.

Q: Will Maharaj help me discard my uniform?

M: What is the need? It is not eternal, it never was.

Q: We have not discarded ours, that is the problem.

M: Now, tell me, when the knowingness was not there, what experiences did you have? That little touch of “I Amness” and you felt the existence of yourself and the world.

Q: How to give up this knowingness?

M: Where is the need? If you accept that uniform as yourself, then the question of giving it up will be there. Give up your identity with the body, try to know yourself. It is merely knowingness, you cannot perceive that state. You come here because you are ignorant, not because you are knowledgeable. This knowledge I give is only to remove ignorance.

December 26, 1980

Maharaj: Out of what is the body created?

Questioner: It is an expression ofconsciousness.

M: Is this body not composed of the five elements? You know that you exist; does not this knowledge depend on the five elements? The consciousness cannot be known without the body. It depends on the form.

Q: Do you mean that without the body I do not know that I am?

M: That is correct. From your own experience, not what you have heard or read, can you know that you exist without the body?

Q: I exist without this body.

M: Forget about what you have read. When you did not have the experience of this body, did you have the experience of being?

Q: My English is not very good, I cannot express it, but I know “I Am. ”

M: Before you were born, could you have felt or sensed or known that you exist? A jnani is free because he sees that the body is made up of the five elements and it works according to the nature of these elements. I see that body, but I am not concerned with whatever that body does. There is nothing in it with which I can identify. The essence of the combination of the five elements is the sense of being, of existing. It has all come simultaneously, I have no part in it. Feeling that I am present depends on having a body; I am neither the body nor the conscious presence.

In this body is the subtle principle “I Am”; that principle witnesses all this. You are not the words. Words are the expression of space, they are not yours. Still further, you are not that “I Am”

Q: What am “I” then?

M: Who is asking?

Q: There is nothing here, no “I”?

M: Who is asking this?

Q: There is a sense of something, I don ‘t know what it is.

M: If you feel that sense of something, can it be the truth? When this consciousness goes into oblivion, who is to say what that state is?

Q: I don’t know.

M: Because your “I Amness” is not there, you do not know yourself. When you began knowing that you are, you did a lot of mischief, but when the “I Am” is not there, there is no question of mischief.

Q: Is the “I Am” there all the time, as long as my body is there?

M: The “I Am” is absent only in the state of samadhi, when the self merges into the Self. Otherwise, it will be there. In the state of a realized person the “I Am” is there; he just doesn’t give much importance to it. A jnani is not guided by a concept.

Q: Do we have a relationship, Maharaj, when I think I should be here with you’

M: The very thought is the relationship.

Q: The intensity of my longing to be here made me wonder if Maharaj thinks of his disciples?

M: I think of them more than you know.

December 30, 1980

Questioner: I think there should be beauty in the whole manifestation.

Maharaj: You should not get involved in what has appeared. Take a tree - the bark, the leaves, the blossoms, the fruit, all have a different nature. If you get involved in the appearance of these, you will lose sight of the source, the tree.

Intellectually, you have understood, but you have to be one with it, you have to identify with what you have understood. Understand that the seed of this body is the sperm of the father mixed with the ovum of the mother. That is the seed for the manifestation of the phenomen, but I am not the seed, I am not the phenomena, nor am I the consciousness which is time-bound.

The names and forms which you see are consciousness only. Your consciousness is very pure and that’s why you are able to judge. The Atman is colorless, but it is able to judge colors, etc.

Your sadhana is over; you have reached this place.

This knowledge is for those who have no desires. The Self-knowledge is the most precious knowledge.

To you who search for the Self I explain this type of knowledge. I lead you to a state where there is no hunger, no desire, therefore I am not inclined to invite those who are worried about their possessions and their relations to listen to my talks.

When you have knowledge you see that the consciousness “I” is all-pervasive, as long as the consciousness is there; but the witness of the consciousness has no “I Am” and that is your true, eternal nature.

“I love” gives rise to great joy, and at the same time there is nothing so miserable as “I love”

Giving up the body is a great festival for me.

What is the worth of all the activities of human beings? It is all entertainment, just to pass time. You get pleasure only when you forget yourself; in deep sleep you have forgotten yourself, that itself is joy.

It is the Atman, not the personality, that is drawn to spirituality.

I will not expound knowledge in the future; a few words here and there will be all.

January 3, 1981

Maharaj: Beingness has the quality to become whatever you think of. Whatever concept you feed to the consciousness, the consciousness will provide you with that. Whatever you hold on to intensely, you are bound to be that, that is the quality of your consciousness. You should never think that you are the body.

Consciousness is not the body. As a result of the body the beingness is felt, but beingness is all-pervasive.

Consciousness alone feels the expanse of consciousness, but I, the Absolute, am not that.

Whatever is known is known by consciousness, is in the field of consciousness. The consciousness and the knowledge will subside when the food body dies. The Absolute always remains. The seed of knowledge is planted in you by these talks; now you have to follow it up. You must nurse it, ruminate over it, so that the tree of knowledge will grow.

