Entries Tagged with "Zohar"


Weekly Consciousness Tune-Up-…1/13/08-1/19/08

Published on Monday, January 14th, 2008

Light My Desire

I have a question for you. Have you ever experienced a really nagging, excruciating toothache? Like, the worst kind. Shooting pain, sweats, desperate for treatment?

So, would it be safe to assume that you possess, right now, a desire not to want a toothache? Five seconds ago, before you read this, were you aware that you had a desire not to want a toothache? No. Why?

Because that desire was already fulfilled.

But if suddenly your tooth started aching right now, BOOM, your desire would awaken. You’d say, “I don’t want to have a toothache.” And then, when that toothache pain dissipated, you would feel great fulfillment. Correct?

We have no awareness of desire that is already fulfilled.

The kabbalists explain that when we - the souls of humanity - were originally created, every possible desire was already fulfilled. We were born a completely fulfilled soul.

We were also born unappreciative of what the Creator was instilling within us.

Just like you were unconscious of your desire not to have a toothache, because that desire was completely fulfilled, we were literally born unconscious, unaware, unappreciative of what the Creator was instilling within us.

Think about this for a minute. Imagine all the possible joys in your life, from sex and food and movies to watching your kids grow and feeling competent at work and being in a loving relationship. Every conceivable pleasure we now have a desire for was once ours.

But we were unconscious. So we said to the Creator, “Hey, we want to wake up! We want to truly appreciate. We need to experience a world that will ignite our desire.”

If the Light we were born into included infinite happiness, we needed to experience infinite sadness to awaken a thirst and hunger for that happiness.

If infinite peace of mind was included in everything that was fulfilling us, we asked to experience infinite depression, fear, and anxiety to awaken the desire and thirst for that healing and fulfillment.

That is why the Zohar says you only know something by its opposite. You only know white when you see black. You only know Light when you see darkness. You only know up when you see down.

It’s a bit depressing, no? Does this mean we need to experience pain every time we want to taste happiness? The answer is no.

This week, pay attention to the law of opposites. Reflect back on your life, your happiest memories, your feelings of greatest accomplishment. Were they preceded by hardship, by lack, by tough times? The next seven days, find strength to see through to the other side of whatever difficulty you are facing by meditating on the words of Rav Ashlag:

“Every good situation is nothing more than the fruit born
by a bad situation that preceded it.”

And stay tuned for next week’s answers to these questions:

If the Light is infinite, and includes infinite solutions to our problems, couldn’t the Light also come up with the solution to the ultimate paradox of existence?

How do we experience pleasure without having to experience pain?

How can we awaken that desire?

All the best,

Yehuda


Tags: , , ,

Testing For Truth—Divine Protoplasmic Analysis (formerly referred to as Applied Kinesiology

Published on Thursday, June 8th, 2006

The term Applied Kinesiology brings up a myriad of conclusions by experts and self-proclaimed specialists in the field. This is why Dr. David R.Hawkins, MD, PhD. has discontinued using the term in the context of Advanced Consciousness (Science) Research. Applied Kinesiology (AK), is about muscle movement. Divine Protoplasmic Analysis (Myswizard) refers to whether or not life or protoplasm goes weak (falsehood or not Reality) or strong (Absolute Truth, God or Reality) to a stimulus. This powerful tool is uncomplicated because it only uses the body’s electrical chi system and your muscles. The challenge is that accurate readings require a subtle discernment. Learning to test is like learning anything else. It requires practice and willingness. Divine Protoplasmic Analysis is available to anyone who calibrates over the level of integrity (200).

How long will it take to learn how to test?
This depends on the individual’s level of consciousness, willingness, and their intention. The more you practice, the better it will work for you. Have fun with it. If you run into difficulties, there may be a karmic issue going on, personal level of consciousness, or other factors. Clear the acupuncture meridians by doing the ‘Thymic thump’. While holding a loved one in mind, thump the thymus (center of chest above the breastbone) while saying ha ha ha. Then proceed with the testing. Don’t allow discouragement to end your journey. When the conditions are right, things will happen.

People struggle with testing when they over-mentalize. Protoplasmic testing is out of the realm of the intellect. The intellect is in the 400s and this type of testing is 600. That puts it out of thinkingness and into the non-physical.

How and why does testing work?
The protoplasmic response is a simple yes or no response to a single stimulus. The stimulus can be a substance or a simple statement. If the stimulus is beneficial and supports life, the muscles test strong. If the stimulus is not beneficial, the body (protoplasm) will test weak. The response is very quick and brief.

A critical understanding of testing is that it measures the calibrated level of consciousness (LOC) on Dr. Hawkins’ Map of Consciousness (MAP) of a stimulus (object, statement, place, issue, occurrence, idea, intention, or writing). Anything over 200 is integrous and true. It is a gift from Divinity and a revelation of Absolute Truth. God does not have agendas and secrets, so we experience Truth at higher levels of consciousness. It is nothing special. It just is.

A Further Explanation
What you are testing is the body’s response to The Field (The Entirety of Divinity). Since The Field holds infinite information for eternity, there is nothing which escapes it. Questions must be definitive and have perfect clarity. (See “New Self-Testing Techniques—The Way to Absolute Truth Through the Elimination of Doubt.” and “Testing Parameters for Self-testing”)

So, either something exists or it does not exist. This is a subtle understanding, so to further explain, think about electricity. Either the light bulb that lights your room gets electrical power or it does not. Non-electric current does not flow through the wires to turn off the light. The electrical current stops and the light turns off. It is a matter of being on or not on. It is a different way of thinking about opposites. To paraphrase Dr. Hawkins, “There is no such thing as offness.”

Whatever our life essence is, it works in much the same way. There is either existence or no existence. It is based on The Universal Force of All Life knowing what is Absolute and what is not. Therefore, the Protoplasmic test measures if something strengthens this life energy. If the stimulus is (Reality/Divine), the answer will be positive (yes). If (falsehood/no Reality) it will be negative (no).

A Revelation in New Self-Testing Techniques (”There Are No Secrets”)
There Are No Secrets: The Highest Journey

Testing Parameters for Self-testing (Myswizard.com_Absolute Truth)

See Benefits of Reading Power vs. Force under Devotional Nonduality

Your Body Doesn\'t Lie


Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Weekly Consciousness Tune-Up…Yehuda Berg 4/2-4/8/06

Published on Monday, April 3rd, 2006

Say You Love Me

Depression. Anger. Co-dependency. Jealousy. Addiction. Impatience.

Sound familiar? What do all of these things have in common? They’re all forms of idol worshipping.

This week’s Zohar portion (Tzav) refers to the dangers of idol worshipping. If you think it only refers to bowing down to ancient statues, think again. Anything that you allow to control you is considered by the Kabbalists to be idol worshipping.

The energy in the coming days assists you in cleansing one form of idol worship — approval-seeking.

What is approval-seeking? It’s looking for someone else’s energy to fill up your black holes. Rav Ashlag, founder of The Kabbalah Centre, said dependence on others’ approval in order to feel good is the seed of uncertainty, depression, and sadness. Rav Ashlag also said that this need is an essential part of who we are, but the only way to truly fulfill it is to generate it from within.

Make no mistake, approval-seeking is the greatest drug ever invented. Looking for other people’s energy to fill you up gives you a temporary high but a lasting crash. And for those of you who are thinking, “There really isn’t one person in my life from whom I’m hooked on getting approval,” chances are you’re seeking approval from anyone and everyone.

The bottom line is this – the Light sees everything you do. You don’t need the human mind to recognize your greatness. It’s registered upstairs. If you are out there doing good, following your internal compass, then you are going to get good in return.

In one of my favorite prayers of Rosh Hashanah, it is written that God remembers everything that’s been forgotten. The kabbalists explain that God remembers the good things we do but only after we have forgotten them. That is, God remembers the things we don’t have ego about and seek approval for. Remembering your positive actions and the fact that YOU did them means you’re still waiting for the praises to come back to you.

According to the Zohar, by drawing attention to your positive actions, you are actually sucking the Light out of them and reducing the positive affects of your sharing. This is why the kabbalists say the highest form of sharing is done anonymously.

This week provides you with the perfect energy to begin recognizing just how much you are an approval junky. Take this opportunity to practice stepping away from yourself and noticing how many actions and words you spend seeking others’ approval. The moment you notice how much you rely on others for your own sense of self-worth is the moment you begin to have your own feelings of self-worth.

All the Best,
Yehuda


Tags: , ,

Weekly Consciousness Tune Up…Yehuda Berg 3/5-3/11/06

Published on Monday, March 6th, 2006

Weekly Consciousness Tune Up
March 5 - 11, 2006

Injecting Excitement

We are now entering week two of the month of Pisces. I don’t know about you, but I am feeling the beneficial energies this month has to offer – happiness, creativity, intuition.

But on the flip side, I am sort of falling into a mellow routine. Pisces are all about the mellow and the routine. Routine can be a detriment to spiritual progress, so I opened The Zohar and asked for guidance from the Light as to how to fight my natural inclination this month.

The next day I got an email from two old friends about this exact issue. (Don’t you love when that happens?) It was from Janet and Chris Attwood who are motivational speakers and authors famous for creating The Passion Test. I’ve gone through the steps of this test in the past and found it to be a great, practical solution for identifying passions of mine I didn’t even know existed.

I called them, and they took me through the test again, and it led to a breakthrough on a project I’ve been working to get off the ground for years. It’s an effective tool that helped me, and I want to let you know about it because it can help you too.

It’s important to identify what it is that speaks to your soul when it comes to work, relationships, and spiritual practice. Many of us fall into careers or relationships that are less than satisfying because we simply aren’t aware of what speaks to us.

And going through this process in a month like Pisces - when it is most difficult to ignite the internal fires – is beneficial to you because there is an opening now to ignite your passions for the rest of the year.

But once you identify what you want to do – which is only 1 percent of the issue – you need to look at how you do it – which is the remaining 99 percent.

When Kabbalists speak of the energy of passion, they actually refer to it as excitement. They explain that excitement is not something that is a result of just enjoying what you are doing or who you are doing it with. Excitement is something you consciously inject into an action or situation.

When I say excitement, I don’t mean jumping up and down and pumping your fist. I mean embracing whatever you are doing with 100 percent of your attention and dedication, whether it’s going to dinner with the family, initiating a project at work, making spiritual connections, or just going to the gym.

This week, if you notice that you like what you are doing but just aren’t feeling passionate about it, try injecting excitement into it. And if you find that you aren’t doing what you know you were meant to be doing, I definitely recommend checking out my friends’ The Passion Test.

All the Best,
Yehuda

I normally don’t give out websites such as this, because of the ads and the fact they want to promote others and get your e mail. If you’re interested in taking a test to find out what you like, it’s there for you. Personally, I suggest just listening to your inner self…Myswizard


Tags: ,

Monthly Tune Up…Yehuda Berg 1/30/06-2/28-06

Published on Friday, February 10th, 2006

What can I do?

One of the rewards of Kabbalah is that it empowers us to change the world. This is an intoxicating thought, and (ideally) the more one practices Kabbalah, the greater the enthusiasm becomes for accomplishing this goal.

But we must remind ourselves that global change starts at home, in those little moments that we tend to pass off as “insignificant.” During the month of Aquarius we are better able to recognize that great transformation happens in the little moments.

The kabbalists relate the idea that the world rests on a scale. One side of the scale holds the energy of our positive actions, and the other side holds the energy of our negative actions.

The Zohar says that our actions are like grains of sand on that scale. Notice it doesn’t say rocks or coins or some larger object. In his choice of words, Rav Shimon Bar Yochai (author of the Zohar) is telling us that we never know which little action will tip the scales in our favor. Every act of sharing and every moment of restriction ends up on the scale which side it goes to is up to us.

When students ask me what they can do in response to the horrors of life — the starving children in Asia, the AIDS epidemic in Africa, the war in Iraq — I tell them what the kabbalists have been teaching for millennia — change yourself. Giving your friend those five minutes you don’t have as you are rushing off to an important event, treating your competitors with human dignity, loving someone when you dislike them — that’s how you change the world.

You can effect change in remote areas of the world by effecting change in your home, in your school, in your workplace.

The interconnectedness of all humanity is a fundamental kabbalistic teaching. Whether we see it or not, we share the same scales with the children in Asia, the mothers in Africa, the soldiers in Iraq.

A brief parable explains this. Two people were in a rowboat, when one suddenly took out a drill and began boring a hole in the boat’s bottom. His companion yelled, “Are you crazy? What are you doing?” But the other boatman just kept drilling. “Mind your own business!” he said. “I’m drilling under myself, not you!”

The lesson is clear: we must recognize that “we’re all in the same boat.” This is hardly a new teaching, but it is an awesome one, and we need to see it each day as if for the first time. It is not nearly enough to concentrate solely on our own development; yet “spiritual” people often fall into this trap. “As long as I am growing,” they think, “that’s all that matters.” But we have just seen how very far this is from the teachings of Kabbalah. As much as we are responsible for ourselves, we are responsible for the world.

This month, as you begin to realize the influence every word and deed has on others, do your best to bring this awareness into all the “seemingly insignificant” moments. You never know which grain of sand will tip the scales in the world’s favor.

All the best,

Yehuda


Tags: ,

The Zohar

Published on Saturday, December 24th, 2005

The Zohar

The Zohar (Hebrew זהר “Splendor, radiance”) is widely considered the most important work of Kabbalah, Jewish mysticism. It is a mystical commentary on the Torah (the five books of Moses), written in medieval Aramaic and medieval Hebrew. It contains a mystical discussion of the nature of God, the origin and structure of the universe, the nature of souls, sin, redemption, good and evil, and related topics.

The Zohar is not one book, but a group of books. These books include scriptural interpretations as well as material on theosophic theology, mythical cosmogony, mystical psychology, and what some would call anthropology.

Origin
According to Gershom Scholem, most of the Zohar was written in an exalted style of Aramaic that was spoken in Palestine during the second century of the modern era. The Zohar first appeared in Spain in the 13th century, and was published by a Jewish writer named Moses de Leon. He ascribed this work to a rabbi of the second century, Simeon ben Yohai. Jewish historiography holds that during a time of Roman persecution, Rabbi Simeon hid in a cave for 13 years, studying the Torah with his son, Elazar. [1] During this time he is said to have been inspired by God to write the Zohar.

The fact that the Zohar was found by one lone individual, Moses de Leon, and that it refers to historical events of the post-Talmudical period, caused the authenticity of the work to be questioned from the outset. A story tells that after the death of Moses de Leon, a rich man of Avila named Joseph offered Moses’ widow (who had been left without any means of supporting herself) a large sum of money for the original from which her husband had made the copy. She confessed that her husband himself was the author of the work. She had asked him several times, she said, why he had chosen to credit his own teachings to another, and he had always answered that doctrines put into the mouth of the miracle-working Shimon bar Yochai would be a rich source of profit. The story indicates that shortly after its appearance the work was believed by some to have been written by Moses de Leon.

Acceptance of authenticity
Over time, the general view in the Jewish community came to be one of acceptance of Moses de Leon’s claims; the Zohar was held to be an authentic book of mysticism passed down from the second century, though certain small groups (Baladi Yemenite, Andalusian (Western Sefardic) and some Italian communities) never accepted it as authentic.

The Zohar spread among the Jews with remarkable swiftness. Scarcely fifty years had passed since its appearance in Spain before it was quoted by many Kabbalists, including the Italian mystical writer Menahem Recanati. Its authority was so well established in Spain in the 15th century that Joseph ibn Shem-Tov drew from it arguments in his attacks against Maimonides.

Even representatives of non-mysticism oriented Judaism began to regard it as a sacred book and to invoke its authority in the decision of some ritual questions. They were attracted by its glorification of man, its doctrine of immortality, and its ethical principles, which are more in keeping with the spirit of Talmudic Judaism than are those taught by the philosophers. While Maimonides and his followers regarded man as a fragment of the universe whose immortality is dependent upon the degree of development of his active intellect, the Zohar declared him to be the lord of the Creation, whose immortality is solely dependent upon his morality. According to the Zohar, the moral perfection of man influences the ideal world of the Sefirot; for although the Sefirot expect everything from the Ein Sof (Heb. אין סוף, infinity), the Ein Sof itself is dependent upon man: he alone can bring about the divine effusion. The dew that vivifies the universe flows from the just. By the practice of virtue and by moral perfection, man may increase the outpouring of heavenly grace. Even physical life is subservient to virtue. This, says the Zohar, is indicated in the words “for the Lord God had not caused it to rain” (Gen. 2:5), which means that there had not yet been beneficent action in heaven, because man had not yet been created to pray for it.

The Zohar was quoted by Todros Abulafia, by Menahem Recanati, and even by Isaac of Acco, in whose name the story of the confession of Moses de Leon’s widow is related. Isaac evidently ignored the woman’s alleged confession in favor of the testimony of Joseph ben Todros and of Jacob, a pupil of Moses de Leon, both of whom assured him on oath that the work was not written by Moses. The only objection worthy of consideration by the believers in the authenticity of the Zohar was the lack of references to the work in Jewish literature; and to this they answered that Simeon ben Yohai did not commit his teachings to writing, but transmitted them orally to his disciples, who in turn confided them to their disciples, and these to their successors, until finally the doctrines were embodied in the Zohar. As to the references in the book to historical events of the post-Talmudic period, it was not deemed surprising that Simeon ben Yohai should have foretold future happenings.

Rejection of authenticity
The first attack upon the accepted authorship of the Zohar was made by Elijah Delmedigo. Without expressing any opinion as to the real author of the work, he endeavored to show, in his Bechinat ha-Dat that it could not be attributed to Simeon ben Yohai. The objections were that:

if the Zohar was the work of Simeon ben Yohai, it would have been mentioned by the Talmud, as has been the case with other works of the Talmudic period;
the Zohar contains names of rabbis who lived at a later period than that of Simeon;
were Simeon ben Yohai the father of the Kabbalah, knowing by divine revelation the hidden meaning of the precepts, his decisions on Jewish law would have been adopted by the Talmud; but this has not been done;
were the Kabbalah a revealed doctrine, there would have been no divergence of opinion among the Kabbalists concerning the mystic interpretation of the precepts (Bechinat ha-Dat ed. Vienna, 1833, p. 43).
These arguments and others of the same kind were used by Leon of Modena in his Ari Nohem. A work devoted to the criticism of the Zohar was written, Miṭpaḥat Sefarim, by Jacob Emden, who, waging war against the remaining adherents of the Sabbatai Zevi movement, endeavored to show that the book on which Zevi based his doctrines was a forgery. Emden demonstrates that the Zohar misquotes passages of Scripture; misunderstands the Talmud; contains some ritual observances which were ordained by later rabbinical authorities; mentions the crusades against the Muslims (who did not exist in the second century); uses the expression esnoga, which is a Portuguese corruption of “synagogue,”; and gives a mystical explanation of the Hebrew vowel-points, which were not introduced until long after the Talmudic period.

In the mid-20th century, the Jewish historian Gershom Scholem contended that de Leon himself was the most likely author of the Zohar. Among other things, Scholem noticed the Zohar’s frequent errors in Aramaic grammar, its suspicious traces of Spanish words and sentence patterns, and its lack of knowledge of the land of Israel. This finding is still disputed by many within Orthodox Judaism, although not because of any scholarly proofs, rather because of tradition. Other Jewish scholars have also suggested the possibility that the Zohar was written by a group of people, including de Leon. This theory generally presents de Leon as having been the leader of a mystical school, whose collective effort resulted in the Zohar.

Another theory as to the authorship of the Zohar is that it was transmitted like the Talmud before it was transcribed: as an oral tradition reapplied to changing conditions and eventually recorded. This view simultaneously believes that the Zohar was not written by Rav Shimon, but was a holy work because it consisted of his principles.

Even if de Leon wrote the text, the entire contents of the book may not be fraudulent. Parts of it may be based on older works, and it was a common practice to ascribe the authorship of a document to an ancient rabbi in order to give the document more weight. It is possible that Moshe de Leon considered himself inspired to write this text.

Mysticism
“Woe unto the man,” says Simeon ben Yohai, “who asserts that this Torah intends to relate only commonplace things and secular narratives; for if this were so, then in the present times likewise a Torah might be written with more attractive narratives. In truth, however, the matter is thus: The upper world and the lower are established upon one and the same principle; in the lower world is Israel, in the upper world are the angels. When the angels wish to descend to the lower world, they have to don earthly garments. If this be true of the angels, how much more so of the Torah, for whose sake, indeed, the world and the angels were alike created and exist. The world could simply not have endured to look upon it. Now the narratives of the Torah are its garments. He who thinks that these garments are the Torah itself deserves to perish and have no share in the world to come. Woe unto the fools who look no further when they see an elegant robe! More valuable than the garment is the body which carries it, and more valuable even than that is the soul which animates the body. Fools see only the garment of the Torah, the more intelligent see the body, the wise see the soul, its proper being; and in the Messianic time the ‘upper soul’ of the Torah will stand revealed.”