January 4, 1981

Questioner: I was pondering what Maharaj said about all consciousness being the same this morning, andforjust a few seconds, it was as if everything was one and I was behind it. Is this the aim?

Maharaj: That is not the aim, IT IS SO. It is there and it is only because of identity with the body that what is, doesn’t seem as if it is.

Please understand that there is only one thing to be understood, and that is that you are the formless, timeless unborn. It is because of your identification with the body as an entity that your consciousness, which is universal consciousness, thinks that it is dying. Nobody is dying, because nobody was born.

The millions of forms are the manifestation of consciousness. It is the millions of forms which get created and destroyed, but universal consciousness itself is unborn and undying. Just imagine if all the millions of forms which have been created were still here - how could other forms be created? It is because consciousness is unborn and undying that the millions of forms get created and destroyed; it is a continuous process. Understand that what you are is this unlimited universal consciousness. Only that in which consciousness manifests itself is limited and is created and destroyed. The total potential of consciousness remains. It is unlimited.

You are seeking knowledge from the standpoint of identification with the body and whatever can be grasped by the mind. When this body machine is there, the technique of using it is there, and that is what you are identifying with now, but it is not your true identity. You have no control over it, it has appeared and it will disappear.

I talk to you from the perspective of the universal consciousness and I know that all bodies are the essence of food and that they will vanish.

January 7, 1981

Questioner: Every time something happens now, instead of getting involved in it, I am seeing that everything is that “I Amness”. I am experiencing that.

Maharaj: Witnessing takes place, there is nothing to be done. It is total freedom for one who does not identify with the body.

Q: Everything is happening on its own and I have no concern with it.

M: If that is so, it means that you have understood everything and there is no need for you to linger here any longer.

Questioner [Another person]: It is diferent for me. I have to make an effort not to get involved in thoughts when I meditate.

M: It is the nature of the life force to express itself through thoughts and words, so they will keep on coming. If you have to make an effort in the beginning not to get involved, make that effort until it becomes effortless.

Q: Does the jnani have a mind and thoughts also ?

M: Although thoughts come and go, the jnani is not concerned. Thoughts will come in consciousness; witnessing also takes place in consciousness. You must have the conviction that you are consciousness Thereafter there is nothing for you to do; leave it to the consciousness to do what is to be done. Whatever happens, happens spontaneously.

Q: Where is the seat ofconsciousness?

M: In every particle of the juice of the body. In the scriptural books it is normally given that there are various chakras. Those are available if you want to locate them like that, but according to me, it is throughout the body.

Q: What is the difference between the body and consciousness?

M: What is the difference between sugar and sweetness? The sweetness is there in the sugar cane juice. In the body. the sweetness is the knowledge you are, the consciousness. This knowingness is due to what? What is the prerequisite for consciousness?

Q: Is it the body?

M: The body is necessary to sustain consciousness; for the body to be, food is necessary, is it not?

Q: Yes.

M: If the body does not remain, consciousness will not remain. In the absence of body and consciousness, what are you?

Q: I don ‘t know.

M: Now you want to get some benefit, some advantage, for yourself. To whom is the benefit?

Q: Consciousness.

M: If you are not the body or the consciousness, then what are you? When you realize the Self-knowledge, then the self is released, liberated.

Q: Then what?

M: Then you know, definitely, who you are. That by which you know, you know that, also.

Q: Is that liberation ?

M: Liberation means what? It is no more there. [Flicking his cigarette lighter on and off] This cigarette lighter is the body; the consciousness is the flame. Now it isn’t there anymore; it is liberated. Where is the need to label it in the absence of consciousness?


Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

EBG Excerpt…Truth

Published on Monday, December 12th, 2005

One need not pay heavily for Truth…Truth is free.


Tags:

The Nature of God

Published on Thursday, December 1st, 2005

Throughout the history of humankind, God has been depicted as having so many qualities it would be a monumental task to list them all here. (see Wiki article”God”) The names given to God* probably number in the thousands. Some religions alone, have dozens of names for God. Humans have not found anything to even come close to naming God, let alone trying to describe God’s nature. How can one describe the qualities of anything so incomprehensible as an invisible being in the non-physical with The All Encompassing Power of Creation?

I am not a Quantum Physicist (although there are articles on related subjects here), so I dare not try to explain God in scientific terms. My doubt lies in even trying to achieve this feat regardless. How could even the most brilliant scientists on the planet describe something that is out of the realm of their expertise? Since something is not born from nothing, the assumption that there is no God, has no validity. There are no arguments for the material, arising from the nothing, without first a something there to create it. Of course there are many agnostics(skeptics), and athiests(non-believers), as well as those who believe, but have fallen so far away from God, that their existence calibrates at the lowest levels of human survival. At these levels of skepticism, disbelief, and apathy, there is no need for concern about sharing information regarding God at all. When they are ready God is always present.</