Pardes and Biblical exegesis
The Zohar assumes four kinds of Biblical exegesis: Peshat (”simple/literal meaning”), Remez (”hint/allusion”), Derash (”interpretative/anagogical), and Sod (”secret/mystic”). The initial letters of the words Peshat, Remez, Derash, and Sod form together the word PaRDeS (”paradise/orchard”), which became the designation for the fourfold meaning of which the mystical sense is the highest part.

The mystic allegorism is based by the Zohar on the principle that all visible things, the phenomena of nature included, have besides their exoteric reality an esoteric reality also, destined to instruct man in that which is invisible. This principle is the necessary corollary of the fundamental doctrine of the Zohar. The universe being, according to that doctrine, a gradation of emanations, it follows that the human mind may recognize in each effect the supreme mark, and thus ascend to the cause of all causes.

This ascension, however, can only be made gradually, after the mind has attained four various stages of knowledge; namely: (1) the knowledge of the exterior aspect of things, or, as the Zohar calls it (ii. 36b), “the vision through the mirror that projects an indirect light”; (2) the knowledge of the essence of things, or “the vision through the mirror that projects a direct light”; (3) the knowledge through intuitive representation; and (4) the knowledge through love, since the Law reveals its secrets only to those who love it (ii. 99b).

After the knowledge through love comes the ecstatic state which is applied to the most holy visions. To enter the state of ecstasy one had to remain motionless, with the head between the knees, absorbed in contemplation and murmuring prayers and hymns. There were seven ecstatic stages, each of which was marked by a vision of a different color. At each new stage the contemplative entered a heavenly hall (hekal) of a different hue, until he reached the seventh, which was colorless, and the appearance of which marked both the end of his contemplation and his lapse into unconsciousness. The Zohar gives the following illustration of an ecstatic state:

“Once,” says R. Simeon ben Yohai, “I was plunged in a contemplative ecstasy, and I beheld a sublime ray of a brilliant light which illumined 325 circles, and amid which something dark was bathing. Then the dark point, becoming bright, began to float toward the deep and sublime sea, where all the splendors were gathering. I then asked the meaning of this vision, and I was answered that it represented the forgiveness of sins.”

Effects on Judaism
The Zohar was lauded by many rabbis because it opposed religious formalism, stimulated one’s imagination and emotions, and for many people helped reinvigorate the experience of prayer. In many places prayer had become a mere external religious exercise, while prayer was supposed to be a means of transcending earthly affairs and placing oneself in union with God.

The Zohar was censured by many rabbis because it propagated many superstitious beliefs, and produced a host of mystical dreamers, whose over-heated imaginations peopled the world with spirits, demons, and all kinds of good and bad influences. Many classical rabbis, especially Maimonides, viewed all such beliefs as a violation of Judaism principles of faith.

Its mystic mode of explaining some commandments was applied by its commentators to all religious observances, and produced a strong tendency to substitute a mystic Judaism in the place of traditional rabbinic Judaism.

Shabbat, the Jewish Sabbath, began to be looked upon as the embodiment of God in temporal life, and every ceremony performed on that day was considered to have an influence upon the superior world.

Elements of the Zohar crept into the liturgy of the 16th and 17th centuries, and the religious poets not only used in their compositions the allegorism and symbolism of the Zohar, but even adopted its style, e.g. the use of erotic terminology to illustrate the relations between man and God. Thus, in the language of some Jewish poets, the beloved one’s curls indicate the mysteries of the Deity; sensuous pleasures, and especially intoxication, typify the highest degree of divine love as ecstatic contemplation; while the wine-room represents merely the state through which the human qualities merge or are exalted into those of God.

Influence on Christian mysticism
The enthusiasm felt for the Zohar was shared by many Christian scholars, such as Pico de Mirandola, Reuchlin, Ægidius of Viterbo, etc., all of whom believed that the book contained proofs of the truth of Christianity. They were led to this belief by the analogies existing between some of the teachings of the Zohar and certain Christian dogmas, such as the fall and redemption of man, and the dogma of the Trinity, which seems to be expressed in the Zohar in the following terms: “The Ancient of Days has three heads. He reveals himself in three archetypes, all three forming but one. He is thus symbolized by the number Three. They are revealed in one another. [These are:] first, secret, hidden ‘Wisdom’; above that the Holy Ancient One; and above Him the Unknowable One. None knows what He contains; He is above all conception. He is therefore called for man ‘Non-Existing’ [Ayin]” (Zohar, iii. 288b).

This and other similar doctrines found in the Zohar are now known to be much older than Christianity; but the Christian scholars who were led by the similarity of these teachings to certain Christian dogmas deemed it their duty to propagate the Zohar. Shortly after the publication of the work (Mantua and Cremona, 1558) Joseph de Voisin translated extracts from it which deal with the soul. He was followed by many others.

The disastrous effects of the Sabbatai Zevi messianic movement on the Jewish community dampened the enthusiasm that had been felt for the book in the Jewish community. However, the Zohar is still held in great reverence by many Orthodox Jews, especially the Hasidim (Hasidic Jews).


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Zohar and Kabbalah

Published on Saturday, December 24th, 2005

The Zohar and Kabbalah

Kabbalah is many things: oral traditions, rituals, meditations, magical practices, books of philosophy and theology, stories… It could be a lifetime of learning. The Zohar is part of the Kabbalistic tradition; it was written by Kabbalists and has been studied in depth mostly by Kabbalists. Yet, because Kabbalah is taught in many ways, having learned a little of it does not necessarily help in understanding the Zohar; and I would argue that you do not have to be interested in Kabbalah to appreciate and explore the Zohar.

The Zohar’s purpose is not to teach us Kabbalah; it assumes that we know Kabbalah. Other Kabbalistic books, even when they speak in hints rather than openly, tend to be fairly systematic expositions of ideas. (Two accessible examples, rewarding to study, which are available in English translations, are The Palm Tree of Deborah by Rabbi Moshe Cordovero [16th century], and Gates of Light by Rabbi Joseph Gikatilla, who may have been one of the authors of the Zohar.) Such books do mean to teach you Kabbalah. The Zohar starts with Kabbalah and wants to take you further. For this reason, it is anything but systematic; its ideas are expressed as challenges and paradoxes, and it is mostly a work of images and stories.

The Kabbalistic commentators on the Zohar approach it as a work to be decoded: its symbolism needs to be translated into theological ideas. The Zohar itself invites this decoding, but, as one of the early commentators, Rabbi Shim’on Lavi, already recognized, the result of a completely successful decoding would be a constant repetition of a few key ideas, which the Zohar returns to over and over again. If the purpose of the Zohar were to teach Kabbalah, it could have been ten pages long, not thousands. Further, completely successful decoding has turned out to be impossible, so that the great commentators offer contradictory interpretations of the same passages, because the Zohar deliberately teases and frustrates the interpreter. At the same time that the Zohar works with Kabbalah, it is also undermining it, in order to take us beyond.

Kabbalah is part of the raw material which the authors of the Zohar were working with. They were steeped in its concepts and built on them. Yet they drew at least as much on the Bible; on midrashic literature; on their own physical lives and experiences. Knowing about early Kabbalah can help us to understand the Zohar, but so can knowing Scripture or, especially, being aware of our own physical and emotional being. In the words of my teacher, David Greenstein, “the Zohar succeeds in reinventing kabbalistic consciousness by restoring its connection to lived reality.”

CRASH COURSE IN KABBALAH

Since knowing some specific details about Kabbalah can be a help in understanding the Zohar, here are a few remarks on two Kabbalistic key-words: “secrets” and “Sefirot”.

Secrets

The Zohar often introduces its teachings as “secrets” and “mysteries”. This is a stylistic feature which it shares with other Kabbalistic books. Kabbalah as a whole is often referred to as “nistar” or “chokhmat hanistar” — “the mystery” or “the secret wisdom”. It presents itself as esoteric lore, only for the initiated. Kabbalistic books emphasize that they are based on secret traditions passed on orally from one initiate to another, and that the authors know some things that are too secret to put into writing at all. It is often not clear how much of the secrecy is real. In the Middle Ages, as today, mysterious depth and secrecy had an appeal and were paradoxically a tool for attracting more students and readers. Typically, the Zohar will be very un-secretive about advertising its secrets. To paraphrase my teacher Rabbi David Greenstein’s way of paraphrasing it: “There’s a secret coming! A BIG secret! … Did you catch that secret?” On the other hand, the authors of the Zohar will sometimes slip in something truly esoteric, truly radical, without labelling it as a secret at all — which is one of the most effective ways of hiding it.

What can the whole idea of “secrets” mean to us? There is a Hasidic teaching which looks at this from a spiritual-devotional standpoint. Although this is probably not what the authors of the Zohar had in mind, I find it very helpful:

I heard from the holy mouth of Rebbe Menachem Mendl (of Premishlan) of blessed memory: A mystery is something that a person cannot communicate to another person. It is like the taste of food: it is impossible to describe it to a person who has never experienced that taste, impossible to explain to him in words its quality or its essence. Such a thing is called “a mystery”. So it is with love and fear of God: it is impossible to explain to another person the quality of the love in your heart. It is called a mystery.

But as for calling the wisdom of the Kabbalah “mystery” (nistar) — how is it a mystery? Anyone who wants to learn it can look in a book. If they do not understand, they are no different from people who cannot understand the Talmud or the commentary of the Tosafot — does that make those works “mystery”? No, the essence of all the mysteries in all of the Zohar and the writings of the Ari is clinging to God (devekut)…

Yosher Divrei Emet, section 22
(R. Meshullam Feivish of Zabriza, 1740-1795)

In other words, the real “secrets” or “mysteries” of the Zohar are the inexpressible moments of connection to God which it can awaken for us, each of us in our own way.

Sefirot

One of the most well-known Kabbalistic teachings today, and a key part of most Kabbalistic theology, is the idea of the ten forces or essences called Sefirot. (The singular of Sefirot is Sefirah; originally the word meant “counting” or “number”.) There are different ideas in Kabbalah about what the Sefirot are: are they parts of God, separate beings like angels, basic elements of creation? Although these questions are controversial in later Kabbalah, the Zohar assumes that the Sefirot are divine. They are aspects of God, and when we talk about the Sefirot, it is God we are talking about.

The Sefirot are often diagrammed with set names in a set order, like this

1. Keter (Crown)
2. Chochmah (Wisdom)
3. Binah (Understanding)
4. Chesed
(Lovingkindness)
5. Gevurah (Power)
also called Din (Judgment)
6. Tif’eret (Beauty)
7. Netzach (Eternity,
or Victory)
8. Hod (Splendour,
or Acknowledgement)
9. Yesod (Foundation)
10. Malkhut (Dominion)

Before and beyond the Sefirot, and beyond our understanding, is the hidden inwardness of God, called Eyn Sof (Limitless).

There is a flow of divine power and blessing from one Sefirah to another, finally reaching Malkhut, which is the presence of God in the world.

In some ways the Sefirot are independent beings or forces, which interact with each other in various ways. For example, Chesed and Din are opposing forces; Tif’eret and Malkhut are sometimes close to each other and sometimes distant.

In later Kabbalistic teachings the system becomes much more complex. There are Sefirot within Sefirot; there are configurations of Sefirot, called Partsufim (Faces); there are four worlds or levels of reality which each contain ten Sefirot, and so on. Most of these ideas, however, were developed after the time of the Zohar and are not important for understanding the Zohar.

Reflections on the Sefirot

Several of the Sefirot are highlighted in the texts we will be studying. As a preliminary guide, the following are some impressions about them that emerge from my readings of the Zohar.

Keter (Crown) is the most hidden, inward aspect of God that is revealed at all. Keter is pure love. It is also pure potential, the place where everything is possible. Any deep change involves a moment of connection with Keter. The name of God connected with Keter is “Ehyeh asher Ehyeh” — “I am that I am” or “I will be whatever I will be”.

Chochmah, Wisdom, is also very hidden. In human terms, it is pure consciousness, thought before words, or the initial flash of intuition. In the family imagery of the Zohar, Chochmah is the father. The word Chochmah, which is grammatically feminine, can also refer to Malchut, the feminine Presence, when she is connected with the father and bringing his wisdom into the world.

In the Bible, there are praises of Chochmah, Wisdom, personified as a woman, especially in Proverbs 8:1-9:6. The Zohar would understand these as praises of Malchut.

Binah is the hidden source within God. Our texts allude to Her a few times. In the Zohar’s imagery She is a great river from which all streams flow out; She is the mother or grandmother of everything. Her name means “Understanding” and is also connected with ideas of making a distinction between things (bein = “between”) and building (banah). Within and beyond Her is unfathomable unity; out of Her emerges everything we can understand, the built-up world of distinct entities. Thus Binah is also the beginning of judgment. Before Binah, as far as anything can be perceived at all, it is all love and compassion. With Binah comes the beginning of difference, conflict and limitation, which are necessary for the world as we know it to exist, and the beginning of necessity itself as opposed to freedom.

The first polarities of existence to emerge from Binah are Chesed and Gevurah. They are polarities we can find in ourselves and in our experience of the world; their imagery builds on a tradition found in the Talmud and Midrash which finds them in God. That midrashic tradition speaks about the midat ha-rachamim — God’s attribute of compassion — and the midat ha-din, God’s attribute of justice. The midrashic texts see these “attributes” as polarities of God’s personality and even as separate beings competing for God’s attention: love on one side, justice on the other side, making irreconciliable demands. The imagery of Chesed and Gevurah also draws on the key Jewish experiential concepts of human love and fear of God. The attribute of compassion, and Chesed, stir our feelings of love; the harshness of the attribute of justice, Gevurah, is frightening.
The fear of God as the Zohar understands it is not just about awe or reverence; it includes terror, and it is a realistic response to a terrifying reality. The Zohar sometimes dwells on this fear response and celebrates it, without sugar-coating it in any way.

Imagistically, Chesed, lovingkindness, is white like mother’s milk. It is everything flowing, giving and accepting — everything in us and the world that says “yes”. Gevurah, power, or Din, judgement, is red like blood. It is everything that sets limits, judges, or fights — everything that says “no”. Either can go too far on its own, both are necessary together; always saying yes and always saying no will both get you in trouble.
Reform Rabbi Niles Goldstein has done some interesting thinking and writing on the topic of the fear of God. His book Forests of the Night explores early Hasidic teachings on fear of God; in another book, God at the Edge, he writes about the same topic through personal experience.

Netzach and Hod are not connected with very much specific imagery in the Zohar and, like Keter and Chochmah, are not specifically alluded to in the texts in our course as far as I know. They are the mysterious sources of the inspiration of prophecy, and so it seems appropriate for them to remain in the background.

Yesod is alluded to a few times in our texts. Its imagery is often sexual: it is the circumcised penis, that is, the sanctified channel of uniting and creative energy. Yesod is called “tzaddik” (”righteous person”) and there are texts in which the Kabbalists particularly identify themselves with Yesod. Perhaps the experience of flowing with creative, erotic energy was dear to them. Much later in Jewish history the Baal Shem Tov boldly taught that a righteous person is compared to Yesod because of the intense pleasure they experience in spiritual life.

Yesod is the link between Tif’eret and Malkhut, the “masculine” and “feminine” poles of divine life. Tif’eret is the Zohar’s main image for what is traditionally meant by the word “God”, especially in traditional Jewish prayers, in which God is most often called “Father” and “King” and seems to be far beyond us, Someone to reach out to and yearn for.

Malkhut is more connected with a type of image of God that many people today find more comfortable: the presence of God in us and around us. Malkhut is also called Shekhinah, but this is a name which has other meanings in other contexts. In older Midrash, “Shekhinah” is sometimes simply a name for God (not for a particular aspect). In some Jewish feminist thought today, Shekhinah has feminine attributes that make sense to contemporary women, which may be very different from those imagined by the medieval Kabbalists (see Rabbi Lynn Gottlieb’s book She Who Dwells Within). In order to avoid confusion we will not use the term “Shekhinah” for Malkhut in this course. The Zohar itself rarely uses either name; as with all the Sefirot, it prefers an array of images.

Malkhut is closer to us than the transcendent, out-there-beyond-us aspect of God; therefore, She is also more mingled with all the ups and downs of our lives and deaths. We can call on God beyond us, Tif’eret, to save us from trouble; from Malkhut, we can only ask that She remain with us in our trouble. Yet because Malkhut is the aspect of reality which we encounter, She includes everything in the world that is terrifying as well as everything good. She is strongly connected with Gevurah and shares its frightening aspect. See, in this course, “The Wisdom of Solomon”. Everything good and everything bad in the world “feeds into” her, and she straddles all kinds of borderlines. Therefore there are many possible images of her and ways of thinking about her. Nearly every text in this course has something new to offer about Malkhut; as you read the texts, I invite you to be open to learn something new each time about this way of perceiving how God is present to us.

Gershom Scholem, the founder of the academic field of Kabbalah study, once expressed his personal opionion that “the doctrine of emanations [Sefirot] is the great misfortune of the Kabbalah”. Perhaps what he meant is that the system of Sefirot gives the illusion of being a complex enough scheme to really capture reality, but in fact it ends up, like any other system, presenting a very limited picture.

As for the Zohar, it works with this structure, but also works against it — for example, now and then changing the standard order of the Sefirot, or their set characteristics, to remind you that no system is equivalent to reality. To study Zohar, it is helpful to memorize the standard diagram of the Ten Sefirot — and then let it slip to the back of your mind.


Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Zohar: Bereshith to Lekh Lekha

Published on Friday, December 23rd, 2005

My own books of The Zohar are the Pritzker editons. A lot of work and translation went into three very important and comprehensive works. This version of The Zohar(in translation) is hard to stop reading, however, as they say below. We are very blessed to have the technology which offers these works online for us to read…Myswizard

This is the only extensive translation of a portion of the Zohar, the longest and one of the most important texts of the Kabbalah, in the public domain.

The Zohar is a Kabbalistic commentary on the Hebrew Bible. Long before the ‘Bible Code,’ Jewish scholars were attempting to wring deep meaning out of every syllable of the text of the Hebrew Bible, using numerology, gematria, and other techniques. Dozens of pages in this book are devoted to analyses of the hidden meaning behind first few letters of Genesis! This might seem ultra-pedantic; however, the Zohar makes the Biblical text come to life, brimming with mystical significance. Seemingly unimportant details and turns of phrase, which you may have read long ago and forgotten, lead to immense vistas of a mysterious world inside the world.

This is not a critical edition; written by a pseudonymous Theosophist, probably British, it is laced with out-of-place terminology such as ‘Karma’ and ‘Planes.’ It nevertheless lets you wade in the rip current of one of the most magical of the world’s sacred texts, and leaves you gasping for air and wanting more.

J.B. Hare 10/18/2005

THE SEPHER HA-ZOHAR
OR
THE BOOK OF LIGHT
Containing the doctrines of Kabbalah, together with the discourses and teachings of its author, the Kabbalist, Rabbi ben Simeon, and now for the first time translated into English, with notes, references and expository remarks.
Zohar: Bereshith to Lekh Lekha


Tags: , , , ,

Zohar Quote

Published on Thursday, December 22nd, 2005

Perfect love is that which changes not, but continues and abides the same in all circumstances, be they joyous or adverse. We should therefore love God even if he takes from us life, health, yea everything we hold dear…The Zohar


Tags: , ,

Weekly Consciousness Tune-Up…Yehuda Berg 12/11-12/17 ‘05

Published on Monday, December 12th, 2005

I thought I would preface this weekly tune-up by saying that I find the study of Kabbalah a very gentle way of looking at God and The Universe. This is why I have it on my site, as well as the fact that as a spiritual study it calibrates very high. Have a Healthy and Happy Holiday..no matter which one’s you celebrate!
Myswizard

Weekly Consciousness Tune-Up
December 11th – December 17th, 2005

Screaming Children

Continuing with the saga of Esau and Jacob, it says in the Zohar this week that as Esau approached Jacob to kill him (for stealing his birthright blessing), something in his soul compelled him to kiss Jacob instead.

The lesson the Zohar wants us to learn is that when we let go of judgment, we create an opening for love and Light to enter.

I remember one time in High School I was having trouble with a student in my grade. Everything this kid did got under my skin, and I walked around for weeks filled with judgment against him. I asked my father and teacher about this, and he told me something I’ve never forgotten: “When we bring judgment to others, we bring judgment upon ourselves.”

What the Rav taught me was that, if for nothing else, I needed to refrain from judging this boy because I was only going to hurt myself.

Of course, we spoke at great length about why the judgment was there in the first place, and there were many lessons that came up which I’ve shared with you in Tune-Ups in the past. One of them is that we are each mirrors for one another.

When we’re annoyed at another person’s trait or behavior, we’re really annoyed at them for showing us a part of ourselves that we’d rather not face. The truth is, most likely we’re too scared to face it.

Our judgment against others is really a judgment against ourselves.

A key teaching of the kabbalists is we must recognize the spark of Light within others. But before we can embrace the Light in others, we must first embrace our own Light. The only way to embrace our Light is to remove the pain that covers it. It means letting go of judging ourselves. It means allowing ourselves to listen to our painful feelings. And it means being gently self-accepting of what we hear.

When people begin to practice Kabbalah, certain pitfalls always show up. One of them involves confusing restriction with suppression. While it is important to practice restriction of our reactions and to allow room for the Light to enter the picture, it’s also essential that we allow for the expression of our deep emotions.

Suppression is stuffing our emotions somewhere far away and out of reach. It is a form of judgment because we are not giving ourselves the human dignity to allow for the honest expression of who we are. At first glance these responses may look the same, but in the long run they are anything but.

Chances are if you are like me, you are oftentimes impatient with yourself. When you get depressed or afraid or angry, you think, “I shouldn’t be feeling this way.” Yes, your goal is to stop being a slave to your feelings. But at the same time, the Zohar teaches that your feelings carry messages for you.

Only by patiently sitting with your painful feelings and listening to them can you hear what they’re trying to say. Think of them as screaming children. Why do kids scream and throw tantrums? Because they want to be heard. And after giving them a few minutes of your patience and undivided attention, more often than not they quiet down and go along their merry way.

Take time to meditate this week. Find a safe, quiet place where you can sit quietly and listen. What pain have you been suppressing? It’s time to let it come to the surface - and to love yourself for it. Don’t forget, you didn’t make you, the Light did. I think the Light knows what it’s doing.

All the Best,
Yehuda


Tags: , , ,

Weekly Consciousness Tune-Up…Yehuda Berg 12/4-12/10 ‘05

Published on Monday, December 5th, 2005

Weekly Consciousness Tune-Up
December 4th – December 10th, 2005

One Big Look

This is the week in which we first hear of the famous Biblical story of Jacob’s ladder. As the story goes, Jacob is traveling in the desert to meet up with his brother Esau. Along the way Jacob stops to sleep, and he dreams of a ladder with angels going up and down.

We can look at this as a nice, mythical story, or we can draw lessons for our own life.

The Zohar teaches us that during sleep a part of our soul detaches from our body and travels back to its source, an eternal realm beyond time, space, and motion. Our soul communicates with us from this place, sending us messages about what we need to change, dangerous situations to avoid, methods for removing our fears, opportunities coming our way – everything.

During the waking state we’re usually oblivious to the messages the Light is sending us, but in the dream state we can’t escape ourselves. We step outside and take one big look at our lives - where we’ve been, where we are, and where we’re headed.

That’s why kabbalists do their greatest spiritual work at night. In the nighttime we’re unburdened by the illusions of the 1% world, and we see clearly into the 99% world.

A helpful practice for this week is when you are lying in bed, waiting for sleep to come, start talking. It can be a whisper out loud or inside your head. Many people write into a journal. The point is to begin an honest, truthful dialogue with your soul. Address the issues that are weighing on your mind. Ask your soul to guide you through the night into a place of clarity. Ask questions – but be willing to receive the answer. Most of the time, if we don’t get an answer, it means we are not willing to hear it.

Another beautiful lesson revealed by the Zohar is that our dreams are a result of our merit. The acts of sharing and transformation we do during the day, or lack thereof, determine how pure or impure are dreams are. Let’s not forget the Opponent has many tricks and giving us the wrong messages in our dreams is one of them.

Of course, it’s often difficult to decipher the bizarre language of dreams. The Sages warn us that the interpretation is directly tied to the manifestation, which is why we shouldn’t share our dreams with just anyone. Do you have a Kabbalah teacher? If so, are you talking with them about your dreams? Maybe this is the week to start. And if you don’t have a teacher, speak to your local Kabbalah Centre’s Student Coordinator or call our Student Support Department (1-800-KABBALAH.) It’s really important to have a teacher, someone who cares about you and with whom you can speak about the meanings of your nighttime visions.

And remember, if you are in a mode of sharing during the day, you can expect message-filled dreams at night.

Have a beautiful start to the miraculous month of Sagittarius.

All the Best,

Yehuda


Tags: , , ,

Weekly Consciousness Tune-Up…Yehuda Berg 9/18-9/24 ‘05

Published on Tuesday, September 20th, 2005

Weekly Consciousness Tune-Up
September 18th – September 24th, 2005

Like Mel

Did you ever see that Mel Gibson movie, What Women Want? The premise is that Mel falls under a spell of sorts and wakes up one morning with the ability to hear women’s thoughts. At first he takes advantage of his new talent, using it to charm women, but eventually it drives him nuts.

As we reach the middle of the month of Elul (Virgo), we’ll all be a little like Mel. Except we’ll see what’s wrong with everyone around us.

This eventually drives us nuts because instead of using this talent for a positive purpose, we usually get stuck in our heads judging everyone.

I first became aware of this during Elul ten years ago. I found myself seeing and thinking the worst of everyone and it was very unsettling to me. Here I am, a spiritual man, a teacher of Kabbalah, and yet I was judging people for their shortcomings.

I finally sat down with my father and asked him what I was doing wrong. He said, “You have to understand that having this Virgo energy is a gift. You are seeing what’s wrong because the Light is providing you with a mirror for what you need to work on within yourself.”

He explained that the process of repentance we go through during Elul prepares our souls for the rebirth that happens on Rosh Hashanah. Every piece of inner filth we find and remove creates more room for new beginnings to enter our life on Rosh Hashanah.

But it would almost be too easy if we could see our garbage right away. That’s why our souls asked for life to be a mystery. In any good mystery, the solution lies in discovering the clues. In our case, the clues to our correction are our hotbuttons.

When, for example, your girlfriend’s lateness ticks you off, it is a clue that you need to work on your patience. Or when your co-worker’s laziness infuriates you, it is a clue that you too are lazy (to some degree.) Seeing others’ faults is seeing your own.

Our goal in the days leading up to Rosh Hashanah is:

“…to achieve the self-restraint and judgment to consider difficult people in our lives as reflections of our own negative traits.” – Zohar, portion Vaera

I hope this week we all find the wisdom and inspiration to change ourselves, instead of trying to change others.

All the Best,
Yehuda


Tags: , ,

Weekly Consciousness Tune-Up…Yehuda Berg 8/28-9/3 ‘05

Published on Monday, August 29th, 2005

Weekly Consciousness Tune-Up
August 28th – September 3rd, 2005

Klippot Cracking

One of the greatest things we can learn from Kabbalah is how to pass through the pain of life without suffering.

The Zohar explains that pain purifies and removes the shells of negativity (klippot) that surround our inner Light. These shells are created by our negative deeds and they cover and limit our spiritual development. They are barriers between us and the Light.

Suffering is resistance to this pain.

We often approach our daily lives with the mentality of avoid pain at all costs. And the moment we do feel it, we immediately look for ways to anesthetize ourselves. The Zohar teaches that by resisting the pain, we are only creating bigger problems for ourselves in the future.

Pain is transitory but suffering sticks around and keeps us stuck.

The story of a student of mine in New York articulates this point. She had suffered from a chronic bad ankle for years. After endless searching, she finally found a healing modality, called Rolfing, which cured her ankle. Rolfing is a structural re-balancing technique developed to improve movement through intense, hands-on manipulation of rigid muscles, bones, and joints. What the Rolfer does, essentially, is pull the muscle and tendon tissue away from injured joints. And though it doesn’t always have to be, it usually is painful.

Through this process of using the hands to writhe the tissue away, the joint is freed up and given a chance to heal. You see, when the joint is injured and attached to all the surrounding tendons, the muscle tissue don’t have room enough to repair themselves.

That is how it is with the klippot constantly clinging to us - it makes it hard for us to grow and change. But if we want to go to our next level in spiritual awareness, love, friendships, career - we need to go through the painful process of separating ourselves from our klippot.

And we separate ourselves from our klippot every time we put our all into a job and it fails, every time someone we love goes away, every time our trust is broken – in other words, every time we take a risk and get hurt.

Contrary to what it feels like in the moment, the pain is actually a sign that something good is on the way. Think about the painful moments in your past. Does what I am writing ring true for you?

So it’s important to remind ourselves this week that the pain is good - it’s our klippot cracking. And once this separation heals, we will be stronger, healthier and one step closer to our true fulfillment.

All the Best,
Yehuda


Tags: , ,

Kabbalah

Published on Wednesday, June 29th, 2005

KabbalahThe tree of life

Kabbalah Introduction

(articles at the bottom of the intro)
Kabbalah (Hebrew קַבָּלָה “reception”, Standard Hebrew Qabbala, Tiberian Hebrew Qabbālāh; also written variously as Cabala, Cabalah, Cabbala, Cabbalah, Kabala, Kabalah, Kabbala, Qabala, Qabalah) is an interpretation (exegesis, hermeneutic) key, “soul” of the Torah (Hebrew Bible), or the religious mystical system of Judaism claiming an insight into divine nature.

Kabbalah is a doctrine of esoteric knowledge concerning God and the universe. Kabbalah stresses the reasons and understanding of the commandments, and the cause of events described in the Torah. Kabbalah includes the understanding of the spiritual spheres in creation, and the rules and ways by which God administers the existence of the universe. (Some of its adherents may describe Kabbalah as: A unique, universal and secret knowledge of God, the laws of nature and of the universe. Technically speaking it explains laws of “light”. All things in the world are different levels, the closer to God the more revealed the Godliness.) According to Jewish tradition, this knowledge has come down as a revelation to elect saints from a remote past, and preserved only by a privileged few. It is considered part of the Jewish Oral Law. It is the traditional mystical explanation of the Torah.

Origin of Jewish mysticism

Era of Torah and Tanakh

The origin of mysticism for Jews goes hand-in-hand with the origins of the entire Tanakh (the Hebrew Bible). The Torah’s description of the creation in the opening of the Book of Genesis remains the strongest textual source for an “invisible” and “inscrutable” God creating the universe, the world, and finally Adam and Eve, who are placed in a mysterious Garden of Eden with its Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil and a Tree of Life, and the interaction of these creations with the Serpent which leads to disaster when they eat the forbidden fruit, as recorded in Genesis 2 [1].

The near sacrifice of Isaac, Jacob’s vision of the ladder to heaven, Moses’ experience with the burning bush and his encounters with God on Mount Sinai, the prophet Ezekiel’s visions are all evidence of mystical events and beliefs in the Tanakh, and most importantly, all these episodes form the bed-rock of Kabbalah’s teachings.

Early forms of Jewish mysticism at first consisted only of empirical “lore”. In the medieval era it greatly developed with the appearance of the mystical text, the Sefer Yetzirah. Jewish sources attribute the book to Abraham. It became the object of the systematic study of the elect who were called baale ha-kabbalah (בעלי הקבלה “possessors or masters of the Kabbalah”). From the thirteenth century onward Kabbalah branched out into an extensive literature, alongside of and often in opposition to the Talmud.

Kabbalah teaches that every Hebrew letter, word, number, and accent of the Hebrew Bible contains a hidden sense; and it teaches the methods of interpretation for ascertaining these meanings.

Orthodox Judaism typically rejects the idea that Kabbalah underwent significant historical development and change.

Mystic doctrines in Talmudic times

In Talmudic times the terms Ma’aseh Bereshit (”Works of Creation”) and Ma’aseh Merkabah (”Works of the Divine Throne/Chariot”) clearly indicate the Midrashic nature of these speculations; they are really based upon Genesis 1 and Book of Ezekiel 1:4-28; while the names Sitrei Torah (Talmud Hag. 13a) and Razei Torah (Ab. vi. 1) indicate their character as secret lore. In contrast to the explicit statement of the Hebrew Bible that God created not only the world, but also the matter out of which it was made, the opinion is expressed in very early times that God created the world from matter He found ready at hand — (according to some, this is an opinion probably due to the influence of the Platonic-Stoic cosmogony).

Eminent rabbinic teachers in the Land of Israel held the doctrine of the preexistence of matter (Midrash Genesis Rabbah i. 5, iv. 6), in spite of the protest of Gamaliel II. (ib. i. 9).

In dwelling upon the nature of God and the universe, the mystics of the Talmudic period asserted, in contrast to Biblical transcendentalism, that “God is the dwelling-place of the universe; but the universe is not the dwelling-place of God”. Possibly the designation (”place”) for God, so frequently found in Talmudic-Midrashic literature, is due to this conception, just as Philo, in commenting on Genesis 28:11 says, “God is called ha makom (המקום “the place”) because God encloses the universe, but is Himself not enclosed by anything” (De Somniis, i. 11).

Even in very early times of the Land of Israel as well as Alexandrian theology recognized the two attributes of God, middat hadin (the “attribute of justice”), and middat ha-rahamim (the “attribute of mercy”) (Midrash Sifre, Deuteronomy 27); and so is the contrast between justice and mercy a fundamental doctrine of the Kabbalah. Other hypostasizations are represented by the ten “agencies” (the Sefirot) through which God created the world; namely, wisdom, insight, cognition, strength, power, inexorableness, justice, right, love, and mercy.

While the Sefirot are based on these ten creative “potentialities”, it is especially the personification of wisdom which, in Philo, represents the totality of these primal ideas; and the Targ. Yer. i., agreeing with him, translates the first verse of the Bible as follows: “By wisdom God created the heaven and the earth.”

So, also, the figure of Metatron passed into Kabbalah from the Talmud, where it played the role of the demiurgos being expressly mentioned as God. Mention may also be made of the seven preexisting things enumerated in an old baraita (an extra-mishnaic teacing); namely, the Torah, repentance, paradise and hell, the throne of God, the Heavenly Temple, and the name of the Messiah (Talmud Pes. 54a). Although the origin of this doctrine must be sought probably in certain mythological ideas, the Platonic doctrine of preexistence has modified the older, simpler conception, and the preexistence of the seven must therefore be understood as an “ideal” preexistence, a conception that was later more fully developed in the Kabbalah.

The attempts of the mystics to bridge the gulf between God and the world are evident in the doctrine of the preexistence of the soul, and of its close relation to God before it enters the human body — a doctrine taught by the Hellenistic sages (Wisdom viii. 19) as well as by the Palestinian rabbis.

In the Middle ages, Baruch Spinoza may have had this passage in mind when he said that the ancient Jews did not separate God from the world. This conception of God may be pantheistic or panentheistic. It also postulates the union of man with God; both these ideas were further developed in the later Kabbalah. (He was excommunicated from the main Jewish community of his times by the rabbis at the time for espousing these views).

Kabbalah of the early Middle Ages

There were certain early rishonim who are known to have been experts in Kabbalah. One of the best known is Nahmanides (the Ramban) (1194-1270) whose commentary on the Torah is considered to be based on Kabbalistic knowledge as well as Bahya ben Asher (the Rabbeinu Behaye) (d. 1340). Another was Isaac the Blind (1160-1235) who wrote about the mystical classic the Bahir, and his student known as Azriel.

Lurianic Kabbalah in the Middle Ages

Following the upheavals and dislocations in the Jewish world as a result of the Spanish Inquisition and the expulsion of the Jews from Spain in 1492, the trauma of Anti-Semitism during the Middle Ages, Jews began to search for signs of when the long-awaited Jewish Messiah would come to comfort them in their painful exiles. As part of that “search for meaning” in their lives, Kabbalah received its biggest boost in the Jewish world when the explication of the Kabbalistic teachings of Rabbi Isaac Luria (1534-1572) (known as the ARI), by his disciple Rabbi Chaim Vital who published the ARI’s teachings, gained wide-spread popularity. It was Rabbi Isaac Luria who popularized and gave credence to the teachings of the Zohar which had until then been a little-known work. The author of the Shulkhan Arukh (the Jewish “Code of Law”), Rabbi Yosef Karo (1488-1575, and Rabbi Moses ben Jacob Cordovero (1522-1570) were also great scholars of Kabbalah and spread its teachings during this era.

Kabbalah of the Sefardim and Mizrahim

The Kabbalah of the Sefardi and Mizrahi Torah scholars has its own long history. Rabbis Moses ben Jacob Cordovero, Chaim Vital, and Yosef Karo are part of this school of Kabbalah.

Kabbalah of the Maharal

One of the most important teachers of Kabbalah recognized as an authority by all serious scholars until the present time, was Rabbi Judah Loew ben Bezalel (1525-1609) known as the Maharal of Prague. Many of his written works survive and are studied for their deep Kabbalistic insights. During the twentieth century, Rabbi Isaac Hutner (1906-1980) continued to spread the Maharal’s teachings indirectly through his own teachings and scholarly publications within the modern yeshiva world.

The failure of Sabbatian mysticism

The spiritual and mystical yearnings of many Jews remained frustrated after the death of Rabbi Isaac Luria and his disciples and colleagues. No hope was in sight for many following the devastation and mass killings of the pogroms that followed in the wake the Chmielnicki Uprising (1648-1654), and it was at this time that a controversial scholar of the Kabbalah by the name of Sabbatai Zevi (1626-1676) captured the hearts and minds of the Jewish masses of that time with the promise of a newly-minted “Messianic” Millennialism in the form of his own personage. His charisma, mystical teachings that included repeated pronounciations of the holy Tetragrammaton in public, tied to an unstable personality, and with the help of his own “prophet” Nathan of Gaza, convinced the Jewish masses that the “Jewish Messiah” had finally come. It seemed that the esoteric teachings of Kabbalah had found their “champion” and had triumphed, but this era of Jewish history unravelled when Zevi became an apostate to Judaism by converting to Islam after he was arrested by the Ottoman Sultan and threatened with execution for attempting a plan to conquer the world and rebuild the Temple in Jerusalem.

Many of his followers continued to worship him in secret and most leading rabbis were always on guard to root them out. The Sabbatian movement was followed by that of the “Frankists” who were disciples of another pseudo-mystic Jacob Frank (1726-1791) who eventually became an apostate to Judaism by converting to Catholicism. This era of disappointment did not stem the Jewish masses’ yearnings for “mystical” leadership.

Spread of Kabbalah during the 1700s

The eighteenth century saw an explosion of new efforts in the writing and spread of Kabbalah by three well know rabbis working in different areas of Europe:

1. Rabbi Israel ben Eliezer (1698-1760) in the area of Ukraine spread teachings based on Rabbi Isaac Luria’s foundations. From him sprang the vast ongoing schools of Hasidic Judaism, with each successive rebbe viewed by his “Hasidim” as continuing the role of dispensor of mystical divine blessings and guidance.
2. Rabbi Elijah of Vilna (1720-1797), based in Lithuania, had his teachings encoded and publicized by his disciples such as by Rabbi Chaim Volozhin who published the mystical-ethical work Nefesh HaChaim. However, he was staunchly opposed to the new Hasidic movement and warned against their public displays of religious fervour inspired by the mystical teachings of their rabbis.
3. Rabbi Moshe Chaim Luzzatto (1707-1746), based in Italy, was a precocious Talmudic scholar who arrived at the startling conclusion that there was a need for the public teaching and study of Kabbalah. He established a yeshiva for Kabbalah study and actively recruited outstanding students, in addition, wrote copious manuscripts in an appealing clear Hebrew style, all of which gained the attention of both admirers as well of rabbinical critics who feared another “Zevi (false messiah) in the making”. He was forced to close his school by his rabbinical opponents, hand over and destroy many of his most precious unpublished kabbalistic writings, and go into exile in the Netherlands. He eventually moved to the Land of Israel. Some of his most important works such as Derekh Hashem survive and are used as a gateway to the world of Jewish mysticism.

The modern world

Two of the most influential sources spreading Kabbalistic teachings have come from the growth and spread of Hasidic Judaism, as can be seen by the growth of the Lubavitch movement, and from the influence of the writings of Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook (1864-1935) who inspired the followers of Religious Zionism with mystical writings and hopes that interpreted the rise of modern day Zionism as the onset of the atchalta dege’ula - the “beginning of the redemption” of the Jewish people from their exile, in expectation of the arrival of the “final redemption” of the Jewish Messiah. The varied Hasidic works (sifrei chasidus) and Rabbi Kook’s voluminous writings drew heavily on the long chain of Kabbalistic thought and methodology.

Primary texts

Tile page of first edition of the Zohar, Mantua, 1558 (Library of Congress).
• Sefer Raziel HaMalakh (”Book of Raziel the angel”) - the first and oldest book of Kabbalah. It explains Mazal (”fortune” or “destiny” associated with the notions of Kabbalah astrology)
• Sefer Yetzirah, (”Book of Creation”). The first commentaries on this small book were written in the 10th century, and the text itself is quoted as early as the sixth century. Its historical origins are unclear. It exists today in a number of editions, up to 2500 words long. Like many Jewish mystical texts, it was written in such a way as to be meaningless to those who read it without an extensive background in the Tanakh (Hebrew Bible) and Midrash.
• Bahir (”illumination”), also known as The Midrash of Rabbi Nehuniah ben haKana. It is some 12,000 words long. First published in Provence in 1176, many Orthodox Jews believe that the author was Rabbi Nehuniah ben haKana, a Talmudic sage of the first century. Historians, however, believe that the book was likely written not long before it was published.
• Zohar (זהר “splendor”) - the most important work of Jewish mysticism. It is an esoteric mystical commentary on the Torah, written in Aramaic. In the 13th century, a Spanish Jew by the name of Moses de Leon claimed to discover the text of the Zohar, attributing it to the 2nd century Rabbi Shimon bar Yohai. This book was subsequently published throughout the Jewish world. Though the book was widely accepted, over the subsequent centuries a small number of significant rabbis published works espousing the view that it was a forgery, and that it contained concepts contrary to Judaism.
Modern historian Gershom Scholem (a famous scholar and historian of Kabbalah in the twentieth century), echoing many of the arguments of some of these rabbis, contends that de Leon himself was the author of the Zohar. The Zohar contains and elaborates upon much of the material found in Sefer Yetzirah and Bahir, and is considered the Kabbalistic work par excellence.

Theodicy: explanation for the existence of evil

The ten Sephiroth or ‘emanations’ of God

Kabbalistic works offer a theodicy, a philosophical reconciliation of how the existence of a good and powerful God is compatible with the existence of evil in the world. There are mainly two different ways to describe why there is evil in the world, according to the Kabbalah. Both makes use of the kabbalistic Tree of Life:
• The kabbalistic tree, which consists of ten Sephiroth, the ten “enumerations” or “emanations” of God, consists of three “pillars”: The left side of the tree, the “female side”, is considered to be more destructive than the right side, the “male side”. Gevurah (גבורה), for example, stands for strength and discipline, while her male counterpart, Chesed (חסד), stands for love and mercy. The “center pillar” of the tree does not have any polarity, and no gender is given to them.
• In the medieval era, old ideas from Babylon gained new strength. The Qliphoth, (or Kelippot)(קליפות the primeval “husks” of impurity), were blamed for all the evil in the world. Qliphoth are the “evil twin” of the sephiroth. The tree of Qliphoth is usually called the kabbalistic Tree of Death, and sometimes the qliphoth are called the “death angels”, or “angels of death”. The qliphoth are found in the old Babylonian incantations, a fact used as evidence in favor of the antiquity of most of the edit] kabbalistic material.

Kabbalistic understanding of God

Ein Sof and the emanation of angelic hierarchies (Universes or olamot אולם)
Kabbalah (Jewish mysticism) teaches that God is neither matter nor spirit. Rather God is the creator of both, but is himself neither. But if God is so different than his creation, how can there be any interaction between the Creator and the created? This question prompted Kabbalists to envision two aspects of God, (a) God himself, who in the end is unknowable, and (b) the revealed aspect of God who created the universe, preserves the universe, and interacts with mankind. Kabbalists believe that these two aspects are not contradictory but complement one another.

Some Kabbalistic scholars, such as Moses ben Jacob Cordovero and Schneur Zalman of Liadi (founder of Lubavitch (Chabad) Hasidism), hold that the first aspect of God is all that there really exists; all else is completely nullified to God and therefore an illusion. Depending on how this is explained, such a view can result in panentheism, or pantheism. However, most other Jews who believe in Kabbalah hold that there is an aspect of God that is revealed to the world.

Kabbalists speak of the first aspect of God as Ein Sof (אין סוף); this is translated as “the infinite”, “endless”, or “that which has no limits”. In this view, nothing can be said about this aspect of God. This aspect of God is impersonal.

Sefirot

Most forms of Kabbalah teach that the Sefirot are not distinct from the Ein Sof, but are somehow within it in a potential manner. Kabbalists speak of the second aspect of God as being seen by the universe as ten emanations from God; these emanations are called sefirot. See also Kabbalistic use of the Tetragrammaton.
The sefirot mediate the interaction of the ultimate unknowable God with the physical and spiritual world. Some explain the sefirot as stages of the creative process whereby God, from His own infinite being, created the progression of realms which culminated in our finite and physical universe. Others suggest that the sefirot may be thought of as analogous to the fundamental laws of physics. Just as gravity, electro-magnetism, the strong nuclear force, and the weak nuclear force allow for interactions between matter and energy, the ten sefirot allow for interaction between God and the universe.

A Christian theological view

The Kabbalah’s idea of emanations can be compared to the distinction made by fourteenth century Christian theologian Gregory Palamas. Palamas drew a distinction between God’s essence and energies, affirming that God was unknowable in His essence, but knowable in His energies. Palamas never enumerated God’s energies, but described them as ways that God could act in the universe, and particularly on people, from the light shining from the face of Moses after Moses descended Mt. Sinai, to the light surrounding Moses, Elijah and Jesus on Mt. Tabor during the transfiguration of Jesus. For Palamas, God’s energies were not some other thing separate from God, but were God; however the idea of energies was kept distinct from the idea of the three persons of the Trinity.

The human soul in Kabbalah

The Zohar posits that the human soul has three elements, the nefesh, ru’ach, and neshamah. The nefesh is found in all humans, and enters the physical body at birth. It is the source of one’s physical and psychological nature. The next two parts of the soul are not implanted at birth, but can be developed over time; their development depends on the actions and beliefs of the individual. They are said to only fully exist in people awakened spiritually. A common way of explaining the three parts of the soul is as follows:
• Nefesh (נפש) - the lower part, or “animal part”, of the soul. It is linked to instincts and bodily cravings.
• Ruach (רוח) - the middle soul, the “spirit”. It contains the moral virtues and the ability to distinguish between good and evil.
• Neshamah (נשמה) - the higher soul, or “super-soul”. This separates man from all other lifeforms. It is related to the intellect, and allows man to enjoy and benefit from the afterlife. This part of the soul is provided both to Jew and non-Jew alike at birth. It allows one to have some awareness of the existence and presence of God.
The Raaya Meheimna, a later addition to the Zohar by an unknown author, posits that there are two more parts of the human soul, the chayyah and yehidah. Gershom Scholem writes that these “were considered to represent the sublimest levels of intuitive cognition, and to be within the grasp of only a few chosen individuals”.
• Chayyah (חיה) - The part of the soul that allows one to have an awareness of the divine life force itself.
• Yehidah (יחידה) - the highest plane of the soul, in which one can achieve as full a union with God as is possible.
Both rabbinic and kabbalistic works posit that there are also a few additional, non-permanent states to the soul that people can develop on certain occasions. These extra souls, or extra states of the soul, play no part in any afterlife scheme, but are mentioned for completeness:
• Ruach HaKodesh (רוח הקודש) - (”spirit of holiness”) a state of the soul that makes prophecy possible. Since the age of classical prophecy passed, no one receives the soul of prophesy any longer.
• Neshamah Yeseira - The “supplemental soul” that a Jew experience on Shabbat. It makes possible an enhanced spiritual enjoyment of the day. This exists only when one is observing Shabbat; it can be lost and gained depending on one’s observance.
• Neshamah Kedosha - Provided to Jews at the age of maturity (13 for boys, 12 for girls), and is related to the study and fulfillment of the Torah commandments. It exists only when one studies and follows Torah; it can be lost and gained depending on one’s study and observance.

Foretelling the future

A small number of Kabbalists have attempted to foretell events by the Kabbalah. The term has come to be used to refer to secret science in general; mystic art; or mystery.
Following that, the English word “cabal” came to refer to any small, secretive and possibly conspiratorial group.

Practical applications

The Midrash and Talmud are replete with the use of Divine names and incantations that are claimed to effect supernatural or metaphysical results. Most post-Talmudic rabbinical literature disapproves of the use of any or most of these formulae, termed Kabbalah Ma’asith (”practical Kabbalah”). There are various arguments; one stated by the Medieval Rabbi Jacob Mölin (Maharil) is that the person using it may lack the required grounding, and the spell would be ineffective, leading to a de facto diminuition of belief in the power of these statements.
Kabbalistic knowledge is required to produce a Golem. Some adherents of Kabbalah developed the idea of invoking a curse against a sinner termed Pulsa diNura (”lashes of fire”).

Textual antiquity of esoteric mysticism

Early forms of esoteric mysticism existed over 2,000 years ago. Ben Sira warns against it, saying: “You shall have no business with secret things” (Sirach iii. 22; compare Talmud Hagigah 13a; Midrash Genesis Rabbah viii.).
Apocalyptic literature belonging to the second and first pre-Christian centuries contained some elements of later Kabbalah, and as, according to Josephus, such writings were in the possession of the Essenes, and were jealously guarded by them against disclosure, for which they claimed a hoary antiquity (see Philo, “De Vita Contemplativa,” iii., and Hippolytus, “Refutation of all Heresies,” ix. 27).

That many such books containing secret lore were kept hidden away by the “enlightened” is stated in IV Esdras xiv. 45-46, where Pseudo-Ezra is told to publish the twenty-four books of the canon openly that the worthy and the unworthy may alike read, but to keep the seventy other books hidden in order to “deliver them only to such as be wise” (compare Dan. xii. 10); for in them are the spring of understanding, the fountain of wisdom, and the stream of knowledge.

Instructive for the study of the development of Kabbalah is the Book of Jubilees written under King John Hyrcanus. It refers to the writings of Jared, Cainan, and Noah, and presents Abraham as the renewer, and Levi as the permanent guardian, of these ancient writings. It offers a cosmogony based upon the twenty-two letters of the Hebrew alphabet, and connected with Jewish chronology and Messianology, while at the same time insisting upon the heptad as the holy number rather than upon the decadic system adopted by the later haggadists and the Sefer Yetzirah. The Pythagorean idea of the creative powers of numbers and letters, upon which the Sefer Yetzirah is founded, and which was known in the time of the Mishnah (before 200 CE).

Gnosticism and Kabbalah

Gnostic literature testifies to the antiquity of the Kabbalah. Gnosticism - systems of secret spiritual knowledge, or some sources say - — that is, the cabalistic Chochmah (חכמה “wisdom”) - seems to have been the first attempt on the part of Jewish sages to give the empirical mystic lore, with the help of Platonic and Pythagorean or Stoic ideas, a speculative turn. This led to the danger of heresy from which the Jewish rabbinic figures Rabbi Akiva and Ben Zoma strove to extricate themselves.
Original teachings of gnosticism have much in common with Kabbalah:
1. Core terminology of classical gnostics was Jewish names of God.
2. Mainstream Gnostics accepted a “Jewish Messiah” as a key figure of gnosticism
3. A Key text of Gnosticism - Apocryphon of John - mentions 365 powers who created the World. The same is a number of dark powers among 613 powers of the soul in Judaism and Kabbalah.
Essene, Manichaean and Nasorean doctrines (of gnostic character) claim that before Kabbalah there existed a so-called Aramaic Quabalta.

Criticisms

Dualism

One of the most serious and sustained criticisms of Kabbalah is that it may lead away from monotheism, and instead promote dualism, the belief that there is a supernatural counterpart to God. The dualistic system of good and of evil powers, which goes back to Zoroastrianism, can be traced through Gnosticism; having influenced the cosmology of the ancient Kabbalah before it reached the medieval one.
• Some early mystics believed in a heavenly being called Metatron, a lesser Adonai-”God”, that worked in concert with the greater Adonai. While this essentially Gnostic belief was never a mainstream trend within Jewish thought, some Kabbalists accepted it.
• Later Kabbalistic works, including the Zohar, appear to more strongly affirm dualism, as they ascribe all evil to a supernatural force known as the Sitra Ahra (”the other side”.) “The dualistic tendency is, perhaps, most marked in the Kabbalistic treatment of the problem of evil. The profound sense of the reality of evil brought many Kabbalists to posit a realm of the demonic, the Sitra Ahra, a kind of negative mirror image of the “side of holiness” with which it was locked in combat.” [Encyclopaedia Judaica, Volume 6, “Dualism”, p.244]. However the Zohar indicates that the Sitra Ahra has no power over God, and only exists as a creation of God to give man free choice.
• According to Kabbalists, no person can understand the true, unknown nature of God. Rather, there is God that makes Himself known to man, and a hidden Ein Sof that is totally removed from man’s experience. One can have a reading of this theology which is totally monotheistic; however one can also have a reading of this theology which is essentially dualistic. Professor Gershom Scholem writes “It is clear that with this postulate of an impersonal basic reality in God, which becomes a person - or appears as a person - only in the process of Creation and Revelation, Kabbalism abandons the personalistic basis of the Biblical conception of God….It will not surprise us to find that speculation has run the whole gamut - from attempts to re-transform the impersonal En-Sof into the personal God of the Bible to the downright heretical doctrine of a genuine dualism between the hidden Ein Sof and the personal Demiurge of Scripture.” (Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism Shocken Books p.11-12)

Debate about Kabbalah in Judaism

Although it was criticized by a small number of rabbis, Kabbalah has nevertheless been a fundamental part of most Jewish theology for many centuries, and is particularly influential in Hasidic and Sephardic thought. As well, the Vilna Gaon, the greatest leader of the Mitnagdim - opponents of the Hasidim - was also a major Kabbalist. Gershom Scholem has written that between 1500 and 1800 “Kabbalah was widely considered to be the true Jewish theology”. Though many Modern Orthodox Jews do not ascribe to Kabbalah, most other Orthodox Jews still consider it a fundamental part of Jewish thought and belief.

Early critiques

The idea that there are ten divine sefirot could evolve over time into the idea that “God is One being, yet in that One being there are Ten” which opens up a debate about what the “correct beliefs” in God should be, according to Judaism.

Rabbi Leon Modena, a 17th century Venetian critic of Kabbalah, wrote that if we were to accept the Kabbalah, then the Christian trinity would indeed be compatible with Judaism, as the Trinity closely resembles the Kabbalistic doctrine of sefirot. This critique was in response to the fact that some Jews went so far as to address individual sefirot individually in some of their prayers.

Belief in the sefirot would be similar to the Christian belief in the Trinity, which states that while God is One, in that One there are three persons. This interpretation of Kabbalah in fact did occur among some European Jews in the 17th century.

Kabbalah had many other opponents, notably Rabbi Yitzchak ben Sheshet Perfet (The Rivash); he stated that Kabbalah was “worse than Christianity”, as it made God into 10, not just into three. The critique, however, is considered untenable. Most followers of Kabbalah never believed this interpretation of Kabbalah. The Christian Trinity concept posits that there are three persons existing within the Godhead, one of whom literally became a human being. In contrast, the mainstream understanding of the Kabbalistic sefirot holds that they have no mind or intelligence; further, they are not addressed in prayer, and they can not become a human being. They are conduits for interaction - not persons or beings.

Within Conservative and Reform Judaism

Kabbalah tended to be rejected by most Jews in the Conservative and Reform movements, though its influences were not completely eliminated. While it was generally not studied as a discipline, the Kabbalistic Kabbalat Shabbat service remained part of the Conservative liturgy, as did the Yedid Nefesh prayer. Nevertheless, in the 1960s, Rabbi Saul Lieberman of the Jewish Theological Seminary, is reputed to have introduced a lecture by Scholem on Kabbalah with a statement that Kabbalah itself was “nonsense”, but the academic study of Kabbalah was “scholarship”. This view became popular among many Jews, who viewed the subject as worthy of study, but who did not accept Kabbalah as teaching literal truths.

According to Rabbi Bradley Shavit Artson (Dean of the Conservative Ziegler School of Rabbinical Studies in the University of Judaism), “many western Jews insisted that their future and their freedom required shedding what they perceived as parochial orientalism. They fashioned a Judaism that was decorous and strictly rational (according to 19th-century European standards), denigrating Kabbalah as backward, superstitious, and marginal”.
However, in the late 20th and early 21st centuries there has been a revival in interest in Kabbalah in Conservative Judaism. The Kabbalistic 12th century prayer Ani’im Zemirot was restored to the new Conservative Sim Shalom siddur, as was the B’rikh Shmeh passage from the Zohar, and the mystical Ushpizin service welcoming to the Sukkah the spirits of Jewish forbearers. All Conservative Rabbinical seminaries now teach several courses in Kabbalah, and the Ziegler School of Rabbinical Studies in Los Angeles has a fulltime instructor in Kabbalah and Hasidut.

According to Artson “Ours is an age hungry for meaning, for a sense of belonging, for holiness. In that search, we have returned to the very Kabbalah our predecessors scorned. The stone that the builders rejected has become the head cornerstone (Psalm 118:22)… Kabbalah was the last universal theology adopted by the entire Jewish people, hence faithfulness to our commitment to positive-historical Judaism mandates a reverent receptivity to Kabbalah”.1

Kabbalah Centre

The growth of the modern international Kabbalah Centre, with its fascination for non-Jewish devotees such as Madonna the famous female singer and others, continues to be a source of serious discussion within many Jewish communities today. There are those, Jews and non-Jews alike, who are drawn to its teachings absolutely convinced that they are indeed studying and practicing the Kabbalah, but all the main Jewish denominations find the Kabbalah Centre’s actvities to be controversial and do not encourage their members to participate in any way.

Kabbalah in non-Jewish society

Kabbalah eventually gained an audience outside of the Jewish community. Christian versions of Kabbalah began to develop; by the early 18th century some kabbalah came to be used by some hermetic philosophers, neo-pagans and other new religious groups.

Hermetic Kabbalah

The Western Esoteric (or Hermetic) Tradition, a precursor to both the neo-Pagan and New Age movements, is intertwined with aspects of Kabbalah. Within the Hermetic tradition, much of Kabbalah has been changed from its Jewish roots through syncretism, but core Kabbalistic beliefs are still recognizably present.
“Hermetic” Kabbalah, as it is sometimes called, probably reached its peak in the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, a 19th-century organization that was arguably the pinnacle of ceremonial magic (or, depending upon one’s position, its ultimate descent into decadence). Within the Golden Dawn, Kabbalistic principles such as the ten Sephiroth were fused with Greek and Egyptian deities, the Enochian system of angelic magic of John Dee, and certain Eastern (particularly Hindu and Buddhist) concepts within the structure of a Masonic- or Rosicrucian-style esoteric order. Many of the Golden Dawn’s rituals were exposed by the legendary occultist Aleister Crowley and were eventually compiled into book form by Israel Regardie, an author of some note. The credibility of Crowley is inconsistent at best though, as many of the rituals “exposed” were actually manipulated versions.

Crowley made his mark on the use of Kabbalah with several of his writings; of these, perhaps the most illustrative is Liber 777. This book is quite simply a set of tables relating various parts of ceremonial magic and Eastern and Western religion to thirty-two numbers representing the ten spheres and twenty-two paths of the Kabbalistic Tree of Life. The attitude of syncretism displayed by Hermetic Kabbalists is plainly evident here, as one may simply check the table to see that Chesed (חסד “Mercy”) corresponds to Jupiter, Isis, the color blue (on the Queen Scale), Poseidon, Brahma, and amethysts–none of which, certainly, the original Jewish Kabbalists had in mind!

However popular within certain sects, Crowley is not without many critics. Dion Fortune, a fellow initiate of the Golden Dawn, disagreed with Crowley, and her work The Mystical Qabalah implicitly states this. Elphas Levi’s works such as Transcendental Magic, heavily steeped in esoteric Kabbalah (rendering it very difficult to understand correctly; it is completely misunderstood by critics), agrees. Samael Aun Weor has many significant works that discuss Kabbalah within many religions usually considered unrelated to Kabbalah, such as the Egyptian, Pagan, and Central American religions, which is summarized in his work The Initiatic Path in the Arcana of Tarot and Kabbalah.

Modern forms

A recent modern revival has been initiated by the controversial Kabbalah Center founded by Philip Berg in Los Angeles in 1984, and run by him and his sons Yehuda and Michael. With a number of branches worldwide, the group has attracted many non-Jews, including entertainment celebrities such as Madonna, Demi Moore, Mick Jagger and Britney Spears. Reactions from organized Jewish groups have been almost uniformly negative.

Fictional representations

The Television series and films Neon Genesis Evangelion utilised the Kabbalah imagery heavily and implied a secret portion of the Kabbalah contained within the Dead Sea scrolls and maintained through time by various individuals and operating in a group currently known as “Seelee” (the leader of whom is believed to be either Cain or the Wandering Jew). Imagery such as the Systema Sephiroticum is utilised by various characters in the decorum of their offices and operation areas. During an apocolytic sequence in the film End of Evangelion heavy use of the Tree of Life is undertaken, both visually and with characters “walking through” the explanation of what is happening. The comic series Promethea by Alan Moore draws heavily on Kabbalah, and is in large part a framework for an overview and explanation of many Kabbalistic concepts. The main character journeys up through the entire tree of life over the course of many issues exploring the symbolism and meaning of each level and of the journey itself.

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article “Kabbalah”.


Tags: , , , , ,